Real Estate - Development
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
LRE vs KORE vs TWLO vs NRDS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
Internet Content & Information
Financial - Credit Services
LRE vs KORE vs TWLO vs NRDS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Development | Telecommunications Services | Internet Content & Information | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $18M | $156M | $29.86B | $726M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $36.91B | $285M | $5.30B | $837M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.12B | $-70M | $104M | $69M |
| Gross Margin | 16.4% | 55.3% | 48.8% | 92.4% |
| Operating Margin | 5.0% | -4.0% | 4.7% | 8.3% |
| Forward P/E | 4.3x | — | 36.3x | 10.0x |
| Total Debt | $11.60B | $307M | $1.08B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.30B | $19M | $682M | $98M |
LRE vs KORE vs TWLO vs NRDS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lead Real Estate Co… (LRE) | 100 | 26.5 | -73.5% |
| KORE Group Holdings… (KORE) | 100 | 302.3 | +202.3% |
| Twilio Inc. (TWLO) | 100 | 336.7 | +236.7% |
| NerdWallet, Inc. (NRDS) | 100 | 109.9 | +9.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LRE vs KORE vs TWLO vs NRDS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LRE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.84, yield 0.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.84, current ratio 1.42x
- Beta 0.84, yield 0.9%, current ratio 1.42x
- Lower P/E (4.3x vs 36.3x)
KORE is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +266.4% vs NRDS's -10.4%
TWLO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 13.7%, EPS growth 131.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.8%
- 5.8% 10Y total return vs KORE's -9.8%
NRDS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and quality is your priority.
- 21.7% NII/revenue growth vs KORE's 3.4%
- 5.8% margin vs KORE's -24.5%
- 14.8% ROA vs KORE's -16.5%, ROIC 14.0% vs -30.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.7% NII/revenue growth vs KORE's 3.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.3x vs 36.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.8% margin vs KORE's -24.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.84 vs TWLO's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +266.4% vs NRDS's -10.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 14.8% ROA vs KORE's -16.5%, ROIC 14.0% vs -30.4% |
LRE vs KORE vs TWLO vs NRDS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LRE vs KORE vs TWLO vs NRDS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NRDS leads in 2 of 6 categories
KORE leads 1 • LRE leads 0 • TWLO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — TWLO and NRDS each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LRE is the larger business by revenue, generating $36.9B annually — 129.3x KORE's $285M. NRDS is the more profitable business, keeping 5.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KORE's -24.5%. On growth, TWLO holds the edge at +20.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $36.9B | $285M | $5.3B | $837M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.0B | $44M | $415M | $130M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.1B | -$70M | $104M | $69M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2.8B | $3M | $1.0B | $135M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.4% | +55.3% | +48.8% | +92.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | -4.0% | +4.7% | +8.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.0% | -24.5% | +2.0% | +5.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.5% | +1.0% | +19.0% | +15.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.9% | -0.3% | +20.0% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +44.9% | +36.0% | +3.8% | — |
Valuation Metrics
NRDS leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.3x trailing earnings, LRE trades at a 100% valuation discount to TWLO's 938.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NRDS's 5.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TWLO's 77.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $18M | $156M | $29.9B | $726M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $84M | $444M | $30.3B | $628M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 4.33x | -1.21x | 938.43x | 15.27x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 36.33x | 9.99x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.30x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.05x | — | 77.16x | 5.41x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.15x | 0.54x | 5.89x | 0.87x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.64x | — | 4.03x | 1.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 28.91x | 5.57x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NRDS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LRE delivers a 26.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $1 for TWLO. TWLO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LRE's 2.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NRDS scores 8/9 vs KORE's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +26.5% | — | +1.3% | +18.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.5% | -16.5% | +1.1% | +14.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.8% | -30.4% | +1.6% | +14.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.1% | -22.7% | +1.9% | +18.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.74x | — | 0.14x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $10.3B | $288M | $399M | -$98M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.3B | $19M | $682M | $98M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11.6B | $307M | $1.1B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 49.14x | -1.96x | — | 315.67x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — KORE and TWLO each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KORE five years ago would be worth $9,262 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,196 for LRE. Over the past 12 months, KORE leads with a +266.4% total return vs NRDS's -10.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TWLO at 53.2% vs LRE's -39.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -25.7% | +105.8% | +42.4% | -24.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +9.3% | +266.4% | +90.3% | -10.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.0% | +57.9% | +259.4% | +10.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.0% | -7.4% | -35.8% | -65.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.0% | -9.8% | +584.5% | -65.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -39.7% | +16.5% | +53.2% | +3.3% |
