Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

INBK vs CFFN vs WAFD vs HOMB vs BANR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
INBK
First Internet Bancorp

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$222M
5Y Perf.+58.7%
CFFN
Capitol Federal Financial, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.02B
5Y Perf.-33.3%
WAFD
WaFd, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.73B
5Y Perf.+37.9%
HOMB
Home Bancshares, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.29B
5Y Perf.+85.6%
BANR
Banner Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.22B
5Y Perf.+74.6%

INBK vs CFFN vs WAFD vs HOMB vs BANR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
INBK logoINBK
CFFN logoCFFN
WAFD logoWAFD
HOMB logoHOMB
BANR logoBANR
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - Regional
Market Cap$222M$1.02B$2.73B$5.29B$2.22B
Revenue (TTM)$323M$417M$1.41B$1.45B$819M
Net Income (TTM)$-35M$73M$243M$458M$195M
Gross Margin13.7%47.3%50.9%65.6%79.0%
Operating Margin-15.8%19.9%20.5%36.0%29.5%
Forward P/E11.4x11.8x10.9x10.8x10.5x
Total Debt$355M$1.95B$1.82B$1.20B$373M
Cash & Equiv.$457M$252M$657M$910M$183M

INBK vs CFFN vs WAFD vs HOMB vs BANRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

INBK
CFFN
WAFD
HOMB
BANR
StockMay 20May 26Return
First Internet Banc… (INBK)100158.7+58.7%
Capitol Federal Fin… (CFFN)10066.7-33.3%
WaFd, Inc. (WAFD)100137.9+37.9%
Home Bancshares, In… (HOMB)100185.6+85.6%
Banner Corporation (BANR)100174.6+74.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: INBK vs CFFN vs WAFD vs HOMB vs BANR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CFFN leads in 5 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Banner Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
INBK
First Internet Bancorp
The Financial Play

INBK plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: financial services exposure
CFFN
Capitol Federal Financial, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CFFN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 10.0%, EPS growth 79.3%
  • 10.0% NII/revenue growth vs INBK's -3.2%
  • Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BANR's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
  • 4.4% yield, vs HOMB's 2.8%
Best for: growth exposure
WAFD
WaFd, Inc.
The Financial Play

WAFD lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: financial services exposure
HOMB
Home Bancshares, Inc.
The Banking Pick

HOMB is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.

  • NIM 3.8% vs CFFN's 1.8%
Best for: bank quality
BANR
Banner Corporation
The Banking Pick

BANR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.80, yield 3.0%
  • 101.1% 10Y total return vs WAFD's 84.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.80, Low D/E 19.1%, current ratio 0.02x
  • PEG 0.90 vs CFFN's 5.80
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCFFN logoCFFN10.0% NII/revenue growth vs INBK's -3.2%
ValueBANR logoBANRLower P/E (10.5x vs 10.8x), PEG 0.90 vs 3.55
Quality / MarginsCFFN logoCFFNEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs BANR's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyBANR logoBANRBeta 0.80 vs INBK's 1.01, lower leverage
DividendsCFFN logoCFFN4.4% yield, vs HOMB's 2.8%
Momentum (1Y)CFFN logoCFFN+44.6% vs HOMB's -1.9%
Efficiency (ROA)CFFN logoCFFNEfficiency ratio 0.3% vs BANR's 0.5%

INBK vs CFFN vs WAFD vs HOMB vs BANR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

INBKFirst Internet Bancorp
FY 2025
Loan Servicing
188.6%$9M
Bank Servicing
29.5%$1M
Loan Servicing Asset Revaluation
-118.1%$-5,466,000
CFFNCapitol Federal Financial, Inc.
FY 2025
Deposit Account
75.4%$11M
Insurance Services
24.6%$4M
WAFDWaFd, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

HOMBHome Bancshares, Inc.
FY 2024
Financial Service, Other
52.3%$43M
Deposit Account
47.7%$39M
BANRBanner Corporation
FY 2025
Deposit Account
65.3%$25M
Credit Card, Merchant Discount
34.7%$14M

INBK vs CFFN vs WAFD vs HOMB vs BANR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLINBKLAGGINGBANR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — HOMB and BANR each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

HOMB is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 4.5x INBK's $323M. HOMB is the more profitable business, keeping 27.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to INBK's -10.9%.

