Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
JVA vs KDP vs SBUX vs FARM vs SMPL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic
Restaurants
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
JVA vs KDP vs SBUX vs FARM vs SMPL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Beverages - Non-Alcoholic | Restaurants | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods |
| Market Cap | $24M | $38.75B | $118.83B | $28M | $1.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $101M | $16.94B | $37.70B | $338M | $1.45B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $1.83B | $1.37B | $-19M | $91M |
| Gross Margin | 16.4% | 53.8% | 20.6% | 40.7% | 34.0% |
| Operating Margin | 2.9% | 21.3% | 9.0% | -1.8% | 14.4% |
| Forward P/E | 17.0x | 12.5x | 44.0x | — | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $8M | $16.14B | $26.61B | $53M | $304M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $702K | $1.03B | $3.22B | $7M | $98M |
JVA vs KDP vs SBUX vs FARM vs SMPL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coffee Holding Co.,… (JVA) | 100 | 151.6 | +51.6% |
| Keurig Dr Pepper In… (KDP) | 100 | 102.1 | +2.1% |
| Starbucks Corporati… (SBUX) | 100 | 133.7 | +33.7% |
| Farmer Bros. Co. (FARM) | 100 | 16.6 | -83.4% |
| The Simply Good Foo… (SMPL) | 100 | 73.0 | -27.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: JVA vs KDP vs SBUX vs FARM vs SMPL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
JVA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 22.6%, EPS growth -35.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.6%
- 22.6% revenue growth vs FARM's 0.3%
- +35.6% vs SMPL's -64.8%
- 4.5% ROA vs FARM's -11.7%, ROIC 5.3% vs -1.2%
KDP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.15, yield 3.2%
- 8.3% 10Y total return vs SBUX's 114.8%
- Beta 0.15, yield 3.2%, current ratio 0.64x
- 10.8% margin vs FARM's -5.5%
SBUX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, FARM doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
SMPL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.38, Low D/E 16.8%, current ratio 3.64x
- PEG 0.31 vs SBUX's 2.82
- Lower P/E (7.5x vs 44.0x), PEG 0.31 vs 2.82
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.6% revenue growth vs FARM's 0.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.5x vs 44.0x), PEG 0.31 vs 2.82 | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.8% margin vs FARM's -5.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.15 vs JVA's 1.23 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs SBUX's 2.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +35.6% vs SMPL's -64.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.5% ROA vs FARM's -11.7%, ROIC 5.3% vs -1.2% |
JVA vs KDP vs SBUX vs FARM vs SMPL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
JVA vs KDP vs SBUX vs FARM vs SMPL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
JVA leads in 2 of 6 categories
KDP leads 1 • FARM leads 1 • SBUX leads 0 • SMPL leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KDP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SBUX is the larger business by revenue, generating $37.7B annually — 374.9x JVA's $101M. KDP is the more profitable business, keeping 10.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FARM's -5.5%. On growth, JVA holds the edge at +20.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $101M | $16.9B | $37.7B | $338M | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4M | $3.9B | $5.1B | $5M | $231M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | $1.8B | $1.4B | -$19M | $91M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | $1.6B | $2.3B | -$3M | $174M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.4% | +53.8% | +20.6% | +40.7% | +34.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.9% | +21.3% | +9.0% | -1.8% | +14.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | +10.8% | +3.6% | -5.5% | +6.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | +9.3% | +6.2% | -0.8% | +12.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.0% | +9.4% | +5.4% | -1.2% | -0.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +45.0% | -47.4% | -62.3% | — | -31.6% |
Valuation Metrics
FARM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.2x trailing earnings, SMPL trades at a 81% valuation discount to SBUX's 64.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SMPL offers better value at 0.51x vs SBUX's 4.10x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $24M | $38.7B | $118.8B | $28M | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $32M | $53.9B | $142.2B | $75M | $1.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.04x | 18.64x | 63.96x | -1.88x | 12.20x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 12.53x | 44.00x | — | 7.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.78x | 4.10x | — | 0.51x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.80x | 12.24x | 27.01x | 7.48x | 5.97x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.25x | 2.33x | 3.20x | 0.08x | 0.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.88x | 1.52x | — | 0.63x | 0.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 25.75x | 48.66x | 4.32x | 7.86x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JVA leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KDP delivers a 7.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-48 for FARM. SMPL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FARM's 1.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KDP scores 7/9 vs JVA's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.8% | +7.0% | — | -47.6% | +5.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.5% | +3.1% | +4.2% | -11.7% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.3% | +6.7% | +17.7% | -1.2% | +8.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.6% | +7.9% | +16.2% | -1.5% | +9.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.30x | 0.63x | — | 1.23x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8M | $15.1B | $23.4B | $47M | $206M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $701,872 | $1.0B | $3.2B | $7M | $98M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8M | $16.1B | $26.6B | $53M | $304M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.97x | 3.68x | 6.03x | -1.88x | 6.77x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JVA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SBUX five years ago would be worth $10,075 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,379 for FARM. Over the past 12 months, JVA leads with a +35.6% total return vs SMPL's -64.