Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LOAN vs GPMT vs TPVG vs FBRT vs SACH

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LOAN
Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc.

REIT - Mortgage

Real EstateNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$49M
5Y Perf.-33.3%
GPMT
Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.

REIT - Mortgage

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$70M
5Y Perf.-89.0%
TPVG
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$234M
5Y Perf.-67.6%
FBRT
Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc.

REIT - Mortgage

Real EstateNYSE • US
Market Cap$699M
5Y Perf.-44.6%
SACH
Sachem Capital Corp.

REIT - Mortgage

Real EstateAMEX • US
Market Cap$53M
5Y Perf.-81.0%

LOAN vs GPMT vs TPVG vs FBRT vs SACH — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LOAN logoLOAN
GPMT logoGPMT
TPVG logoTPVG
FBRT logoFBRT
SACH logoSACH
IndustryREIT - MortgageREIT - MortgageAsset ManagementREIT - MortgageREIT - Mortgage
Market Cap$49M$70M$234M$699M$53M
Revenue (TTM)$8M$132M$97M$401M$38M
Net Income (TTM)$5M$-40M$-12M$72M$6M
Gross Margin99.9%47.3%83.5%59.9%98.1%
Operating Margin58.1%-4.3%77.9%36.9%42.0%
Forward P/E8.7x6.2x9.0x28.1x
Total Debt$23M$1.17B$469M$4.25B$278M
Cash & Equiv.$178K$66M$20M$167M$11M

LOAN vs GPMT vs TPVG vs FBRT vs SACHLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LOAN
GPMT
TPVG
FBRT
SACH
StockOct 21May 26Return
Manhattan Bridge Ca… (LOAN)10066.7-33.3%
Granite Point Mortg… (GPMT)10011.0-89.0%
TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG)10032.4-67.6%
Franklin BSP Realty… (FBRT)10055.4-44.6%
Sachem Capital Corp. (SACH)10019.0-81.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LOAN vs GPMT vs TPVG vs FBRT vs SACH

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LOAN leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. TPVG, FBRT, and SACH also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
LOAN
Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

LOAN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 103.7% 10Y total return vs TPVG's 91.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.09, Low D/E 52.1%, current ratio 31.09x
  • 70.0% margin vs GPMT's -30.5%
  • Beta 0.09 vs GPMT's 1.42, lower leverage
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
GPMT
Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

GPMT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 187.8%, EPS growth 73.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.9%
  • 187.8% FFO/revenue growth vs FBRT's -100.0%
Best for: growth exposure
TPVG
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
The Banking Pick

TPVG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.

  • Lower P/E (6.2x vs 28.1x)
Best for: value
FBRT
Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play

FBRT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.73, yield 18.6%
  • Beta 0.73, yield 18.6%, current ratio 18.43x
  • 18.6% yield, vs LOAN's 10.7%
Best for: income & stability and defensive
SACH
Sachem Capital Corp.
The Real Estate Income Play

SACH is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +35.6% vs GPMT's -23.4%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthGPMT logoGPMT187.8% FFO/revenue growth vs FBRT's -100.0%
ValueTPVG logoTPVGLower P/E (6.2x vs 28.1x)
Quality / MarginsLOAN logoLOAN70.0% margin vs GPMT's -30.5%
Stability / SafetyLOAN logoLOANBeta 0.09 vs GPMT's 1.42, lower leverage
DividendsFBRT logoFBRT18.6% yield, vs LOAN's 10.7%
Momentum (1Y)SACH logoSACH+35.6% vs GPMT's -23.4%
Efficiency (ROA)LOAN logoLOAN8.1% ROA vs GPMT's -2.3%, ROIC 8.5% vs 2.6%

LOAN vs GPMT vs TPVG vs FBRT vs SACH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

LOANManhattan Bridge Capital, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

GPMTGranite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

TPVGTriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

FBRTFranklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc.
FY 2025
Real Estate Owned
50.9%$30M
Agency Business
49.1%$29M
SACHSachem Capital Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

