Computer Hardware
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LOGI vs GPRO vs SONO vs IMMR vs AAPL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Consumer Electronics
Consumer Electronics
Software - Application
Consumer Electronics
LOGI vs GPRO vs SONO vs IMMR vs AAPL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Computer Hardware | Consumer Electronics | Consumer Electronics | Software - Application | Consumer Electronics |
| Market Cap | $14.81B | $213M | $1.80B | $211M | $4.22T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.84B | $652M | $1.46B | $1.47B | $451.44B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $711M | $-93M | $-41M | $66M | $122.58B |
| Gross Margin | 43.2% | 33.6% | 44.8% | 27.8% | 47.9% |
| Operating Margin | 16.0% | -12.8% | 2.0% | 9.1% | 32.6% |
| Forward P/E | 18.6x | 27.8x | 47.3x | 15.5x | 33.8x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $83M | $60M | $322M | $112.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.75B | $50M | $175M | $78M | $35.93B |
LOGI vs GPRO vs SONO vs IMMR vs AAPL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Logitech Internatio… (LOGI) | 100 | 173.6 | +73.6% |
| GoPro, Inc. (GPRO) | 100 | 29.5 | -70.5% |
| Sonos, Inc. (SONO) | 100 | 137.1 | +37.1% |
| Immersion Corporati… (IMMR) | 100 | 96.0 | -4.0% |
| Apple Inc. (AAPL) | 100 | 361.6 | +261.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LOGI vs GPRO vs SONO vs IMMR vs AAPL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LOGI is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.36, yield 1.5%, current ratio 2.22x
GPRO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +134.6% vs IMMR's -6.1%
Among these 5 stocks, SONO doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
IMMR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 35.4%, EPS growth 295.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 227.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.52, Low D/E 56.9%, current ratio 1.72x
- 35.4% revenue growth vs GPRO's -18.7%
- Lower P/E (15.5x vs 33.8x)
AAPL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.99, yield 0.4%
- 11.7% 10Y total return vs LOGI's 6.4%
- 27.2% margin vs GPRO's -14.3%
- Beta 0.99 vs GPRO's 3.08
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 35.4% revenue growth vs GPRO's -18.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.5x vs 33.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.2% margin vs GPRO's -14.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.99 vs GPRO's 3.08 | |
| Dividends | 6.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs AAPL's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +134.6% vs IMMR's -6.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 34.0% ROA vs GPRO's -20.0%, ROIC 67.4% vs -44.4% |
LOGI vs GPRO vs SONO vs IMMR vs AAPL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LOGI vs GPRO vs SONO vs IMMR vs AAPL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AAPL leads in 4 of 6 categories
IMMR leads 1 • LOGI leads 0 • GPRO leads 0 • SONO leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AAPL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AAPL is the larger business by revenue, generating $451.4B annually — 692.9x GPRO's $652M. AAPL is the more profitable business, keeping 27.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GPRO's -14.3%. On growth, IMMR holds the edge at +5.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.8B | $652M | $1.5B | $1.5B | $451.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $855M | -$78M | $61M | $166M | $160.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $711M | -$93M | -$41M | $66M | $122.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $976M | -$24M | $118M | -$69M | $129.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.2% | +33.6% | +44.8% | +27.8% | +47.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.0% | -12.8% | +2.0% | +9.1% | +32.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +14.7% | -14.3% | -2.8% | +4.5% | +27.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +20.2% | -3.7% | +8.1% | -4.7% | +28.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.4% | +0.4% | +8.4% | +5.4% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | +75.0% | -29.3% | -137.3% | +21.8% |
Valuation Metrics
IMMR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.6x trailing earnings, IMMR trades at a 96% valuation discount to AAPL's 38.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, IMMR's 3.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SONO's 142.1x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14.8B | $213M | $1.8B | $211M | $4.22T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.1B | $246M | $1.7B | $455M | $4.30T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 21.50x | -2.36x | -29.20x | 1.58x | 38.53x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.60x | 27.80x | 47.27x | 15.49x | 33.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 2.16x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 16.85x | — | 142.14x | 2.95x | 29.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.06x | 0.33x | 1.25x | 0.17x | 10.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.88x | 2.88x | 5.06x | 0.38x | 58.49x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.18x | — | 16.64x | — | 42.72x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AAPL delivers a 146.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $147 in annual profit, vs $-102 for GPRO. SONO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AAPL's 1.52x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AAPL scores 8/9 vs IMMR's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +32.2% | -102.5% | -10.4% | +13.0% | +146.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +18.5% | -20.0% | -4.8% | +5.3% | +34.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +97.8% | -44.4% | -13.4% | +21.2% | +67.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +31.1% | -49.3% | -9.9% | +25.8% | +69.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.09x | 0.17x | 0.57x | 1.52x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$1.8B | $34M | -$115M | $244M | $76.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.8B | $50M | $175M | $78M | $35.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $83M | $60M | $322M | $112.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -52.43x | 2587.88x | 12.24x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AAPL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AAPL five years ago would be worth $22,442 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,287 for GPRO. Over the past 12 months, GPRO leads with a +134.6% total return vs IMMR's -6.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AAPL at 18.7% vs GPRO's -31.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +2.9% | -4.8% | -14.9% | +3.6% | +6.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +35.0% | +134.6% | +66.0% | -6.1% | +47.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +66.3% | -67.6% | -31.6% | +3.4% | +67.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -4.6% | -87.1% | -60.4% | -6.1% | +124.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +640.3% | -85.8% | -25.2% | +13.3% | +1174.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.5% | -31.3% | -11.9% | +1.1% | +18.7% |
