Apparel - Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LVLU vs CPRI vs URBN vs BURL vs PVH
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Luxury Goods
Apparel - Retail
Apparel - Retail
Apparel - Manufacturers
LVLU vs CPRI vs URBN vs BURL vs PVH — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Retail | Luxury Goods | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Retail | Apparel - Manufacturers |
| Market Cap | $6.28B | $2.23B | $6.32B | $19.40B | $4.06B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $285M | $3.71B | $6.17B | $11.56B | $8.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-45M | $-504M | $465M | $610M | $469M |
| Gross Margin | 41.8% | 61.4% | 36.0% | 41.9% | 58.2% |
| Operating Margin | -16.7% | -1.8% | 9.9% | 8.9% | 7.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 13.4x | 13.4x | 31.3x | 8.1x |
| Total Debt | $39M | $3.10B | $1.23B | $3.99B | $3.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $166M | $369M | $1.23B | $748M |
LVLU vs CPRI vs URBN vs BURL vs PVH — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lulu's Fashion Loun… (LVLU) | 100 | 5.2 | -94.8% |
| Capri Holdings Limi… (CPRI) | 100 | 31.6 | -68.4% |
| Urban Outfitters, I… (URBN) | 100 | 222.4 | +122.4% |
| Burlington Stores, … (BURL) | 100 | 104.6 | +4.6% |
| PVH Corp. (PVH) | 100 | 83.0 | -17.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LVLU vs CPRI vs URBN vs BURL vs PVH
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LVLU is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.41
- Beta 0.41 vs CPRI's 2.03, lower leverage
- +60.7% vs CPRI's +18.4%
CPRI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
URBN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 11.1%, EPS growth 18.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.35, Low D/E 43.5%, current ratio 1.51x
- PEG 0.06 vs PVH's 0.60
- Beta 1.35, current ratio 1.51x
BURL is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 440.2% 10Y total return vs URBN's 143.2%
PVH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (8.1x vs 31.3x)
- 0.2% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 11.1% revenue growth vs LVLU's -11.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.1x vs 31.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.5% margin vs LVLU's -15.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.41 vs CPRI's 2.03, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.2% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +60.7% vs CPRI's +18.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.3% ROA vs LVLU's -43.6%, ROIC 13.1% vs -53.9% |
LVLU vs CPRI vs URBN vs BURL vs PVH — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LVLU vs CPRI vs URBN vs BURL vs PVH — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
URBN leads in 2 of 6 categories
CPRI leads 1 • PVH leads 1 • LVLU leads 0 • BURL leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CPRI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BURL is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.6B annually — 40.5x LVLU's $285M. URBN is the more profitable business, keeping 7.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LVLU's -15.8%. On growth, BURL holds the edge at +11.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $285M | $3.7B | $6.2B | $11.6B | $8.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$42M | $72M | $614M | $1.5B | $924M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$45M | -$504M | $465M | $610M | $469M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1M | $491M | $445M | $232M | $516M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.8% | +61.4% | +36.0% | +41.9% | +58.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -16.7% | -1.8% | +9.9% | +8.9% | +7.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -15.8% | -13.6% | +7.5% | +5.3% | +5.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.5% | +13.2% | +7.2% | +2.0% | +5.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.6% | -18.7% | +10.1% | +11.5% | +4.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +25.2% | +120.8% | -18.0% | +20.4% | +65.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PVH leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.4x trailing earnings, PVH trades at a 74% valuation discount to BURL's 32.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), URBN offers better value at 0.06x vs PVH's 0.62x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.3B | $2.2B | $6.3B | $19.4B | $4.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.3B | $5.2B | $7.2B | $22.2B | $6.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -113.24x | -1.87x | 13.92x | 32.24x | 8.39x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.36x | 13.36x | 31.34x | 8.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.06x | — | 0.62x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 9.77x | 17.49x | 6.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 19.87x | 0.50x | 1.02x | 1.68x | 0.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 469.50x | 5.94x | 2.30x | 5.05x | 0.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 14.55x | 14.20x | 113.08x | 6.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
URBN leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BURL delivers a 29.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $30 in annual profit, vs $-18 for LVLU. URBN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.44x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CPRI's 8.34x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), URBN scores 8/9 vs LVLU's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -17.9% | -4.7% | +16.5% | +29.7% | +9.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -43.6% | -15.1% | +9.3% | +6.5% | +4.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -53.9% | -13.6% | +13.1% | +10.3% | +7.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -86.3% | -17.0% | +16.5% | +12.0% | +8.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 8 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.94x | 8.34x | 0.44x | 1.03x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $35M | $2.9B | $856M | $2.8B | $2.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $166M | $369M | $1.2B | $748M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $39M | $3.1B | $1.2B | $4.0B | $3.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -20.21x | — | 2531.08x | 11.36x | 2.42x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
