Auto - Dealerships
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
KFS vs HRTG vs PLMR vs NODK vs ACGL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Diversified
KFS vs HRTG vs PLMR vs NODK vs ACGL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Auto - Dealerships | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $338M | $688M | $3.01B | $263M | $33.42B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $147M | $776M | $978M | $-12M | $19.93B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-10M | $202M | $197M | $-4M | $4.40B |
| Gross Margin | 85.3% | 35.6% | 60.6% | 29.6% | 37.2% |
| Operating Margin | -4.5% | 34.8% | 25.9% | -4.3% | 25.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 4.9x | 11.8x | — | 10.0x |
| Total Debt | $78M | $100M | $7M | $1M | $2.73B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $16M | $559M | $107M | $52M | $993M |
KFS vs HRTG vs PLMR vs NODK vs ACGL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kingsway Financial … (KFS) | 100 | 529.1 | +429.1% |
| Heritage Insurance … (HRTG) | 100 | 178.7 | +78.7% |
| Palomar Holdings, I… (PLMR) | 100 | 152.3 | +52.3% |
| NI Holdings, Inc. (NODK) | 100 | 85.5 | -14.5% |
| Arch Capital Group … (ACGL) | 100 | 332.4 | +232.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KFS vs HRTG vs PLMR vs NODK vs ACGL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KFS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.12, yield 0.3%
- Beta 1.12, yield 0.3%, current ratio 790.93x
- 0.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs ACGL's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
- +32.7% vs PLMR's -29.2%
HRTG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.06 vs ACGL's 0.35
- Lower P/E (4.9x vs 10.0x), PEG 0.06 vs 0.35
- 26.0% margin vs KFS's -7.0%
- 8.8% ROA vs KFS's -4.5%, ROIC 15.4% vs -12.4%
PLMR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 58.2%, EPS growth 60.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.18, Low D/E 0.8%
- 58.2% revenue growth vs NODK's -12.3%
- Beta 0.18 vs KFS's 1.12, lower leverage
NODK lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
ACGL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 321.0% 10Y total return vs PLMR's 496.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 58.2% revenue growth vs NODK's -12.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.9x vs 10.0x), PEG 0.06 vs 0.35 | |
| Quality / Margins | 26.0% margin vs KFS's -7.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.18 vs KFS's 1.12, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs ACGL's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.7% vs PLMR's -29.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.8% ROA vs KFS's -4.5%, ROIC 15.4% vs -12.4% |
KFS vs HRTG vs PLMR vs NODK vs ACGL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
KFS vs HRTG vs PLMR vs NODK vs ACGL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HRTG leads in 3 of 6 categories
ACGL leads 1 • KFS leads 1 • PLMR leads 0 • NODK leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — HRTG and PLMR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACGL and NODK operate at a comparable scale, with $19.9B and -$12M in trailing revenue. HRTG is the more profitable business, keeping 26.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KFS's -7.0%. On growth, PLMR holds the edge at +59.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $147M | $776M | $978M | -$12M | $19.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $817,000 | $280M | $267M | -$4M | $5.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$10M | $202M | $197M | -$4M | $4.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$346,000 | $203M | $318M | -$27M | $6.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +85.3% | +35.6% | +60.6% | +29.6% | +37.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.5% | +34.8% | +25.9% | -4.3% | +25.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.0% | +26.0% | +20.2% | -3.7% | +22.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.2% | +26.1% | +32.6% | -5.4% | +30.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +35.9% | +0.5% | +59.7% | -16.6% | +7.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +23.1% | +20.2% | 0.0% | +93.5% | +39.0% |
Valuation Metrics
HRTG leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.5x trailing earnings, HRTG trades at a 78% valuation discount to PLMR's 15.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HRTG offers better value at 0.04x vs ACGL's 0.28x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $338M | $688M | $3.0B | $263M | $33.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $400M | $229M | $2.9B | $213M | $35.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -27.44x | 3.55x | 15.81x | -25.62x | 8.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 4.85x | 11.76x | — | 10.04x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.04x | 0.16x | — | 0.28x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 0.84x | 11.08x | — | 6.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.47x | 0.81x | 3.43x | 0.92x | 1.68x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.55x | 1.37x | 3.31x | 1.12x | 1.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 3.95x | 7.48x | — | 5.45x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HRTG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HRTG delivers a 43.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $44 in annual profit, vs $-34 for KFS. NODK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KFS's 2.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HRTG scores 7/9 vs KFS's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -34.4% | +43.7% | +21.7% | -1.8% | +19.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.5% | +8.8% | +6.8% | -0.9% | +5.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -12.4% | +15.4% | +25.5% | -4.8% | +15.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -6.7% | +38.8% | +11.3% | -9.5% | +11.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.27x | 0.20x | 0.01x | 0.01x | 0.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $62M | -$459M | -$100M | -$50M | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $16M | $559M | $107M | $52M | $993M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $78M | $100M | $7M | $1M | $2.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.83x | 31.04x | 74.08x | — | 34.86x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HRTG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HRTG five years ago would be worth $24,956 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,861 for NODK. Over the past 12 months, KFS leads with a +32.7% total return vs PLMR's -29.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HRTG at 76.3% vs NODK's -1.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | 0.0% | -17.9% | -14.0% | -3.5% | -0.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +32.7% | -12.7% | -29.2% | +5.1% | -0.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +33.8% | +447.9% | +123.6% | -3.5% | +29.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +134.6% | +149.6% | +71.4% | -31.4% | +147.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +156.5% | +77.6% | +496.9% | -13.2% | +321.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +10.2% | +76.3% | +30.8% | -1.2% | +9.1% |
