Packaged Foods
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LSF vs SMPL vs HAIN vs FLNT vs MGPI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaged Foods
Packaged Foods
Advertising Agencies
Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries
LSF vs SMPL vs HAIN vs FLNT vs MGPI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Packaged Foods | Advertising Agencies | Beverages - Wineries & Distilleries |
| Market Cap | $34M | $1.24B | $84M | $82M | $408M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $38M | $1.45B | $1.51B | $209M | $521M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2M | $91M | $-544M | $-27M | $-240M |
| Gross Margin | 49.2% | 34.0% | 20.0% | 24.5% | 36.4% |
| Operating Margin | -9.9% | 14.4% | -31.8% | -9.7% | -51.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 7.5x | — | — | 12.1x |
| Total Debt | $246K | $304M | $779M | $38M | $267M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $98M | $54M | $13M | $18M |
LSF vs SMPL vs HAIN vs FLNT vs MGPI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Laird Superfood, In… (LSF) | 100 | 6.9 | -93.1% |
| The Simply Good Foo… (SMPL) | 100 | 56.4 | -43.6% |
| The Hain Celestial … (HAIN) | 100 | 2.1 | -97.9% |
| Fluent, Inc. (FLNT) | 100 | 18.6 | -81.4% |
| MGP Ingredients, In… (MGPI) | 100 | 48.0 | -52.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LSF vs SMPL vs HAIN vs FLNT vs MGPI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LSF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 26.5%, EPS growth 83.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.6%
- 26.5% revenue growth vs MGPI's -23.8%
SMPL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.38
- 3.7% 10Y total return vs MGPI's -17.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.38, Low D/E 16.8%, current ratio 3.64x
- Beta 0.38, current ratio 3.64x
Among these 5 stocks, HAIN doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FLNT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +19.9% vs SMPL's -64.8%
MGPI is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 2.5% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 26.5% revenue growth vs MGPI's -23.8% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.3% margin vs MGPI's -46.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.38 vs HAIN's 2.12, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.5% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +19.9% vs SMPL's -64.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.7% ROA vs HAIN's -36.8%, ROIC 8.1% vs -23.7% |
LSF vs SMPL vs HAIN vs FLNT vs MGPI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LSF vs SMPL vs HAIN vs FLNT vs MGPI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SMPL leads in 2 of 6 categories
HAIN leads 1 • LSF leads 1 • FLNT leads 0 • MGPI leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SMPL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HAIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 39.4x LSF's $38M. SMPL is the more profitable business, keeping 6.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MGPI's -46.0%. On growth, SMPL holds the edge at -0.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $38M | $1.4B | $1.5B | $209M | $521M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$4M | $231M | -$430M | -$11M | -$249M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2M | $91M | -$544M | -$27M | -$240M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | $174M | $5M | -$5M | $54M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.2% | +34.0% | +20.0% | +24.5% | +36.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -9.9% | +14.4% | -31.8% | -9.7% | -51.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.9% | +6.3% | -36.1% | -13.0% | -46.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.6% | +12.0% | +0.3% | -2.4% | +10.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -74.5% | -0.3% | -6.7% | -5.5% | -12.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.6% | -31.6% | -11.3% | +31.6% | -44.0% |
Valuation Metrics
HAIN leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $34M | $1.2B | $84M | $82M | $408M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $26M | $1.4B | $808M | $107M | $656M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -17.50x | 12.20x | -0.13x | -2.64x | -3.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.45x | — | — | 12.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.51x | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 5.97x | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.78x | 0.86x | 0.05x | 0.39x | 0.76x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.37x | 0.70x | 0.14x | 3.95x | 0.57x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 39.99x | 7.86x | — | — | 5.37x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SMPL leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SMPL delivers a 5.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $-165 for HAIN. LSF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FLNT's 2.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LSF scores 6/9 vs FLNT's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -14.8% | +5.2% | -164.7% | -134.2% | -32.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -10.0% | +3.7% | -36.8% | -34.3% | -19.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -28.8% | +8.1% | -23.7% | -31.8% | -6.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -16.1% | +9.4% | -29.2% | -76.6% | -8.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.02x | 0.17x | 1.64x | 2.07x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | $206M | $725M | $25M | $248M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $98M | $54M | $13M | $18M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $246,430 | $304M | $779M | $38M | $267M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 6.77x | -8.60x | -3.74x | -40.23x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LSF leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SMPL five years ago would be worth $3,565 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $182 for HAIN. Over the past 12 months, FLNT leads with a +19.9% total return vs SMPL's -64.