Agricultural Farm Products
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LOCL vs AREC vs HYFM vs FARM vs AVO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Coal
Agricultural - Machinery
Packaged Foods
Food Distribution
LOCL vs AREC vs HYFM vs FARM vs AVO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural Farm Products | Coal | Agricultural - Machinery | Packaged Foods | Food Distribution |
| Market Cap | $14M | $230M | $5M | $28M | $942M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $46M | $145K | $146M | $338M | $1.34B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-122M | $-38M | $-65M | $-19M | $33M |
| Gross Margin | 2.4% | 96.6% | 10.2% | 40.7% | 12.0% |
| Operating Margin | -135.7% | -203.0% | -35.8% | -1.8% | 4.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | — | 20.2x |
| Total Debt | $437M | $221M | $170M | $53M | $201M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $937K | $604K | $26M | $7M | $65M |
LOCL vs AREC vs HYFM vs FARM vs AVO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Local Bounti Corpor… (LOCL) | 100 | 1.3 | -98.7% |
| American Resources … (AREC) | 100 | 70.7 | -29.3% |
| Hydrofarm Holdings … (HYFM) | 100 | 0.2 | -99.8% |
| Farmer Bros. Co. (FARM) | 100 | 12.5 | -87.5% |
| Mission Produce, In… (AVO) | 100 | 65.8 | -34.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LOCL vs AREC vs HYFM vs FARM vs AVO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LOCL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 38.4%, EPS growth 9.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 291.0%
- 38.4% revenue growth vs AREC's -97.1%
AREC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 127.0% 10Y total return vs AVO's -3.6%
- 0.8% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
- +165.2% vs HYFM's -75.4%
Among these 5 stocks, HYFM doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FARM is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
AVO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.32
- Lower volatility, beta 0.32, Low D/E 32.4%, current ratio 1.95x
- Beta 0.32, current ratio 1.95x
- 2.5% margin vs AREC's -262.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 38.4% revenue growth vs AREC's -97.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.5% margin vs AREC's -262.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.32 vs AREC's 2.48 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +165.2% vs HYFM's -75.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.3% ROA vs LOCL's -29.2%, ROIC 7.2% vs -13.2% |
LOCL vs AREC vs HYFM vs FARM vs AVO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LOCL vs AREC vs HYFM vs FARM vs AVO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AVO leads in 3 of 6 categories
AREC leads 1 • LOCL leads 0 • HYFM leads 0 • FARM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AVO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AVO is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.3B annually — 9209.4x AREC's $145,025. AVO is the more profitable business, keeping 2.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AREC's -262.0%. On growth, LOCL holds the edge at +19.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $46M | $145,025 | $146M | $338M | $1.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$39M | -$24M | -$23M | $5M | $91M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$122M | -$38M | -$65M | -$19M | $33M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$48M | -$7M | -$8M | -$3M | $38M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +2.4% | +96.6% | +10.2% | +40.7% | +12.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -135.7% | -203.0% | -35.8% | -1.8% | +4.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.7% | -262.0% | -44.5% | -5.5% | +2.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -104.1% | -48.0% | -5.7% | -0.8% | +2.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.1% | -78.7% | -33.3% | -1.2% | -16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +70.6% | +56.5% | -22.7% | — | -118.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — HYFM and FARM each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, FARM's 7.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AVO's 10.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14M | $230M | $5M | $28M | $942M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $450M | $450M | $148M | $75M | $1.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.11x | -4.37x | -0.07x | -1.88x | 25.09x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 20.15x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 4.76x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 7.48x | 10.16x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.37x | 600.58x | 0.03x | 0.08x | 0.68x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — | 0.02x | 0.63x | 1.53x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 4.32x | 25.33x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AVO leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AVO delivers a 5.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-48 for FARM. AVO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.32x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FARM's 1.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AVO scores 6/9 vs AREC's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | — | -32.3% | -47.6% | +5.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -29.2% | -18.8% | -16.3% | -11.7% | +3.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -13.2% | -35.8% | -9.6% | -1.2% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -16.3% | -61.3% | -12.1% | -1.5% | +8.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 0.76x | 1.23x | 0.32x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $436M | $220M | $143M | $47M | $136M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $937,000 | $604,485 | $26M | $7M | $65M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $437M | $221M | $170M | $53M | $201M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.62x | -2.41x | -3.77x | -1.88x | 10.85x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AREC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AREC five years ago would be worth $7,467 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16 for HYFM. Over the past 12 months, AREC leads with a +165.2% total return vs HYFM's -75.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AREC at 14.6% vs HYFM's -56.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -25.5% | -16.5% | -35.0% | -13.5% | +14.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -33.5% | +165.2% | -75.4% | -28.9% | +29.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.1% | +50.3% | -91.9% | -52.2% | +11.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.7% | -25.3% | -99.8% | -86.2% | -33.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.7% | +127.0% | -99.8% | -95.8% | -3.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -35.4% | +14.6% | -56.8% | -21.8% | +3.7% |
