Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
IBIO vs NVAX vs NUVB vs CRL vs IQV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
IBIO vs NVAX vs NUVB vs CRL vs IQV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $26M | $1.50B | $1.67B | $8.98B | $30.32B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $300K | $596M | $143M | $4.03B | $16.63B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-25M | $-88M | $-146M | $-185M | $1.39B |
| Gross Margin | -76.7% | 84.6% | 91.6% | 24.9% | 26.1% |
| Operating Margin | -76.6% | -11.2% | -105.0% | 11.8% | 13.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 3.6x | — | 16.4x | 14.1x |
| Total Debt | $4M | $249M | $10M | $3.07B | $16.17B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $241M | $164M | $214M | $1.98B |
IBIO vs NVAX vs NUVB vs CRL vs IQV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| iBio, Inc. (IBIO) | 100 | 0.2 | -99.8% |
| Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) | 100 | 8.4 | -91.6% |
| Nuvation Bio Inc. (NUVB) | 100 | 48.2 | -51.8% |
| Charles River Labor… (CRL) | 100 | 83.1 | -16.9% |
| IQVIA Holdings Inc. (IQV) | 100 | 109.1 | +9.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IBIO vs NVAX vs NUVB vs CRL vs IQV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IBIO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NVAX ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 64.7%, EPS growth 306.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -11.1%
- Lower P/E (3.6x vs 16.4x)
NUVB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.04, Low D/E 3.3%, current ratio 6.95x
- Beta 2.04, current ratio 6.95x
- 7.0% revenue growth vs CRL's -0.9%
- +136.3% vs IQV's +16.5%
Among these 5 stocks, CRL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
IQV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.33
- 166.5% 10Y total return vs CRL's 119.2%
- 8.3% margin vs IBIO's -82.5%
- Beta 1.33 vs NVAX's 2.11
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.0% revenue growth vs CRL's -0.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (3.6x vs 16.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.3% margin vs IBIO's -82.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.33 vs NVAX's 2.11 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +136.3% vs IQV's +16.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.7% ROA vs IBIO's -57.9%, ROIC 8.7% vs -130.5% |
IBIO vs NVAX vs NUVB vs CRL vs IQV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
IBIO vs NVAX vs NUVB vs CRL vs IQV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IQV leads in 2 of 6 categories
NUVB leads 1 • IBIO leads 0 • NVAX leads 0 • CRL leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NUVB and IQV each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IQV is the larger business by revenue, generating $16.6B annually — 55440.0x IBIO's $300,000. IQV is the more profitable business, keeping 8.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IBIO's -82.5%. On growth, NUVB holds the edge at +26.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $300,000 | $596M | $143M | $4.0B | $16.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$22M | -$47M | -$145M | $757M | $3.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$25M | -$88M | -$146M | -$185M | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$19M | -$96M | -$126M | $391M | $2.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -76.7% | +84.6% | +91.6% | +24.9% | +26.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -76.6% | -11.2% | -105.0% | +11.8% | +13.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -82.5% | -14.7% | -102.1% | -4.6% | +8.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -64.0% | -16.1% | -88.1% | +9.7% | +16.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -79.1% | +26.0% | +1.2% | +8.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +81.1% | -102.0% | +106.3% | -160.0% | +15.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — NVAX and IQV each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.6x trailing earnings, NVAX trades at a 84% valuation discount to IQV's 22.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NVAX's 2.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CRL's 13.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $26M | $1.5B | $1.7B | $9.0B | $30.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $21M | $1.5B | $1.5B | $11.8B | $44.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.94x | 3.63x | -8.03x | -62.52x | 22.79x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 16.42x | 14.06x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.56x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 2.56x | — | 12.98x | 12.97x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 64.74x | 1.34x | 26.61x | 2.24x | 1.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.16x | — | 5.38x | 2.81x | 4.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 17.31x | 14.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IQV leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IQV delivers a 22.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-71 for IBIO. NUVB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IQV's 2.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NVAX scores 5/9 vs IQV's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -71.3% | — | -44.1% | -5.7% | +22.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -57.9% | -7.4% | -23.8% | -2.5% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -130.5% | — | -54.3% | +6.3% | +8.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -88.6% | +100.4% | -42.8% | +8.1% | +11.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.24x | — | 0.03x | 0.95x | 2.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | $8M | -$154M | $2.9B | $14.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $241M | $164M | $214M | $2.