Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ICCC vs DBVT vs ADMA vs NVAX vs SNY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - General
ICCC vs DBVT vs ADMA vs NVAX vs SNY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $73M | $1690.08T | $1.89B | $1.66B | $104.60B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $28M | $0.00 | $510M | $596M | $46.72B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $-168M | $165M | $-88M | $7.81B |
| Gross Margin | 40.9% | — | 61.3% | 84.6% | 72.3% |
| Operating Margin | 8.4% | — | 42.1% | -11.2% | 13.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 9.7x | 4.0x | 10.3x |
| Total Debt | $15M | $22M | $80M | $249M | $21.79B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $194M | $88M | $241M | $7.66B |
ICCC vs DBVT vs ADMA vs NVAX vs SNY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ImmuCell Corporation (ICCC) | 100 | 178.5 | +78.5% |
| DBV Technologies S.… (DBVT) | 100 | 40.7 | -59.3% |
| ADMA Biologics, Inc. (ADMA) | 100 | 248.3 | +148.3% |
| Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) | 100 | 22.0 | -78.0% |
| Sanofi (SNY) | 100 | 88.2 | -11.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ICCC vs DBVT vs ADMA vs NVAX vs SNY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ICCC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.
- Beta 0.38, current ratio 3.41x
- Beta 0.38 vs NVAX's 2.22
DBVT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +100.5% vs ADMA's -61.5%
ADMA has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.25
- Lower volatility, beta 1.25, Low D/E 16.7%, current ratio 6.71x
- 32.4% margin vs NVAX's -14.7%
- 27.4% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0%
NVAX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 64.7%, EPS growth 306.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -11.1%
- 64.7% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0%
- Lower P/E (4.0x vs 9.7x)
SNY is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 59.1% 10Y total return vs ADMA's 34.8%
- 5.1% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 64.7% revenue growth vs DBVT's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.0x vs 9.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 32.4% margin vs NVAX's -14.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.38 vs NVAX's 2.22 | |
| Dividends | 5.1% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +100.5% vs ADMA's -61.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 27.4% ROA vs DBVT's -89.0% |
ICCC vs DBVT vs ADMA vs NVAX vs SNY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
ICCC vs DBVT vs ADMA vs NVAX vs SNY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
ADMA leads in 3 of 6 categories
NVAX leads 1 • ICCC leads 1 • DBVT leads 0 • SNY leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ADMA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SNY and DBVT operate at a comparable scale, with $46.7B and $0 in trailing revenue. ADMA is the more profitable business, keeping 32.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NVAX's -14.7%. On growth, SNY holds the edge at +59.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $28M | $0 | $510M | $596M | $46.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | -$112M | $221M | -$47M | $9.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | -$168M | $165M | -$88M | $7.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $715,351 | -$151M | $108M | -$97M | $8.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.9% | — | +61.3% | +84.6% | +72.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.4% | — | +42.1% | -11.2% | +13.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.4% | — | +32.4% | -14.7% | +16.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | — | +21.2% | -16.3% | +17.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.4% | — | -0.3% | -79.1% | +59.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +82.1% | +91.5% | +72.7% | -102.0% | -5.2% |
Valuation Metrics
NVAX leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.0x trailing earnings, NVAX trades at a 78% valuation discount to SNY's 18.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NVAX's 2.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ICCC's 80.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $73M | $1690.08T | $1.9B | $1.7B | $104.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $84M | $1690.08T | $1.9B | $1.7B | $121.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -30.96x | -0.75x | 13.62x | 3.98x | 18.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 9.69x | — | 10.29x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 80.38x | — | 9.45x | 2.83x | 10.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.75x | — | 3.71x | 1.48x | 1.91x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.39x | 0.65x | 4.19x | — | 1.26x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 68.06x | — | 10.02x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ADMA leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ADMA delivers a 39.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $39 in annual profit, vs $-130 for DBVT. DBVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ICCC's 0.55x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ICCC scores 7/9 vs DBVT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.0% | -130.2% | +39.0% | — | +10.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.1% | -89.0% | +27.4% | -7.4% | +6.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.1% | — | +36.0% | — | +5.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.1% | -145.7% | +38.8% | +100.4% | +6.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.55x | 0.13x | 0.17x | — | 0.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $11M | -$172M | -$8M | $8M | $14.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $194M | $88M | $241M | $7.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15M | $22M | $80M | $249M | $21.