Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LIF vs AAPL vs GOOGL vs META vs QCOM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LIF
Life360, Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.50B
5Y Perf.+36.0%
AAPL
Apple Inc.

Consumer Electronics

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.31T
5Y Perf.+39.2%
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.85T
5Y Perf.+120.0%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.

Internet Content & Information

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.54T
5Y Perf.+20.9%
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$230.92B
5Y Perf.+10.0%

LIF vs AAPL vs GOOGL vs META vs QCOM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LIF logoLIF
AAPL logoAAPL
GOOGL logoGOOGL
META logoMETA
QCOM logoQCOM
IndustrySoftware - ApplicationConsumer ElectronicsInternet Content & InformationInternet Content & InformationSemiconductors
Market Cap$3.50B$4.31T$4.85T$1.54T$230.92B
Revenue (TTM)$489M$451.44B$422.57B$214.96B$44.49B
Net Income (TTM)$151M$122.58B$160.21B$70.59B$9.92B
Gross Margin77.8%47.9%60.4%81.9%54.8%
Operating Margin3.8%32.6%32.7%41.2%25.5%
Forward P/E34.2x33.7x28.9x18.8x20.4x
Total Debt$310M$112.38B$59.29B$83.90B$16.37B
Cash & Equiv.$494M$35.93B$30.71B$35.87B$7.84B

LIF vs AAPL vs GOOGL vs META vs QCOMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LIF
AAPL
GOOGL
META
QCOM
StockJun 24May 26Return
Life360, Inc. (LIF)100136.0+36.0%
Apple Inc. (AAPL)100139.2+39.2%
Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL)100220.0+120.0%
Meta Platforms, Inc. (META)100120.9+20.9%
QUALCOMM Incorporat… (QCOM)100110.0+10.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LIF vs AAPL vs GOOGL vs META vs QCOM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: GOOGL leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Apple Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and operational efficiency and capital deployment. LIF and QCOM also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
LIF
Life360, Inc.
The Growth Play

LIF ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 31.8%, EPS growth 29.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 28.9%
  • 31.8% revenue growth vs AAPL's 6.4%
Best for: growth exposure
AAPL
Apple Inc.
The Income Pick

AAPL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 1.04, yield 0.4%
  • 12.0% 10Y total return vs GOOGL's 10.0%
  • Beta 1.04 vs LIF's 2.18
  • 34.0% ROA vs QCOM's 18.4%, ROIC 67.4% vs 29.1%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
GOOGL
Alphabet Inc.
The Defensive Pick

GOOGL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.28, Low D/E 14.3%, current ratio 2.01x
  • PEG 0.97 vs QCOM's 9.80
  • Lower P/E (28.9x vs 33.7x), PEG 0.97 vs 1.89
  • 37.9% margin vs QCOM's 22.3%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
The Growth Angle

Among these 5 stocks, META doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: communication services exposure
QCOM
QUALCOMM Incorporated
The Defensive Pick

QCOM is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.

  • Beta 1.64, yield 1.6%, current ratio 2.82x
  • 1.6% yield, 23-year raise streak, vs AAPL's 0.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthLIF logoLIF31.8% revenue growth vs AAPL's 6.4%
ValueGOOGL logoGOOGLLower P/E (28.9x vs 33.7x), PEG 0.97 vs 1.89
Quality / MarginsGOOGL logoGOOGL37.9% margin vs QCOM's 22.3%
Stability / SafetyAAPL logoAAPLBeta 1.04 vs LIF's 2.18
DividendsQCOM logoQCOM1.6% yield, 23-year raise streak, vs AAPL's 0.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)GOOGL logoGOOGL+160.3% vs LIF's -2.5%
Efficiency (ROA)AAPL logoAAPL34.0% ROA vs QCOM's 18.4%, ROIC 67.4% vs 29.1%

LIF vs AAPL vs GOOGL vs META vs QCOM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

LIFLife360, Inc.
FY 2025
Subscription and Circulation
75.4%$369M
Product and Service, Other
14.0%$68M
Hardware
10.6%$52M
AAPLApple Inc.
FY 2025
iPhone
50.4%$209.6B
Service
26.2%$109.2B
Wearables, Home and Accessories
8.6%$35.7B
Mac
8.1%$33.7B
iPad
6.7%$28.0B
GOOGLAlphabet Inc.
FY 2025
Google Search & Other
55.7%$224.5B
Google Cloud
14.6%$58.7B
Google Inc.
11.9%$48.0B
YouTube Advertising Revenue
10.0%$40.4B
Google Network
7.4%$29.8B
Other Bets
0.4%$1.5B
Other Segments
-0.0%$-127,000,000
METAMeta Platforms, Inc.
FY 2025
Family of Apps
98.9%$198.8B
Reality Labs
1.1%$2.2B
QCOMQUALCOMM Incorporated
FY 2025
QCT
87.3%$38.4B
QTL
12.7%$5.6B

