Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
INBK vs CFFN vs WAFD vs HOMB vs BANR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
INBK vs CFFN vs WAFD vs HOMB vs BANR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $222M | $1.02B | $2.73B | $5.29B | $2.22B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $323M | $417M | $1.41B | $1.45B | $819M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-35M | $73M | $243M | $458M | $195M |
| Gross Margin | 13.7% | 47.3% | 50.9% | 65.6% | 79.0% |
| Operating Margin | -15.8% | 19.9% | 20.5% | 36.0% | 29.5% |
| Forward P/E | 11.4x | 11.8x | 10.9x | 10.8x | 10.5x |
| Total Debt | $355M | $1.95B | $1.82B | $1.20B | $373M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $457M | $252M | $657M | $910M | $183M |
INBK vs CFFN vs WAFD vs HOMB vs BANR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Internet Banc… (INBK) | 100 | 158.7 | +58.7% |
| Capitol Federal Fin… (CFFN) | 100 | 66.7 | -33.3% |
| WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) | 100 | 137.9 | +37.9% |
| Home Bancshares, In… (HOMB) | 100 | 185.6 | +85.6% |
| Banner Corporation (BANR) | 100 | 174.6 | +74.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: INBK vs CFFN vs WAFD vs HOMB vs BANR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
INBK plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
CFFN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 10.0%, EPS growth 79.3%
- 10.0% NII/revenue growth vs INBK's -3.2%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BANR's 0.5% (lower = leaner)
- 4.4% yield, vs HOMB's 2.8%
WAFD lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
HOMB is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 3.8% vs CFFN's 1.8%
BANR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.80, yield 3.0%
- 101.1% 10Y total return vs WAFD's 84.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, Low D/E 19.1%, current ratio 0.02x
- PEG 0.90 vs CFFN's 5.80
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.0% NII/revenue growth vs INBK's -3.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.5x vs 10.8x), PEG 0.90 vs 3.55 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BANR's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.80 vs INBK's 1.01, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.4% yield, vs HOMB's 2.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.6% vs HOMB's -1.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs BANR's 0.5% |
INBK vs CFFN vs WAFD vs HOMB vs BANR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
INBK vs CFFN vs WAFD vs HOMB vs BANR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
INBK leads in 2 of 6 categories
CFFN leads 0 • WAFD leads 0 • HOMB leads 0 • BANR leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — HOMB and BANR each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOMB is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 4.5x INBK's $323M. HOMB is the more profitable business, keeping 27.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to INBK's -10.9%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $323M | $417M | $1.4B | $1.5B | $819M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$46M | $97M | $277M | $601M | $253M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$35M | $73M | $243M | $458M | $195M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | $61M | $226M | $354M | $248M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +13.7% | +47.3% | +50.9% | +65.6% | +79.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -15.8% | +19.9% | +20.5% | +36.0% | +29.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -10.9% | +16.3% | +16.0% | +27.7% | +23.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +11.9% | +11.9% | +14.8% | +29.1% | +30.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -27.7% | +33.3% | +46.3% | +26.0% | +11.2% |
Valuation Metrics
INBK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.6x trailing earnings, BANR trades at a 23% valuation discount to CFFN's 15.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BANR offers better value at 1.00x vs CFFN's 7.36x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $222M | $1.0B | $2.7B | $5.3B | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $121M | $2.7B | $3.9B | $5.6B | $2.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.33x | 15.04x | 13.56x | 13.36x | 11.63x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.38x | 11.85x | 10.93x | 10.82x | 10.47x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 7.36x | 4.41x | 4.39x | 1.00x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 29.91x | 12.98x | 10.12x | 9.55x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.69x | 2.43x | 1.93x | 3.64x | 2.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.62x | 0.97x | 0.94x | 1.36x | 1.16x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 5.81x | 20.37x | 13.09x | 12.53x | 8.96x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — HOMB and BANR each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HOMB delivers a 10.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-9 for INBK. BANR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CFFN's 1.86x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CFFN scores 7/9 vs INBK's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -9.4% | +7.0% | +8.0% | +10.9% | +10.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.6% | +0.7% | +1.0% | +2.0% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.1% | +2.0% | +3.9% | +7.2% | +7.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -6.6% | +2.5% | +5.7% | +9.8% | +10.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.99x | 1.86x | 0.60x | 0.30x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$102M | $1.7B | $1.2B | $292M | $190M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $457M | $252M | $657M | $910M | $183M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $355M | $2.0B | $1.8B | $1.2B | $373M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.25x | 0.41x | 0.48x | 1.44x | 1.11x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INBK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BANR five years ago would be worth $12,958 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,745 for INBK. Over the past 12 months, CFFN leads with a +44.6% total return vs HOMB's -1.