REIT - Specialty
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
IRM vs EXR vs PSA vs CUBE vs NSA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Industrial
REIT - Industrial
IRM vs EXR vs PSA vs CUBE vs NSA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Specialty | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial | REIT - Industrial |
| Market Cap | $39.29B | $30.38B | $54.24B | $9.18B | $3.34B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7.25B | $3.38B | $4.86B | $1.13B | $750M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $272M | $974M | $1.90B | $327M | $89M |
| Gross Margin | 55.0% | 28.4% | 60.6% | 5.8% | 28.4% |
| Operating Margin | 18.0% | 44.1% | 50.8% | 29.5% | 31.9% |
| Forward P/E | 58.6x | 30.9x | 32.4x | 28.4x | 82.4x |
| Total Debt | $19.05B | $14.97B | $10.25B | $3.53B | $3.43B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $159M | $139M | $318M | $6M | $24M |
IRM vs EXR vs PSA vs CUBE vs NSA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Iron Mountain Incor… (IRM) | 100 | 512.7 | +412.7% |
| Extra Space Storage… (EXR) | 100 | 148.7 | +48.7% |
| Public Storage (PSA) | 100 | 152.4 | +52.4% |
| CubeSmart (CUBE) | 100 | 141.5 | +41.5% |
| National Storage Af… (NSA) | 100 | 144.5 | +44.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: IRM vs EXR vs PSA vs CUBE vs NSA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
IRM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 12.2%, EPS growth -19.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.6%
- 314.2% 10Y total return vs NSA's 182.3%
- 12.2% FFO/revenue growth vs NSA's -2.3%
- +39.7% vs CUBE's +0.9%
EXR is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, current ratio 1.28x
- Beta 0.52, yield 4.5%, current ratio 1.28x
PSA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and stability.
- 39.2% margin vs IRM's 3.8%
- Beta 0.51 vs IRM's 1.10
- 9.4% ROA vs IRM's 1.3%, ROIC 8.9% vs 6.2%
CUBE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 5.2%
- PEG 2.49 vs NSA's 14.40
- Lower P/E (28.4x vs 32.4x), PEG 2.49 vs 4.34
NSA is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 5.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs CUBE's 5.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.2% FFO/revenue growth vs NSA's -2.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (28.4x vs 32.4x), PEG 2.49 vs 4.34 | |
| Quality / Margins | 39.2% margin vs IRM's 3.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.51 vs IRM's 1.10 | |
| Dividends | 5.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs CUBE's 5.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.7% vs CUBE's +0.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.4% ROA vs IRM's 1.3%, ROIC 8.9% vs 6.2% |
IRM vs EXR vs PSA vs CUBE vs NSA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
IRM vs EXR vs PSA vs CUBE vs NSA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PSA leads in 3 of 6 categories
IRM leads 1 • EXR leads 0 • CUBE leads 0 • NSA leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PSA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IRM is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.2B annually — 9.7x NSA's $750M. PSA is the more profitable business, keeping 39.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to IRM's 3.8%. On growth, IRM holds the edge at +21.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7.2B | $3.4B | $4.9B | $1.1B | $750M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.3B | $2.2B | $3.6B | $597M | $427M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $272M | $974M | $1.9B | $327M | $89M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$625M | $1.8B | $3.1B | $611M | $297M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.0% | +28.4% | +60.6% | +5.8% | +28.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.0% | +44.1% | +50.8% | +29.5% | +31.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.8% | +28.8% | +39.2% | +28.9% | +11.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.6% | +54.6% | +63.1% | +54.0% | +39.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.6% | +9.3% | +2.9% | +3.3% | -1.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.9% | +4.8% | +33.1% | -7.7% | +60.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — CUBE and NSA each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 27.6x trailing earnings, CUBE trades at a 90% valuation discount to IRM's 269.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), CUBE offers better value at 2.41x vs NSA's 10.83x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $39.3B | $30.4B | $54.2B | $9.2B | $3.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $58.2B | $45.2B | $64.2B | $12.7B | $6.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 269.51x | 31.34x | 34.29x | 27.59x | 61.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 58.61x | 30.94x | 32.36x | 28.44x | 82.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 7.21x | 4.60x | 2.41x | 10.83x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 23.94x | 20.51x | 18.84x | 17.98x | 14.42x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.69x | 8.99x | 11.24x | 8.18x | 4.44x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.13x | 5.82x | 3.32x | 2.17x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 16.61x | 18.72x | 16.20x | 11.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PSA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PSA delivers a 20.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $6 for NSA. EXR carries lower financial leverage with a 1.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NSA's 2.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EXR scores 5/9 vs CUBE's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +6.7% | +20.3% | +11.7% | +5.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.3% | +3.3% | +9.4% | +4.9% | +1.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.2% | +3.9% | +8.9% | +5.5% | +4.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.2% | +5.4% | +11.6% | +7.3% | +5.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.05x | 1.10x | 1.27x | 2.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $18.9B | $14.8B | $9.9B | $3.5B | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $159M | $139M | $318M | $6M | $24M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19.1B | $15.0B | $10.3B | $3.5B | $3.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.28x | 2.68x | 6.88x | 3.90x | 1.73x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IRM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IRM five years ago would be worth $34,991 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,856 for CUBE. Over the past 12 months, IRM leads with a +39.7% total return vs CUBE's +0.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IRM at 36.0% vs CUBE's 0.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +59.7% | +11.1% | +20.7% | +16.8% | +57.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +39.7% | +2.1% | +7.7% | +0.9% | +26.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +151.5% | +4.0% | +16.0% | +0.1% | +32.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +249.9% | +19.8% | +36.3% | +18.6% | +20.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +314.2% | +107.1% | +57.5% | +75.0% | +182.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +36.0% | +1.3% | +5.1% | +0.0% | +9.7% |
