Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HTB vs UVSP vs NBTB vs SFNC vs FBNC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
HTB vs UVSP vs NBTB vs SFNC vs FBNC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $772M | $1.10B | $2.35B | $3.09B | $2.45B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $292M | $518M | $867M | $627M | $543M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $64M | $91M | $169M | $-398M | $111M |
| Gross Margin | 70.5% | 61.0% | 72.1% | 5.8% | 70.1% |
| Operating Margin | 27.7% | 21.9% | 25.3% | -84.2% | 26.6% |
| Forward P/E | 12.6x | 11.1x | 10.8x | 10.3x | 12.6x |
| Total Debt | $175M | $352M | $327M | $641M | $75M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $14M | $554M | $185M | $380M | $147M |
HTB vs UVSP vs NBTB vs SFNC vs FBNC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| HomeTrust Bancshare… (HTB) | 100 | 297.7 | +197.7% |
| Univest Financial C… (UVSP) | 100 | 234.7 | +134.7% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
| Simmons First Natio… (SFNC) | 100 | 124.5 | +24.5% |
| First Bancorp (FBNC) | 100 | 232.8 | +132.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HTB vs UVSP vs NBTB vs SFNC vs FBNC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HTB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 166.6% 10Y total return vs FBNC's 228.5%
- PEG 0.40 vs NBTB's 1.53
- NIM 3.9% vs UVSP's 2.8%
- Beta 0.77 vs SFNC's 1.02
UVSP has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 3.6%, EPS growth 22.5%
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs SFNC's 0.9%
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.89, Low D/E 17.3%, current ratio 1.60x
- Beta 0.89, yield 3.2%, current ratio 1.60x
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7%
SFNC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (10.3x vs 12.6x)
- 4.0% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.2%
FBNC is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +45.3% vs NBTB's +9.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.3x vs 12.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.77 vs SFNC's 1.02 | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.3% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs SFNC's 0.9% |
HTB vs UVSP vs NBTB vs SFNC vs FBNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
HTB vs UVSP vs NBTB vs SFNC vs FBNC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HTB leads in 3 of 6 categories
SFNC leads 1 • UVSP leads 0 • NBTB leads 0 • FBNC leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HTB leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 3.0x HTB's $292M. HTB is the more profitable business, keeping 22.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFNC's -63.4%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $292M | $518M | $867M | $627M | $543M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $91M | $119M | $241M | -$497M | $155M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $64M | $91M | $169M | -$398M | $111M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $43M | $92M | $225M | $755M | $199M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.5% | +61.0% | +72.1% | +5.8% | +70.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +27.7% | +21.9% | +25.3% | -84.2% | +26.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +22.0% | +17.5% | +19.5% | -63.4% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | +18.7% | +25.2% | +71.7% | +36.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.4% | +23.1% | +39.5% | +42.1% | +3.4% |
Valuation Metrics
SFNC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.2x trailing earnings, UVSP trades at a 45% valuation discount to FBNC's 22.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HTB offers better value at 0.39x vs NBTB's 1.92x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $772M | $1.1B | $2.4B | $3.1B | $2.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $933M | $897M | $2.5B | $3.4B | $2.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.34x | 12.21x | 13.53x | -7.24x | 22.08x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.63x | 11.10x | 10.80x | 10.35x | 12.62x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.39x | 0.84x | 1.92x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.13x | 7.49x | 10.35x | — | 15.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.64x | 2.12x | 2.71x | 4.93x | 4.51x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.31x | 1.18x | 1.21x | 0.84x | 1.48x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 38.81x | 11.34x | 10.75x | 6.88x | 12.33x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HTB leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HTB delivers a 11.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-12 for SFNC. FBNC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UVSP's 0.37x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UVSP scores 7/9 vs SFNC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.0% | +9.8% | +9.5% | -11.6% | +7.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.4% | +1.1% | +1.1% | -1.6% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.1% | +6.5% | +7.9% | -9.1% | +6.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.3% | +8.8% | +2.4% | -4.2% | +5.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.29x | 0.37x | 0.17x | 0.19x | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $161M | -$202M | $142M | $261M | -$72M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $14M | $554M | $185M | $380M | $147M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $175M | $352M | $327M | $641M | $75M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.27x | 0.60x | 1.05x | -1.01x | 0.91x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HTB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HTB five years ago would be worth $17,503 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,461 for SFNC. Over the past 12 months, FBNC leads with a +45.3% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HTB at 35.1% vs SFNC's 15.