Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
IMXI vs V vs MA vs AXP vs PYPL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
IMXI vs V vs MA vs AXP vs PYPL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $477M | $616.45B | $443.44B | $218.57B | $40.77B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $521M | $40.00B | $32.79B | $80.46B | $33.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $33M | $22.24B | $15.57B | $11.22B | $5.06B |
| Gross Margin | 7.6% | 80.4% | 83.4% | 83.2% | 46.6% |
| Operating Margin | -3.8% | 60.0% | 59.2% | 17.1% | 18.3% |
| Forward P/E | 10.5x | 24.6x | 25.5x | 18.1x | 8.7x |
| Total Debt | $217M | $25.17B | $19.00B | $57.76B | $9.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $169M | $20.15B | $10.57B | $47.71B | $8.05B |
IMXI vs V vs MA vs AXP vs PYPL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| International Money… (IMXI) | 100 | 143.8 | +43.8% |
| Visa Inc. (V) | 100 | 164.6 | +64.6% |
| Mastercard Incorpor… (MA) | 100 | 166.5 | +66.5% |
| American Express Co… (AXP) | 100 | 335.2 | +235.2% |
| PayPal Holdings, In… (PYPL) | 100 | 29.8 | -70.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IMXI vs V vs MA vs AXP vs PYPL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IMXI has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.37, current ratio 2.51x
- Beta 0.37, current ratio 2.51x
- Beta 0.37 vs PYPL's 1.39
- +51.6% vs PYPL's -32.3%
V ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.68, yield 0.7%
- 50.1% margin vs IMXI's 6.3%
MA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 16.4%, EPS growth 18.9%
- 16.4% NII/revenue growth vs IMXI's -21.0%
- 29.5% ROA vs AXP's 3.7%, ROIC 56.5% vs 12.0%
AXP is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 429.9% 10Y total return vs MA's 437.2%
- PEG 0.56 vs IMXI's 2.50
- NIM 5.8% vs PYPL's 0.1%
- 1.0% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs V's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
PYPL is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (8.7x vs 25.5x), PEG 0.98 vs 1.22
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.4% NII/revenue growth vs IMXI's -21.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.7x vs 25.5x), PEG 0.98 vs 1.22 | |
| Quality / Margins | 50.1% margin vs IMXI's 6.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.37 vs PYPL's 1.39 | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs V's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +51.6% vs PYPL's -32.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 29.5% ROA vs AXP's 3.7%, ROIC 56.5% vs 12.0% |
IMXI vs V vs MA vs AXP vs PYPL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
IMXI vs V vs MA vs AXP vs PYPL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AXP leads in 2 of 6 categories
V leads 1 • PYPL leads 1 • MA leads 1 • IMXI leads 1
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
V leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AXP is the larger business by revenue, generating $80.5B annually — 154.6x IMXI's $521M. V is the more profitable business, keeping 50.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IMXI's 6.3%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $521M | $40.0B | $32.8B | $80.5B | $33.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3M | $27.6B | $21.6B | $18.4B | $6.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $33M | $22.2B | $15.6B | $11.2B | $5.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $16M | $21.2B | $17.7B | $14.3B | $5.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | +80.4% | +83.4% | +83.2% | +46.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.8% | +60.0% | +59.2% | +17.1% | +18.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.3% | +50.1% | +45.6% | +13.5% | +15.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.0% | +53.9% | +51.6% | +19.9% | +16.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -63.4% | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -38.8% | +35.3% | +21.2% | +17.6% | -6.2% |
Valuation Metrics
PYPL leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.5x trailing earnings, PYPL trades at a 73% valuation discount to V's 31.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AXP offers better value at 0.64x vs IMXI's 3.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $477M | $616.4B | $443.4B | $218.6B | $40.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $525M | $621.5B | $451.9B | $228.6B | $42.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.69x | 31.50x | 30.32x | 20.72x | 8.54x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.45x | 24.59x | 25.55x | 18.10x | 8.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.51x | 1.99x | 1.44x | 0.64x | 0.97x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 24.65x | 22.00x | 14.68x | 6.08x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.92x | 15.41x | 13.52x | 2.72x | 1.23x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.97x | 16.66x | 58.07x | 6.63x | 2.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 30.18x | 28.57x | 26.22x | 13.66x | 7.33x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MA delivers a 2.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $22 for IMXI. PYPL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MA's 2.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MA scores 9/9 vs V's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +22.1% | +58.9% | +2.1% | +33.9% | +25.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.5% | +22.7% | +29.5% | +3.7% | +6.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -7.6% | +29.2% | +56.5% | +12.0% | +15.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.8% | +36.2% | +64.4% | +11.3% | +18.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 9 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.34x | 0.66x | 2.45x | 1.73x | 0.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $48M | $5.0B | $8.4B | $10.1B | $1.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $169M | $20.2B | $10.6B | $47.7B | $8.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $217M | $25.2B | $19.0B | $57.8B | $10.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.69x | 26.72x | 27.23x | 2.07x | 19.28x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AXP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AXP five years ago would be worth $20,853 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,835 for PYPL. Over the past 12 months, IMXI leads with a +51.6% total return vs PYPL's -32.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AXP at 28.9% vs PYPL's -14.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.4% | -7.1% | -10.7% | -14.0% | -20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +51.6% | -7.4% | -11.0% | +16.6% | -32.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -38.0% | +41.2% | +32.2% | +114.0% | -38.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +9.4% | +42.6% | +36.8% | +108.5% | -81.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +63.5% | +329.1% | +437.2% | +429.9% | +17.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -14.8% | +12.2% | +9.7% | +28.9% | -14.9% |