Risk & Volatility
ACGL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ACGL is the less volatile stock with a -0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KFS's 1.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ACGL currently trades 90.7% from its 52-week high vs PLMR's 64.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.12x | 0.33x | 0.18x | 0.53x | -0.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.80 | $31.98 | $175.85 | $14.70 | $103.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.82 | $16.83 | $107.75 | $12.01 | $82.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +70.2% | +70.1% | +64.5% | +87.1% | +90.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.0 | 50.3 | 34.6 | 48.2 | 45.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 83K | 309K | 234K | 17K | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
KFS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: HRTG as "Buy", PLMR as "Buy", ACGL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 74.0% upside for HRTG (target: $39) vs -2.7% for PLMR (target: $110). KFS is the only dividend payer here at 0.31% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $39.00 | $110.25 | — | $104.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 | 11 | — | 34 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.3% | — | — | — | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.04 | — | — | — | $0.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +0.3% | +1.2% | +1.0% | +5.7% |
HRTG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). ACGL leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
KFS vs HRTG vs PLMR vs NODK vs ACGL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KFS or HRTG or PLMR or NODK or ACGL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Palomar Holdings, Inc.
(PLMR) is the stronger pick with 58. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 3% for NI Holdings, Inc. (NODK). Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG) offers the better valuation at 3. 5x trailing P/E (4. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KFS or HRTG or PLMR or NODK or ACGL?
On trailing P/E, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.
(HRTG) is the cheapest at 3. 5x versus Palomar Holdings, Inc. at 15. 8x. On forward P/E, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 4. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 06x versus Arch Capital Group Ltd. 's 0. 35x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KFS or HRTG or PLMR or NODK or ACGL?
Over the past 5 years, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.
(HRTG) delivered a total return of +149. 6%, compared to -31. 4% for NI Holdings, Inc. (NODK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLMR returned +496. 9% versus NODK's -13. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KFS or HRTG or PLMR or NODK or ACGL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 01β versus Kingsway Financial Services Inc. 's 1. 12β — meaning KFS is approximately -9824% more volatile than ACGL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NI Holdings, Inc. (NODK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 2% for Kingsway Financial Services Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KFS or HRTG or PLMR or NODK or ACGL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Palomar Holdings, Inc.
(PLMR) is pulling ahead at 58. 2% versus -12. 3% for NI Holdings, Inc. (NODK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 214. 4% year-over-year, compared to -308. 3% for NI Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PLMR leads at 38. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KFS or HRTG or PLMR or NODK or ACGL?
Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc.
(HRTG) is the more profitable company, earning 23. 1% net margin versus -7. 8% for Kingsway Financial Services Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HRTG leads at 30. 6% versus -10. 2% for KFS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KFS leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KFS or HRTG or PLMR or NODK or ACGL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 06x versus Arch Capital Group Ltd. 's 0. 35x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Heritage Insurance Holdings, Inc. (HRTG) trades at 4. 9x forward P/E versus 11. 8x for Palomar Holdings, Inc. — 6. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for HRTG: 74. 0% to $39. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — KFS or HRTG or PLMR or NODK or ACGL?
In this comparison, KFS (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. HRTG, PLMR, NODK, ACGL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is KFS or HRTG or PLMR or NODK or ACGL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 01), +321. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ACGL: +321. 0%, KFS: +156. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KFS and HRTG and PLMR and NODK and ACGL?
These companies operate in different sectors (KFS (Consumer Cyclical) and HRTG (Financial Services) and PLMR (Financial Services) and NODK (Financial Services) and ACGL (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: KFS is a small-cap high-growth stock; HRTG is a small-cap deep-value stock; PLMR is a small-cap high-growth stock; NODK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACGL is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.