Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LKFN vs FFIN vs TOWN vs SFNC vs FULT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
LKFN vs FFIN vs TOWN vs SFNC vs FULT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $1.63B | $4.61B | $2.66B | $3.09B | $4.13B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $422M | $739M | $1.01B | $627M | $1.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $103M | $243M | $169M | $-398M | $392M |
| Gross Margin | 61.0% | 70.8% | 69.6% | 5.8% | 67.4% |
| Operating Margin | 29.8% | 36.8% | 20.9% | -84.2% | 25.7% |
| Forward P/E | 14.4x | 15.9x | 10.7x | 10.3x | 10.6x |
| Total Debt | $184M | $197M | $371M | $641M | $1.30B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $57M | $763M | $253M | $380M | $271M |
LKFN vs FFIN vs TOWN vs SFNC vs FULT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lakeland Financial … (LKFN) | 100 | 146.6 | +46.6% |
| First Financial Ban… (FFIN) | 100 | 105.7 | +5.7% |
| TowneBank (TOWN) | 100 | 184.7 | +84.7% |
| Simmons First Natio… (SFNC) | 100 | 124.5 | +24.5% |
| Fulton Financial Co… (FULT) | 100 | 191.3 | +91.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LKFN vs FFIN vs TOWN vs SFNC vs FULT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LKFN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.79, yield 3.2%
- 142.7% 10Y total return vs FFIN's 145.4%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner)
- Beta 0.79 vs FULT's 1.13, lower leverage
FFIN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 18.8%, EPS growth 12.2%
- 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7%
TOWN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.81, Low D/E 15.3%, current ratio 0.10x
SFNC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.
- Beta 1.02, yield 4.0%, current ratio 0.86x
- Lower P/E (10.3x vs 10.7x)
FULT is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency and bank quality.
- PEG 0.76 vs TOWN's 5.58
- NIM 3.2% vs TOWN's 2.9%
- +29.6% vs FFIN's -3.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.8% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.3x vs 10.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.79 vs FULT's 1.13, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs SFNC's 4.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +29.6% vs FFIN's -3.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs SFNC's 0.9% |
LKFN vs FFIN vs TOWN vs SFNC vs FULT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
LKFN vs FFIN vs TOWN vs SFNC vs FULT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories
SFNC leads 1 • FULT leads 1 • LKFN leads 0 • TOWN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FFIN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FULT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.9B annually — 4.5x LKFN's $422M. FFIN is the more profitable business, keeping 30.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFNC's -63.4%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $422M | $739M | $1.0B | $627M | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $130M | $310M | $238M | -$497M | $529M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $103M | $243M | $169M | -$398M | $392M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $104M | $290M | $212M | $755M | $267M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.0% | +70.8% | +69.6% | +5.8% | +67.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.8% | +36.8% | +20.9% | -84.2% | +25.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.5% | +30.2% | +16.8% | -63.4% | +20.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +24.6% | +39.6% | +21.0% | +71.7% | +15.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +23.4% | -7.7% | -7.3% | +42.1% | +47.2% |
Valuation Metrics
SFNC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.3x trailing earnings, FULT trades at a 50% valuation discount to FFIN's 20.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FULT offers better value at 0.74x vs TOWN's 8.23x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.6B | $4.6B | $2.7B | $3.1B | $4.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.8B | $4.0B | $2.8B | $3.4B | $5.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.61x | 20.76x | 15.76x | -7.24x | 10.31x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.42x | 15.92x | 10.68x | 10.35x | 10.61x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.93x | 3.98x | 8.23x | — | 0.74x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.49x | 14.17x | 13.22x | — | 9.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.87x | 6.23x | 2.64x | 4.93x | 2.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.12x | 2.89x | 1.10x | 0.84x | 1.13x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.72x | 15.73x | 12.57x | 6.88x | 14.52x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FFIN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LKFN delivers a 14.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-12 for SFNC. FFIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.12x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FULT's 0.37x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LKFN scores 6/9 vs SFNC's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.2% | +13.3% | +7.3% | -11.6% | +11.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.5% | +1.6% | +0.9% | -1.6% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.6% | +11.0% | +6.0% | -9.1% | +7.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.8% | +16.0% | +4.7% | -4.2% | +9.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.24x | 0.12x | 0.15x | 0.19x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $127M | -$566M | $118M | $261M | $1.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $57M | $763M | $253M | $380M | $271M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $184M | $197M | $371M | $641M | $1.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.82x | 1.48x | 0.74x | -1.01x | 0.