Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LOGI vs GPRO vs SONO vs IMMR vs AAPL

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LOGI
Logitech International S.A.

Computer Hardware

TechnologyNASDAQ • CH
Market Cap$14.81B
5Y Perf.+73.6%
GPRO
GoPro, Inc.

Consumer Electronics

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$213M
5Y Perf.-70.5%
SONO
Sonos, Inc.

Consumer Electronics

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.80B
5Y Perf.+37.1%
IMMR
Immersion Corporation

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$211M
5Y Perf.-4.0%
AAPL
Apple Inc.

Consumer Electronics

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.22T
5Y Perf.+261.6%

LOGI vs GPRO vs SONO vs IMMR vs AAPL — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LOGI logoLOGI
GPRO logoGPRO
SONO logoSONO
IMMR logoIMMR
AAPL logoAAPL
IndustryComputer HardwareConsumer ElectronicsConsumer ElectronicsSoftware - ApplicationConsumer Electronics
Market Cap$14.81B$213M$1.80B$211M$4.22T
Revenue (TTM)$4.84B$652M$1.46B$1.47B$451.44B
Net Income (TTM)$711M$-93M$-41M$66M$122.58B
Gross Margin43.2%33.6%44.8%27.8%47.9%
Operating Margin16.0%-12.8%2.0%9.1%32.6%
Forward P/E18.6x27.8x47.3x15.5x33.8x
Total Debt$0.00$83M$60M$322M$112.38B
Cash & Equiv.$1.75B$50M$175M$78M$35.93B

LOGI vs GPRO vs SONO vs IMMR vs AAPLLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LOGI
GPRO
SONO
IMMR
AAPL
StockMay 20May 26Return
Logitech Internatio… (LOGI)100173.6+73.6%
GoPro, Inc. (GPRO)10029.5-70.5%
Sonos, Inc. (SONO)100137.1+37.1%
Immersion Corporati… (IMMR)10096.0-4.0%
Apple Inc. (AAPL)100361.6+261.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LOGI vs GPRO vs SONO vs IMMR vs AAPL

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: IMMR and AAPL are tied at the top with 3 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Apple Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. GPRO also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
LOGI
Logitech International S.A.
The Defensive Pick

LOGI is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.

  • Beta 1.36, yield 1.5%, current ratio 2.22x
Best for: defensive
GPRO
GoPro, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

GPRO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +134.6% vs IMMR's -6.1%
Best for: momentum
SONO
Sonos, Inc.
The Technology Pick

Among these 5 stocks, SONO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
IMMR
Immersion Corporation
The Growth Play

IMMR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 35.4%, EPS growth 295.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 227.7%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.52, Low D/E 56.9%, current ratio 1.72x
  • 35.4% revenue growth vs GPRO's -18.7%
  • Lower P/E (15.5x vs 33.8x)
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
AAPL
Apple Inc.
The Income Pick

AAPL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.99, yield 0.4%
  • 11.7% 10Y total return vs LOGI's 6.4%
  • 27.2% margin vs GPRO's -14.3%
  • Beta 0.99 vs GPRO's 3.08
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthIMMR logoIMMR35.4% revenue growth vs GPRO's -18.7%
ValueIMMR logoIMMRLower P/E (15.5x vs 33.8x)
Quality / MarginsAAPL logoAAPL27.2% margin vs GPRO's -14.3%
Stability / SafetyAAPL logoAAPLBeta 0.99 vs GPRO's 3.08
DividendsIMMR logoIMMR6.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs AAPL's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)GPRO logoGPRO+134.6% vs IMMR's -6.1%
Efficiency (ROA)AAPL logoAAPL34.0% ROA vs GPRO's -20.0%, ROIC 67.4% vs -44.4%

LOGI vs GPRO vs SONO vs IMMR vs AAPL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

LOGILogitech International S.A.
FY 2025
Retail Gaming
29.4%$1.3B
Retail Keyboards Desktops
19.4%$883M
Retail Pointing Devices
17.3%$789M
Retail Video Collaboration
13.7%$626M
Retail Video
6.9%$316M
Retail Tablet And Other Accessories
6.6%$300M
Retail Headsets
3.9%$180M
Other (1)
2.7%$124M
GPROGoPro, Inc.
FY 2024
Subscription and Service Revenue
100.0%$107M
SONOSonos, Inc.
FY 2025
Sonos Speakers
77.7%$1.1B
Sonos System Products
17.3%$249M
Partner Products And Other Revenue
5.0%$72M
IMMRImmersion Corporation
FY 2023
Fixed Fee License and Per-Unit Royalties
49.9%$34M
Per-Unit Royalties
42.1%$28M
Fixed Fee License
7.8%$5M
Development, Services and Other
0.2%$138,000
AAPLApple Inc.
FY 2025
iPhone
50.4%$209.6B
Service
26.2%$109.2B
Wearables, Home and Accessories
8.6%$35.7B
Mac
8.1%$33.7B
iPad
6.7%$28.0B

