Staffing & Employment Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
KFY vs TRU vs EFX vs MAN vs RHI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Consulting Services
Consulting Services
Staffing & Employment Services
Staffing & Employment Services
KFY vs TRU vs EFX vs MAN vs RHI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Staffing & Employment Services | Consulting Services | Consulting Services | Staffing & Employment Services | Staffing & Employment Services |
| Market Cap | $3.45B | $14.07B | $21.19B | $1.41B | $2.77B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.89B | $4.73B | $6.28B | $17.96B | $5.38B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $269M | $705M | $699M | $-13M | $133M |
| Gross Margin | 26.1% | 52.7% | 44.7% | 16.7% | 36.8% |
| Operating Margin | 13.2% | 18.1% | 18.3% | 0.8% | 1.4% |
| Forward P/E | 12.7x | 15.1x | 20.4x | 8.1x | 20.5x |
| Total Debt | $571M | $5.16B | $5.09B | $2.39B | $421M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.01B | $854M | $181M | $871M | $464M |
KFY vs TRU vs EFX vs MAN vs RHI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Korn Ferry (KFY) | 100 | 224.0 | +124.0% |
| TransUnion (TRU) | 100 | 83.4 | -16.6% |
| Equifax Inc. (EFX) | 100 | 114.5 | +14.5% |
| ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN) | 100 | 43.2 | -56.8% |
| Robert Half Interna… (RHI) | 100 | 53.3 | -46.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KFY vs TRU vs EFX vs MAN vs RHI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KFY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 169.9% 10Y total return vs TRU's 142.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.85, Low D/E 30.5%, current ratio 1.83x
- PEG 0.66 vs EFX's 4.39
- Beta 0.85, yield 2.4%, current ratio 1.83x
TRU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 9.4%, EPS growth 60.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.2%
- 9.4% revenue growth vs RHI's -7.2%
- 14.9% margin vs MAN's -0.1%
EFX lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, MAN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
RHI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 22 yrs, beta 0.99, yield 8.7%
- 8.7% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs KFY's 2.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.4% revenue growth vs RHI's -7.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.7x vs 20.4x), PEG 0.66 vs 4.39 | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.9% margin vs MAN's -0.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.85 vs TRU's 1.36, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 8.7% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs KFY's 2.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.3% vs EFX's -33.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.1% ROA vs MAN's -0.1%, ROIC 18.5% vs 5.6% |
KFY vs TRU vs EFX vs MAN vs RHI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
KFY vs TRU vs EFX vs MAN vs RHI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KFY leads in 3 of 6 categories
MAN leads 1 • RHI leads 1 • TRU leads 0 • EFX leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — TRU and EFX each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MAN is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.0B annually — 6.2x KFY's $2.9B. TRU is the more profitable business, keeping 14.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MAN's -0.1%. On growth, EFX holds the edge at +14.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.9B | $4.7B | $6.3B | $18.0B | $5.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $479M | $1.4B | $1.9B | $236M | $150M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $269M | $705M | $699M | -$13M | $133M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $288M | $697M | $1.1B | -$161M | $267M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.1% | +52.7% | +44.7% | +16.7% | +36.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | +18.1% | +18.3% | +0.8% | +1.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.3% | +14.9% | +11.1% | -0.1% | +2.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.0% | +14.7% | +18.1% | -0.9% | +5.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.2% | +13.7% | +14.3% | +7.1% | -5.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.8% | +172.0% | +34.0% | +36.2% | -39.6% |
Valuation Metrics
MAN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.6x trailing earnings, KFY trades at a 56% valuation discount to EFX's 33.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), KFY offers better value at 0.75x vs EFX's 7.11x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.5B | $14.1B | $21.2B | $1.4B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.0B | $18.4B | $26.1B | $2.9B | $2.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.58x | 31.44x | 33.01x | -104.90x | 20.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.73x | 15.08x | 20.40x | 8.12x | 20.48x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.75x | 5.91x | 7.11x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.07x | 12.83x | 14.38x | 9.02x | 21.57x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.25x | 3.08x | 3.49x | 0.08x | 0.52x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.89x | 3.16x | 4.60x | 0.69x | 2.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.44x | 21.27x | 18.68x | — | 10.39x |
Profitability & Efficiency
KFY leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRU delivers a 15.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-1 for MAN. KFY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.31x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MAN's 1.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TRU scores 8/9 vs MAN's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.9% | +15.1% | +14.2% | -0.6% | +10.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.1% | +6.2% | +5.9% | -0.1% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +18.5% | +7.3% | +8.5% | +5.6% | +4.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.3% | +8.6% | +11.2% | +6.2% | +5.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 1 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.31x | 1.13x | 1.07x | 1.16x | 0.