LOAN vs GPMT vs TPVG vs FBRT vs SACH — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLLOANLAGGINGSACH

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

LOAN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

FBRT is the larger business by revenue, generating $401M annually — 53.0x LOAN's $8M. LOAN is the more profitable business, keeping 70.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GPMT's -30.5%. On growth, GPMT holds the edge at +157.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricLOAN logoLOANManhattan Bridge …GPMT logoGPMTGranite Point Mor…TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…FBRT logoFBRTFranklin BSP Real…SACH logoSACHSachem Capital Co…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$8M$132M$97M$401M$38M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$4M-$8M-$22M$159M$17M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$5M-$40M-$12M$72M$6M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$5M$463,000-$59M$121M$3M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+99.9%+47.3%+83.5%+59.9%+98.1%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+58.1%-4.3%+77.9%+36.9%+42.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+70.0%-30.5%+50.6%+17.9%+16.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+62.6%+0.4%-58.7%+30.3%+6.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+14.6%+157.8%+145.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-8.3%+40.9%-2.3%-65.0%-79.9%
LOAN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

GPMT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 4.7x trailing earnings, TPVG trades at a 83% valuation discount to SACH's 28.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LOAN's 9.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FBRT's 49.0x.

MetricLOAN logoLOANManhattan Bridge …GPMT logoGPMTGranite Point Mor…TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…FBRT logoFBRTFranklin BSP Real…SACH logoSACHSachem Capital Co…
Market CapShares × price$49M$70M$234M$699M$53M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$71M$1.2B$683M$4.8B$320M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS8.71x-1.27x4.73x14.20x28.06x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.6.23x8.98x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate4.67x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.00x20.68x9.02x49.02x11.33x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue5.04x0.48x2.41x1.12x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.13x0.13x0.66x0.51x0.29x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF9.91x26.41x2.40x21.11x
GPMT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

LOAN leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

LOAN delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-7 for GPMT. LOAN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.52x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FBRT's 2.78x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LOAN scores 7/9 vs TPVG's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricLOAN logoLOANManhattan Bridge …GPMT logoGPMTGranite Point Mor…TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…FBRT logoFBRTFranklin BSP Real…SACH logoSACHSachem Capital Co…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+12.2%-7.1%-3.4%+4.7%+3.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+8.1%-2.3%-1.5%+1.2%+1.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+8.5%+2.6%+7.2%+1.2%+4.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+11.3%+4.6%+9.4%+1.5%+6.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–976466
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.52x2.12x1.33x2.78x1.59x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$22M$1.1B$449M$4.1B$267M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$178,012$66M$20M$167M$11M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$23M$1.2B$469M$4.3B$278M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense3.38x0.58x-1.02x1.25x
LOAN leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

LOAN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in LOAN five years ago would be worth $10,224 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,518 for GPMT. Over the past 12 months, SACH leads with a +35.6% total return vs GPMT's -23.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LOAN at 5.4% vs SACH's -16.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLOAN logoLOANManhattan Bridge …GPMT logoGPMTGranite Point Mor…TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…FBRT logoFBRTFranklin BSP Real…SACH logoSACHSachem Capital Co…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-5.4%-35.9%-9.6%-8.2%+10.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-8.6%-23.4%+7.4%-7.9%+35.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+17.2%-36.3%-5.6%+2.6%-42.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+2.2%-64.8%-15.2%-10.8%-43.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+103.7%-50.4%+91.2%-10.8%-5.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+5.4%-13.9%-1.9%+0.9%-16.8%
LOAN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — LOAN and SACH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

LOAN is the less volatile stock with a 0.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GPMT's 1.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SACH currently trades 81.5% from its 52-week high vs GPMT's 47.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLOAN logoLOANManhattan Bridge …GPMT logoGPMTGranite Point Mor…TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…FBRT logoFBRTFranklin BSP Real…SACH logoSACHSachem Capital Co…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.09x1.42x0.77x0.73x0.40x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$5.85$3.12$7.53$11.84$1.35
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$4.13$1.24$4.48$8.24$0.80
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+73.0%+47.1%+76.6%+76.7%+81.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10035.554.467.651.064.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded29K152K501K902K158K
Evenly matched — LOAN and SACH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

FBRT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: GPMT as "Hold", TPVG as "Hold", FBRT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 70.1% upside for GPMT (target: $3) vs 55.1% for TPVG (target: $9). For income investors, FBRT offers the higher dividend yield at 18.59% vs LOAN's 10.71%.

