Real Estate - Development
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LRE vs NRDS vs OPEN vs TREE vs HOOD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Real Estate - Services
Financial - Conglomerates
Financial - Capital Markets
LRE vs NRDS vs OPEN vs TREE vs HOOD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Real Estate - Development | Financial - Credit Services | Real Estate - Services | Financial - Conglomerates | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $18M | $726M | $4.08B | $552M | $68.72B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $36.91B | $837M | $3.94B | $1.12B | $4.47B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.12B | $69M | $-1.39B | $181M | $1.90B |
| Gross Margin | 16.4% | 92.4% | 7.9% | 94.3% | 83.3% |
| Operating Margin | 5.0% | 8.3% | -9.9% | 7.3% | 46.8% |
| Forward P/E | 4.3x | 10.0x | — | 7.1x | 40.5x |
| Total Debt | $11.60B | $0.00 | $193M | $435M | $15.41B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.30B | $98M | $962M | $81M | $4.26B |
LRE vs NRDS vs OPEN vs TREE vs HOOD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lead Real Estate Co… (LRE) | 100 | 26.5 | -73.5% |
| NerdWallet, Inc. (NRDS) | 100 | 109.9 | +9.9% |
| Opendoor Technologi… (OPEN) | 100 | 201.5 | +101.5% |
| LendingTree, Inc. (TREE) | 100 | 257.0 | +157.0% |
| Robinhood Markets, … (HOOD) | 100 | 777.6 | +677.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LRE vs NRDS vs OPEN vs TREE vs HOOD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LRE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.84, yield 0.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.84, current ratio 1.42x
- Lower P/E (4.3x vs 10.0x)
- Beta 0.84 vs OPEN's 3.09
NRDS is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.39, current ratio 3.45x
OPEN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +5.1% vs NRDS's -10.4%
TREE is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 24.1%, EPS growth 443.3%
- 21.8% ROA vs OPEN's -53.6%, ROIC 9.0% vs -15.8%
HOOD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- 119.1% 10Y total return vs OPEN's -50.8%
- PEG 0.16 vs NRDS's 0.19
- NIM 4.0% vs NRDS's 0.6%
- 51.6% NII/revenue growth vs OPEN's -15.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 51.6% NII/revenue growth vs OPEN's -15.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.3x vs 10.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 42.1% margin vs OPEN's -35.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.84 vs OPEN's 3.09 | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +5.1% vs NRDS's -10.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.8% ROA vs OPEN's -53.6%, ROIC 9.0% vs -15.8% |
LRE vs NRDS vs OPEN vs TREE vs HOOD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LRE vs NRDS vs OPEN vs TREE vs HOOD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HOOD leads in 2 of 6 categories
NRDS leads 1 • LRE leads 1 • OPEN leads 0 • TREE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HOOD leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LRE is the larger business by revenue, generating $36.9B annually — 44.1x NRDS's $837M. HOOD is the more profitable business, keeping 42.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to OPEN's -35.2%. On growth, LRE holds the edge at +19.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $36.9B | $837M | $3.9B | $1.1B | $4.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.0B | $130M | -$363M | $120M | $2.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.1B | $69M | -$1.4B | $181M | $1.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2.8B | $135M | $1.1B | $73M | $2.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.4% | +92.4% | +7.9% | +94.3% | +83.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | +8.3% | -9.9% | +7.3% | +46.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.0% | +5.8% | -35.2% | +13.5% | +42.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.5% | +15.6% | +27.2% | +5.4% | +36.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.9% | — | -37.6% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +44.9% | — | -50.0% | +2.3% | +2.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — LRE and OPEN each lead in 2 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.7x trailing earnings, TREE trades at a 90% valuation discount to HOOD's 37.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), HOOD offers better value at 0.14x vs NRDS's 0.30x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $18M | $726M | $4.1B | $552M | $68.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $84M | $628M | $3.3B | $906M | $79.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 4.33x | 15.27x | -3.13x | 3.69x | 37.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 9.99x | — | 7.11x | 40.47x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.30x | — | — | 0.14x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.05x | 5.41x | — | 8.73x | 36.63x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.15x | 0.87x | 0.93x | 0.49x | 15.36x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.64x | 1.98x | 4.06x | 1.95x | 7.66x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 5.57x | 3.93x | 9.09x | 42.34x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NRDS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TREE delivers a 86.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $86 in annual profit, vs $-163 for OPEN. OPEN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LRE's 2.74x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NRDS scores 8/9 vs HOOD's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +26.5% | +18.3% | -163.2% | +86.0% | +21.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.5% | +14.8% | -53.6% | +21.8% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.8% | +14.0% | -15.8% | +9.0% | +7.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.1% | +18.1% | -11.7% | +13.2% | +24.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.74x | — | 0.19x | 1.52x | 1.68x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $10.3B | -$98M | -$769M | $354M | $11.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.3B | $98M | $962M | $81M | $4.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $11.6B | $0 | $193M | $435M | $15.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 49.14x | 315.67x | -8.92x | 4.45x | 97.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HOOD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HOOD five years ago would be worth $21,907 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,126 for TREE. Over the past 12 months, OPEN leads with a +510.1% total return vs NRDS's -10.