LIF vs AAPL vs GOOGL vs META vs QCOM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLAAPLLAGGINGLIF

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

META leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

AAPL is the larger business by revenue, generating $451.4B annually — 922.3x LIF's $489M. GOOGL is the more profitable business, keeping 37.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to QCOM's 22.3%. On growth, META holds the edge at +33.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricLIF logoLIFLife360, Inc.AAPL logoAAPLApple Inc.GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.META logoMETAMeta Platforms, I…QCOM logoQCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$489M$451.4B$422.6B$215.0B$44.5B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$33M$160.0B$161.3B$109.3B$12.8B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$151M$122.6B$160.2B$70.6B$9.9B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$81M$129.2B$73.3B$48.3B$12.5B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+77.8%+47.9%+60.4%+81.9%+54.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+3.8%+32.6%+32.7%+41.2%+25.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+30.8%+27.2%+37.9%+32.8%+22.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+16.5%+28.6%+17.3%+22.4%+28.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+26.4%+16.6%+21.8%+33.1%-3.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+14.3%+21.8%+81.9%+62.4%+173.0%
META leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — LIF and META and QCOM each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 24.9x trailing earnings, LIF trades at a 43% valuation discount to QCOM's 43.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GOOGL offers better value at 1.24x vs QCOM's 21.03x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricLIF logoLIFLife360, Inc.AAPL logoAAPLApple Inc.GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.META logoMETAMeta Platforms, I…QCOM logoQCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor…
Market CapShares × price$3.5B$4.31T$4.85T$1.54T$230.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.3B$4.38T$4.88T$1.59T$239.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS24.89x39.31x37.07x25.95x43.73x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.34.22x33.71x28.90x18.77x20.37x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.20x1.24x1.41x21.03x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple101.90x30.27x32.44x15.63x17.16x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue7.14x10.35x12.03x7.69x5.21x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share6.84x59.68x11.80x7.22x11.42x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF40.26x43.59x66.17x33.50x18.01x
Evenly matched — LIF and META and QCOM each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

AAPL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

AAPL delivers a 146.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $147 in annual profit, vs $33 for META. GOOGL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AAPL's 1.52x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AAPL scores 8/9 vs META's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricLIF logoLIFLife360, Inc.AAPL logoAAPLApple Inc.GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.META logoMETAMeta Platforms, I…QCOM logoQCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+35.9%+146.7%+39.0%+33.2%+40.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+20.4%+34.0%+27.4%+20.8%+18.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.0%+67.4%+25.1%+27.6%+29.1%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+3.1%+69.6%+30.3%+29.4%+28.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–958756
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.57x1.52x0.14x0.39x0.77x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$184M$76.4B$28.6B$48.0B$8.5B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$494M$35.9B$30.7B$35.9B$7.8B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$310M$112.4B$59.3B$83.9B$16.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense392.15x78.84x17.60x
AAPL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

GOOGL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in GOOGL five years ago would be worth $35,112 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $18,229 for QCOM. Over the past 12 months, GOOGL leads with a +160.3% total return vs LIF's -2.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GOOGL at 55.1% vs AAPL's 19.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLIF logoLIFLife360, Inc.AAPL logoAAPLApple Inc.GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.META logoMETAMeta Platforms, I…QCOM logoQCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-31.6%+8.3%+27.2%-6.2%+27.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-2.5%+49.0%+160.3%+2.3%+53.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+70.8%+273.3%+163.3%+111.7%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+134.8%+251.1%+100.7%+82.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1199.3%+1003.5%+415.1%+382.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+19.5%+55.1%+38.1%+28.4%
GOOGL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — AAPL and GOOGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

AAPL is the less volatile stock with a 1.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LIF's 2.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GOOGL currently trades 99.7% from its 52-week high vs LIF's 39.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLIF logoLIFLife360, Inc.AAPL logoAAPLApple Inc.GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.META logoMETAMeta Platforms, I…QCOM logoQCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.18x1.04x1.28x1.55x1.64x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$112.54$294.76$402.00$796.25$228.04
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$37.01$193.46$152.20$520.26$121.99
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+39.1%+99.5%+99.7%+76.6%+96.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10049.869.383.544.382.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.4M40.0M28.0M15.7M15.6M
Evenly matched — AAPL and GOOGL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

QCOM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: LIF as "Buy", AAPL as "Buy", GOOGL as "Buy", META as "Buy", QCOM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 68.1% upside for LIF (target: $74) vs -15.3% for QCOM (target: $186). For income investors, QCOM offers the higher dividend yield at 1.57% vs GOOGL's 0.21%.