MetricLOAN logoLOANManhattan Bridge …GPMT logoGPMTGranite Point Mor…TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…FBRT logoFBRTFranklin BSP Real…SACH logoSACHSachem Capital Co…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$2.50$8.95$15.33
# AnalystsCovering analysts12124
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+10.7%+14.7%+17.8%+18.6%+18.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises00000
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.46$0.22$1.02$1.69$0.20
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.0%+8.0%0.0%+2.1%0.0%
FBRT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

LOAN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). GPMT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallManhattan Bridge Capital, I… (LOAN)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LOAN vs GPMT vs TPVG vs FBRT vs SACH: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LOAN or GPMT or TPVG or FBRT or SACH a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.

(GPMT) is the stronger pick with 187. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. (FBRT). TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 7x trailing P/E (6. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. (FBRT) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LOAN or GPMT or TPVG or FBRT or SACH?

On trailing P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) is the cheapest at 4. 7x versus Sachem Capital Corp. at 28. 1x. On forward P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. is actually cheaper at 6. 2x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LOAN or GPMT or TPVG or FBRT or SACH?

Over the past 5 years, Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc.

(LOAN) delivered a total return of +2. 2%, compared to -64. 8% for Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. (GPMT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LOAN returned +103. 7% versus GPMT's -50. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LOAN or GPMT or TPVG or FBRT or SACH?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc.

(LOAN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 09β versus Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. 's 1. 42β — meaning GPMT is approximately 1447% more volatile than LOAN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. (LOAN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 52% versus 3% for Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LOAN or GPMT or TPVG or FBRT or SACH?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.

(GPMT) is pulling ahead at 187. 8% versus -100. 0% for Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. (FBRT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sachem Capital Corp. grew EPS 104. 2% year-over-year, compared to -22. 0% for Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GPMT leads at 22. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LOAN or GPMT or TPVG or FBRT or SACH?

Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc.

(LOAN) is the more profitable company, earning 57. 7% net margin versus -28. 3% for Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. — meaning it keeps 57. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LOAN leads at 81. 6% versus 36. 9% for FBRT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SACH leads at 97. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is LOAN or GPMT or TPVG or FBRT or SACH more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) trades at 6. 2x forward P/E versus 9. 0x for Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. — 2. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GPMT: 70. 1% to $2. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — LOAN or GPMT or TPVG or FBRT or SACH?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Franklin BSP Realty Trust, Inc. (FBRT) offers the highest yield at 18. 6%, versus 10. 7% for Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. (LOAN).

09

Is LOAN or GPMT or TPVG or FBRT or SACH better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc.

(LOAN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 09), 10. 7% yield, +103. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LOAN: +103. 7%, GPMT: -50. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between LOAN and GPMT and TPVG and FBRT and SACH?

These companies operate in different sectors (LOAN (Real Estate) and GPMT (Real Estate) and TPVG (Financial Services) and FBRT (Real Estate) and SACH (Real Estate)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: LOAN is a small-cap high-growth stock; GPMT is a small-cap high-growth stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock; FBRT is a small-cap deep-value stock; SACH is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

LOAN

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 41%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GPMT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 78%
  • Gross Margin > 28%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TPVG

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 18%
  • Net Margin > 30%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FBRT

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 10%
  • Dividend Yield > 7.4%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SACH

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Real Estate
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 72%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform LOAN and GPMT and TPVG and FBRT and SACH on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(LOAN: 14.6% · GPMT: 157.8%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.