Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LOVE vs LZB vs ETH vs FLXS vs WSM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LOVE
The Lovesac Company

Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$228M
5Y Perf.-42.9%
LZB
La-Z-Boy Incorporated

Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.46B
5Y Perf.-19.4%
ETH
Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust

Asset Management - Cryptocurrency

Financial ServicesAMEX • US
Market Cap$554M
5Y Perf.-29.3%
FLXS
Flexsteel Industries, Inc.

Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$295M
5Y Perf.+45.3%
WSM
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$22.60B
5Y Perf.+18.6%

LOVE vs LZB vs ETH vs FLXS vs WSM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LOVE logoLOVE
LZB logoLZB
ETH logoETH
FLXS logoFLXS
WSM logoWSM
IndustryFurnishings, Fixtures & AppliancesFurnishings, Fixtures & AppliancesAsset Management - CryptocurrencyFurnishings, Fixtures & AppliancesSpecialty Retail
Market Cap$228M$1.46B$554M$295M$22.60B
Revenue (TTM)$690M$2.13B$615M$458M$7.81B
Net Income (TTM)$13M$84M$47M$22M$1.09B
Gross Margin57.7%43.5%60.5%23.2%46.2%
Operating Margin6.3%5.5%10.1%6.1%18.1%
Forward P/E25.7x13.5x8.5x11.9x21.1x
Total Debt$183M$491M$124M$59M$1.46B
Cash & Equiv.$84M$328M$76M$40M$1.02B

LOVE vs LZB vs ETH vs FLXS vs WSMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LOVE
LZB
ETH
FLXS
WSM
StockJul 24May 26Return
The Lovesac Company (LOVE)10057.1-42.9%
La-Z-Boy Incorporat… (LZB)10080.6-19.4%
Grayscale Ethereum … (ETH)10070.7-29.3%
Flexsteel Industrie… (FLXS)100145.3+45.3%
Williams-Sonoma, In… (WSM)100118.6+18.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LOVE vs LZB vs ETH vs FLXS vs WSM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LZB and FLXS are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Flexsteel Industries, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. WSM and ETH also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
LOVE
The Lovesac Company
The Consumer Cyclical Pick

Among these 5 stocks, LOVE doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
LZB
La-Z-Boy Incorporated
The Income Pick

LZB has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.97, yield 2.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.97, Low D/E 47.6%, current ratio 1.91x
  • Beta 0.97, yield 2.3%, current ratio 1.91x
  • Beta 0.97 vs ETH's 2.91
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
ETH
Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust
The Banking Pick

ETH is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.20 vs LZB's 1.88
  • Lower P/E (8.5x vs 21.1x), PEG 0.20 vs 1.36
Best for: valuation efficiency
FLXS
Flexsteel Industries, Inc.
The Growth Play

FLXS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 6.9%, EPS growth 85.9%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.8%
  • 6.9% revenue growth vs ETH's -4.9%
  • +80.1% vs LOVE's -23.5%
Best for: growth exposure
WSM
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

WSM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.

  • 5.9% 10Y total return vs LZB's 58.2%
  • 13.9% margin vs LOVE's 1.9%
  • 20.6% ROA vs LOVE's 2.6%, ROIC 44.3% vs 3.3%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFLXS logoFLXS6.9% revenue growth vs ETH's -4.9%
ValueETH logoETHLower P/E (8.5x vs 21.1x), PEG 0.20 vs 1.36
Quality / MarginsWSM logoWSM13.9% margin vs LOVE's 1.9%
Stability / SafetyLZB logoLZBBeta 0.97 vs ETH's 2.91
DividendsLZB logoLZB2.3% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs WSM's 1.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)FLXS logoFLXS+80.1% vs LOVE's -23.5%
Efficiency (ROA)WSM logoWSM20.6% ROA vs LOVE's 2.6%, ROIC 44.3% vs 3.3%

LOVE vs LZB vs ETH vs FLXS vs WSM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

LOVEThe Lovesac Company
FY 2025
Sactionals Member
91.4%$622M
Sacs Member
7.2%$49M
Other Operating Segment
1.5%$10M
LZBLa-Z-Boy Incorporated
FY 2024
Stationary Upholstery Furniture
95.5%$2.0B
Delivery
10.0%$206M
Product and Service, Other
8.0%$164M
Bedroom Furniture
6.4%$131M
Wholesale Segment
-20.0%$-409,146,000
ETHGrayscale Ethereum Mini Trust
FY 2025
Upholstery Furniture
48.9%$301M
Case Goods Furniture
28.6%$176M
Accent
19.0%$117M
Manufactured Product, Other
3.5%$22M
FLXSFlexsteel Industries, Inc.
FY 2023
Residential
100.0%$394M
WSMWilliams-Sonoma, Inc.
FY 2024
Pottery Barn Segment
39.4%$3.0B
West Elm Segment
23.9%$1.8B
Williams Sonoma Segment
16.9%$1.3B
Pottery Barn Kids And Teen Segment
14.4%$1.1B
Other Segments
5.5%$421M