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JVA at 38.0% vs SMPL's -31.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.7% | +4.5% | +24.9% | -13.5% | -36.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +35.6% | -13.5% | +29.0% | -28.9% | -64.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +163.0% | -5.1% | +3.8% | -52.2% | -67.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.7% | -10.6% | +0.8% | -86.2% | -64.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +17.0% | +833.4% | +114.8% | -95.8% | +3.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +38.0% | -1.7% | +1.3% | -21.8% | -31.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KDP and SBUX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KDP is the less volatile stock with a 0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JVA's 1.23 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SBUX currently trades 96.9% from its 52-week high vs SMPL's 33.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.23x | 0.15x | 0.99x | 0.79x | 0.38x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.63 | $35.94 | $107.55 | $2.48 | $36.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.93 | $24.88 | $77.99 | $1.21 | $10.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.7% | +79.4% | +96.9% | +51.6% | +33.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.6 | 57.9 | 69.1 | 52.1 | 42.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 126K | 10.9M | 7.7M | 283K | 2.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KDP and SBUX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KDP as "Buy", SBUX as "Hold", SMPL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 62.1% upside for SMPL (target: $20) vs 4.0% for SBUX (target: $108). For income investors, KDP offers the higher dividend yield at 3.22% vs SBUX's 2.33%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $32.33 | $108.38 | — | $20.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 28 | 59 | — | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.2% | +2.3% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 7 | 16 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.92 | $2.43 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.1% |
JVA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). KDP leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
JVA vs KDP vs SBUX vs FARM vs SMPL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is JVA or KDP or SBUX or FARM or SMPL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Coffee Holding Co.
, Inc. (JVA) is the stronger pick with 22. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 3% for Farmer Bros. Co. (FARM). The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) offers the better valuation at 12. 2x trailing P/E (7. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. (KDP) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — JVA or KDP or SBUX or FARM or SMPL?
On trailing P/E, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the cheapest at 12.
2x versus Starbucks Corporation at 64. 0x. On forward P/E, The Simply Good Foods Company is actually cheaper at 7. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Simply Good Foods Company wins at 0. 31x versus Starbucks Corporation's 2. 82x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — JVA or KDP or SBUX or FARM or SMPL?
Over the past 5 years, Starbucks Corporation (SBUX) delivered a total return of +0.
8%, compared to -86. 2% for Farmer Bros. Co. (FARM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KDP returned +833. 4% versus FARM's -95. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — JVA or KDP or SBUX or FARM or SMPL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.
(KDP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 15β versus Coffee Holding Co. , Inc. 's 1. 23β — meaning JVA is approximately 698% more volatile than KDP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 123% for Farmer Bros. Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — JVA or KDP or SBUX or FARM or SMPL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Coffee Holding Co.
, Inc. (JVA) is pulling ahead at 22. 6% versus 0. 3% for Farmer Bros. Co. (FARM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. grew EPS 45. 7% year-over-year, compared to -257. 9% for Farmer Bros. Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, JVA leads at 13. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — JVA or KDP or SBUX or FARM or SMPL?
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.
(KDP) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 5% net margin versus -4. 2% for Farmer Bros. Co. — meaning it keeps 12. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KDP leads at 22. 0% versus -0. 4% for FARM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KDP leads at 52. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is JVA or KDP or SBUX or FARM or SMPL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 31x versus Starbucks Corporation's 2. 82x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) trades at 7. 5x forward P/E versus 44. 0x for Starbucks Corporation — 36. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SMPL: 62. 1% to $20. 17.
08Which pays a better dividend — JVA or KDP or SBUX or FARM or SMPL?
In this comparison, KDP (3.
2% yield), SBUX (2. 3% yield) pay a dividend. JVA, FARM, SMPL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is JVA or KDP or SBUX or FARM or SMPL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc.
(KDP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 15), 3. 2% yield, +833. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KDP: +833. 4%, JVA: +17. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between JVA and KDP and SBUX and FARM and SMPL?
These companies operate in different sectors (JVA (Consumer Defensive) and KDP (Consumer Defensive) and SBUX (Consumer Cyclical) and FARM (Consumer Defensive) and SMPL (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: JVA is a small-cap high-growth stock; KDP is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; SBUX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; FARM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SMPL is a small-cap deep-value stock. KDP, SBUX pay a dividend while JVA, FARM, SMPL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.