Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LB vs XOM vs COP vs OXY vs CVX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Integrated
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Integrated
LB vs XOM vs COP vs OXY vs CVX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Integrated | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Integrated |
| Market Cap | $4.93B | $620.85B | $140.02B | $53.66B | $364.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $206M | $323.90B | $58.31B | $23.18B | $184.43B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $41M | $28.84B | $7.32B | $4.71B | $12.30B |
| Gross Margin | 69.1% | 21.7% | 29.2% | 26.2% | 30.4% |
| Operating Margin | 32.4% | 10.5% | 18.3% | 12.4% | 9.0% |
| Forward P/E | 45.7x | 14.8x | 13.3x | 13.0x | 15.0x |
| Total Debt | $692K | $43.54B | $23.44B | $23.96B | $46.74B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $31M | $10.68B | $6.50B | $1.99B | $6.47B |
LB vs XOM vs COP vs OXY vs CVX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| LandBridge Company … (LB) | 100 | 276.3 | +176.3% |
| Exxon Mobil Corpora… (XOM) | 100 | 127.3 | +27.3% |
| ConocoPhillips (COP) | 100 | 100.4 | +0.4% |
| Occidental Petroleu… (OXY) | 100 | 85.6 | -14.4% |
| Chevron Corporation (CVX) | 100 | 116.7 | +16.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LB vs XOM vs COP vs OXY vs CVX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 81.1%, EPS growth 14.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 56.7%
- 179.0% 10Y total return vs COP's 233.4%
- Beta 1.00, yield 3.6%, current ratio 4.87x
- 81.1% revenue growth vs OXY's -20.3%
XOM has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in momentum and efficiency.
- +43.9% vs LB's -17.4%
- 6.4% ROA vs LB's 3.4%, ROIC 8.6% vs 10.4%
COP is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.08, Low D/E 36.4%, current ratio 1.30x
- Beta 0.08 vs LB's 1.00
OXY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and quality is your priority.
- Lower P/E (13.0x vs 15.0x)
- 20.3% margin vs CVX's 6.7%
CVX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta -0.05, yield 3.8%
- 3.8% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs XOM's 2.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 81.1% revenue growth vs OXY's -20.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.0x vs 15.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.3% margin vs CVX's 6.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.08 vs LB's 1.00 | |
| Dividends | 3.8% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs XOM's 2.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.9% vs LB's -17.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.4% ROA vs LB's 3.4%, ROIC 8.6% vs 10.4% |
LB vs XOM vs COP vs OXY vs CVX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LB vs XOM vs COP vs OXY vs CVX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LB leads in 3 of 6 categories
OXY leads 1 • XOM leads 0 • COP leads 0 • CVX leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
XOM is the larger business by revenue, generating $323.9B annually — 1571.2x LB's $206M. OXY is the more profitable business, keeping 20.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CVX's 6.7%. On growth, LB holds the edge at +16.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $206M | $323.9B | $58.3B | $23.2B | $184.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $80M | $59.9B | $22.4B | $10.6B | $37.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $41M | $28.8B | $7.3B | $4.7B | $12.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $166M | $23.6B | $18.3B | $3.6B | $16.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +69.1% | +21.7% | +29.2% | +26.2% | +30.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +32.4% | +10.5% | +18.3% | +12.4% | +9.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.0% | +8.9% | +12.6% | +20.3% | +6.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +80.5% | +7.3% | +31.4% | +15.4% | +8.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.0% | -1.3% | -2.5% | -23.1% | -5.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -11.0% | -20.2% | +3.1% | -24.5% |
Valuation Metrics
OXY leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 18.1x trailing earnings, COP trades at a 69% valuation discount to LB's 59.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, OXY's 6.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LB's 37.7x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.9B | $620.8B | $140.0B | $53.7B | $364.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.9B | $653.7B | $157.0B | $75.6B | $404.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 59.23x | 21.86x | 18.09x | 33.51x | 27.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 45.71x | 14.79x | 13.29x | 12.99x | 15.02x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 37.71x | 10.91x | 6.77x | 6.66x | 10.89x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 24.77x | 1.92x | 2.38x | 2.49x | 1.97x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.24x | 2.37x | 2.23x | 1.47x | 1.76x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 40.41x | 26.29x | 8.35x | 13.07x | 21.95x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LB leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OXY delivers a 12.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $6 for LB. LB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to OXY's 0.65x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LB scores 9/9 vs XOM's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.5% | +10.7% | +11.3% | +12.6% | +7.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.4% | +6.4% | +6.0% | +5.6% | +4.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.4% | +8.6% | +10.4% | +4.7% | +6.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.1% | +8.9% | +10.4% | +4.9% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.16x | 0.36x | 0.65x | 0.24x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$30M | $32.9B | $16.9B | $22.0B | $40.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $31M | $10.7B | $6.5B | $2.0B | $6.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $692,000 | $43.5B | $23.4B | $24.0B | $46.