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LSF at 52.4% vs HAIN's -65.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +41.3% | -36.4% | -29.8% | +9.5% | -20.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -53.1% | -64.8% | -49.2% | +19.9% | -38.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +253.9% | -67.8% | -95.8% | -37.8% | -79.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.1% | -64.3% | -98.2% | -86.6% | -66.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -92.3% | +3.7% | -98.5% | -90.7% | -17.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +52.4% | -31.5% | -65.3% | -14.6% | -41.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SMPL and FLNT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SMPL is the less volatile stock with a 0.38 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HAIN's 2.12 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLNT currently trades 66.7% from its 52-week high vs HAIN's 33.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.27x | 0.38x | 2.12x | 1.14x | 0.63x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.94 | $36.92 | $2.22 | $4.15 | $34.99 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.96 | $10.21 | $0.55 | $1.50 | $16.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +39.7% | +33.7% | +33.2% | +66.7% | +54.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.8 | 42.9 | 47.8 | 38.9 | 47.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 47K | 2.8M | 1.2M | 33K | 279K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SMPL as "Buy", HAIN as "Hold", FLNT as "Hold", MGPI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 62.1% upside for SMPL (target: $20) vs 26.4% for FLNT (target: $4). MGPI is the only dividend payer here at 2.53% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $20.17 | $1.17 | $3.50 | $29.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 24 | 44 | 2 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.48 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +4.1% | +1.7% | 0.0% | +0.3% |
SMPL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). HAIN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
LSF vs SMPL vs HAIN vs FLNT vs MGPI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LSF or SMPL or HAIN or FLNT or MGPI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Laird Superfood, Inc.
(LSF) is the stronger pick with 26. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 8% for MGP Ingredients, Inc. (MGPI). The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) offers the better valuation at 12. 2x trailing P/E (7. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LSF or SMPL or HAIN or FLNT or MGPI?
On forward P/E, The Simply Good Foods Company is actually cheaper at 7.
5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LSF or SMPL or HAIN or FLNT or MGPI?
Over the past 5 years, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) delivered a total return of -64.
3%, compared to -98. 2% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SMPL returned +3. 7% versus HAIN's -98. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LSF or SMPL or HAIN or FLNT or MGPI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
38β versus The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. 's 2. 12β — meaning HAIN is approximately 460% more volatile than SMPL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Laird Superfood, Inc. (LSF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 2% for Fluent, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LSF or SMPL or HAIN or FLNT or MGPI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Laird Superfood, Inc.
(LSF) is pulling ahead at 26. 5% versus -23. 8% for MGP Ingredients, Inc. (MGPI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Laird Superfood, Inc. grew EPS 83. 5% year-over-year, compared to -601. 2% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SMPL leads at 7. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LSF or SMPL or HAIN or FLNT or MGPI?
The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) is the more profitable company, earning 7.
1% net margin versus -34. 0% for The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SMPL leads at 15. 1% versus -29. 6% for HAIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LSF leads at 40. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LSF or SMPL or HAIN or FLNT or MGPI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, The Simply Good Foods Company (SMPL) trades at 7.
5x forward P/E versus 12. 1x for MGP Ingredients, Inc. — 4. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SMPL: 62. 1% to $20. 17.
08Which pays a better dividend — LSF or SMPL or HAIN or FLNT or MGPI?
In this comparison, MGPI (2.
5% yield) pays a dividend. LSF, SMPL, HAIN, FLNT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LSF or SMPL or HAIN or FLNT or MGPI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MGP Ingredients, Inc.
(MGPI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 63), 2. 5% yield). The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (HAIN) carries a higher beta of 2. 12 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MGPI: -17. 3%, HAIN: -98. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LSF and SMPL and HAIN and FLNT and MGPI?
These companies operate in different sectors (LSF (Consumer Defensive) and SMPL (Consumer Defensive) and HAIN (Consumer Defensive) and FLNT (Communication Services) and MGPI (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LSF is a small-cap high-growth stock; SMPL is a small-cap deep-value stock; HAIN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FLNT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MGPI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. MGPI pays a dividend while LSF, SMPL, HAIN, FLNT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.