LOGI vs GPRO vs SONO vs IMMR vs AAPL — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLAAPLLAGGINGSONO

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

AAPL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

AAPL is the larger business by revenue, generating $451.4B annually — 692.9x GPRO's $652M. AAPL is the more profitable business, keeping 27.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GPRO's -14.3%. On growth, IMMR holds the edge at +5.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricLOGI logoLOGILogitech Internat…GPRO logoGPROGoPro, Inc.SONO logoSONOSonos, Inc.IMMR logoIMMRImmersion Corpora…AAPL logoAAPLApple Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$4.8B$652M$1.5B$1.5B$451.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$855M-$78M$61M$166M$160.0B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$711M-$93M-$41M$66M$122.6B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$976M-$24M$118M-$69M$129.2B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+43.2%+33.6%+44.8%+27.8%+47.9%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+16.0%-12.8%+2.0%+9.1%+32.6%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+14.7%-14.3%-2.8%+4.5%+27.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+20.2%-3.7%+8.1%-4.7%+28.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+7.4%+0.4%+8.4%+5.4%+16.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.1%+75.0%-29.3%-137.3%+21.8%
AAPL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

IMMR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 1.6x trailing earnings, IMMR trades at a 96% valuation discount to AAPL's 38.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, IMMR's 3.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SONO's 142.1x.

MetricLOGI logoLOGILogitech Internat…GPRO logoGPROGoPro, Inc.SONO logoSONOSonos, Inc.IMMR logoIMMRImmersion Corpora…AAPL logoAAPLApple Inc.
Market CapShares × price$14.8B$213M$1.8B$211M$4.22T
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$13.1B$246M$1.7B$455M$4.30T
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS21.50x-2.36x-29.20x1.58x38.53x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.18.60x27.80x47.27x15.49x33.78x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.16x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple16.85x142.14x2.95x29.68x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.06x0.33x1.25x0.17x10.14x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share6.88x2.88x5.06x0.38x58.49x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF15.18x16.64x42.72x
IMMR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

AAPL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

AAPL delivers a 146.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $147 in annual profit, vs $-102 for GPRO. SONO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AAPL's 1.52x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AAPL scores 8/9 vs IMMR's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricLOGI logoLOGILogitech Internat…GPRO logoGPROGoPro, Inc.SONO logoSONOSonos, Inc.IMMR logoIMMRImmersion Corpora…AAPL logoAAPLApple Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+32.2%-102.5%-10.4%+13.0%+146.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+18.5%-20.0%-4.8%+5.3%+34.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+97.8%-44.4%-13.4%+21.2%+67.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+31.1%-49.3%-9.9%+25.8%+69.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–954428
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.09x0.17x0.57x1.52x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$1.8B$34M-$115M$244M$76.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$1.8B$50M$175M$78M$35.9B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$83M$60M$322M$112.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-52.43x2587.88x12.24x
AAPL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

AAPL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AAPL five years ago would be worth $22,442 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,287 for GPRO. Over the past 12 months, GPRO leads with a +134.6% total return vs IMMR's -6.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AAPL at 18.7% vs GPRO's -31.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLOGI logoLOGILogitech Internat…GPRO logoGPROGoPro, Inc.SONO logoSONOSonos, Inc.IMMR logoIMMRImmersion Corpora…AAPL logoAAPLApple Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+2.9%-4.8%-14.9%+3.6%+6.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+35.0%+134.6%+66.0%-6.1%+47.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+66.3%-67.6%-31.6%+3.4%+67.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-4.6%-87.1%-60.4%-6.1%+124.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+640.3%-85.8%-25.2%+13.3%+1174.1%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+18.5%-31.3%-11.9%+1.1%+18.7%
AAPL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