Risk & Volatility
AVO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AVO is the less volatile stock with a 0.32 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AREC's 2.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AVO currently trades 85.6% from its 52-week high vs HYFM's 21.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 2.48x | 0.91x | 0.79x | 0.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.00 | $7.11 | $4.78 | $2.48 | $15.53 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.98 | $0.61 | $0.81 | $1.21 | $10.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +40.3% | +31.9% | +21.8% | +51.6% | +85.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.6 | 51.2 | 54.8 | 52.1 | 47.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.7M | 2.5M | 41K | 283K | 925K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AREC and AVO each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AREC as "Buy", AVO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 208.4% upside for AREC (target: $7) vs 42.9% for AVO (target: $19). AREC is the only dividend payer here at 0.78% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | — | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $7.00 | — | — | $19.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 7 | — | — | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.8% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.02 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.6% |
AVO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AREC leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
LOCL vs AREC vs HYFM vs FARM vs AVO: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LOCL or AREC or HYFM or FARM or AVO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Local Bounti Corporation (LOCL) is the stronger pick with 38.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -97. 1% for American Resources Corporation (AREC). Mission Produce, Inc. (AVO) offers the better valuation at 25. 1x trailing P/E (20. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate American Resources Corporation (AREC) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LOCL or AREC or HYFM or FARM or AVO?
Over the past 5 years, American Resources Corporation (AREC) delivered a total return of -25.
3%, compared to -99. 8% for Hydrofarm Holdings Group, Inc. (HYFM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AREC returned +127. 0% versus HYFM's -99. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LOCL or AREC or HYFM or FARM or AVO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mission Produce, Inc.
(AVO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 32β versus American Resources Corporation's 2. 48β — meaning AREC is approximately 683% more volatile than AVO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mission Produce, Inc. (AVO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 123% for Farmer Bros. Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — LOCL or AREC or HYFM or FARM or AVO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Local Bounti Corporation (LOCL) is pulling ahead at 38.
4% versus -97. 1% for American Resources Corporation (AREC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Local Bounti Corporation grew EPS 9. 4% year-over-year, compared to -257. 9% for Farmer Bros. Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LOCL leads at 291. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LOCL or AREC or HYFM or FARM or AVO?
Mission Produce, Inc.
(AVO) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 7% net margin versus -104. 7% for American Resources Corporation — meaning it keeps 2. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AVO leads at 5. 1% versus -86. 3% for AREC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FARM leads at 43. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is LOCL or AREC or HYFM or FARM or AVO more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AREC: 208.
4% to $7. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — LOCL or AREC or HYFM or FARM or AVO?
In this comparison, AREC (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. LOCL, HYFM, FARM, AVO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is LOCL or AREC or HYFM or FARM or AVO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Mission Produce, Inc.
(AVO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 32)). American Resources Corporation (AREC) carries a higher beta of 2. 48 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AVO: -3. 6%, AREC: +127. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between LOCL and AREC and HYFM and FARM and AVO?
These companies operate in different sectors (LOCL (Consumer Defensive) and AREC (Energy) and HYFM (Industrials) and FARM (Consumer Defensive) and AVO (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LOCL is a small-cap high-growth stock; AREC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HYFM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FARM is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AVO is a small-cap quality compounder stock. AREC pays a dividend while LOCL, HYFM, FARM, AVO do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.