URBN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in URBN five years ago would be worth $17,842 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $515 for LVLU. Over the past 12 months, LVLU leads with a +60.7% total return vs CPRI's +18.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors URBN at 35.6% vs LVLU's -36.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +88.6% | -23.4% | -6.5% | +2.8% | +30.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +60.7% | +18.4% | +36.0% | +25.1% | +24.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.5% | -50.5% | +149.2% | +68.1% | +7.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.8% | -68.6% | +78.4% | -7.4% | -24.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.8% | -63.1% | +143.2% | +440.2% | -1.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -36.6% | -20.9% | +35.6% | +18.9% | +2.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LVLU and PVH each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LVLU is the less volatile stock with a 0.41 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CPRI's 2.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PVH currently trades 88.5% from its 52-week high vs LVLU's 31.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.41x | 2.03x | 1.35x | 1.30x | 1.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.32 | $28.27 | $84.35 | $351.85 | $100.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.98 | $15.37 | $51.12 | $218.52 | $59.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +31.2% | +66.1% | +83.5% | +87.1% | +88.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.8 | 47.3 | 55.7 | 44.5 | 60.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 25K | 2.5M | 1.5M | 721K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — LVLU and BURL each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LVLU as "Hold", CPRI as "Hold", URBN as "Hold", BURL as "Buy", PVH as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 35.5% upside for CPRI (target: $25) vs -80.2% for LVLU (target: $2). PVH is the only dividend payer here at 0.17% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $2.00 | $25.33 | $89.57 | $331.88 | $100.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 53 | 58 | 35 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | $0.15 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +0.2% | +5.5% | +1.4% | +12.9% |
URBN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). CPRI leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
LVLU vs CPRI vs URBN vs BURL vs PVH: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LVLU or CPRI or URBN or BURL or PVH a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Urban Outfitters, Inc.
(URBN) is the stronger pick with 11. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 1% for Lulu's Fashion Lounge Holdings, Inc. (LVLU). PVH Corp. (PVH) offers the better valuation at 8. 4x trailing P/E (8. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Burlington Stores, Inc. (BURL) a "Buy" — based on 35 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LVLU or CPRI or URBN or BURL or PVH?
On trailing P/E, PVH Corp.
(PVH) is the cheapest at 8. 4x versus Burlington Stores, Inc. at 32. 2x. On forward P/E, PVH Corp. is actually cheaper at 8. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Urban Outfitters, Inc. wins at 0. 06x versus PVH Corp. 's 0. 60x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LVLU or CPRI or URBN or BURL or PVH?
Over the past 5 years, Urban Outfitters, Inc.
(URBN) delivered a total return of +78. 4%, compared to -94. 8% for Lulu's Fashion Lounge Holdings, Inc. (LVLU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BURL returned +440. 2% versus LVLU's -94. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LVLU or CPRI or URBN or BURL or PVH?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lulu's Fashion Lounge Holdings, Inc.
(LVLU) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 41β versus Capri Holdings Limited's 2. 03β — meaning CPRI is approximately 393% more volatile than LVLU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Urban Outfitters, Inc. (URBN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 44% versus 8% for Capri Holdings Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LVLU or CPRI or URBN or BURL or PVH?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Urban Outfitters, Inc.
(URBN) is pulling ahead at 11. 1% versus -11. 1% for Lulu's Fashion Lounge Holdings, Inc. (LVLU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Burlington Stores, Inc. grew EPS 21. 9% year-over-year, compared to -176. 7% for Lulu's Fashion Lounge Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BURL leads at 10. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LVLU or CPRI or URBN or BURL or PVH?
Urban Outfitters, Inc.
(URBN) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 5% net margin versus -26. 6% for Capri Holdings Limited — meaning it keeps 7. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: URBN leads at 9. 8% versus -16. 9% for CPRI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CPRI leads at 63. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LVLU or CPRI or URBN or BURL or PVH more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Urban Outfitters, Inc. (URBN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 06x versus PVH Corp. 's 0. 60x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, PVH Corp. (PVH) trades at 8. 1x forward P/E versus 31. 3x for Burlington Stores, Inc. — 23. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CPRI: 35. 5% to $25. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — LVLU or CPRI or URBN or BURL or PVH?
In this comparison, PVH (0.
2% yield) pays a dividend. LVLU, CPRI, URBN, BURL do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LVLU or CPRI or URBN or BURL or PVH better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lulu's Fashion Lounge Holdings, Inc.
(LVLU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 41)). Capri Holdings Limited (CPRI) carries a higher beta of 2. 03 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LVLU: -94. 8%, CPRI: -63. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LVLU and CPRI and URBN and BURL and PVH?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LVLU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CPRI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; URBN is a small-cap deep-value stock; BURL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PVH is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.