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.90x | 69.44x | 9.42x | 3.25x | 17.22x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LB five years ago would be worth $27,901 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,396 for CVX. Over the past 12 months, XOM leads with a +43.9% total return vs LB's -17.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LB at 40.8% vs OXY's -1.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +32.3% | +20.3% | +19.7% | +27.9% | +18.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -17.4% | +43.9% | +34.7% | +40.8% | +39.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +179.0% | +44.9% | +23.7% | -4.0% | +26.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +179.0% | +164.6% | +131.9% | +109.3% | +94.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +179.0% | +105.0% | +233.4% | -7.7% | +135.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +40.8% | +13.2% | +7.3% | -1.4% | +8.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — XOM and CVX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
XOM is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LB's 1.00 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CVX currently trades 85.0% from its 52-week high vs LB's 73.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.00x | -0.15x | 0.08x | -0.13x | -0.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $87.60 | $176.41 | $135.87 | $67.45 | $214.71 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $43.75 | $101.19 | $84.28 | $38.72 | $133.77 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.0% | +83.0% | +84.6% | +80.0% | +85.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.0 | 42.4 | 43.4 | 41.5 | 42.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 390K | 18.9M | 9.6M | 17.2M | 11.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — XOM and CVX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LB as "Buy", XOM as "Hold", COP as "Buy", OXY as "Buy", CVX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 14.6% upside for LB (target: $73) vs 4.6% for CVX (target: $191). For income investors, CVX offers the higher dividend yield at 3.76% vs XOM's 2.73%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $73.33 | $160.43 | $127.07 | $56.64 | $190.93 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 52 | 55 | 52 | 52 | 53 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.6% | +2.7% | +2.8% | +3.0% | +3.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 26 | 1 | 4 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.29 | $4.00 | $3.19 | $1.59 | $6.87 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.3% | +3.6% | 0.0% | +3.3% |
LB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). OXY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
LB vs XOM vs COP vs OXY vs CVX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LB or XOM or COP or OXY or CVX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, LandBridge Company LLC (LB) is the stronger pick with 81.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -20. 3% for Occidental Petroleum Corporation (OXY). ConocoPhillips (COP) offers the better valuation at 18. 1x trailing P/E (13. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate LandBridge Company LLC (LB) a "Buy" — based on 52 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LB or XOM or COP or OXY or CVX?
On trailing P/E, ConocoPhillips (COP) is the cheapest at 18.
1x versus LandBridge Company LLC at 59. 2x. On forward P/E, Occidental Petroleum Corporation is actually cheaper at 13. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LB or XOM or COP or OXY or CVX?
Over the past 5 years, LandBridge Company LLC (LB) delivered a total return of +179.
0%, compared to +94. 0% for Chevron Corporation (CVX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: COP returned +233. 4% versus OXY's -7. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LB or XOM or COP or OXY or CVX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
15β versus LandBridge Company LLC's 1. 00β — meaning LB is approximately -785% more volatile than XOM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, LandBridge Company LLC (LB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 65% for Occidental Petroleum Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LB or XOM or COP or OXY or CVX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), LandBridge Company LLC (LB) is pulling ahead at 81.
1% versus -20. 3% for Occidental Petroleum Corporation (OXY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LandBridge Company LLC grew EPS 1398% year-over-year, compared to -34. 0% for Occidental Petroleum Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, LB leads at 56. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LB or XOM or COP or OXY or CVX?
LandBridge Company LLC (LB) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
1% net margin versus 6. 7% for Chevron Corporation — meaning it keeps 15. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LB leads at 59. 5% versus 9. 0% for CVX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LB leads at 91. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LB or XOM or COP or OXY or CVX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Occidental Petroleum Corporation (OXY) trades at 13.
0x forward P/E versus 45. 7x for LandBridge Company LLC — 32. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LB: 14. 6% to $73. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — LB or XOM or COP or OXY or CVX?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Chevron Corporation (CVX) offers the highest yield at 3. 8%, versus 2. 7% for Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM).
09Is LB or XOM or COP or OXY or CVX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
15), 2. 7% yield, +105. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (XOM: +105. 0%, LB: +179. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LB and XOM and COP and OXY and CVX?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LB is a small-cap high-growth stock; XOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock; COP is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; OXY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CVX is a large-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.