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.28x | -189.82x | 50.85x | -6.40x | 17.51x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ADMA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ADMA five years ago would be worth $48,922 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $630 for NVAX. Over the past 12 months, DBVT leads with a +100.5% total return vs ADMA's -61.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ADMA at 32.7% vs SNY's -1.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +36.0% | +3.6% | -54.3% | +41.8% | -5.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +56.6% | +100.5% | -61.5% | +51.8% | -8.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.6% | +18.1% | +133.4% | +35.7% | -5.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.0% | -68.3% | +389.2% | -93.7% | +2.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.2% | -87.1% | +34.8% | -89.4% | +59.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.6% | +5.7% | +32.7% | +10.7% | -1.9% |
Risk & Volatility
ICCC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ICCC is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NVAX's 2.22 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ICCC currently trades 88.7% from its 52-week high vs ADMA's 35.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.38x | 1.26x | 1.25x | 2.22x | 0.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.08 | $26.18 | $22.73 | $11.97 | $53.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.52 | $7.53 | $7.21 | $5.80 | $42.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.7% | +75.3% | +35.9% | +84.5% | +81.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.8 | 47.4 | 26.0 | 61.8 | 31.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 20K | 252K | 7.4M | 4.2M | 3.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ADMA and NVAX each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DBVT as "Buy", ADMA as "Buy", NVAX as "Buy", SNY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 157.0% upside for ADMA (target: $21) vs 17.8% for SNY (target: $51). SNY is the only dividend payer here at 5.09% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $46.33 | $21.00 | $18.00 | $51.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 15 | 10 | 23 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +5.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $1.88 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.7% | +0.3% | +5.4% |
ADMA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NVAX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ICCC vs DBVT vs ADMA vs NVAX vs SNY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ICCC or DBVT or ADMA or NVAX or SNY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Novavax, Inc.
(NVAX) is the stronger pick with 64. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 5% for Sanofi (SNY). Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) offers the better valuation at 4. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ICCC or DBVT or ADMA or NVAX or SNY?
On trailing P/E, Novavax, Inc.
(NVAX) is the cheapest at 4. 0x versus Sanofi at 18. 2x. On forward P/E, ADMA Biologics, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ICCC or DBVT or ADMA or NVAX or SNY?
Over the past 5 years, ADMA Biologics, Inc.
(ADMA) delivered a total return of +389. 2%, compared to -93. 7% for Novavax, Inc. (NVAX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SNY returned +59. 1% versus NVAX's -89. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ICCC or DBVT or ADMA or NVAX or SNY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ImmuCell Corporation (ICCC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
38β versus Novavax, Inc. 's 2. 22β — meaning NVAX is approximately 491% more volatile than ICCC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DBV Technologies S. A. (DBVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 55% for ImmuCell Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ICCC or DBVT or ADMA or NVAX or SNY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Novavax, Inc.
(NVAX) is pulling ahead at 64. 7% versus 5. 5% for Sanofi (SNY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Novavax, Inc. grew EPS 306. 5% year-over-year, compared to -347. 5% for DBV Technologies S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ADMA leads at 49. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ICCC or DBVT or ADMA or NVAX or SNY?
Novavax, Inc.
(NVAX) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 2% net margin versus -8. 1% for ImmuCell Corporation — meaning it keeps 39. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVAX leads at 50. 1% versus -6. 2% for ICCC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVAX leads at 93. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ICCC or DBVT or ADMA or NVAX or SNY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ADMA Biologics, Inc.
(ADMA) trades at 9. 7x forward P/E versus 10. 3x for Sanofi — 0. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ADMA: 157. 0% to $21. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ICCC or DBVT or ADMA or NVAX or SNY?
In this comparison, SNY (5.
1% yield) pays a dividend. ICCC, DBVT, ADMA, NVAX do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ICCC or DBVT or ADMA or NVAX or SNY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sanofi (SNY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
51), 5. 1% yield). Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) carries a higher beta of 2. 22 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SNY: +59. 1%, NVAX: -89. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ICCC and DBVT and ADMA and NVAX and SNY?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ICCC is a small-cap high-growth stock; DBVT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; ADMA is a small-cap high-growth stock; NVAX is a small-cap high-growth stock; SNY is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. SNY pays a dividend while ICCC, DBVT, ADMA, NVAX do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.