Software - Infrastructure
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
KVYO vs MANH vs HUBS vs SPSC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
Software - Application
Software - Infrastructure
KVYO vs MANH vs HUBS vs SPSC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $4.77B | $8.50B | $12.58B | $2.14B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.31B | $1.10B | $3.30B | $762M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $217M | $100M | $91M |
| Gross Margin | 74.6% | 55.6% | 83.7% | 68.0% |
| Operating Margin | -3.2% | 25.6% | 1.9% | 15.3% |
| Forward P/E | 19.1x | 26.8x | 19.6x | 12.7x |
| Total Debt | $121M | $112M | $485M | $10M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.06B | $329M | $882M | $151M |
KVYO vs MANH vs HUBS vs SPSC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Klaviyo, Inc. (KVYO) | 100 | 45.7 | -54.3% |
| Manhattan Associate… (MANH) | 100 | 72.6 | -27.4% |
| HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS) | 100 | 49.6 | -50.4% |
| SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC) | 100 | 33.5 | -66.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: KVYO vs MANH vs HUBS vs SPSC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
KVYO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 31.6%, EPS growth 35.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 37.7%
- 31.6% revenue growth vs MANH's 3.7%
MANH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 145.1% 10Y total return vs HUBS's 469.1%
- 19.7% margin vs KVYO's -0.7%
- -21.9% vs HUBS's -62.0%
- 28.0% ROA vs KVYO's -0.6%, ROIC 236.8% vs -22.2%
HUBS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
SPSC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- beta 1.03
- Lower volatility, beta 1.03, Low D/E 1.0%, current ratio 1.74x
- PEG 0.89 vs MANH's 1.25
- Beta 1.03, current ratio 1.74x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 31.6% revenue growth vs MANH's 3.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.7x vs 19.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.7% margin vs KVYO's -0.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.03 vs KVYO's 1.30, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -21.9% vs HUBS's -62.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 28.0% ROA vs KVYO's -0.6%, ROIC 236.8% vs -22.2% |
KVYO vs MANH vs HUBS vs SPSC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
KVYO vs MANH vs HUBS vs SPSC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MANH leads in 3 of 6 categories
SPSC leads 1 • KVYO leads 0 • HUBS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MANH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HUBS is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.3B annually — 4.3x SPSC's $762M. MANH is the more profitable business, keeping 19.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KVYO's -0.7%. On growth, KVYO holds the edge at +27.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.3B | $1.1B | $3.3B | $762M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$28M | $288M | $166M | $162M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | $217M | $100M | $91M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $224M | $380M | $712M | $167M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +74.6% | +55.6% | +83.7% | +68.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -3.2% | +25.6% | +1.9% | +15.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.7% | +19.7% | +3.0% | +11.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +17.0% | +34.5% | +21.6% | +21.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +27.9% | +7.4% | +23.4% | +5.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +160.0% | -3.5% | +2.5% | -8.6% |
Valuation Metrics
SPSC leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 23.2x trailing earnings, SPSC trades at a 92% valuation discount to HUBS's 284.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SPSC offers better value at 1.62x vs MANH's 1.86x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.8B | $8.5B | $12.6B | $2.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.8B | $8.3B | $12.2B | $2.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -143.32x | 39.88x | 284.08x | 23.24x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.06x | 26.79x | 19.61x | 12.73x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.86x | — | 1.62x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 28.67x | 69.24x | 11.30x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.87x | 7.86x | 4.02x | 2.84x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.83x | 27.85x | 6.29x | 2.23x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 25.17x | 22.74x | 17.77x | 14.04x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MANH leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MANH delivers a 78.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $78 in annual profit, vs $-1 for KVYO. SPSC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MANH's 0.36x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MANH scores 6/9 vs KVYO's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -0.8% | +78.2% | +5.0% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.6% | +28.0% | +2.7% | +7.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -22.2% | +2.4% | +0.4% | +12.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.7% | +76.3% | +0.5% | +12.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.36x | 0.23x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$944M | -$216M | -$397M | -$141M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.1B | $329M | $882M | $151M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $121M | $112M | $485M | $10M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 4753.07x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MANH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MANH five years ago would be worth $10,805 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,794 for HUBS. Over the past 12 months, MANH leads with a -21.9% total return vs HUBS's -62.