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FULT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FULT five years ago would be worth $14,141 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,178 for FFIN. Over the past 12 months, FULT leads with a +29.6% total return vs FFIN's -3.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FULT at 32.1% vs FFIN's 8.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.7% | +8.5% | +7.8% | +14.6% | +11.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +9.0% | -3.2% | +9.4% | +16.7% | +29.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.1% | +29.1% | +70.5% | +53.4% | +130.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +10.5% | -28.2% | +23.3% | -15.4% | +41.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +142.7% | +145.4% | +109.6% | +25.2% | +106.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.0% | +8.9% | +19.5% | +15.3% | +32.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LKFN and SFNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LKFN is the less volatile stock with a 0.79 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FULT's 1.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SFNC currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs FFIN's 83.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.79x | 0.95x | 0.81x | 1.02x | 1.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $69.40 | $38.74 | $37.86 | $22.18 | $22.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $54.36 | $28.11 | $31.91 | $17.00 | $16.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.2% | +83.6% | +92.0% | +96.3% | +93.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.9 | 58.2 | 47.4 | 62.3 | 55.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 153K | 740K | 467K | 1.2M | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — LKFN and SFNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LKFN as "Hold", FFIN as "Hold", TOWN as "Buy", SFNC as "Buy", FULT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 21.2% upside for FFIN (target: $39) vs 5.4% for LKFN (target: $66). For income investors, SFNC offers the higher dividend yield at 4.00% vs FFIN's 2.22%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $66.00 | $39.25 | — | $22.67 | $24.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.2% | +2.2% | +3.0% | +4.0% | +3.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | 11 | 10 | 6 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.00 | $0.72 | $1.03 | $0.85 | $0.77 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.6% |
FFIN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SFNC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
LKFN vs FFIN vs TOWN vs SFNC vs FULT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LKFN or FFIN or TOWN or SFNC or FULT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the stronger pick with 18. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) offers the better valuation at 10. 3x trailing P/E (10. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TowneBank (TOWN) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LKFN or FFIN or TOWN or SFNC or FULT?
On trailing P/E, Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) is the cheapest at 10.
3x versus First Financial Bankshares, Inc. at 20. 8x. On forward P/E, Simmons First National Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fulton Financial Corporation wins at 0. 76x versus TowneBank's 5. 58x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LKFN or FFIN or TOWN or SFNC or FULT?
Over the past 5 years, Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) delivered a total return of +41.
4%, compared to -28. 2% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FFIN returned +145. 4% versus SFNC's +25. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LKFN or FFIN or TOWN or SFNC or FULT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
79β versus Fulton Financial Corporation's 1. 13β — meaning FULT is approximately 43% more volatile than LKFN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 12% versus 37% for Fulton Financial Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LKFN or FFIN or TOWN or SFNC or FULT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is pulling ahead at 18. 8% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fulton Financial Corporation grew EPS 32. 5% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LKFN or FFIN or TOWN or SFNC or FULT?
First Financial Bankshares, Inc.
(FFIN) is the more profitable company, earning 30. 2% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 30. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FFIN leads at 36. 8% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FFIN leads at 70. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LKFN or FFIN or TOWN or SFNC or FULT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fulton Financial Corporation (FULT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 76x versus TowneBank's 5. 58x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) trades at 10. 3x forward P/E versus 15. 9x for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. — 5. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FFIN: 21. 2% to $39. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — LKFN or FFIN or TOWN or SFNC or FULT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 2. 2% for First Financial Bankshares, Inc. (FFIN).
09Is LKFN or FFIN or TOWN or SFNC or FULT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
79), 3. 2% yield, +142. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LKFN: +142. 7%, FULT: +106. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LKFN and FFIN and TOWN and SFNC and FULT?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LKFN is a small-cap deep-value stock; FFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; TOWN is a small-cap deep-value stock; SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; FULT is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.