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$436M | $4.3B | $4.9B | $1.5B | -$43M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.0B | $854M | $181M | $871M | $464M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $571M | $5.2B | $5.1B | $2.4B | $421M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 18.94x | 3.61x | 5.38x | 1.98x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KFY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KFY five years ago would be worth $10,810 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,514 for MAN. Over the past 12 months, KFY leads with a +7.3% total return vs EFX's -33.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KFY at 14.9% vs RHI's -20.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.9% | -12.3% | -17.7% | +1.2% | +2.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +7.3% | -13.9% | -33.2% | -17.0% | -31.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +51.8% | +13.9% | -9.9% | -46.4% | -49.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.1% | -29.3% | -23.2% | -64.9% | -58.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +169.9% | +142.0% | +58.3% | -30.8% | +10.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.9% | +4.4% | -3.4% | -18.8% | -20.4% |
Risk & Volatility
KFY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KFY is the less volatile stock with a 0.85 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TRU's 1.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KFY currently trades 85.5% from its 52-week high vs RHI's 56.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.81x | 1.36x | 0.86x | 0.89x | 0.91x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $78.50 | $99.39 | $281.03 | $47.34 | $48.54 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $58.95 | $65.23 | $166.02 | $25.15 | $21.84 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.5% | +73.4% | +62.5% | +64.3% | +56.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.2 | 47.2 | 42.0 | 47.1 | 49.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 508K | 2.3M | 1.6M | 1.1M | 2.9M |
Analyst Outlook
RHI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KFY as "Buy", TRU as "Buy", EFX as "Buy", MAN as "Hold", RHI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 48.4% upside for RHI (target: $41) vs 4.3% for KFY (target: $70). For income investors, RHI offers the higher dividend yield at 8.67% vs TRU's 0.63%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $70.00 | $94.88 | $227.60 | $37.86 | $40.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 11 | 26 | 34 | 29 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.4% | +0.6% | +1.1% | +4.7% | +8.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 22 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.58 | $0.46 | $1.88 | $1.43 | $2.37 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.6% | +2.4% | +4.4% | +2.7% | +3.3% |
KFY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). MAN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
KFY vs TRU vs EFX vs MAN vs RHI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KFY or TRU or EFX or MAN or RHI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TransUnion (TRU) is the stronger pick with 9.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 2% for Robert Half International Inc. (RHI). Korn Ferry (KFY) offers the better valuation at 14. 6x trailing P/E (12. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Korn Ferry (KFY) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KFY or TRU or EFX or MAN or RHI?
On trailing P/E, Korn Ferry (KFY) is the cheapest at 14.
6x versus Equifax Inc. at 33. 0x. On forward P/E, ManpowerGroup Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Korn Ferry wins at 0. 66x versus Equifax Inc. 's 4. 39x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KFY or TRU or EFX or MAN or RHI?
Over the past 5 years, Korn Ferry (KFY) delivered a total return of +8.
1%, compared to -64. 9% for ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KFY returned +172. 4% versus MAN's -31. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KFY or TRU or EFX or MAN or RHI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Korn Ferry (KFY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
81β versus TransUnion's 1. 36β — meaning TRU is approximately 69% more volatile than KFY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Korn Ferry (KFY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 31% versus 116% for ManpowerGroup Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KFY or TRU or EFX or MAN or RHI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TransUnion (TRU) is pulling ahead at 9.
4% versus -7. 2% for Robert Half International Inc. (RHI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TransUnion grew EPS 60. 0% year-over-year, compared to -109. 6% for ManpowerGroup Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TRU leads at 7. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KFY or TRU or EFX or MAN or RHI?
Equifax Inc.
(EFX) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 9% net margin versus -0. 1% for ManpowerGroup Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRU leads at 18. 7% versus 1. 3% for MAN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRU leads at 59. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KFY or TRU or EFX or MAN or RHI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Korn Ferry (KFY) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 66x versus Equifax Inc. 's 4. 39x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ManpowerGroup Inc. (MAN) trades at 8. 1x forward P/E versus 20. 5x for Robert Half International Inc. — 12. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RHI: 48. 4% to $40. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — KFY or TRU or EFX or MAN or RHI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Robert Half International Inc. (RHI) offers the highest yield at 8. 7%, versus 0. 6% for TransUnion (TRU).
09Is KFY or TRU or EFX or MAN or RHI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Korn Ferry (KFY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
81), 2. 4% yield, +172. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KFY: +172. 4%, TRU: +139. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KFY and TRU and EFX and MAN and RHI?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KFY is a small-cap deep-value stock; TRU is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; EFX is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MAN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; RHI is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.