Residential Construction
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LEN vs DHI vs PHM vs NVR vs TOL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Residential Construction
Residential Construction
Residential Construction
Residential Construction
LEN vs DHI vs PHM vs NVR vs TOL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Residential Construction | Residential Construction | Residential Construction | Residential Construction | Residential Construction |
| Market Cap | $19.54B | $43.21B | $23.08B | $16.92B | $13.42B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $34.13B | $33.35B | $16.83B | $10.17B | $10.97B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.08B | $3.17B | $2.04B | $1.34B | $1.35B |
| Gross Margin | 17.6% | 22.8% | 26.1% | 22.8% | 25.7% |
| Operating Margin | 7.7% | 11.8% | 16.4% | 16.5% | 15.7% |
| Forward P/E | 14.7x | 14.0x | 12.0x | 16.9x | 11.1x |
| Total Debt | $6.32B | $6.03B | $2.40B | $1.20B | $2.92B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.80B | $2.99B | $2.01B | $1.96B | $1.26B |
LEN vs DHI vs PHM vs NVR vs TOL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lennar Corporation (LEN) | 100 | 149.8 | +49.8% |
| D.R. Horton, Inc. (DHI) | 100 | 269.7 | +169.7% |
| PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) | 100 | 353.5 | +253.5% |
| NVR, Inc. (NVR) | 100 | 189.1 | +89.1% |
| Toll Brothers, Inc. (TOL) | 100 | 438.3 | +338.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LEN vs DHI vs PHM vs NVR vs TOL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LEN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.92, yield 2.2%
- 2.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs DHI's 1.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
DHI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.85, Low D/E 24.4%, current ratio 17.39x
- Beta 0.85, yield 1.1%, current ratio 17.39x
PHM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 5.9% 10Y total return vs TOL's 458.1%
NVR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and stability.
- 13.2% margin vs LEN's 6.1%
- Beta 0.68 vs TOL's 1.21, lower leverage
- 22.3% ROA vs LEN's 6.0%, ROIC 43.8% vs 7.9%
TOL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Rev growth 1.1%, EPS growth -10.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.2%
- PEG 0.35 vs LEN's 44.65
- 1.1% revenue growth vs DHI's -6.9%
- Lower P/E (11.1x vs 16.9x), PEG 0.35 vs 1.24
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 1.1% revenue growth vs DHI's -6.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.1x vs 16.9x), PEG 0.35 vs 1.24 | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.2% margin vs LEN's 6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.68 vs TOL's 1.21, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs DHI's 1.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +40.4% vs LEN's -12.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 22.3% ROA vs LEN's 6.0%, ROIC 43.8% vs 7.9% |
LEN vs DHI vs PHM vs NVR vs TOL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LEN vs DHI vs PHM vs NVR vs TOL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NVR leads in 2 of 6 categories
TOL leads 2 • LEN leads 1 • DHI leads 0 • PHM leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NVR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LEN is the larger business by revenue, generating $34.1B annually — 3.4x NVR's $10.2B. NVR is the more profitable business, keeping 13.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LEN's 6.1%. On growth, TOL holds the edge at +2.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $34.1B | $33.3B | $16.8B | $10.2B | $11.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.8B | $4.0B | $2.8B | $1.7B | $1.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.1B | $3.2B | $2.0B | $1.3B | $1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $28M | $3.5B | $1.6B | $1.1B | $1.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +17.6% | +22.8% | +26.1% | +22.8% | +25.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.7% | +11.8% | +16.4% | +16.5% | +15.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | +9.5% | +12.1% | +13.2% | +12.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.1% | +10.5% | +9.8% | +10.8% | +9.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.5% | -2.3% | -12.4% | -4.9% | +2.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -52.5% | -13.2% | -30.4% | -13.1% | -1.1% |
Valuation Metrics
TOL leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.5x trailing earnings, TOL trades at a 25% valuation discount to NVR's 14.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TOL offers better value at 0.33x vs LEN's 44.65x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $19.5B | $43.2B | $23.1B | $16.9B | $13.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $22.0B | $46.3B | $23.5B | $16.2B | $15.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.35x | 12.89x | 10.80x | 13.95x | 10.50x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.69x | 14.01x | 12.01x | 16.90x | 11.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 44.65x | 1.03x | 0.65x | 1.02x | 0.33x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.64x | 10.22x | 7.54x | 9.03x | 8.36x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.57x | 1.26x | 1.33x | 1.64x | 1.22x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.05x | 1.87x | 1.85x | 4.84x | 1.71x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 693.18x | 13.16x | 13.20x | 15.43x | 13.07x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NVR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NVR delivers a 34.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $34 in annual profit, vs $9 for LEN. PHM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TOL's 0.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PHM scores 5/9 vs TOL's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.2% | +12.9% | +15.9% | +34.3% | +16.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.0% | +8.9% | +11.4% | +22.3% | +9.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.9% | +12.1% | +17.2% | +43.8% | +13.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.8% | +13.1% | +20.0% | +32.9% | +15.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.29x | 0.24x | 0.19x | 0.31x | 0.35x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.5B | $3.0B | $394M | -$760M | $1.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.8B | $3.0B | $2.0B | $2.0B | $1.