Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
HTB vs SFNC vs HOMB vs NBTB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
HTB vs SFNC vs HOMB vs NBTB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $775M | $3.08B | $5.27B | $2.38B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $292M | $627M | $1.45B | $867M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $64M | $-398M | $458M | $169M |
| Gross Margin | 70.5% | 5.8% | 65.6% | 72.1% |
| Operating Margin | 27.7% | -84.2% | 36.0% | 25.3% |
| Forward P/E | 12.7x | 10.3x | 10.8x | 10.9x |
| Total Debt | $175M | $641M | $1.20B | $327M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $380M | $910M | $185M |
HTB vs SFNC vs HOMB vs NBTB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| HomeTrust Bancshare… (HTB) | 100 | 298.8 | +198.8% |
| Simmons First Natio… (SFNC) | 100 | 124.0 | +24.0% |
| Home Bancshares, In… (HOMB) | 100 | 184.9 | +84.9% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 145.6 | +45.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HTB vs SFNC vs HOMB vs NBTB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HTB has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 167.6% 10Y total return vs NBTB's 104.0%
- PEG 0.40 vs HOMB's 3.55
- NIM 3.9% vs SFNC's 2.9%
- Beta 0.74 vs SFNC's 1.01
SFNC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (10.3x vs 10.9x)
- 4.0% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs HOMB's 2.8%
HOMB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 21 yrs, beta 0.81, yield 2.8%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 12.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.88, Low D/E 17.3%, current ratio 1.60x
- Beta 0.88, yield 3.1%, current ratio 1.60x
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.3x vs 10.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs SFNC's 1.01 | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs HOMB's 2.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +30.8% vs HOMB's -3.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% |
HTB vs SFNC vs HOMB vs NBTB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HTB vs SFNC vs HOMB vs NBTB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SFNC leads in 1 of 6 categories
HOMB leads 1 • HTB leads 1 • NBTB leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SFNC and HOMB each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOMB is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 5.0x HTB's $292M. HOMB is the more profitable business, keeping 27.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFNC's -63.4%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $292M | $627M | $1.5B | $867M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $91M | -$497M | $601M | $241M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $64M | -$398M | $458M | $169M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $43M | $755M | $354M | $225M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.5% | +5.8% | +65.6% | +72.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.7% | -84.2% | +36.0% | +25.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +22.0% | -63.4% | +27.7% | +19.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | +71.7% | +29.1% | +25.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.4% | +42.1% | +26.0% | +39.5% |
Valuation Metrics
SFNC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.4x trailing earnings, HTB trades at a 10% valuation discount to NBTB's 13.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HTB offers better value at 0.39x vs HOMB's 4.37x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $775M | $3.1B | $5.3B | $2.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $936M | $3.3B | $5.6B | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.39x | -7.21x | 13.31x | 13.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.67x | 10.30x | 10.83x | 10.94x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.39x | — | 4.37x | 1.95x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.16x | — | 10.08x | 10.46x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.65x | 4.91x | 3.63x | 2.74x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.31x | 0.84x | 1.35x | 1.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 38.95x | 6.85x | 12.48x | 10.87x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HOMB leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HTB delivers a 11.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-12 for SFNC. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HOMB's 0.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HOMB scores 7/9 vs SFNC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.0% | -11.6% | +10.9% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.4% | -1.6% | +2.0% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.1% | -9.1% | +7.2% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.3% | -4.2% | +9.8% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.29x | 0.19x | 0.30x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $161M | $261M | $292M | $142M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $380M | $910M | $185M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $175M | $641M | $1.2B | $327M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.27x | -1.01x | 1.44x | 1.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HTB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HTB five years ago would be worth $17,661 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,507 for SFNC. Over the past 12 months, HTB leads with a +30.8% total return vs HOMB's -3.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HTB at 35.3% vs HOMB's 12.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.9% | +14.2% | -3.4% | +10.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +30.8% | +14.1% | -3.9% | +8.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +147.7% | +52.8% | +41.5% | +55.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +76.6% | -14.9% | +8.6% | +33.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +167.6% | +24.8% | +57.7% | +104.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +35.3% | +15.2% | +12.3% | +15.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HTB and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HTB is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SFNC's 1.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NBTB currently trades 97.2% from its 52-week high vs HOMB's 86.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | 1.01x | 0.81x | 0.88x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $47.64 | $22.18 | $30.83 | $46.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $34.66 | $17.00 | $25.68 | $39.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.7% | +95.9% | +86.8% | +97.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.3 | 57.9 | 48.1 | 56.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 71K | 1.2M | 1.5M | 237K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SFNC and HOMB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HTB as "Buy", SFNC as "Buy", HOMB as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 19.6% upside for HOMB (target: $32) vs 0.9% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, SFNC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.01% vs HTB's 1.06%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $22.67 | $32.00 | $46.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 9 | 19 | 10 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +4.0% | +2.8% | +3.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 6 | 21 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.49 | $0.85 | $0.75 | $1.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.9% | 0.0% | +1.6% | +0.4% |
SFNC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). HOMB leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
HTB vs SFNC vs HOMB vs NBTB: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HTB or SFNC or HOMB or NBTB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc. (HTB) offers the better valuation at 12. 4x trailing P/E (12. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc. (HTB) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HTB or SFNC or HOMB or NBTB?
On trailing P/E, HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc.
(HTB) is the cheapest at 12. 4x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. at 13. 7x. On forward P/E, Simmons First National Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc. wins at 0. 40x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. 's 3. 55x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HTB or SFNC or HOMB or NBTB?
Over the past 5 years, HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc.
(HTB) delivered a total return of +76. 6%, compared to -14. 9% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HTB returned +167. 6% versus SFNC's +24. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HTB or SFNC or HOMB or NBTB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc.
(HTB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus Simmons First National Corporation's 1. 01β — meaning SFNC is approximately 37% more volatile than HTB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 30% for Home Bancshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HTB or SFNC or HOMB or NBTB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 16. 3% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HTB or SFNC or HOMB or NBTB?
Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 7% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 27. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOMB leads at 36. 0% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HTB or SFNC or HOMB or NBTB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc. (HTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 40x versus Home Bancshares, Inc. 's 3. 55x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) trades at 10. 3x forward P/E versus 12. 7x for HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc. — 2. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HOMB: 19. 6% to $32. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HTB or SFNC or HOMB or NBTB?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 1. 1% for HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc. (HTB).
09Is HTB or SFNC or HOMB or NBTB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc.
(HTB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 1. 1% yield, +167. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HTB: +167. 6%, SFNC: +24. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HTB and SFNC and HOMB and NBTB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; HOMB is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.