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.5% | +20.9% | +9.3% | +14.6% | +16.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.4% | +32.0% | +9.0% | +16.7% | +45.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +146.8% | +137.1% | +54.1% | +53.4% | +117.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +75.0% | +46.4% | +29.9% | -15.4% | +39.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +166.6% | +140.1% | +102.2% | +25.2% | +228.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +35.1% | +33.4% | +15.5% | +15.3% | +29.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HTB and UVSP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HTB is the less volatile stock with a 0.77 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SFNC's 1.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UVSP currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs FBNC's 94.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.77x | 1.01x | 0.89x | 1.02x | 0.96x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $47.64 | $39.06 | $46.92 | $22.18 | $62.64 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $34.66 | $27.91 | $39.20 | $17.00 | $40.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.4% | +98.8% | +96.1% | +96.3% | +94.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.7 | 68.1 | 57.3 | 62.3 | 55.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 71K | 180K | 236K | 1.2M | 203K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — NBTB and SFNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HTB as "Buy", UVSP as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", SFNC as "Buy", FBNC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 6.5% upside for FBNC (target: $63) vs -11.9% for UVSP (target: $34). For income investors, SFNC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.00% vs HTB's 1.07%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $34.00 | $46.00 | $22.67 | $63.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 6 | 10 | 9 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.1% | +2.3% | +3.2% | +4.0% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 1 | 12 | 6 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.49 | $0.88 | $1.43 | $0.85 | $0.90 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.9% | +3.2% | +0.4% | 0.0% | +0.0% |
HTB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SFNC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
HTB vs UVSP vs NBTB vs SFNC vs FBNC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HTB or UVSP or NBTB or SFNC or FBNC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Univest Financial Corporation (UVSP) offers the better valuation at 12. 2x trailing P/E (11. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc. (HTB) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HTB or UVSP or NBTB or SFNC or FBNC?
On trailing P/E, Univest Financial Corporation (UVSP) is the cheapest at 12.
2x versus First Bancorp at 22. 1x. On forward P/E, Simmons First National Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc. wins at 0. 40x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 53x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HTB or UVSP or NBTB or SFNC or FBNC?
Over the past 5 years, HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc.
(HTB) delivered a total return of +75. 0%, compared to -15. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FBNC returned +228. 5% versus SFNC's +25. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HTB or UVSP or NBTB or SFNC or FBNC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc.
(HTB) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 77β versus Simmons First National Corporation's 1. 02β — meaning SFNC is approximately 34% more volatile than HTB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Bancorp (FBNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 37% for Univest Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HTB or UVSP or NBTB or SFNC or FBNC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Bancorp grew EPS 45. 7% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HTB or UVSP or NBTB or SFNC or FBNC?
HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc.
(HTB) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 0% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 22. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HTB leads at 27. 7% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HTB or UVSP or NBTB or SFNC or FBNC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc. (HTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 40x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 53x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) trades at 10. 3x forward P/E versus 12. 6x for HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc. — 2. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FBNC: 6. 5% to $63. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — HTB or UVSP or NBTB or SFNC or FBNC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 1. 1% for HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc. (HTB).
09Is HTB or UVSP or NBTB or SFNC or FBNC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, HomeTrust Bancshares, Inc.
(HTB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 77), 1. 1% yield, +166. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HTB: +166. 6%, SFNC: +25. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HTB and UVSP and NBTB and SFNC and FBNC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; UVSP is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; FBNC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.