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MANH at -5.4% vs SPSC's -28.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -46.2% | -14.2% | -36.1% | -35.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -53.1% | -21.9% | -62.0% | -59.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.9% | -15.3% | -45.1% | -62.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.9% | +8.1% | -52.1% | -41.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.9% | +145.1% | +469.1% | +119.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -21.6% | -5.4% | -18.1% | -28.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MANH and SPSC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SPSC is the less volatile stock with a 1.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KVYO's 1.30 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MANH currently trades 58.1% from its 52-week high vs HUBS's 35.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.30x | 1.10x | 1.18x | 1.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $37.79 | $247.22 | $682.57 | $153.16 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.31 | $119.06 | $187.45 | $50.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +41.7% | +58.1% | +35.8% | +37.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 37.0 | 50.6 | 51.1 | 46.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.2M | 678K | 1.5M | 605K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KVYO as "Buy", MANH as "Buy", HUBS as "Buy", SPSC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 110.1% upside for KVYO (target: $33) vs 20.2% for SPSC (target: $69).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $33.13 | $197.25 | $360.89 | $68.71 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 15 | 47 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.7% | +4.0% | +5.3% |
MANH leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SPSC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
KVYO vs MANH vs HUBS vs SPSC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is KVYO or MANH or HUBS or SPSC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Klaviyo, Inc.
(KVYO) is the stronger pick with 31. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 7% for Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH). SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC) offers the better valuation at 23. 2x trailing P/E (12. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Klaviyo, Inc. (KVYO) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — KVYO or MANH or HUBS or SPSC?
On trailing P/E, SPS Commerce, Inc.
(SPSC) is the cheapest at 23. 2x versus HubSpot, Inc. at 284. 1x. On forward P/E, SPS Commerce, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: SPS Commerce, Inc. wins at 0. 89x versus Manhattan Associates, Inc. 's 1. 25x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — KVYO or MANH or HUBS or SPSC?
Over the past 5 years, Manhattan Associates, Inc.
(MANH) delivered a total return of +8. 1%, compared to -52. 1% for HubSpot, Inc. (HUBS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HUBS returned +469. 1% versus KVYO's -51. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — KVYO or MANH or HUBS or SPSC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SPS Commerce, Inc.
(SPSC) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 03β versus Klaviyo, Inc. 's 1. 30β — meaning KVYO is approximately 27% more volatile than SPSC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 36% for Manhattan Associates, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — KVYO or MANH or HUBS or SPSC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Klaviyo, Inc.
(KVYO) is pulling ahead at 31. 6% versus 3. 7% for Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HubSpot, Inc. grew EPS 863. 0% year-over-year, compared to 2. 6% for Manhattan Associates, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KVYO leads at 37. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — KVYO or MANH or HUBS or SPSC?
Manhattan Associates, Inc.
(MANH) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 3% net margin versus -2. 6% for Klaviyo, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MANH leads at 26. 1% versus -5. 5% for KVYO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HUBS leads at 83. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is KVYO or MANH or HUBS or SPSC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 89x versus Manhattan Associates, Inc. 's 1. 25x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, SPS Commerce, Inc. (SPSC) trades at 12. 7x forward P/E versus 26. 8x for Manhattan Associates, Inc. — 14. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KVYO: 110. 1% to $33. 13.
08Which pays a better dividend — KVYO or MANH or HUBS or SPSC?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is KVYO or MANH or HUBS or SPSC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, HubSpot, Inc.
(HUBS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 18), +469. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HUBS: +469. 1%, KVYO: -51. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between KVYO and MANH and HUBS and SPSC?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: KVYO is a small-cap high-growth stock; MANH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HUBS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; SPSC is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.