Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
HTB vs UVSP vs NBTB vs SFNC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
HTB vs UVSP vs NBTB vs SFNC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $772M | $1.10B | $2.35B | $3.09B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $292M | $518M | $867M | $627M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $64M | $91M | $169M | $-398M |
| Gross Margin | 70.5% | 61.0% | 72.1% | 5.8% |
| Operating Margin | 27.7% | 21.9% | 25.3% | -84.2% |
| Forward P/E | 12.6x | 11.1x | 10.8x | 10.3x |
| Total Debt | $175M | $352M | $327M | $641M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $554M | $185M | $380M |
HTB vs UVSP vs NBTB vs SFNC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| HomeTrust Bancshare… (HTB) | 100 | 297.7 | +197.7% |
| Univest Financial C… (UVSP) | 100 | 234.7 | +134.7% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
| Simmons First Natio… (SFNC) | 100 | 124.5 | +24.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HTB vs UVSP vs NBTB vs SFNC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HTB has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 166.6% 10Y total return vs UVSP's 140.1%
- PEG 0.40 vs NBTB's 1.53
- NIM 3.9% vs UVSP's 2.8%
- Beta 0.77 vs SFNC's 1.02
UVSP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 3.6%, EPS growth 22.5%
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs SFNC's 0.9%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 17.3%, current ratio 1.60x
- Beta 0.89, yield 3.2%, current ratio 1.60x
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7%
SFNC is the clearest fit if your priority is value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (10.3x vs 10.8x)
- 4.0% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.3x vs 10.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.77 vs SFNC's 1.02 | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.4% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs SFNC's 0.9% |
HTB vs UVSP vs NBTB vs SFNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HTB vs UVSP vs NBTB vs SFNC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HTB leads in 2 of 6 categories
SFNC leads 1 • UVSP leads 0 • NBTB leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — HTB and SFNC each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 3.0x HTB's $292M. HTB is the more profitable business, keeping 22.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFNC's -63.4%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $292M | $518M | $867M | $627M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $91M | $119M | $241M | -$497M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $64M | $91M | $169M | -$398M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $43M | $92M | $225M | $755M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.5% | +61.0% | +72.1% | +5.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.7% | +21.9% | +25.3% | -84.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +22.0% | +17.5% | +19.5% | -63.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | +18.7% | +25.2% | +71.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.4% | +23.1% | +39.5% | +42.1% |
Valuation Metrics
SFNC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.2x trailing earnings, UVSP trades at a 10% valuation discount to NBTB's 13.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HTB offers better value at 0.39x vs NBTB's 1.92x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $772M | $1.1B | $2.4B | $3.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $933M | $897M | $2.5B | $3.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.34x | 12.21x | 13.53x | -7.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.63x | 11.10x | 10.80x | 10.35x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.39x | 0.84x | 1.92x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.13x | 7.49x | 10.35x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.64x | 2.12x | 2.71x | 4.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.31x | 1.18x | 1.21x | 0.84x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 38.81x | 11.34x | 10.75x | 6.88x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HTB leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HTB delivers a 11.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-12 for SFNC. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UVSP's 0.37x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UVSP scores 7/9 vs SFNC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.0% | +9.8% | +9.5% | -11.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.4% | +1.1% | +1.1% | -1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.1% | +6.5% | +7.9% | -9.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.3% | +8.8% | +2.4% | -4.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.29x | 0.37x | 0.17x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $161M | -$202M | $142M | $261M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $554M | $185M | $380M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $175M | $352M | $327M | $641M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.27x | 0.60x | 1.05x | -1.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HTB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HTB five years ago would be worth $17,503 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,461 for SFNC. Over the past 12 months, HTB leads with a +32.4% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HTB at 35.1% vs SFNC's 15.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.5% | +20.9% | +9.3% | +14.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.4% | +32.0% | +9.0% | +16.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +146.8% | +137.1% | +54.1% | +53.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +75.0% | +46.4% | +29.9% | -15.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +166.6% | +140.1% | +102.2% | +25.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +35.1% | +33.4% | +15.5% | +15.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HTB and UVSP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HTB is the less volatile stock with a 0.77 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SFNC's 1.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.77x | 1.01x | 0.89x | 1.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $47.64 | $39.06 | $46.92 | $22.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $34.66 | $27.91 | $39.20 | $17.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.4% | +98.8% | +96.1% | +96.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.7 | 68.1 | 57.3 | 62.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 71K | 180K | 236K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NBTB and SFNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HTB as "Buy", UVSP as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", SFNC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 6.1% upside for SFNC (target: $23) vs -11.9% for UVSP (target: $34). For income investors, SFNC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.00% vs HTB's 1.07%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $34.00 | $46.00 | $22.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 6 | 10 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +2.3% | +3.2% | +4.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 1 | 12 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.49 | $0.88 | $1.43 | $0.85 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.9% | +3.2% | +0.4% | 0.0% |
HTB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). SFNC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
HTB vs UVSP vs NBTB vs SFNC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HTB or UVSP or NBTB or SFNC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Univest Financial Corporation (UVSP) offers the better valuation at 12. 2x trailing P/E (11. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc. (HTB) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HTB or UVSP or NBTB or SFNC?
On trailing P/E, Univest Financial Corporation (UVSP) is the cheapest at 12.
2x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. at 13. 5x. On forward P/E, Simmons First National Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc. wins at 0. 40x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 53x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HTB or UVSP or NBTB or SFNC?
Over the past 5 years, HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc.
(HTB) delivered a total return of +75. 0%, compared to -15. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HTB returned +166. 6% versus SFNC's +25. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HTB or UVSP or NBTB or SFNC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc.
(HTB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 77β versus Simmons First National Corporation's 1. 02β — meaning SFNC is approximately 34% more volatile than HTB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 37% for Univest Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HTB or UVSP or NBTB or SFNC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Univest Financial Corporation grew EPS 22. 5% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HTB or UVSP or NBTB or SFNC?
HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc.
(HTB) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 0% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 22. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HTB leads at 27. 7% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HTB or UVSP or NBTB or SFNC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc. (HTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 40x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 53x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) trades at 10. 3x forward P/E versus 12. 6x for HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc. — 2. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SFNC: 6. 1% to $22. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — HTB or UVSP or NBTB or SFNC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 1. 1% for HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc. (HTB).
09Is HTB or UVSP or NBTB or SFNC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc.
(HTB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 77), 1. 1% yield, +166. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HTB: +166. 6%, SFNC: +25. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HTB and UVSP and NBTB and SFNC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; UVSP is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.