Risk & Volatility
IMXI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IMXI is the less volatile stock with a 0.37 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PYPL's 1.39 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMXI currently trades 99.4% from its 52-week high vs PYPL's 58.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.37x | 0.68x | 0.67x | 1.24x | 1.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.95 | $375.51 | $601.77 | $387.49 | $79.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.58 | $293.89 | $480.50 | $273.89 | $38.46 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.4% | +85.6% | +83.2% | +82.3% | +58.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.9 | 53.3 | 42.3 | 53.4 | 40.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 358K | 6.9M | 3.2M | 3.1M | 15.4M |
Analyst Outlook
AXP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IMXI as "Buy", V as "Buy", MA as "Buy", AXP as "Hold", PYPL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 70.2% upside for IMXI (target: $27) vs 11.8% for PYPL (target: $52). For income investors, AXP offers the higher dividend yield at 1.02% vs PYPL's 0.29%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $27.00 | $362.45 | $656.87 | $373.30 | $51.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 61 | 64 | 57 | 70 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% | +0.6% | +1.0% | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 15 | 14 | 15 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.36 | $3.07 | $3.26 | $0.13 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.4% | +2.2% | +2.6% | +2.7% | +14.8% |
AXP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). V leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow).
IMXI vs V vs MA vs AXP vs PYPL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IMXI or V or MA or AXP or PYPL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is the stronger pick with 16.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -21. 0% for International Money Express, Inc. (IMXI). PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E (8. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate International Money Express, Inc. (IMXI) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IMXI or V or MA or AXP or PYPL?
On trailing P/E, PayPal Holdings, Inc.
(PYPL) is the cheapest at 8. 5x versus Visa Inc. at 31. 5x. On forward P/E, PayPal Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: American Express Company wins at 0. 56x versus International Money Express, Inc. 's 2. 50x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IMXI or V or MA or AXP or PYPL?
Over the past 5 years, American Express Company (AXP) delivered a total return of +108.
5%, compared to -81. 6% for PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MA returned +437. 2% versus PYPL's +17. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IMXI or V or MA or AXP or PYPL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), International Money Express, Inc.
(IMXI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 37β versus PayPal Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 39β — meaning PYPL is approximately 275% more volatile than IMXI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 49% versus 2% for Mastercard Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IMXI or V or MA or AXP or PYPL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is pulling ahead at 16.
4% versus -21. 0% for International Money Express, Inc. (IMXI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PayPal Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 35. 6% year-over-year, compared to -39. 7% for International Money Express, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IMXI or V or MA or AXP or PYPL?
Visa Inc.
(V) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 1% net margin versus 6. 3% for International Money Express, Inc. — meaning it keeps 50. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: V leads at 60. 0% versus -3. 8% for IMXI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MA leads at 83. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IMXI or V or MA or AXP or PYPL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, American Express Company (AXP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 56x versus International Money Express, Inc. 's 2. 50x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, PayPal Holdings, Inc. (PYPL) trades at 8. 7x forward P/E versus 25. 5x for Mastercard Incorporated — 16. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IMXI: 70. 2% to $27. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — IMXI or V or MA or AXP or PYPL?
In this comparison, AXP (1.
0% yield), V (0. 7% yield), MA (0. 6% yield), PYPL (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. IMXI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is IMXI or V or MA or AXP or PYPL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
67), 0. 6% yield, +437. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MA: +437. 2%, PYPL: +17. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IMXI and V and MA and AXP and PYPL?
These companies operate in different sectors (IMXI (Technology) and V (Financial Services) and MA (Financial Services) and AXP (Financial Services) and PYPL (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: IMXI is a small-cap deep-value stock; V is a large-cap quality compounder stock; MA is a large-cap high-growth stock; AXP is a large-cap quality compounder stock; PYPL is a mid-cap deep-value stock. V, MA, AXP pay a dividend while IMXI, PYPL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.