MetricINBK logoINBKFirst Internet Ba…CFFN logoCFFNCapitol Federal F…WAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.HOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …BANR logoBANRBanner Corporation
RevenueTrailing 12 months$323M$417M$1.4B$1.5B$819M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$46M$97M$277M$601M$253M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$35M$73M$243M$458M$195M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$10M$61M$226M$354M$248M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+13.7%+47.3%+50.9%+65.6%+79.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-15.8%+19.9%+20.5%+36.0%+29.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-10.9%+16.3%+16.0%+27.7%+23.8%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+11.9%+11.9%+14.8%+29.1%+30.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-27.7%+33.3%+46.3%+26.0%+11.2%
Evenly matched — HOMB and BANR each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

INBK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 11.6x trailing earnings, BANR trades at a 23% valuation discount to CFFN's 15.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BANR offers better value at 1.00x vs CFFN's 7.36x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricINBK logoINBKFirst Internet Ba…CFFN logoCFFNCapitol Federal F…WAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.HOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …BANR logoBANRBanner Corporation
Market CapShares × price$222M$1.0B$2.7B$5.3B$2.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$121M$2.7B$3.9B$5.6B$2.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-6.33x15.04x13.56x13.36x11.63x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.11.38x11.85x10.93x10.82x10.47x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate7.36x4.41x4.39x1.00x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple29.91x12.98x10.12x9.55x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.69x2.43x1.93x3.64x2.71x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.62x0.97x0.94x1.36x1.16x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF5.81x20.37x13.09x12.53x8.96x
INBK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — HOMB and BANR each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

HOMB delivers a 10.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-9 for INBK. BANR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CFFN's 1.86x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CFFN scores 7/9 vs INBK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricINBK logoINBKFirst Internet Ba…CFFN logoCFFNCapitol Federal F…WAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.HOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …BANR logoBANRBanner Corporation
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-9.4%+7.0%+8.0%+10.9%+10.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-0.6%+0.7%+1.0%+2.0%+1.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-5.1%+2.0%+3.9%+7.2%+7.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-6.6%+2.5%+5.7%+9.8%+10.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–947777
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.99x1.86x0.60x0.30x0.19x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$102M$1.7B$1.2B$292M$190M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$457M$252M$657M$910M$183M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$355M$2.0B$1.8B$1.2B$373M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-0.25x0.41x0.48x1.44x1.11x
Evenly matched — HOMB and BANR each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

INBK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BANR five years ago would be worth $12,958 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,745 for INBK. Over the past 12 months, CFFN leads with a +44.6% total return vs HOMB's -1.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INBK at 33.9% vs HOMB's 12.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricINBK logoINBKFirst Internet Ba…CFFN logoCFFNCapitol Federal F…WAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.HOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …BANR logoBANRBanner Corporation
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+25.2%+20.0%+11.9%-3.0%+6.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+18.3%+44.6%+28.5%-1.9%+9.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+139.9%+60.9%+51.6%+42.0%+60.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-22.6%-18.6%+22.5%+6.6%+29.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+15.5%+12.0%+84.4%+58.2%+101.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+33.9%+17.2%+14.9%+12.4%+17.1%
INBK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — WAFD and BANR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

BANR is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than INBK's 1.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WAFD currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs HOMB's 87.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricINBK logoINBKFirst Internet Ba…CFFN logoCFFNCapitol Federal F…WAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.HOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …BANR logoBANRBanner Corporation
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.01x1.01x0.81x0.82x0.80x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$28.51$7.96$36.12$30.83$69.83
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$17.05$5.51$26.31$25.68$57.05
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+89.5%+98.2%+98.8%+87.1%+93.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10068.860.768.350.358.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded59K926K661K1.4M292K
Evenly matched — WAFD and BANR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — CFFN and HOMB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: INBK as "Hold", CFFN as "Hold", WAFD as "Hold", HOMB as "Hold", BANR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 19.1% upside for HOMB (target: $32) vs -10.5% for CFFN (target: $7). For income investors, CFFN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.35% vs INBK's 0.94%.

