REIT - Hotel & Motel
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
IHT vs RLJ vs PK vs SHO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Hotel & Motel
REIT - Hotel & Motel
REIT - Hotel & Motel
IHT vs RLJ vs PK vs SHO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Hotel & Motel | REIT - Hotel & Motel | REIT - Hotel & Motel | REIT - Hotel & Motel |
| Market Cap | $11M | $1.34B | $2.25B | $1.93B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7M | $1.36B | $2.53B | $986M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1M | $25M | $-215M | $38M |
| Gross Margin | 32.7% | 1.4% | -4.7% | 20.1% |
| Operating Margin | -9.2% | 9.5% | 11.1% | 8.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 597.6x | 24.4x | 131.1x |
| Total Debt | $13M | $2.32B | $4.26B | $925M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $93K | $410M | $232M | $109M |
IHT vs RLJ vs PK vs SHO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| InnSuites Hospitali… (IHT) | 100 | 138.8 | +38.8% |
| RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) | 100 | 85.8 | -14.2% |
| Park Hotels & Resor… (PK) | 100 | 113.8 | +13.8% |
| Sunstone Hotel Inve… (SHO) | 100 | 116.9 | +16.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IHT vs RLJ vs PK vs SHO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IHT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
RLJ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.99, yield 6.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.99, current ratio 2.04x
- Beta 0.99, yield 6.9%, current ratio 2.04x
- Beta 0.99 vs PK's 1.32, lower leverage
PK is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (24.4x vs 131.1x)
SHO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 6.0%, EPS growth -69.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.7%
- 11.5% 10Y total return vs PK's -11.4%
- 6.0% FFO/revenue growth vs PK's -2.2%
- 3.8% margin vs IHT's -19.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.0% FFO/revenue growth vs PK's -2.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (24.4x vs 131.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.8% margin vs IHT's -19.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.99 vs PK's 1.32, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.9% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs PK's 12.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +33.4% vs IHT's -53.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.3% ROA vs IHT's -10.3%, ROIC 2.0% vs -4.2% |
IHT vs RLJ vs PK vs SHO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
IHT vs RLJ vs PK vs SHO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SHO leads in 2 of 6 categories
IHT leads 0 • RLJ leads 0 • PK leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SHO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PK is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 340.3x IHT's $7M. SHO is the more profitable business, keeping 3.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IHT's -19.5%. On growth, SHO holds the edge at +11.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7M | $1.4B | $2.5B | $986M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $60,273 | $316M | $612M | $190M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1M | $25M | -$215M | $38M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$11,223 | $254M | $448M | $132M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +32.7% | +1.4% | -4.7% | +20.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -9.2% | +9.5% | +11.1% | +8.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -19.5% | +1.8% | -8.5% | +3.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.2% | +18.6% | +17.7% | +13.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -1.1% | +3.6% | -1.3% | +11.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -29.4% | -150.0% | +117.2% | +7.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — RLJ and PK each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 244.6x trailing earnings, SHO trades at a 59% valuation discount to RLJ's 597.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, RLJ's 10.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SHO's 13.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $11M | $1.3B | $2.3B | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $23M | $3.2B | $6.3B | $2.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.25x | 597.64x | -7.88x | 244.56x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 24.41x | 131.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 10.40x | 11.17x | 13.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.41x | 1.00x | 0.89x | 2.01x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 15.80x | 0.61x | 0.72x | 1.03x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 11.45x | 22.08x | 24.48x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SHO leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SHO delivers a 1.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-4 for IHT. SHO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.48x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IHT's 19.98x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RLJ scores 6/9 vs IHT's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.2% | +1.1% | -6.7% | +1.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -10.3% | +0.5% | -2.6% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.2% | +2.3% | +2.2% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.6% | +2.8% | +3.1% | +2.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 19.98x | 1.06x | 1.38x | 0.48x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $13M | $1.9B | $4.0B | $816M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $92,752 | $410M | $232M | $109M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13M | $2.3B | $4.3B | $925M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.48x | 1.18x | -0.01x | 1.58x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — RLJ and PK and SHO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SHO five years ago would be worth $9,054 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,600 for IHT. Over the past 12 months, RLJ leads with a +33.4% total return vs IHT's -53.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PK at 7.2% vs IHT's -1.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -11.4% | +17.6% | +6.2% | +14.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -53.7% | +33.4% | +21.9% | +31.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.2% | -3.0% | +23.4% | +10.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -64.0% | -34.5% | -27.2% | -9.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.9% | -29.9% | -11.4% | +11.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.1% | -1.0% | +7.2% | +3.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RLJ and SHO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RLJ is the less volatile stock with a 0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PK's 1.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SHO currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs IHT's 27.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.06x | 0.99x | 1.32x | 1.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.24 | $8.96 | $12.39 | $10.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.95 | $6.54 | $9.84 | $8.14 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +27.4% | +98.7% | +90.3% | +99.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.8 | 72.3 | 52.1 | 70.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10K | 2.3M | 3.9M | 1.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — RLJ and PK and SHO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: RLJ as "Hold", PK as "Hold", SHO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 2.8% upside for PK (target: $12) vs -32.2% for RLJ (target: $6). For income investors, PK offers the higher dividend yield at 12.57% vs IHT's 1.75%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $6.00 | $11.50 | $10.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 18 | 25 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.7% | +6.9% | +12.6% | +4.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.02 | $0.61 | $1.41 | $0.44 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | +2.4% | +2.0% | +5.6% |
SHO leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 4 categories are tied.
IHT vs RLJ vs PK vs SHO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IHT or RLJ or PK or SHO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc.
(SHO) is the stronger pick with 6. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 2% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK). Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (SHO) offers the better valuation at 244. 6x trailing P/E (131. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) a "Hold" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IHT or RLJ or PK or SHO?
On trailing P/E, Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc.
(SHO) is the cheapest at 244. 6x versus RLJ Lodging Trust at 597. 6x. On forward P/E, Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. is actually cheaper at 24. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IHT or RLJ or PK or SHO?
Over the past 5 years, Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc.
(SHO) delivered a total return of -9. 5%, compared to -64. 0% for InnSuites Hospitality Trust (IHT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SHO returned +11. 5% versus IHT's -44. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IHT or RLJ or PK or SHO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
99β versus Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. 's 1. 32β — meaning PK is approximately 33% more volatile than RLJ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. (SHO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 48% versus 20% for InnSuites Hospitality Trust — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IHT or RLJ or PK or SHO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc.
(SHO) is pulling ahead at 6. 0% versus -2. 2% for Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. grew EPS -69. 8% year-over-year, compared to -817. 5% for InnSuites Hospitality Trust. Over a 3-year CAGR, IHT leads at 5. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IHT or RLJ or PK or SHO?
Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc.
(SHO) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 6% net margin versus -18. 3% for InnSuites Hospitality Trust — meaning it keeps 2. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RLJ leads at 9. 3% versus -9. 8% for IHT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IHT leads at 46. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IHT or RLJ or PK or SHO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Park Hotels & Resorts Inc.
(PK) trades at 24. 4x forward P/E versus 131. 1x for Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc. — 106. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PK: 2. 8% to $11. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — IHT or RLJ or PK or SHO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Park Hotels & Resorts Inc. (PK) offers the highest yield at 12. 6%, versus 1. 7% for InnSuites Hospitality Trust (IHT).
09Is IHT or RLJ or PK or SHO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sunstone Hotel Investors, Inc.
(SHO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 00), 4. 3% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SHO: +11. 5%, PK: -11. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IHT and RLJ and PK and SHO?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: IHT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RLJ is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PK is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SHO is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.