LOVE vs LZB vs ETH vs FLXS vs WSM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLWSMLAGGINGLZB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

WSM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

WSM is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.8B annually — 17.0x FLXS's $458M. WSM is the more profitable business, keeping 13.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LOVE's 1.9%. On growth, FLXS holds the edge at +9.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricLOVE logoLOVEThe Lovesac Compa…LZB logoLZBLa-Z-Boy Incorpor…ETH logoETHGrayscale Ethereu…FLXS logoFLXSFlexsteel Industr…WSM logoWSMWilliams-Sonoma, …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$690M$2.1B$615M$458M$7.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$58M$243M$70M$31M$1.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$13M$84M$47M$22M$1.1B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$11M$158M$20M$28M$1.1B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+57.7%+43.5%+60.5%+23.2%+46.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+6.3%+5.5%+10.1%+6.1%+18.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+1.9%+3.9%+8.4%+4.8%+13.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-1.5%+7.4%+0.0%+6.1%+13.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.5%+3.8%+9.8%-4.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-18.4%-23.5%-28.1%-27.2%-1.1%
WSM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ETH leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 10.8x trailing earnings, ETH trades at a 52% valuation discount to LOVE's 22.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ETH offers better value at 0.25x vs LZB's 2.10x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricLOVE logoLOVEThe Lovesac Compa…LZB logoLZBLa-Z-Boy Incorpor…ETH logoETHGrayscale Ethereu…FLXS logoFLXSFlexsteel Industr…WSM logoWSMWilliams-Sonoma, …
Market CapShares × price$228M$1.5B$554M$295M$22.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$327M$1.6B$602M$314M$23.0B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS22.64x15.13x10.84x15.54x20.76x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.25.68x13.52x8.55x11.90x21.08x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.10x0.25x1.34x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.54x6.23x9.71x10.38x13.98x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.34x0.69x0.90x0.67x2.89x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.21x1.46x1.16x1.87x10.85x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF13.06x12.88x9999.00x8.74x21.41x
ETH leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

WSM leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

WSM delivers a 51.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $51 in annual profit, vs $7 for LOVE. ETH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.26x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LOVE's 0.85x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLXS scores 8/9 vs WSM's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricLOVE logoLOVEThe Lovesac Compa…LZB logoLZBLa-Z-Boy Incorpor…ETH logoETHGrayscale Ethereu…FLXS logoFLXSFlexsteel Industr…WSM logoWSMWilliams-Sonoma, …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+6.5%+7.9%+10.0%+12.2%+51.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.6%+4.0%+6.4%+7.5%+20.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+3.3%+8.7%+7.6%+9.9%+44.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+3.6%+9.1%+10.5%+12.3%+41.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–957484
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.85x0.48x0.26x0.35x0.70x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$99M$162M$47M$19M$437M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$84M$328M$76M$40M$1.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$183M$491M$124M$59M$1.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense241.20x721.00x380.21x
WSM leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FLXS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in WSM five years ago would be worth $20,735 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,157 for LOVE. Over the past 12 months, FLXS leads with a +80.1% total return vs LOVE's -23.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FLXS at 50.7% vs LOVE's -15.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLOVE logoLOVEThe Lovesac Compa…LZB logoLZBLa-Z-Boy Incorpor…ETH logoETHGrayscale Ethereu…FLXS logoFLXSFlexsteel Industr…WSM logoWSMWilliams-Sonoma, …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+8.2%-4.0%-26.1%+38.7%-1.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-23.5%-9.9%+28.9%+80.1%+18.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-40.1%+34.7%-33.4%+242.4%+227.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-78.4%-11.5%-30.3%+19.5%+107.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-34.9%+58.2%-18.8%+51.4%+587.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-15.7%+10.4%-12.7%+50.7%+48.4%
FLXS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — LZB and FLXS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

