Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
KRNY vs OCFC vs NBTB vs WSFS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
KRNY vs OCFC vs NBTB vs WSFS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $508M | $1.08B | $2.35B | $3.80B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $344M | $656M | $867M | $1.36B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $32M | $71M | $169M | $287M |
| Gross Margin | 44.1% | 54.5% | 72.1% | 74.7% |
| Operating Margin | 9.0% | 14.1% | 25.3% | 28.0% |
| Forward P/E | 12.9x | 9.9x | 10.8x | 11.8x |
| Total Debt | $1.26B | $1.63B | $327M | $303M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $167M | $135M | $185M | $1.33B |
KRNY vs OCFC vs NBTB vs WSFS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kearny Financial Co… (KRNY) | 100 | 94.3 | -5.7% |
| OceanFirst Financia… (OCFC) | 100 | 113.1 | +13.1% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 143.9 | +43.9% |
| WSFS Financial Corp… (WSFS) | 100 | 260.4 | +160.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KRNY vs OCFC vs NBTB vs WSFS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KRNY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 5.5%
- Rev growth 5.1%, EPS growth 130.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.83, current ratio 1.20x
- Beta 0.83, yield 5.5%, current ratio 1.20x
OCFC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value is your priority.
- Lower P/E (9.9x vs 12.9x)
NBTB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs OCFC's -4.7%
WSFS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 129.0% 10Y total return vs NBTB's 102.2%
- PEG 0.67 vs OCFC's 3.57
- NIM 3.4% vs KRNY's 1.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs OCFC's -4.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.9x vs 12.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs OCFC's 1.05 | |
| Dividends | 5.5% yield, vs NBTB's 3.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.9% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs NBTB's 0.5% |
KRNY vs OCFC vs NBTB vs WSFS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
KRNY vs OCFC vs NBTB vs WSFS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WSFS leads in 3 of 6 categories
KRNY leads 0 • OCFC leads 0 • NBTB leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WSFS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WSFS is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.4B annually — 4.0x KRNY's $344M. WSFS is the more profitable business, keeping 21.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KRNY's 7.6%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $344M | $656M | $867M | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $43M | $103M | $241M | $408M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $32M | $71M | $169M | $287M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $40M | $80M | $225M | $214M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.1% | +54.5% | +72.1% | +74.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.0% | +14.1% | +25.3% | +28.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.6% | +10.8% | +19.5% | +21.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.2% | +12.1% | +25.2% | +15.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +50.0% | -36.1% | +39.5% | +22.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — OCFC and NBTB and WSFS each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.5x trailing earnings, NBTB trades at a 30% valuation discount to KRNY's 19.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WSFS offers better value at 0.81x vs OCFC's 5.80x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $508M | $1.1B | $2.4B | $3.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.6B | $2.6B | $2.5B | $2.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.24x | 16.14x | 13.53x | 14.16x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.93x | 9.93x | 10.80x | 11.79x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 5.80x | 1.92x | 0.81x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 44.52x | 27.70x | 10.35x | 6.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.48x | 1.65x | 2.71x | 2.79x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.68x | 0.65x | 1.21x | 1.44x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 23.76x | 13.63x | 10.75x | 17.79x |
Profitability & Efficiency
WSFS leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WSFS delivers a 10.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $4 for OCFC. WSFS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KRNY's 1.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KRNY scores 7/9 vs WSFS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.3% | +4.3% | +9.5% | +10.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +0.5% | +1.1% | +1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.1% | +2.2% | +7.9% | +9.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.5% | +2.7% | +2.4% | +10.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.68x | 0.98x | 0.17x | 0.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.1B | $1.5B | $142M | -$1.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $167M | $135M | $185M | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.3B | $1.6B | $327M | $303M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.22x | 0.33x | 1.05x | 1.30x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WSFS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WSFS five years ago would be worth $14,315 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,946 for KRNY. Over the past 12 months, KRNY leads with a +37.9% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WSFS at 33.0% vs KRNY's 9.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.9% | +8.1% | +9.3% | +31.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +37.9% | +20.5% | +9.0% | +37.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +32.6% | +55.7% | +54.1% | +135.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -20.5% | +2.5% | +29.9% | +43.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -9.0% | +45.4% | +102.2% | +129.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.9% | +15.9% | +15.5% | +33.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — KRNY and WSFS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KRNY is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OCFC's 1.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WSFS currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs OCFC's 91.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.83x | 1.05x | 0.89x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.50 | $20.61 | $46.92 | $73.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.76 | $16.09 | $39.20 | $49.92 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.1% | +91.6% | +96.1% | +98.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.8 | 53.8 | 57.3 | 64.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 298K | 662K | 236K | 385K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KRNY and NBTB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KRNY as "Hold", OCFC as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", WSFS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 17.6% upside for KRNY (target: $10) vs 2.1% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, KRNY offers the higher dividend yield at 5.45% vs WSFS's 0.95%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.50 | $19.67 | $46.00 | $74.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 8 | 10 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.5% | +4.5% | +3.2% | +0.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 12 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.44 | $0.84 | $1.43 | $0.68 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +7.6% | +0.4% | +7.6% |
WSFS leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 3 categories are tied.
KRNY vs OCFC vs NBTB vs WSFS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KRNY or OCFC or NBTB or WSFS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 7% for OceanFirst Financial Corp. (OCFC). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 13. 5x trailing P/E (10. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Kearny Financial Corp. (KRNY) a "Hold" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KRNY or OCFC or NBTB or WSFS?
On trailing P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the cheapest at 13. 5x versus Kearny Financial Corp. at 19. 2x. On forward P/E, OceanFirst Financial Corp. is actually cheaper at 9. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: WSFS Financial Corporation wins at 0. 67x versus OceanFirst Financial Corp. 's 3. 57x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KRNY or OCFC or NBTB or WSFS?
Over the past 5 years, WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) delivered a total return of +43.
1%, compared to -20. 5% for Kearny Financial Corp. (KRNY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WSFS returned +129. 0% versus KRNY's -9. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KRNY or OCFC or NBTB or WSFS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kearny Financial Corp.
(KRNY) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 83β versus OceanFirst Financial Corp. 's 1. 05β — meaning OCFC is approximately 26% more volatile than KRNY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 168% for Kearny Financial Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KRNY or OCFC or NBTB or WSFS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -4. 7% for OceanFirst Financial Corp. (OCFC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Kearny Financial Corp. grew EPS 130. 2% year-over-year, compared to -29. 1% for OceanFirst Financial Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KRNY or OCFC or NBTB or WSFS?
WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) is the more profitable company, earning 21.
1% net margin versus 7. 6% for Kearny Financial Corp. — meaning it keeps 21. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WSFS leads at 28. 0% versus 9. 0% for KRNY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WSFS leads at 74. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KRNY or OCFC or NBTB or WSFS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 67x versus OceanFirst Financial Corp. 's 3. 57x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, OceanFirst Financial Corp. (OCFC) trades at 9. 9x forward P/E versus 12. 9x for Kearny Financial Corp. — 3. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KRNY: 17. 6% to $9. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — KRNY or OCFC or NBTB or WSFS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Kearny Financial Corp. (KRNY) offers the highest yield at 5. 5%, versus 0. 9% for WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS).
09Is KRNY or OCFC or NBTB or WSFS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, WSFS Financial Corporation (WSFS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
89), 0. 9% yield, +129. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WSFS: +129. 0%, OCFC: +45. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KRNY and OCFC and NBTB and WSFS?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KRNY is a small-cap income-oriented stock; OCFC is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; WSFS is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.