Leisure
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
LUCK vs DKNG vs FLUT vs RSI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
LUCK vs DKNG vs FLUT vs RSI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Leisure | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| Market Cap | $1.04B | $12.50B | $17.64B | $2.98B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.24B | $6.05B | $17.02B | $1.24B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-88M | $4M | $-455M | $37M |
| Gross Margin | 21.4% | 41.3% | 44.2% | 34.9% |
| Operating Margin | 11.7% | -0.2% | 4.4% | 9.3% |
| Forward P/E | 1496.0x | 99.1x | 16.5x | 46.5x |
| Total Debt | $2.63B | $1.93B | $13.35B | $18M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $60M | $1.60B | $3.83B | $341M |
LUCK vs DKNG vs FLUT vs RSI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lucky Strike Entert… (LUCK) | 100 | 76.7 | -23.3% |
| DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) | 100 | 44.5 | -55.5% |
| Flutter Entertainme… (FLUT) | 100 | 49.3 | -50.7% |
| Rush Street Interac… (RSI) | 100 | 208.3 | +108.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LUCK vs DKNG vs FLUT vs RSI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LUCK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends is your priority.
- 3.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
DKNG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 27.0%, EPS growth 99.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 39.3%
- 27.0% revenue growth vs LUCK's 4.0%
FLUT is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (16.5x vs 46.5x)
RSI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.07
- 189.9% 10Y total return vs DKNG's 157.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.07, Low D/E 6.1%, current ratio 1.93x
- Beta 1.07, current ratio 1.93x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.0% revenue growth vs LUCK's 4.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.5x vs 46.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.0% margin vs LUCK's -7.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.07 vs LUCK's 1.33 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +138.2% vs FLUT's -58.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.0% ROA vs LUCK's -2.7% |
LUCK vs DKNG vs FLUT vs RSI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LUCK vs DKNG vs FLUT vs RSI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
RSI leads in 3 of 6 categories
FLUT leads 1 • LUCK leads 1 • DKNG leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — DKNG and RSI each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLUT is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.0B annually — 13.7x RSI's $1.2B. RSI is the more profitable business, keeping 3.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LUCK's -7.1%. On growth, DKNG holds the edge at +42.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $6.1B | $17.0B | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $281M | $266M | $2.0B | $156M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$88M | $4M | -$455M | $37M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $25M | $612M | $880M | $147M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.4% | +41.3% | +44.2% | +34.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.7% | -0.2% | +4.4% | +9.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.1% | +0.1% | -2.7% | +3.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.0% | +10.1% | +5.2% | +11.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.7% | +42.8% | +17.4% | +41.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +43.7% | +192.9% | -22.3% | +60.0% |
Valuation Metrics
FLUT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, FLUT's 10.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than DKNG's 49.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.0B | $12.5B | $17.6B | $3.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.6B | $12.8B | $27.2B | $2.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -57.54x | -3113.58x | -58.47x | 199.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1496.00x | 99.14x | 16.51x | 46.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 12.29x | 49.42x | 10.69x | 20.87x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.87x | 2.06x | 1.08x | 2.63x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 19.81x | 1.87x | 21.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 28.75x | 19.31x | 16.35x | 18.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RSI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RSI delivers a 12.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-4 for FLUT. RSI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DKNG's 3.06x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DKNG scores 7/9 vs FLUT's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +0.5% | -4.3% | +12.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.7% | +0.1% | -1.6% | +6.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.4% | -0.9% | +4.5% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.7% | -0.6% | +4.6% | +26.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 3.06x | 1.38x | 0.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.6B | $330M | $9.5B | -$322M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $60M | $1.6B | $3.8B | $341M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.6B | $1.9B | $13.3B | $18M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.54x | 1.92x | 0.04x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RSI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RSI five years ago would be worth $21,388 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,935 for FLUT. Over the past 12 months, RSI leads with a +138.2% total return vs FLUT's -58.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RSI at 105.4% vs FLUT's -20.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -11.2% | -29.3% | -53.7% | +44.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -19.4% | -27.3% | -58.3% | +138.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -43.7% | +4.3% | -49.0% | +766.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -18.5% | -47.9% | -50.7% | +113.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -17.7% | +157.3% | -22.9% | +189.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -17.4% | +1.4% | -20.1% | +105.4% |
Risk & Volatility
RSI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RSI is the less volatile stock with a 1.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LUCK's 1.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RSI currently trades 95.4% from its 52-week high vs FLUT's 32.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.33x | 1.12x | 1.23x | 1.07x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.61 | $48.78 | $313.69 | $29.24 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.71 | $20.46 | $97.94 | $11.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.4% | +51.7% | +32.2% | +95.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.1 | 55.1 | 35.0 | 69.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 78K | 12.9M | 3.4M | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
LUCK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LUCK as "Buy", DKNG as "Buy", FLUT as "Buy", RSI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 125.2% upside for FLUT (target: $228) vs 9.0% for RSI (target: $30). LUCK is the only dividend payer here at 3.20% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $12.83 | $36.88 | $227.86 | $30.40 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 48 | 24 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.2% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.24 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.9% | +6.6% | +6.4% | +0.3% |
RSI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). FLUT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
LUCK vs DKNG vs FLUT vs RSI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LUCK or DKNG or FLUT or RSI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is the stronger pick with 27. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 0% for Lucky Strike Entertainment Corporation (LUCK). Rush Street Interactive, Inc. (RSI) offers the better valuation at 199. 2x trailing P/E (46. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lucky Strike Entertainment Corporation (LUCK) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LUCK or DKNG or FLUT or RSI?
On forward P/E, Flutter Entertainment plc is actually cheaper at 16.
5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LUCK or DKNG or FLUT or RSI?
Over the past 5 years, Rush Street Interactive, Inc.
(RSI) delivered a total return of +113. 9%, compared to -50. 7% for Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RSI returned +189. 9% versus FLUT's -22. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LUCK or DKNG or FLUT or RSI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Rush Street Interactive, Inc.
(RSI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 07β versus Lucky Strike Entertainment Corporation's 1. 33β — meaning LUCK is approximately 24% more volatile than RSI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Rush Street Interactive, Inc. (RSI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 3% for DraftKings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LUCK or DKNG or FLUT or RSI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), DraftKings Inc.
(DKNG) is pulling ahead at 27. 0% versus 4. 0% for Lucky Strike Entertainment Corporation (LUCK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Rush Street Interactive, Inc. grew EPS 418. 5% year-over-year, compared to -820. 8% for Flutter Entertainment plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, DKNG leads at 39. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LUCK or DKNG or FLUT or RSI?
Rush Street Interactive, Inc.
(RSI) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 9% net margin versus -1. 9% for Flutter Entertainment plc — meaning it keeps 2. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LUCK leads at 11. 4% versus -0. 3% for DKNG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FLUT leads at 45. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LUCK or DKNG or FLUT or RSI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) trades at 16.
5x forward P/E versus 1496. 0x for Lucky Strike Entertainment Corporation — 1479. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FLUT: 125. 2% to $227. 86.
08Which pays a better dividend — LUCK or DKNG or FLUT or RSI?
In this comparison, LUCK (3.
2% yield) pays a dividend. DKNG, FLUT, RSI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LUCK or DKNG or FLUT or RSI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lucky Strike Entertainment Corporation (LUCK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (3.
2% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LUCK: -17. 7%, FLUT: -22. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LUCK and DKNG and FLUT and RSI?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LUCK is a small-cap income-oriented stock; DKNG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FLUT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; RSI is a small-cap high-growth stock. LUCK pays a dividend while DKNG, FLUT, RSI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.