Risk & Volatility
PSA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PSA is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than IRM's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PSA currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs CUBE's 91.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.10x | 0.52x | 0.51x | 0.53x | 0.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $134.09 | $155.19 | $313.51 | $44.13 | $44.02 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $77.77 | $125.71 | $256.54 | $35.09 | $27.43 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.5% | +92.7% | +98.6% | +91.3% | +98.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 77.9 | 49.0 | 51.6 | 50.7 | 55.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 1.1M | 1.1M | 2.2M | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CUBE and NSA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: IRM as "Buy", EXR as "Hold", PSA as "Hold", CUBE as "Hold", NSA as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 3.7% upside for EXR (target: $149) vs -23.1% for NSA (target: $33). For income investors, NSA offers the higher dividend yield at 5.26% vs IRM's 2.34%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $132.33 | $149.13 | $304.82 | $41.50 | $33.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 20 | 28 | 36 | 29 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.3% | +4.5% | +4.2% | +5.2% | +5.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.09 | $6.49 | $13.09 | $2.08 | $2.28 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.5% | 0.0% | +0.4% | 0.0% |
PSA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IRM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
IRM vs EXR vs PSA vs CUBE vs NSA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is IRM or EXR or PSA or CUBE or NSA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) is the stronger pick with 12.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 3% for National Storage Affiliates Trust (NSA). CubeSmart (CUBE) offers the better valuation at 27. 6x trailing P/E (28. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — IRM or EXR or PSA or CUBE or NSA?
On trailing P/E, CubeSmart (CUBE) is the cheapest at 27.
6x versus Iron Mountain Incorporated at 269. 5x. On forward P/E, CubeSmart is actually cheaper at 28. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: CubeSmart wins at 2. 49x versus National Storage Affiliates Trust's 14. 40x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — IRM or EXR or PSA or CUBE or NSA?
Over the past 5 years, Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) delivered a total return of +249.
9%, compared to +18. 6% for CubeSmart (CUBE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IRM returned +314. 2% versus PSA's +57. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — IRM or EXR or PSA or CUBE or NSA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Public Storage (PSA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
51β versus Iron Mountain Incorporated's 1. 10β — meaning IRM is approximately 115% more volatile than PSA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Extra Space Storage Inc. (EXR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 105% versus 2% for National Storage Affiliates Trust — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — IRM or EXR or PSA or CUBE or NSA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM) is pulling ahead at 12.
2% versus -2. 3% for National Storage Affiliates Trust (NSA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Extra Space Storage Inc. grew EPS 13. 9% year-over-year, compared to -40. 7% for National Storage Affiliates Trust. Over a 3-year CAGR, EXR leads at 19. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — IRM or EXR or PSA or CUBE or NSA?
Public Storage (PSA) is the more profitable company, earning 37.
0% net margin versus 2. 1% for Iron Mountain Incorporated — meaning it keeps 37. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PSA leads at 46. 7% versus 20. 4% for IRM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NSA leads at 46. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is IRM or EXR or PSA or CUBE or NSA more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, CubeSmart (CUBE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 49x versus National Storage Affiliates Trust's 14. 40x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, CubeSmart (CUBE) trades at 28. 4x forward P/E versus 82. 4x for National Storage Affiliates Trust — 54. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EXR: 3. 7% to $149. 13.
08Which pays a better dividend — IRM or EXR or PSA or CUBE or NSA?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
National Storage Affiliates Trust (NSA) offers the highest yield at 5. 3%, versus 2. 3% for Iron Mountain Incorporated (IRM).
09Is IRM or EXR or PSA or CUBE or NSA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Extra Space Storage Inc.
(EXR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 52), 4. 5% yield, +107. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EXR: +107. 1%, IRM: +314. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between IRM and EXR and PSA and CUBE and NSA?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: IRM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; EXR is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; PSA is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; CUBE is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NSA is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.