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INBK at 33.9% vs HOMB's 12.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +25.2% | +20.0% | +11.9% | -3.0% | +6.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.3% | +44.6% | +28.5% | -1.9% | +9.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +139.9% | +60.9% | +51.6% | +42.0% | +60.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.6% | -18.6% | +22.5% | +6.6% | +29.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.5% | +12.0% | +84.4% | +58.2% | +101.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +33.9% | +17.2% | +14.9% | +12.4% | +17.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WAFD and BANR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BANR is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than INBK's 1.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WAFD currently trades 98.8% from its 52-week high vs HOMB's 87.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.01x | 1.01x | 0.81x | 0.82x | 0.80x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $28.51 | $7.96 | $36.12 | $30.83 | $69.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.05 | $5.51 | $26.31 | $25.68 | $57.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.5% | +98.2% | +98.8% | +87.1% | +93.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.8 | 60.7 | 68.3 | 50.3 | 58.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 59K | 926K | 661K | 1.4M | 292K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CFFN and HOMB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: INBK as "Hold", CFFN as "Hold", WAFD as "Hold", HOMB as "Hold", BANR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 19.1% upside for HOMB (target: $32) vs -10.5% for CFFN (target: $7). For income investors, CFFN offers the higher dividend yield at 4.35% vs INBK's 0.94%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $26.50 | $7.00 | $35.00 | $32.00 | $70.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 5 | 11 | 19 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.9% | +4.4% | +3.0% | +2.8% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 7 | 21 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.24 | $0.34 | $1.05 | $0.75 | $1.96 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +0.4% | +3.7% | +1.6% | +1.6% |
INBK leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Total Returns. 4 categories are tied.
INBK vs CFFN vs WAFD vs HOMB vs BANR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is INBK or CFFN or WAFD or HOMB or BANR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Capitol Federal Financial, Inc.
(CFFN) is the stronger pick with 10. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 2% for First Internet Bancorp (INBK). Banner Corporation (BANR) offers the better valuation at 11. 6x trailing P/E (10. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First Internet Bancorp (INBK) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — INBK or CFFN or WAFD or HOMB or BANR?
On trailing P/E, Banner Corporation (BANR) is the cheapest at 11.
6x versus Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. at 15. 0x. On forward P/E, Banner Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Banner Corporation wins at 0. 90x versus Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. 's 5. 80x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — INBK or CFFN or WAFD or HOMB or BANR?
Over the past 5 years, Banner Corporation (BANR) delivered a total return of +29.
6%, compared to -22. 6% for First Internet Bancorp (INBK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BANR returned +101. 1% versus CFFN's +12. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — INBK or CFFN or WAFD or HOMB or BANR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Banner Corporation (BANR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
80β versus First Internet Bancorp's 1. 01β — meaning INBK is approximately 27% more volatile than BANR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Banner Corporation (BANR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 186% for Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — INBK or CFFN or WAFD or HOMB or BANR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Capitol Federal Financial, Inc.
(CFFN) is pulling ahead at 10. 0% versus -3. 2% for First Internet Bancorp (INBK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. grew EPS 79. 3% year-over-year, compared to -239. 9% for First Internet Bancorp. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — INBK or CFFN or WAFD or HOMB or BANR?
Home Bancshares, Inc.
(HOMB) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 7% net margin versus -10. 9% for First Internet Bancorp — meaning it keeps 27. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOMB leads at 36. 0% versus -15. 8% for INBK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BANR leads at 79. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is INBK or CFFN or WAFD or HOMB or BANR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Banner Corporation (BANR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 90x versus Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. 's 5. 80x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Banner Corporation (BANR) trades at 10. 5x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. — 1. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HOMB: 19. 1% to $32. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — INBK or CFFN or WAFD or HOMB or BANR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Capitol Federal Financial, Inc. (CFFN) offers the highest yield at 4. 4%, versus 0. 9% for First Internet Bancorp (INBK).
09Is INBK or CFFN or WAFD or HOMB or BANR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Banner Corporation (BANR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
80), 3. 0% yield, +101. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BANR: +101. 1%, INBK: +15. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between INBK and CFFN and WAFD and HOMB and BANR?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: INBK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CFFN is a small-cap deep-value stock; WAFD is a small-cap deep-value stock; HOMB is a small-cap deep-value stock; BANR is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.