LZB is the less volatile stock with a 0.97 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ETH's 2.91 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLXS currently trades 92.0% from its 52-week high vs ETH's 47.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLOVE logoLOVEThe Lovesac Compa…LZB logoLZBLa-Z-Boy Incorpor…ETH logoETHGrayscale Ethereu…FLXS logoFLXSFlexsteel Industr…WSM logoWSMWilliams-Sonoma, …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.33x0.97x2.91x1.51x1.49x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$21.90$44.49$45.78$59.95$221.81
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$10.33$29.03$16.85$29.38$147.39
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+71.3%+79.9%+47.6%+92.0%+82.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10053.754.755.860.448.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded299K382K4.6M47K1.2M
Evenly matched — LZB and FLXS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — LZB and WSM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: LOVE as "Buy", LZB as "Buy", ETH as "Hold", WSM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 44.0% upside for LOVE (target: $23) vs -2.1% for FLXS (target: $54). For income investors, LZB offers the higher dividend yield at 2.32% vs FLXS's 1.14%.

MetricLOVE logoLOVEThe Lovesac Compa…LZB logoLZBLa-Z-Boy Incorpor…ETH logoETHGrayscale Ethereu…FLXS logoFLXSFlexsteel Industr…WSM logoWSMWilliams-Sonoma, …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$22.50$54.00$200.25
# AnalystsCovering analysts1191056
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.3%+0.0%+1.1%+1.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises40120
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.83$0.00$0.63$2.57
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+8.7%+5.4%0.0%+1.0%+3.8%
Evenly matched — LZB and WSM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

WSM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ETH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallWilliams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LOVE vs LZB vs ETH vs FLXS vs WSM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LOVE or LZB or ETH or FLXS or WSM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Flexsteel Industries, Inc.

(FLXS) is the stronger pick with 6. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 9% for Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH). Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) offers the better valuation at 10. 8x trailing P/E (8. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Lovesac Company (LOVE) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LOVE or LZB or ETH or FLXS or WSM?

On trailing P/E, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) is the cheapest at 10.

8x versus The Lovesac Company at 22. 6x. On forward P/E, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust is actually cheaper at 8. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust wins at 0. 20x versus La-Z-Boy Incorporated's 1. 88x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LOVE or LZB or ETH or FLXS or WSM?

Over the past 5 years, Williams-Sonoma, Inc.

(WSM) delivered a total return of +107. 3%, compared to -78. 4% for The Lovesac Company (LOVE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: WSM returned +587. 8% versus LOVE's -34. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LOVE or LZB or ETH or FLXS or WSM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), La-Z-Boy Incorporated (LZB) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

97β versus Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust's 2. 91β — meaning ETH is approximately 201% more volatile than LZB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 26% versus 85% for The Lovesac Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LOVE or LZB or ETH or FLXS or WSM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Flexsteel Industries, Inc.

(FLXS) is pulling ahead at 6. 9% versus -4. 9% for Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flexsteel Industries, Inc. grew EPS 85. 9% year-over-year, compared to -52. 4% for The Lovesac Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, LOVE leads at 11. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LOVE or LZB or ETH or FLXS or WSM?

Williams-Sonoma, Inc.

(WSM) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 9% net margin versus 1. 7% for The Lovesac Company — meaning it keeps 13. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WSM leads at 18. 1% versus 2. 0% for LOVE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ETH leads at 60. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is LOVE or LZB or ETH or FLXS or WSM more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 20x versus La-Z-Boy Incorporated's 1. 88x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) trades at 8. 5x forward P/E versus 25. 7x for The Lovesac Company — 17. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LOVE: 44. 0% to $22. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — LOVE or LZB or ETH or FLXS or WSM?

In this comparison, LZB (2.

3% yield), WSM (1. 4% yield), FLXS (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. LOVE, ETH do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is LOVE or LZB or ETH or FLXS or WSM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, La-Z-Boy Incorporated (LZB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

97), 2. 3% yield). Grayscale Ethereum Mini Trust (ETH) carries a higher beta of 2. 91 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LZB: +58. 2%, ETH: -18. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between LOVE and LZB and ETH and FLXS and WSM?

These companies operate in different sectors (LOVE (Consumer Cyclical) and LZB (Consumer Cyclical) and ETH (Financial Services) and FLXS (Consumer Cyclical) and WSM (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: LOVE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LZB is a small-cap deep-value stock; ETH is a small-cap deep-value stock; FLXS is a small-cap deep-value stock; WSM is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. LZB, FLXS, WSM pay a dividend while LOVE, ETH do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

LOVE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 34%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LZB

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 26%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ETH

Quality Business

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FLXS

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

WSM

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 8%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform LOVE and LZB and ETH and FLXS and WSM on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(LOVE: 2.5% · LZB: 3.8%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(LOVE: 22.6x · LZB: 15.1x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.