Risk & Volatility
AAPL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AAPL is the less volatile stock with a 0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GPRO's 3.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AAPL currently trades 98.4% from its 52-week high vs GPRO's 45.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.36x | 3.08x | 1.75x | 1.52x | 0.99x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $123.01 | $3.05 | $19.82 | $8.15 | $292.13 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $76.81 | $0.54 | $8.73 | $5.25 | $193.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.9% | +45.6% | +75.1% | +79.6% | +98.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 65.0 | 58.1 | 56.1 | 61.0 | 69.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.0M | 7.3M | 1.3M | 518K | 39.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — IMMR and AAPL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LOGI as "Hold", GPRO as "Hold", SONO as "Buy", IMMR as "Buy", AAPL as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 259.7% upside for GPRO (target: $5) vs 5.6% for LOGI (target: $109). For income investors, IMMR offers the higher dividend yield at 5.98% vs AAPL's 0.36%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $109.00 | $5.00 | $19.50 | $10.00 | $317.11 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 28 | 9 | 15 | 110 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.5% | — | — | +6.0% | +0.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 12 | 1 | — | 3 | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.57 | — | — | $0.39 | $1.03 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.5% | +0.1% | +2.1% |
AAPL leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). IMMR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
LOGI vs GPRO vs SONO vs IMMR vs AAPL: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LOGI or GPRO or SONO or IMMR or AAPL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Immersion Corporation (IMMR) is the stronger pick with 35.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 7% for GoPro, Inc. (GPRO). Immersion Corporation (IMMR) offers the better valuation at 1. 6x trailing P/E (15. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sonos, Inc. (SONO) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LOGI or GPRO or SONO or IMMR or AAPL?
On trailing P/E, Immersion Corporation (IMMR) is the cheapest at 1.
6x versus Apple Inc. at 38. 5x. On forward P/E, Immersion Corporation is actually cheaper at 15. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LOGI or GPRO or SONO or IMMR or AAPL?
Over the past 5 years, Apple Inc.
(AAPL) delivered a total return of +124. 4%, compared to -87. 1% for GoPro, Inc. (GPRO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AAPL returned +1174% versus GPRO's -85. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LOGI or GPRO or SONO or IMMR or AAPL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Apple Inc.
(AAPL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 99β versus GoPro, Inc. 's 3. 08β — meaning GPRO is approximately 212% more volatile than AAPL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sonos, Inc. (SONO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 152% for Apple Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LOGI or GPRO or SONO or IMMR or AAPL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Immersion Corporation (IMMR) is pulling ahead at 35.
4% versus -18. 7% for GoPro, Inc. (GPRO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Immersion Corporation grew EPS 295. 2% year-over-year, compared to -64. 5% for Sonos, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, IMMR leads at 227. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LOGI or GPRO or SONO or IMMR or AAPL?
Apple Inc.
(AAPL) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 9% net margin versus -14. 3% for GoPro, Inc. — meaning it keeps 26. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AAPL leads at 32. 0% versus -12. 8% for GPRO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AAPL leads at 46. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LOGI or GPRO or SONO or IMMR or AAPL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Immersion Corporation (IMMR) trades at 15.
5x forward P/E versus 47. 3x for Sonos, Inc. — 31. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GPRO: 259. 7% to $5. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LOGI or GPRO or SONO or IMMR or AAPL?
In this comparison, IMMR (6.
0% yield), LOGI (1. 5% yield), AAPL (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. GPRO, SONO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LOGI or GPRO or SONO or IMMR or AAPL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Apple Inc.
(AAPL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 99), +1174% 10Y return). GoPro, Inc. (GPRO) carries a higher beta of 3. 08 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AAPL: +1174%, GPRO: -85. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LOGI and GPRO and SONO and IMMR and AAPL?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LOGI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; GPRO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SONO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMMR is a small-cap high-growth stock; AAPL is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. LOGI, IMMR pay a dividend while GPRO, SONO, AAPL do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.