Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
LX vs UPST vs LC vs SOFI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
LX vs UPST vs LC vs SOFI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $147M | $2.78B | $1.92B | $20.40B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $14.20B | $1.08B | $1.33B | $4.77B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.61B | $49M | $136M | $481M |
| Gross Margin | 35.4% | 95.2% | 64.7% | 75.1% |
| Operating Margin | 16.1% | 5.1% | 25.0% | 11.0% |
| Forward P/E | 0.3x | 14.7x | 9.6x | 26.5x |
| Total Debt | $5.27B | $1.85B | $16M | $1.82B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.25B | $657M | $918M | $4.93B |
LX vs UPST vs LC vs SOFI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| LexinFintech Holdin… (LX) | 100 | 30.7 | -69.3% |
| Upstart Holdings, I… (UPST) | 100 | 71.2 | -28.8% |
| LendingClub Corpora… (LC) | 100 | 158.0 | +58.0% |
| SoFi Technologies, … (SOFI) | 100 | 128.6 | +28.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LX vs UPST vs LC vs SOFI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.25, yield 6.9%
- Lower P/E (0.3x vs 26.5x)
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs UPST's 0.9% (lower = leaner)
- Beta 1.25 vs UPST's 2.96, lower leverage
UPST is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 58.9%, EPS growth 131.3%
- 58.9% NII/revenue growth vs LX's 8.8%
LC is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.36, Low D/E 1.1%, current ratio 466.38x
- Beta 2.36, current ratio 466.38x
- NIM 5.4% vs SOFI's 4.4%
- +62.4% vs LX's -70.4%
SOFI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 52.7% 10Y total return vs LC's -27.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 58.9% NII/revenue growth vs LX's 8.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.3x vs 26.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs UPST's 0.9% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.25 vs UPST's 2.96, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 6.9% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +62.4% vs LX's -70.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs UPST's 0.9% |
LX vs UPST vs LC vs SOFI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LX vs UPST vs LC vs SOFI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LX leads in 3 of 6 categories
LC leads 1 • UPST leads 0 • SOFI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LX is the larger business by revenue, generating $14.2B annually — 13.2x UPST's $1.1B. LC is the more profitable business, keeping 10.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UPST's 5.0%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $14.2B | $1.1B | $1.3B | $4.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.8B | $68M | $287M | $760M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.6B | $49M | $136M | $481M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | -$146M | -$2.9B | -$2.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +35.4% | +95.2% | +64.7% | +75.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.1% | +5.1% | +25.0% | +11.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.7% | +5.0% | +10.2% | +10.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | -15.4% | -2.1% | -83.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +110.3% | -169.2% | +3.2% | -56.7% |
Valuation Metrics
LX leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.2x trailing earnings, LX trades at a 97% valuation discount to UPST's 64.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LX's 1.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than UPST's 50.1x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $147M | $2.8B | $1.9B | $20.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $590M | $4.0B | $1.0B | $17.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 2.16x | 64.44x | 14.51x | 41.03x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.35x | 14.69x | 9.56x | 26.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.49x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.65x | 50.13x | 2.57x | 22.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.07x | 2.58x | 1.44x | 4.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.22x | 3.90x | 1.32x | 1.91x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.20x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
LX leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LX delivers a 14.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $6 for SOFI. LC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UPST's 2.32x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LX scores 8/9 vs SOFI's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.7% | +6.6% | +9.5% | +5.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.2% | +1.7% | +1.2% | +1.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.0% | +1.7% | +17.3% | +3.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +19.5% | +2.4% | +3.3% | +1.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 5 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.49x | 2.32x | 0.01x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.0B | $1.2B | -$902M | -$3.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.3B | $657M | $918M | $4.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5.3B | $1.9B | $16M | $1.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 153.26x | 1.66x | 0.67x | 0.45x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — LC and SOFI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LC five years ago would be worth $11,510 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,022 for UPST. Over the past 12 months, LC leads with a +62.4% total return vs LX's -70.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SOFI at 43.0% vs LX's 2.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -31.8% | -36.7% | -12.7% | -41.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -70.4% | -37.6% | +62.4% | +23.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +8.1% | +116.7% | +142.9% | +192.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.4% | -69.8% | +15.1% | -3.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.1% | -1.6% | -27.7% | +52.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +2.6% | +29.4% | +34.4% | +43.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LX and LC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LX is the less volatile stock with a 1.25 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UPST's 2.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LC currently trades 77.0% from its 52-week high vs LX's 22.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.25x | 2.96x | 2.36x | 2.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.35 | $87.30 | $21.67 | $32.73 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.02 | $23.96 | $9.70 | $12.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +22.0% | +33.2% | +77.0% | +48.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.7 | 42.7 | 57.4 | 41.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.5M | 4.8M | 2.1M | 65.8M |
Analyst Outlook
LX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LX as "Buy", UPST as "Buy", LC as "Buy", SOFI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 69.9% upside for LX (target: $4) vs 30.6% for SOFI (target: $21). LX is the only dividend payer here at 6.91% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $3.50 | $45.17 | $22.75 | $20.89 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 22 | 29 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.9% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — | 1 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.97 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.3% |
LX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). LC leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
LX vs UPST vs LC vs SOFI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LX or UPST or LC or SOFI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Upstart Holdings, Inc.
(UPST) is the stronger pick with 58. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 8% for LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. (LX). LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. (LX) offers the better valuation at 2. 2x trailing P/E (0. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. (LX) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LX or UPST or LC or SOFI?
On trailing P/E, LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.
(LX) is the cheapest at 2. 2x versus Upstart Holdings, Inc. at 64. 4x. On forward P/E, LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. is actually cheaper at 0. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LX or UPST or LC or SOFI?
Over the past 5 years, LendingClub Corporation (LC) delivered a total return of +15.
1%, compared to -69. 8% for Upstart Holdings, Inc. (UPST). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SOFI returned +52. 7% versus LX's -74. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LX or UPST or LC or SOFI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.
(LX) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 25β versus Upstart Holdings, Inc. 's 2. 96β — meaning UPST is approximately 136% more volatile than LX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, LendingClub Corporation (LC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 2% for Upstart Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LX or UPST or LC or SOFI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Upstart Holdings, Inc.
(UPST) is pulling ahead at 58. 9% versus 8. 8% for LexinFintech Holdings Ltd. (LX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LendingClub Corporation grew EPS 155. 6% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for SoFi Technologies, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LX or UPST or LC or SOFI?
LendingClub Corporation (LC) is the more profitable company, earning 10.
2% net margin versus 5. 0% for Upstart Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LC leads at 25. 0% versus 5. 1% for UPST. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UPST leads at 95. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LX or UPST or LC or SOFI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.
(LX) trades at 0. 3x forward P/E versus 26. 5x for SoFi Technologies, Inc. — 26. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LX: 69. 9% to $3. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — LX or UPST or LC or SOFI?
In this comparison, LX (6.
9% yield) pays a dividend. UPST, LC, SOFI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LX or UPST or LC or SOFI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, LexinFintech Holdings Ltd.
(LX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 25), 6. 9% yield). LendingClub Corporation (LC) carries a higher beta of 2. 36 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LX: -74. 1%, LC: -27. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LX and UPST and LC and SOFI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LX is a small-cap deep-value stock; UPST is a small-cap high-growth stock; LC is a small-cap deep-value stock; SOFI is a mid-cap high-growth stock. LX pays a dividend while UPST, LC, SOFI do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.