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4M | $249M | $10M | $3.1B | $16.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -128.89x | -5.10x | -162.11x | 6.38x | 3.10x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NUVB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IQV five years ago would be worth $7,621 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $20 for IBIO. Over the past 12 months, NUVB leads with a +136.3% total return vs IQV's +16.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NUVB at 43.8% vs IBIO's -57.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -18.8% | +29.5% | -43.8% | -10.1% | -20.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +92.9% | +55.1% | +136.3% | +32.8% | +16.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.4% | +23.9% | +197.5% | -4.2% | -5.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | -94.8% | -58.3% | -46.9% | -23.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -90.4% | -51.8% | +119.2% | +166.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -57.7% | +7.4% | +43.8% | -1.4% | -2.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CRL and IQV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IQV is the less volatile stock with a 1.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVAX's 2.11 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CRL currently trades 79.5% from its 52-week high vs IBIO's 42.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.03x | 2.11x | 2.04x | 1.52x | 1.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.82 | $11.97 | $9.75 | $228.88 | $247.05 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.56 | $5.80 | $1.57 | $131.30 | $134.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +42.9% | +77.1% | +49.4% | +79.5% | +72.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.3 | 64.4 | 59.1 | 57.2 | 58.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 972K | 4.4M | 4.3M | 806K | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
IQV leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NVAX as "Buy", NUVB as "Buy", CRL as "Buy", IQV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 157.3% upside for NUVB (target: $12) vs 12.9% for CRL (target: $205).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $18.00 | $12.40 | $205.43 | $225.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 23 | 9 | 36 | 44 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% | 0.0% | +4.0% | +4.1% |
IQV leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). NUVB leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
IBIO vs NVAX vs NUVB vs CRL vs IQV: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IBIO or NVAX or NUVB or CRL or IQV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Nuvation Bio Inc.
(NUVB) is the stronger pick with 699. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) offers the better valuation at 3. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IBIO or NVAX or NUVB or CRL or IQV?
On trailing P/E, Novavax, Inc.
(NVAX) is the cheapest at 3. 6x versus IQVIA Holdings Inc. at 22. 8x. On forward P/E, IQVIA Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 14. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IBIO or NVAX or NUVB or CRL or IQV?
Over the past 5 years, IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) delivered a total return of -23. 8%, compared to -99. 8% for iBio, Inc. (IBIO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IQV returned +166. 5% versus IBIO's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IBIO or NVAX or NUVB or CRL or IQV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 33β versus Novavax, Inc. 's 2. 11β — meaning NVAX is approximately 58% more volatile than IQV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Nuvation Bio Inc. (NUVB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 2% for IQVIA Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IBIO or NVAX or NUVB or CRL or IQV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nuvation Bio Inc.
(NUVB) is pulling ahead at 699. 0% versus -0. 9% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. (CRL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Novavax, Inc. grew EPS 306. 5% year-over-year, compared to -1555. 0% for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IQV leads at 4. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IBIO or NVAX or NUVB or CRL or IQV?
Novavax, Inc.
(NVAX) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 2% net margin versus -45. 9% for iBio, Inc. — meaning it keeps 39. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVAX leads at 50. 1% versus -46. 5% for IBIO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IBIO leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IBIO or NVAX or NUVB or CRL or IQV more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) trades at 14. 1x forward P/E versus 16. 4x for Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. — 2. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NUVB: 157. 3% to $12. 40.
08Which pays a better dividend — IBIO or NVAX or NUVB or CRL or IQV?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is IBIO or NVAX or NUVB or CRL or IQV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, IQVIA Holdings Inc.
(IQV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+166. 5% 10Y return). iBio, Inc. (IBIO) carries a higher beta of 2. 03 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IQV: +166. 5%, IBIO: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IBIO and NVAX and NUVB and CRL and IQV?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: IBIO is a small-cap high-growth stock; NVAX is a small-cap high-growth stock; NUVB is a small-cap high-growth stock; CRL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IQV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.