Leisure
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
ISPO vs ABNB vs BKNG vs SOND
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Travel Services
Travel Services
Travel Lodging
ISPO vs ABNB vs BKNG vs SOND — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Leisure | Travel Services | Travel Services | Travel Lodging |
| Market Cap | $54M | $84.21B | $132.72B | $3K |
| Revenue (TTM) | $248M | $12.65B | $27.69B | $589M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-10M | $2.52B | $6.15B | $-249M |
| Gross Margin | 33.2% | 82.9% | 100.0% | 37.9% |
| Operating Margin | -3.0% | 20.5% | 34.3% | -22.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 28.3x | 16.3x | — |
| Total Debt | $206M | $2.07B | $19.29B | $1.40B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $35M | $6.56B | $17.20B | $21M |
ISPO vs ABNB vs BKNG vs SOND — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | Feb 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inspirato Incorpora… (ISPO) | 100 | 2.2 | -97.8% |
| Airbnb, Inc. (ABNB) | 100 | 68.8 | -31.2% |
| Booking Holdings In… (BKNG) | 100 | 214.7 | +114.7% |
| Sonder Holdings Inc. (SOND) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ISPO vs ABNB vs BKNG vs SOND
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ISPO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.06
- Lower volatility, beta 0.06, current ratio 0.28x
- Beta 0.06 vs ABNB's 1.33
- +29.1% vs SOND's -100.0%
ABNB plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
BKNG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 13.4%, EPS growth -4.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.3%
- 250.7% 10Y total return vs ABNB's -2.9%
- Beta 0.74, yield 0.9%, current ratio 1.33x
- 13.4% revenue growth vs ISPO's -15.0%
SOND lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.4% revenue growth vs ISPO's -15.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.2% margin vs SOND's -42.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs ABNB's 1.33 | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +29.1% vs SOND's -100.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.1% ROA vs SOND's -24.8% |
ISPO vs ABNB vs BKNG vs SOND — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ISPO vs ABNB vs BKNG vs SOND — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BKNG leads in 3 of 6 categories
ISPO leads 0 • ABNB leads 0 • SOND leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKNG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BKNG is the larger business by revenue, generating $27.7B annually — 111.8x ISPO's $248M. BKNG is the more profitable business, keeping 22.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SOND's -42.3%. On growth, ABNB holds the edge at +17.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $248M | $12.6B | $27.7B | $589M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $42M | $2.6B | $10.2B | $25M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$10M | $2.5B | $6.2B | -$249M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$4M | $4.5B | $9.0B | -$84M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.2% | +82.9% | +100.0% | +37.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.0% | +20.5% | +34.3% | -22.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.2% | +19.9% | +22.2% | -42.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.7% | +36.0% | +32.6% | -14.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -19.6% | +17.9% | +16.2% | -10.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -162.1% | +4.0% | +2.4% | -2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — ISPO and BKNG each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 25.9x trailing earnings, BKNG trades at a 26% valuation discount to ABNB's 34.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ISPO's 3.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SOND's 252.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $54M | $84.2B | $132.7B | $2,662 |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $225M | $79.7B | $134.8B | $1.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.68x | 34.85x | 25.87x | 0.00x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 28.35x | 16.32x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.16x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.59x | 31.33x | 13.41x | 252.91x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.19x | 6.88x | 4.93x | 0.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 10.67x | — | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 18.12x | 14.61x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BKNG leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ABNB scores 6/9 vs SOND's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +31.2% | — | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.6% | +10.2% | +21.1% | -24.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.7% | +50.6% | — | -12.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.4% | +26.3% | +75.4% | -20.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.25x | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $171M | -$4.5B | $2.1B | $1.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $35M | $6.6B | $17.2B | $21M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $206M | $2.1B | $19.3B | $1.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.09x | — | 7.21x | -7.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BKNG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BKNG five years ago would be worth $18,762 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for SOND. Over the past 12 months, ISPO leads with a +29.1% total return vs SOND's -100.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BKNG at 18.3% vs SOND's -97.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.9% | +5.6% | -19.4% | -98.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +29.1% | +14.1% | -16.8% | -100.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -71.1% | +11.8% | +65.4% | -100.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.9% | -7.1% | +87.6% | -100.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.9% | -2.9% | +250.7% | -100.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -33.9% | +3.8% | +18.3% | -97.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — ABNB and SOND each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SOND is the less volatile stock with a -0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ABNB's 1.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ABNB currently trades 95.4% from its 52-week high vs SOND's 0.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.06x | 1.33x | 0.74x | -0.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.90 | $147.25 | $5129.83 | $3.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.19 | $110.81 | $150.62 | $0.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.9% | +95.4% | +3.3% | +0.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 81.0 | 56.2 | 42.4 | 25.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 3.5M | 8.7M | 10K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ISPO and BKNG each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ABNB as "Hold", BKNG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 35.3% upside for BKNG (target: $232) vs 3.5% for ABNB (target: $145). BKNG is the only dividend payer here at 0.89% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $145.44 | $231.72 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 44 | 71 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.53 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +4.5% | +4.9% | 0.0% |
BKNG leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
ISPO vs ABNB vs BKNG vs SOND: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ISPO or ABNB or BKNG or SOND a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) is the stronger pick with 13. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 0% for Inspirato Incorporated (ISPO). Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) offers the better valuation at 25. 9x trailing P/E (16. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) a "Buy" — based on 71 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ISPO or ABNB or BKNG or SOND?
On trailing P/E, Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) is the cheapest at 25. 9x versus Airbnb, Inc. at 34. 9x. On forward P/E, Booking Holdings Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ISPO or ABNB or BKNG or SOND?
Over the past 5 years, Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) delivered a total return of +87. 6%, compared to -100. 0% for Sonder Holdings Inc. (SOND). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BKNG returned +250. 7% versus SOND's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ISPO or ABNB or BKNG or SOND?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sonder Holdings Inc.
(SOND) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 42β versus Airbnb, Inc. 's 1. 33β — meaning ABNB is approximately -420% more volatile than SOND relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — ISPO or ABNB or BKNG or SOND?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) is pulling ahead at 13. 4% versus -15. 0% for Inspirato Incorporated (ISPO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Inspirato Incorporated grew EPS 94. 1% year-over-year, compared to -4. 2% for Booking Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SOND leads at 38. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ISPO or ABNB or BKNG or SOND?
Airbnb, Inc.
(ABNB) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 5% net margin versus -36. 1% for Sonder Holdings Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BKNG leads at 34. 5% versus -29. 4% for SOND. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BKNG leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ISPO or ABNB or BKNG or SOND more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Booking Holdings Inc.
(BKNG) trades at 16. 3x forward P/E versus 28. 3x for Airbnb, Inc. — 12. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BKNG: 35. 3% to $231. 72.
08Which pays a better dividend — ISPO or ABNB or BKNG or SOND?
In this comparison, BKNG (0.
9% yield) pays a dividend. ISPO, ABNB, SOND do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ISPO or ABNB or BKNG or SOND better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sonder Holdings Inc.
(SOND) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 42)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SOND: -100. 0%, ABNB: -2. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ISPO and ABNB and BKNG and SOND?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
BKNG pays a dividend while ISPO, ABNB, SOND do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.