Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
HWC vs HOPE vs UBSI vs IBCP vs WSFS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
HWC vs HOPE vs UBSI vs IBCP vs WSFS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $5.55B | $1.60B | $6.06B | $699M | $3.80B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.02B | $968M | $1.82B | $315M | $1.36B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $486M | $59M | $465M | $69M | $287M |
| Gross Margin | 73.1% | 48.6% | 65.4% | 69.6% | 74.7% |
| Operating Margin | 31.0% | 8.3% | 32.4% | 25.8% | 28.0% |
| Forward P/E | 10.8x | 11.6x | 12.0x | 9.7x | 11.7x |
| Total Debt | $1.34B | $396M | $921M | $117M | $303M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $563M | $560M | $2.54B | $52M | $1.33B |
HWC vs HOPE vs UBSI vs IBCP vs WSFS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hancock Whitney Cor… (HWC) | 100 | 318.0 | +218.0% |
| Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE) | 100 | 130.8 | +30.8% |
| United Bankshares, … (UBSI) | 100 | 149.3 | +49.3% |
| Independent Bank Co… (IBCP) | 100 | 249.8 | +149.8% |
| WSFS Financial Corp… (WSFS) | 100 | 259.1 | +159.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: HWC vs HOPE vs UBSI vs IBCP vs WSFS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
HWC is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 223.3% 10Y total return vs IBCP's 184.6%
HOPE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 4.4% yield, vs IBCP's 3.0%
UBSI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 12.3%, EPS growth 18.9%
- 12.3% NII/revenue growth vs HOPE's -3.2%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs WSFS's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs WSFS's 0.5%
IBCP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 3.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, Low D/E 23.2%, current ratio 370.62x
- Beta 0.83, yield 3.0%, current ratio 370.62x
- Lower P/E (9.7x vs 12.0x), PEG 1.85 vs 1.88
WSFS is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency and bank quality.
- PEG 0.67 vs UBSI's 1.88
- NIM 3.4% vs HOPE's 2.5%
- +37.7% vs IBCP's +12.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.3% NII/revenue growth vs HOPE's -3.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.7x vs 12.0x), PEG 1.85 vs 1.88 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs WSFS's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs HWC's 1.14, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.4% yield, vs IBCP's 3.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.7% vs IBCP's +12.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs WSFS's 0.5% |
HWC vs HOPE vs UBSI vs IBCP vs WSFS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
HWC vs HOPE vs UBSI vs IBCP vs WSFS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IBCP leads in 2 of 6 categories
UBSI leads 1 • WSFS leads 1 • HWC leads 0 • HOPE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UBSI leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HWC is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.0B annually — 6.4x IBCP's $315M. UBSI is the more profitable business, keeping 25.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to HOPE's 6.0%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.0B | $968M | $1.8B | $315M | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $656M | $84M | $590M | $89M | $408M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $486M | $59M | $465M | $69M | $287M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $523M | $147M | $487M | $70M | $214M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +73.1% | +48.6% | +65.4% | +69.6% | +74.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +31.0% | +8.3% | +32.4% | +25.8% | +28.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.1% | +6.0% | +25.5% | +21.7% | +21.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +25.9% | +15.6% | +26.4% | +22.2% | +15.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.4% | +35.0% | +30.0% | +2.3% | +22.9% |
Valuation Metrics
IBCP leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.4x trailing earnings, IBCP trades at a 62% valuation discount to HOPE's 27.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WSFS offers better value at 0.81x vs UBSI's 2.08x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.6B | $1.6B | $6.1B | $699M | $3.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.3B | $1.4B | $4.4B | $764M | $2.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.99x | 27.22x | 13.28x | 10.38x | 14.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.78x | 11.60x | 11.99x | 9.72x | 11.73x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 2.08x | 1.97x | 0.81x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.65x | 17.18x | 7.53x | 9.39x | 6.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.75x | 1.66x | 3.33x | 2.22x | 2.79x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.29x | 0.71x | 1.11x | 1.41x | 1.44x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.62x | 10.58x | 12.60x | 9.96x | 17.79x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBCP delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $3 for HOPE. WSFS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HWC's 0.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IBCP scores 8/9 vs WSFS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.1% | +2.6% | +8.6% | +14.2% | +10.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.4% | +0.3% | +1.4% | +1.3% | +1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.6% | +2.3% | +7.2% | +10.2% | +9.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.2% | +0.9% | +3.0% | +2.6% | +10.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.30x | 0.17x | 0.17x | 0.23x | 0.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $775M | -$164M | -$1.6B | $65M | -$1.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $563M | $560M | $2.5B | $52M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.3B | $396M | $921M | $117M | $303M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.23x | 0.17x | 1.01x | 0.91x | 1.30x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WSFS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IBCP five years ago would be worth $16,369 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,800 for HOPE. Over the past 12 months, WSFS leads with a +37.7% total return vs IBCP's +12.