AAPL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

AAPL is the less volatile stock with a 0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GPRO's 3.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AAPL currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs GPRO's 45.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLOGI logoLOGILogitech Internat…GPRO logoGPROGoPro, Inc.SONO logoSONOSonos, Inc.IMMR logoIMMRImmersion Corpora…AAPL logoAAPLApple Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.36x3.08x1.75x1.52x0.99x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$123.01$3.05$19.82$8.15$292.13
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$76.81$0.54$8.73$5.25$193.25
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+83.9%+45.6%+75.1%+79.6%+98.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10065.058.156.161.069.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.0M7.3M1.3M518K39.8M
AAPL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — IMMR and AAPL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: LOGI as "Hold", GPRO as "Hold", SONO as "Buy", IMMR as "Buy", AAPL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 259.7% upside for GPRO (target: $5) vs 5.6% for LOGI (target: $109). For income investors, IMMR offers the higher dividend yield at 5.98% vs AAPL's 0.36%.

MetricLOGI logoLOGILogitech Internat…GPRO logoGPROGoPro, Inc.SONO logoSONOSonos, Inc.IMMR logoIMMRImmersion Corpora…AAPL logoAAPLApple Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$109.00$5.00$19.50$10.00$317.11
# AnalystsCovering analysts1928915110
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.5%+6.0%+0.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises121314
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.57$0.39$1.03
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+4.5%+0.1%+2.1%
Evenly matched — IMMR and AAPL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

AAPL leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IMMR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallApple Inc. (AAPL)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LOGI vs GPRO vs SONO vs IMMR vs AAPL: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LOGI or GPRO or SONO or IMMR or AAPL a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Immersion Corporation (IMMR) is the stronger pick with 35.

4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 7% for GoPro, Inc. (GPRO). Immersion Corporation (IMMR) offers the better valuation at 1. 6x trailing P/E (15. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sonos, Inc. (SONO) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LOGI or GPRO or SONO or IMMR or AAPL?

On trailing P/E, Immersion Corporation (IMMR) is the cheapest at 1.

6x versus Apple Inc. at 38. 5x. On forward P/E, Immersion Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 5x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LOGI or GPRO or SONO or IMMR or AAPL?

Over the past 5 years, Apple Inc.

(AAPL) delivered a total return of +124. 4%, compared to -87. 1% for GoPro, Inc. (GPRO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AAPL returned +1174% versus GPRO's -85. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LOGI or GPRO or SONO or IMMR or AAPL?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Apple Inc.

(AAPL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 99β versus GoPro, Inc. 's 3. 08β — meaning GPRO is approximately 212% more volatile than AAPL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sonos, Inc. (SONO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 152% for Apple Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LOGI or GPRO or SONO or IMMR or AAPL?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Immersion Corporation (IMMR) is pulling ahead at 35.

4% versus -18. 7% for GoPro, Inc. (GPRO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Immersion Corporation grew EPS 295. 2% year-over-year, compared to -64. 5% for Sonos, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IMMR leads at 227. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LOGI or GPRO or SONO or IMMR or AAPL?

Apple Inc.

(AAPL) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 9% net margin versus -14. 3% for GoPro, Inc. — meaning it keeps 26. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AAPL leads at 32. 0% versus -12. 8% for GPRO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AAPL leads at 46. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is LOGI or GPRO or SONO or IMMR or AAPL more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Immersion Corporation (IMMR) trades at 15.

5x forward P/E versus 47. 3x for Sonos, Inc. — 31. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GPRO: 259. 7% to $5. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — LOGI or GPRO or SONO or IMMR or AAPL?

In this comparison, IMMR (6.

0% yield), LOGI (1. 5% yield), AAPL (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. GPRO, SONO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is LOGI or GPRO or SONO or IMMR or AAPL better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Apple Inc.

(AAPL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 99), +1174% 10Y return). GoPro, Inc. (GPRO) carries a higher beta of 3. 08 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AAPL: +1174%, GPRO: -85. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between LOGI and GPRO and SONO and IMMR and AAPL?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: LOGI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; GPRO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SONO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMMR is a small-cap high-growth stock; AAPL is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. LOGI, IMMR pay a dividend while GPRO, SONO, AAPL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

LOGI

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GPRO

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 20%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SONO

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 26%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IMMR

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 270%
  • Gross Margin > 16%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AAPL

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 8%
  • Net Margin > 16%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform LOGI and GPRO and SONO and IMMR and AAPL on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(LOGI: 7.4% · GPRO: 0.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.