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HOOD at 104.6% vs LRE's -39.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -25.7% | -24.4% | -12.4% | -22.7% | -33.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +9.3% | -10.4% | +510.1% | +6.1% | +52.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.0% | +10.3% | +159.5% | +112.0% | +756.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.0% | -65.5% | -71.6% | -78.7% | +119.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.0% | -65.5% | -50.8% | -45.7% | +119.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -39.7% | +3.3% | +37.4% | +28.5% | +104.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LRE and NRDS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LRE is the less volatile stock with a 0.84 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OPEN's 3.09 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NRDS currently trades 60.2% from its 52-week high vs LRE's 43.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.84x | 1.39x | 3.09x | 1.55x | 3.05x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.97 | $16.24 | $10.87 | $77.35 | $153.86 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.00 | $8.42 | $0.51 | $32.65 | $48.32 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +43.8% | +60.2% | +48.9% | +51.5% | +49.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.6 | 59.1 | 56.2 | 39.3 | 51.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 16K | 830K | 36.3M | 326K | 29.4M |
Analyst Outlook
LRE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NRDS as "Buy", OPEN as "Hold", TREE as "Buy", HOOD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 73.2% upside for TREE (target: $69) vs 22.2% for OPEN (target: $7). LRE is the only dividend payer here at 0.92% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $16.00 | $6.50 | $69.00 | $117.14 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 6 | 26 | 23 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.9% | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.87 | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +9.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.0% |
HOOD leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). NRDS leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
LRE vs NRDS vs OPEN vs TREE vs HOOD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LRE or NRDS or OPEN or TREE or HOOD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Robinhood Markets, Inc.
(HOOD) is the stronger pick with 51. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). LendingTree, Inc. (TREE) offers the better valuation at 3. 7x trailing P/E (7. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NerdWallet, Inc. (NRDS) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LRE or NRDS or OPEN or TREE or HOOD?
On trailing P/E, LendingTree, Inc.
(TREE) is the cheapest at 3. 7x versus Robinhood Markets, Inc. at 37. 2x. On forward P/E, LendingTree, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Robinhood Markets, Inc. wins at 0. 16x versus NerdWallet, Inc. 's 0. 19x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LRE or NRDS or OPEN or TREE or HOOD?
Over the past 5 years, Robinhood Markets, Inc.
(HOOD) delivered a total return of +119. 1%, compared to -78. 7% for LendingTree, Inc. (TREE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HOOD returned +119. 1% versus LRE's -78. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LRE or NRDS or OPEN or TREE or HOOD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lead Real Estate Co.
, Ltd American Depositary Shares (LRE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 84β versus Opendoor Technologies Inc. 's 3. 09β — meaning OPEN is approximately 268% more volatile than LRE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 3% for Lead Real Estate Co. , Ltd American Depositary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LRE or NRDS or OPEN or TREE or HOOD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Robinhood Markets, Inc.
(HOOD) is pulling ahead at 51. 6% versus -15. 2% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LendingTree, Inc. grew EPS 443. 3% year-over-year, compared to -203. 6% for Opendoor Technologies Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LRE leads at 19. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LRE or NRDS or OPEN or TREE or HOOD?
Robinhood Markets, Inc.
(HOOD) is the more profitable company, earning 42. 1% net margin versus -29. 7% for Opendoor Technologies Inc. — meaning it keeps 42. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HOOD leads at 46. 8% versus -6. 2% for OPEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TREE leads at 94. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LRE or NRDS or OPEN or TREE or HOOD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Robinhood Markets, Inc. (HOOD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 16x versus NerdWallet, Inc. 's 0. 19x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, LendingTree, Inc. (TREE) trades at 7. 1x forward P/E versus 40. 5x for Robinhood Markets, Inc. — 33. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TREE: 73. 2% to $69. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LRE or NRDS or OPEN or TREE or HOOD?
In this comparison, LRE (0.
9% yield) pays a dividend. NRDS, OPEN, TREE, HOOD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LRE or NRDS or OPEN or TREE or HOOD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lead Real Estate Co.
, Ltd American Depositary Shares (LRE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 84), 0. 9% yield). Opendoor Technologies Inc. (OPEN) carries a higher beta of 3. 09 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LRE: -78. 0%, OPEN: -50. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LRE and NRDS and OPEN and TREE and HOOD?
These companies operate in different sectors (LRE (Real Estate) and NRDS (Financial Services) and OPEN (Real Estate) and TREE (Financial Services) and HOOD (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LRE is a small-cap deep-value stock; NRDS is a small-cap high-growth stock; OPEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TREE is a small-cap high-growth stock; HOOD is a mid-cap high-growth stock. LRE pays a dividend while NRDS, OPEN, TREE, HOOD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.