MetricLIF logoLIFLife360, Inc.AAPL logoAAPLApple Inc.GOOGL logoGOOGLAlphabet Inc.META logoMETAMeta Platforms, I…QCOM logoQCOMQUALCOMM Incorpor…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$74.05$319.44$406.28$821.80$185.56
# AnalystsCovering analysts10110826069
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.4%+0.2%+0.3%+1.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises142223
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.03$0.82$2.07$3.44
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+2.1%+0.9%+1.7%+3.8%
QCOM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

META leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). AAPL leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.

Best OverallApple Inc. (AAPL)Leads 1 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LIF vs AAPL vs GOOGL vs META vs QCOM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LIF or AAPL or GOOGL or META or QCOM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Life360, Inc.

(LIF) is the stronger pick with 31. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 4% for Apple Inc. (AAPL). Life360, Inc. (LIF) offers the better valuation at 24. 9x trailing P/E (34. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Life360, Inc. (LIF) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LIF or AAPL or GOOGL or META or QCOM?

On trailing P/E, Life360, Inc.

(LIF) is the cheapest at 24. 9x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated at 43. 7x. On forward P/E, Meta Platforms, Inc. is actually cheaper at 18. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Alphabet Inc. wins at 0. 97x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 9. 80x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LIF or AAPL or GOOGL or META or QCOM?

Over the past 5 years, Alphabet Inc.

(GOOGL) delivered a total return of +251. 1%, compared to +82. 3% for QUALCOMM Incorporated (QCOM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AAPL returned +1199% versus QCOM's +382. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LIF or AAPL or GOOGL or META or QCOM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Apple Inc.

(AAPL) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 04β versus Life360, Inc. 's 2. 18β — meaning LIF is approximately 109% more volatile than AAPL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 152% for Apple Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LIF or AAPL or GOOGL or META or QCOM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Life360, Inc.

(LIF) is pulling ahead at 31. 8% versus 6. 4% for Apple Inc. (AAPL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Life360, Inc. grew EPS 29. 0% year-over-year, compared to -44. 2% for QUALCOMM Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, LIF leads at 28. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LIF or AAPL or GOOGL or META or QCOM?

Alphabet Inc.

(GOOGL) is the more profitable company, earning 32. 8% net margin versus 12. 5% for QUALCOMM Incorporated — meaning it keeps 32. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: META leads at 41. 4% versus 3. 8% for LIF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — META leads at 82. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is LIF or AAPL or GOOGL or META or QCOM more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Alphabet Inc. (GOOGL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 97x versus QUALCOMM Incorporated's 9. 80x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) trades at 18. 8x forward P/E versus 34. 2x for Life360, Inc. — 15. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LIF: 68. 1% to $74. 05.

08

Which pays a better dividend — LIF or AAPL or GOOGL or META or QCOM?

In this comparison, QCOM (1.

6% yield), AAPL (0. 4% yield), META (0. 3% yield), GOOGL (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. LIF does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is LIF or AAPL or GOOGL or META or QCOM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Apple Inc.

(AAPL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 04), +1199% 10Y return). Life360, Inc. (LIF) carries a higher beta of 2. 18 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between LIF and AAPL and GOOGL and META and QCOM?

These companies operate in different sectors (LIF (Technology) and AAPL (Technology) and GOOGL (Communication Services) and META (Communication Services) and QCOM (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: LIF is a small-cap high-growth stock; AAPL is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; GOOGL is a mega-cap high-growth stock; META is a mega-cap high-growth stock; QCOM is a large-cap quality compounder stock. QCOM pays a dividend while LIF, AAPL, GOOGL, META do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

LIF

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 13%
  • Net Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AAPL

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 16%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GOOGL

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Net Margin > 22%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

META

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 16%
  • Net Margin > 19%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

QCOM

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 13%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform LIF and AAPL and GOOGL and META and QCOM on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(LIF: 26.4% · AAPL: 16.6%)
Net Margin>
%
(LIF: 30.8% · AAPL: 27.2%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(LIF: 24.9x · AAPL: 39.3x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.