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WSFS at 33.0% vs UBSI's 17.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.2% | +15.3% | +14.1% | +7.2% | +31.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +31.0% | +30.4% | +28.2% | +12.6% | +37.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +117.7% | +80.7% | +61.7% | +130.6% | +135.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +52.2% | -2.0% | +23.7% | +63.7% | +43.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +223.3% | +18.8% | +52.4% | +184.6% | +129.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +29.6% | +21.8% | +17.4% | +32.1% | +33.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — IBCP and WSFS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IBCP is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HWC's 1.14 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WSFS currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs HWC's 90.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.13x | 1.11x | 0.93x | 0.81x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $75.43 | $13.02 | $45.93 | $37.39 | $73.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $52.89 | $9.44 | $34.10 | $29.63 | $49.92 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.3% | +96.2% | +94.5% | +90.8% | +98.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.1 | 59.1 | 55.1 | 50.6 | 64.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 779K | 902K | 916K | 176K | 385K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — HOPE and IBCP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HWC as "Buy", HOPE as "Hold", UBSI as "Hold", IBCP as "Hold", WSFS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 15.8% upside for HOPE (target: $15) vs 7.5% for UBSI (target: $47). For income investors, HOPE offers the higher dividend yield at 4.39% vs WSFS's 0.95%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $77.75 | $14.50 | $46.67 | $38.00 | $79.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 6 | 11 | 7 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.7% | +4.4% | +3.4% | +3.0% | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 0 | 5 | 11 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.82 | $0.55 | $1.48 | $1.03 | $0.68 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +4.4% | 0.0% | +2.1% | +1.8% | +7.6% |
IBCP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). UBSI leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
HWC vs HOPE vs UBSI vs IBCP vs WSFS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is HWC or HOPE or UBSI or IBCP or WSFS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, United Bankshares, Inc.
(UBSI) is the stronger pick with 12. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 2% for Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE). Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) offers the better valuation at 10. 4x trailing P/E (9. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hancock Whitney Corporation (HWC) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — HWC or HOPE or UBSI or IBCP or WSFS?
On trailing P/E, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the cheapest at 10.
4x versus Hope Bancorp, Inc. at 27. 2x. On forward P/E, Independent Bank Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: WSFS Financial Corporation wins at 0. 67x versus United Bankshares, Inc. 's 1. 88x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — HWC or HOPE or UBSI or IBCP or WSFS?
Over the past 5 years, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) delivered a total return of +63.
7%, compared to -2. 0% for Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HWC returned +225. 9% versus HOPE's +19. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — HWC or HOPE or UBSI or IBCP or WSFS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
81β versus Hancock Whitney Corporation's 1. 13β — meaning HWC is approximately 39% more volatile than IBCP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 30% for Hancock Whitney Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — HWC or HOPE or UBSI or IBCP or WSFS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), United Bankshares, Inc.
(UBSI) is pulling ahead at 12. 3% versus -3. 2% for Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: United Bankshares, Inc. grew EPS 18. 9% year-over-year, compared to -43. 9% for Hope Bancorp, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — HWC or HOPE or UBSI or IBCP or WSFS?
United Bankshares, Inc.
(UBSI) is the more profitable company, earning 25. 5% net margin versus 6. 0% for Hope Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 25. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UBSI leads at 32. 4% versus 8. 3% for HOPE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WSFS leads at 74. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is HWC or HOPE or UBSI or IBCP or WSFS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 67x versus United Bankshares, Inc. 's 1. 88x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 12. 0x for United Bankshares, Inc. — 2. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HOPE: 15. 8% to $14. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — HWC or HOPE or UBSI or IBCP or WSFS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Hope Bancorp, Inc. (HOPE) offers the highest yield at 4. 4%, versus 0. 9% for WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS).
09Is HWC or HOPE or UBSI or IBCP or WSFS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Independent Bank Corporation (IBCP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
81), 3. 0% yield, +188. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (IBCP: +188. 6%, HOPE: +19. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between HWC and HOPE and UBSI and IBCP and WSFS?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: HWC is a small-cap deep-value stock; HOPE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; UBSI is a small-cap deep-value stock; IBCP is a small-cap deep-value stock; WSFS is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.