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6.3B | $6.0B | $2.4B | $1.2B | $2.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 198.24x | 44.09x | 5590.17x | 63.47x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TOL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TOL five years ago would be worth $22,218 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,353 for LEN. Over the past 12 months, TOL leads with a +40.4% total return vs LEN's -12.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TOL at 31.0% vs LEN's -5.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -12.2% | +2.7% | +1.1% | -16.3% | +4.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -12.9% | +23.5% | +20.1% | -12.5% | +40.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.1% | +41.1% | +80.9% | +4.1% | +124.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -6.5% | +52.9% | +104.3% | +18.6% | +122.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +129.2% | +434.6% | +590.7% | +272.4% | +458.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -5.7% | +12.2% | +21.8% | +1.3% | +31.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NVR and TOL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NVR is the less volatile stock with a 0.68 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TOL's 1.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TOL currently trades 84.1% from its 52-week high vs LEN's 62.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.92x | 0.85x | 1.01x | 0.68x | 1.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $144.24 | $184.55 | $144.27 | $8618.28 | $168.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $83.03 | $114.17 | $95.20 | $5930.00 | $100.92 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +62.8% | +80.8% | +83.2% | +70.7% | +84.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.2 | 46.3 | 42.9 | 33.4 | 43.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.9M | 2.6M | 1.8M | 20K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
LEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LEN as "Buy", DHI as "Hold", PHM as "Hold", NVR as "Buy", TOL as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 22.5% upside for NVR (target: $7465) vs 9.8% for DHI (target: $164). For income investors, LEN offers the higher dividend yield at 2.23% vs TOL's 0.69%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $102.14 | $163.86 | $141.22 | $7465.33 | $166.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 50 | 52 | 44 | 24 | 46 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | +1.1% | +0.7% | — | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | 11 | 7 | — | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.02 | $1.60 | $0.89 | — | $0.97 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +9.3% | +9.9% | +5.3% | +10.8% | +4.9% |
NVR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TOL leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
LEN vs DHI vs PHM vs NVR vs TOL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LEN or DHI or PHM or NVR or TOL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Toll Brothers, Inc.
(TOL) is the stronger pick with 1. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 9% for D. R. Horton, Inc. (DHI). Toll Brothers, Inc. (TOL) offers the better valuation at 10. 5x trailing P/E (11. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lennar Corporation (LEN) a "Buy" — based on 50 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LEN or DHI or PHM or NVR or TOL?
On trailing P/E, Toll Brothers, Inc.
(TOL) is the cheapest at 10. 5x versus NVR, Inc. at 14. 0x. On forward P/E, Toll Brothers, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Toll Brothers, Inc. wins at 0. 35x versus Lennar Corporation's 44. 65x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LEN or DHI or PHM or NVR or TOL?
Over the past 5 years, Toll Brothers, Inc.
(TOL) delivered a total return of +122. 2%, compared to -6. 5% for Lennar Corporation (LEN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PHM returned +590. 7% versus LEN's +129. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LEN or DHI or PHM or NVR or TOL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NVR, Inc.
(NVR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 68β versus Toll Brothers, Inc. 's 1. 21β — meaning TOL is approximately 78% more volatile than NVR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 35% for Toll Brothers, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LEN or DHI or PHM or NVR or TOL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Toll Brothers, Inc.
(TOL) is pulling ahead at 1. 1% versus -6. 9% for D. R. Horton, Inc. (DHI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Toll Brothers, Inc. grew EPS -10. 1% year-over-year, compared to -44. 2% for Lennar Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, PHM leads at 2. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LEN or DHI or PHM or NVR or TOL?
NVR, Inc.
(NVR) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 0% net margin versus 6. 0% for Lennar Corporation — meaning it keeps 13. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PHM leads at 17. 3% versus 8. 0% for LEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PHM leads at 26. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LEN or DHI or PHM or NVR or TOL more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Toll Brothers, Inc. (TOL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 35x versus Lennar Corporation's 44. 65x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Toll Brothers, Inc. (TOL) trades at 11. 1x forward P/E versus 16. 9x for NVR, Inc. — 5. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVR: 22. 5% to $7465. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — LEN or DHI or PHM or NVR or TOL?
In this comparison, LEN (2.
2% yield), DHI (1. 1% yield), PHM (0. 7% yield), TOL (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. NVR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LEN or DHI or PHM or NVR or TOL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, D.
R. Horton, Inc. (DHI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 85), 1. 1% yield, +434. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DHI: +434. 6%, NVR: +272. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LEN and DHI and PHM and NVR and TOL?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
LEN, DHI, PHM, TOL pay a dividend while NVR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.