MetricINBK logoINBKFirst Internet Ba…CFFN logoCFFNCapitol Federal F…WAFD logoWAFDWaFd, Inc.HOMB logoHOMBHome Bancshares, …BANR logoBANRBanner Corporation
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldHoldHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$26.50$7.00$35.00$32.00$70.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts105111913
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.9%+4.4%+3.0%+2.8%+3.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises107211
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.24$0.34$1.05$0.75$1.96
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.2%+0.4%+3.7%+1.6%+1.6%
Evenly matched — CFFN and HOMB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

INBK leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Total Returns. 4 categories are tied.

Best OverallFirst Internet Bancorp (INBK)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

INBK vs CFFN vs WAFD vs HOMB vs BANR: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is INBK or CFFN or WAFD or HOMB or BANR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Capitol Federal Financial, Inc.

(CFFN) is the stronger pick with 10. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 2% for First Internet Bancorp (INBK). Banner Corporation (BANR) offers the better valuation at 11. 6x trailing P/E (10. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First Internet Bancorp (INBK) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — INBK or CFFN or WAFD or HOMB or BANR?

On trailing P/E, Banner Corporation (BANR) is the cheapest at 11.

6x versus Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. at 15. 0x. On forward P/E, Banner Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Banner Corporation wins at 0. 90x versus Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. 's 5. 80x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — INBK or CFFN or WAFD or HOMB or BANR?

Over the past 5 years, Banner Corporation (BANR) delivered a total return of +29.

6%, compared to -22. 6% for First Internet Bancorp (INBK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BANR returned +101. 1% versus CFFN's +12. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — INBK or CFFN or WAFD or HOMB or BANR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Banner Corporation (BANR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

80β versus First Internet Bancorp's 1. 01β — meaning INBK is approximately 27% more volatile than BANR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Banner Corporation (BANR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 186% for Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — INBK or CFFN or WAFD or HOMB or BANR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Capitol Federal Financial, Inc.

(CFFN) is pulling ahead at 10. 0% versus -3. 2% for First Internet Bancorp (INBK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. grew EPS 79. 3% year-over-year, compared to -239. 9% for First Internet Bancorp. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — INBK or CFFN or WAFD or HOMB or BANR?

Home Bancshares, Inc.

(HOMB) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 7% net margin versus -10. 9% for First Internet Bancorp — meaning it keeps 27. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOMB leads at 36. 0% versus -15. 8% for INBK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BANR leads at 79. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is INBK or CFFN or WAFD or HOMB or BANR more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Banner Corporation (BANR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 90x versus Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. 's 5. 80x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Banner Corporation (BANR) trades at 10. 5x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. — 1. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HOMB: 19. 1% to $32. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — INBK or CFFN or WAFD or HOMB or BANR?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. (CFFN) offers the highest yield at 4. 4%, versus 0. 9% for First Internet Bancorp (INBK).

09

Is INBK or CFFN or WAFD or HOMB or BANR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Banner Corporation (BANR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

80), 3. 0% yield, +101. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BANR: +101. 1%, INBK: +15. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between INBK and CFFN and WAFD and HOMB and BANR?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: INBK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CFFN is a small-cap deep-value stock; WAFD is a small-cap deep-value stock; HOMB is a small-cap deep-value stock; BANR is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

INBK

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CFFN

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

WAFD

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 9%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.1%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HOMB

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 16%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BANR

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 14%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.1%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform INBK and CFFN and WAFD and HOMB and BANR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(INBK: -3.2% · CFFN: 10.0%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.