Risk & Volatility
KORE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KORE is the less volatile stock with a -0.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TWLO's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KORE currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs LRE's 43.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.84x | -0.09x | 1.51x | 1.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.97 | $9.21 | $201.39 | $16.24 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.00 | $2.00 | $91.84 | $8.42 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +43.8% | +99.5% | +97.9% | +60.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.6 | 74.2 | 78.4 | 59.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 16K | 137K | 2.2M | 830K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KORE as "Buy", TWLO as "Buy", NRDS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 63.8% upside for NRDS (target: $16) vs -6.0% for TWLO (target: $185). LRE is the only dividend payer here at 0.92% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $185.17 | $16.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 | 52 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.9% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.87 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% | +2.9% | +9.7% |
NRDS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). KORE leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
LRE vs KORE vs TWLO vs NRDS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LRE or KORE or TWLO or NRDS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, NerdWallet, Inc.
(NRDS) is the stronger pick with 21. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 4% for KORE Group Holdings, Inc. (KORE). Lead Real Estate Co. , Ltd American Depositary Shares (LRE) offers the better valuation at 4. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate KORE Group Holdings, Inc. (KORE) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LRE or KORE or TWLO or NRDS?
On trailing P/E, Lead Real Estate Co.
, Ltd American Depositary Shares (LRE) is the cheapest at 4. 3x versus Twilio Inc. at 938. 4x. On forward P/E, NerdWallet, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LRE or KORE or TWLO or NRDS?
Over the past 5 years, KORE Group Holdings, Inc.
(KORE) delivered a total return of -7. 4%, compared to -78. 0% for Lead Real Estate Co. , Ltd American Depositary Shares (LRE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TWLO returned +584. 5% versus LRE's -78. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LRE or KORE or TWLO or NRDS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), KORE Group Holdings, Inc.
(KORE) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 09β versus Twilio Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning TWLO is approximately -1786% more volatile than KORE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Twilio Inc. (TWLO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 3% for Lead Real Estate Co. , Ltd American Depositary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LRE or KORE or TWLO or NRDS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), NerdWallet, Inc.
(NRDS) is pulling ahead at 21. 7% versus 3. 4% for KORE Group Holdings, Inc. (KORE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Twilio Inc. grew EPS 131. 8% year-over-year, compared to 4. 6% for Lead Real Estate Co. , Ltd American Depositary Shares. Over a 3-year CAGR, LRE leads at 19. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LRE or KORE or TWLO or NRDS?
NerdWallet, Inc.
(NRDS) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 8% net margin versus -51. 1% for KORE Group Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NRDS leads at 8. 3% versus -35. 9% for KORE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NRDS leads at 92. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LRE or KORE or TWLO or NRDS more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, NerdWallet, Inc.
(NRDS) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 36. 3x for Twilio Inc. — 26. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NRDS: 63. 8% to $16. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LRE or KORE or TWLO or NRDS?
In this comparison, LRE (0.
9% yield) pays a dividend. KORE, TWLO, NRDS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LRE or KORE or TWLO or NRDS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, KORE Group Holdings, Inc.
(KORE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 09)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KORE: -9. 8%, NRDS: -65. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LRE and KORE and TWLO and NRDS?
These companies operate in different sectors (LRE (Real Estate) and KORE (Communication Services) and TWLO (Communication Services) and NRDS (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LRE is a small-cap deep-value stock; KORE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TWLO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; NRDS is a small-cap high-growth stock. LRE pays a dividend while KORE, TWLO, NRDS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 9%
- Gross Margin > 29%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.