Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
HWC vs HOPE vs UBSI vs IBCP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
HWC vs HOPE vs UBSI vs IBCP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $5.55B | $1.60B | $6.06B | $699M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.02B | $968M | $1.82B | $315M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $486M | $59M | $465M | $69M |
| Gross Margin | 73.1% | 48.6% | 65.4% | 69.6% |
| Operating Margin | 31.0% | 8.3% | 32.4% | 25.8% |
| Forward P/E | 10.7x | 11.7x | 12.0x | 9.6x |
| Total Debt | $1.34B | $396M | $921M | $117M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $563M | $560M | $2.54B | $52M |
HWC vs HOPE vs UBSI vs IBCP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hancock Whitney Cor… (HWC) | 100 | 315.0 | +215.0% |
| Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE) | 100 | 131.9 | +31.9% |
| United Bankshares, … (UBSI) | 100 | 149.3 | +49.3% |
| Independent Bank Co… (IBCP) | 100 | 245.7 | +145.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HWC vs HOPE vs UBSI vs IBCP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HWC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 223.3% 10Y total return vs IBCP's 184.6%
- +31.0% vs IBCP's +12.6%
HOPE is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 4.4% yield, vs IBCP's 3.0%
UBSI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and bank quality.
- Rev growth 12.3%, EPS growth 18.9%
- NIM 3.3% vs HOPE's 2.5%
- 12.3% NII/revenue growth vs HOPE's -3.2%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs IBCP's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
IBCP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 3.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 23.2%, current ratio 370.62x
- PEG 1.82 vs UBSI's 1.88
- Beta 0.83, yield 3.0%, current ratio 370.62x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.3% NII/revenue growth vs HOPE's -3.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.6x vs 12.0x), PEG 1.82 vs 1.88 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs IBCP's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs HWC's 1.14, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.4% yield, vs IBCP's 3.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +31.0% vs IBCP's +12.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs IBCP's 0.4% |
HWC vs HOPE vs UBSI vs IBCP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HWC vs HOPE vs UBSI vs IBCP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IBCP leads in 3 of 6 categories
UBSI leads 1 • HWC leads 0 • HOPE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UBSI leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HWC is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.0B annually — 6.4x IBCP's $315M. UBSI is the more profitable business, keeping 25.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HOPE's 6.0%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.0B | $968M | $1.8B | $315M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $656M | $84M | $590M | $89M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $486M | $59M | $465M | $69M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $523M | $147M | $487M | $70M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.1% | +48.6% | +65.4% | +69.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +31.0% | +8.3% | +32.4% | +25.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.1% | +6.0% | +25.5% | +21.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.9% | +15.6% | +26.4% | +22.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.4% | +35.0% | +30.0% | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
IBCP leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.4x trailing earnings, IBCP trades at a 62% valuation discount to HOPE's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), IBCP offers better value at 1.97x vs UBSI's 2.08x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.6B | $1.6B | $6.1B | $699M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.3B | $1.4B | $4.4B | $764M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.99x | 27.22x | 13.28x | 10.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.70x | 11.70x | 11.99x | 9.56x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.08x | 1.97x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.65x | 17.18x | 7.53x | 9.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.75x | 1.66x | 3.33x | 2.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.29x | 0.71x | 1.11x | 1.41x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.62x | 10.58x | 12.60x | 9.96x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $3 for HOPE. UBSI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HWC's 0.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs HOPE's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.1% | +2.6% | +8.6% | +14.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.4% | +0.3% | +1.4% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.6% | +2.3% | +7.2% | +10.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.2% | +0.9% | +3.0% | +2.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.30x | 0.17x | 0.17x | 0.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $775M | -$164M | -$1.6B | $65M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $563M | $560M | $2.5B | $52M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.3B | $396M | $921M | $117M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.23x | 0.17x | 1.01x | 0.91x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IBCP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IBCP five years ago would be worth $16,369 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,800 for HOPE. Over the past 12 months, HWC leads with a +31.0% total return vs IBCP's +12.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBCP at 32.1% vs UBSI's 17.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.2% | +15.3% | +14.1% | +7.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +31.0% | +30.4% | +28.2% | +12.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +117.7% | +80.7% | +61.7% | +130.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +52.2% | -2.0% | +23.7% | +63.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +223.3% | +18.8% | +52.4% | +184.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +29.6% | +21.8% | +17.4% | +32.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HOPE and IBCP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IBCP is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HWC's 1.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HOPE currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs HWC's 90.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.14x | 1.10x | 0.95x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $75.43 | $13.02 | $45.93 | $37.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $52.89 | $9.44 | $34.10 | $29.63 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.3% | +96.2% | +94.5% | +90.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.1 | 59.1 | 55.1 | 50.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 779K | 902K | 916K | 176K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HOPE and IBCP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HWC as "Buy", HOPE as "Hold", UBSI as "Hold", IBCP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 15.8% upside for HOPE (target: $15) vs 7.5% for UBSI (target: $47). For income investors, HOPE offers the higher dividend yield at 4.39% vs HWC's 2.68%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $77.75 | $14.50 | $46.67 | $38.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 6 | 11 | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.7% | +4.4% | +3.4% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 0 | 5 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.82 | $0.55 | $1.48 | $1.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.4% | 0.0% | +2.1% | +1.8% |
IBCP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). UBSI leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
HWC vs HOPE vs UBSI vs IBCP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HWC or HOPE or UBSI or IBCP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, United Bankshares, Inc.
(UBSI) is the stronger pick with 12. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 2% for Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE). Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the better valuation at 10. 4x trailing P/E (9. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hancock Whitney Corporation (HWC) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HWC or HOPE or UBSI or IBCP?
On trailing P/E, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the cheapest at 10.
4x versus Hope Bancorp, Inc. at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Independent Bank Corporation wins at 1. 82x versus United Bankshares, Inc. 's 1. 88x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HWC or HOPE or UBSI or IBCP?
Over the past 5 years, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) delivered a total return of +63.
7%, compared to -2. 0% for Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HWC returned +223. 3% versus HOPE's +18. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HWC or HOPE or UBSI or IBCP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
83β versus Hancock Whitney Corporation's 1. 14β — meaning HWC is approximately 38% more volatile than IBCP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, United Bankshares, Inc. (UBSI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 30% for Hancock Whitney Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HWC or HOPE or UBSI or IBCP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), United Bankshares, Inc.
(UBSI) is pulling ahead at 12. 3% versus -3. 2% for Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: United Bankshares, Inc. grew EPS 18. 9% year-over-year, compared to -43. 9% for Hope Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HWC or HOPE or UBSI or IBCP?
United Bankshares, Inc.
(UBSI) is the more profitable company, earning 25. 5% net margin versus 6. 0% for Hope Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 25. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UBSI leads at 32. 4% versus 8. 3% for HOPE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HWC leads at 73. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HWC or HOPE or UBSI or IBCP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 82x versus United Bankshares, Inc. 's 1. 88x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) trades at 9. 6x forward P/E versus 12. 0x for United Bankshares, Inc. — 2. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HOPE: 15. 8% to $14. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — HWC or HOPE or UBSI or IBCP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE) offers the highest yield at 4. 4%, versus 2. 7% for Hancock Whitney Corporation (HWC).
09Is HWC or HOPE or UBSI or IBCP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
83), 3. 0% yield, +184. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBCP: +184. 6%, HOPE: +18. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HWC and HOPE and UBSI and IBCP?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HWC is a small-cap deep-value stock; HOPE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; UBSI is a small-cap deep-value stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.