Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LYG vs BCS vs NWG vs HSBC vs UBS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Diversified
Banks - Diversified
Banks - Diversified
Banks - Diversified
LYG vs BCS vs NWG vs HSBC vs UBS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $77.17B | $79.93B | $30.60B | $305.76B | $137.82B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $65.00B | $26.82B | $29.48B | $147.86B | $59.05B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4.66B | $7.05B | $5.83B | $22.29B | $6.27B |
| Gross Margin | 29.9% | 108.6% | 56.3% | 54.6% | 63.6% |
| Operating Margin | 10.2% | 37.3% | 26.1% | 20.3% | 11.9% |
| Forward P/E | 13.0x | 11.1x | 10.7x | 10.8x | 13.8x |
| Total Debt | $95.14B | $219.94B | $71.83B | $495.79B | $356.12B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $56.66B | $229.75B | $85.35B | $286.92B | $209.86B |
LYG vs BCS vs NWG vs HSBC vs UBS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lloyds Banking Grou… (LYG) | 100 | 385.1 | +285.1% |
| Barclays PLC (BCS) | 100 | 418.9 | +318.9% |
| NatWest Group plc (NWG) | 100 | 529.4 | +429.4% |
| HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) | 100 | 391.1 | +291.1% |
| UBS Group AG (UBS) | 100 | 422.7 | +322.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LYG vs BCS vs NWG vs HSBC vs UBS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LYG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and quality.
- 72.8% NII/revenue growth vs BCS's -53.0%
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs BCS's 0.7% (lower = leaner)
- Beta 1.05 vs BCS's 1.39, lower leverage
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs BCS's 0.7%
BCS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NWG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.15, yield 10.3%
- Rev growth 3.2%, EPS growth 27.4%
- NIM 1.8% vs UBS's 0.4%
- Lower P/E (10.7x vs 13.8x)
HSBC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 264.7% 10Y total return vs UBS's 232.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.12, current ratio 2.62x
- PEG 0.24 vs UBS's 12.52
- Beta 1.12, yield 3.7%, current ratio 2.62x
Among these 5 stocks, UBS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 72.8% NII/revenue growth vs BCS's -53.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.7x vs 13.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs BCS's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.05 vs BCS's 1.39, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 10.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs BCS's 3.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +64.7% vs NWG's +27.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs BCS's 0.7% |
LYG vs BCS vs NWG vs HSBC vs UBS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NWG leads in 2 of 6 categories
BCS leads 1 • HSBC leads 1 • LYG leads 0 • UBS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BCS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HSBC is the larger business by revenue, generating $147.9B annually — 5.5x BCS's $26.8B. BCS is the more profitable business, keeping 26.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LYG's 7.2%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $65.0B | $26.8B | $29.5B | $147.9B | $59.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $6.7B | $9.0B | $8.9B | $35.8B | $9.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4.7B | $7.1B | $5.8B | $22.3B | $6.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | $3.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +29.9% | +108.6% | +56.3% | +54.6% | +63.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.2% | +37.3% | +26.1% | +20.3% | +11.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.2% | +26.7% | +19.8% | +15.1% | +10.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.0% | -30.1% | +19.6% | +17.0% | -26.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +141.8% | +36.0% | +13.3% | +23.5% | +26.1% |
Valuation Metrics
NWG leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.2x trailing earnings, NWG trades at a 82% valuation discount to UBS's 23.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BCS offers better value at 0.28x vs UBS's 21.49x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $77.2B | $79.9B | $30.6B | $305.8B | $137.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $129.5B | $66.6B | $12.2B | $514.6B | $284.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.37x | 10.44x | 4.19x | 14.71x | 23.75x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.02x | 11.09x | 10.67x | 10.76x | 13.84x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.35x | 0.28x | — | 0.33x | 21.49x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.30x | 4.66x | 1.01x | 16.11x | 29.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.87x | 2.19x | 0.76x | 2.07x | 2.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.21x | 0.80x | 0.54x | 1.69x | 1.62x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 3.89x | 12.18x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NWG leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NWG delivers a 13.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $7 for UBS. NWG carries lower financial leverage with a 1.69x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UBS's 3.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NWG scores 7/9 vs BCS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.9% | +9.2% | +13.8% | +11.4% | +7.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.5% | +0.4% | +0.8% | +0.7% | +0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.6% | +2.7% | +5.3% | +4.0% | +1.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.6% | +1.2% | +3.3% | +1.4% | +1.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.99x | 2.81x | 1.69x | 2.68x | 3.94x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $38.5B | -$9.8B | -$13.5B | $208.9B | $146.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $56.7B | $229.8B | $85.3B | $286.9B | $209.9B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $95.1B | $219.9B | $71.8B | $495.8B | $356.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.39x | 0.42x | 0.60x | 0.47x | 0.33x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HSBC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HSBC five years ago would be worth $32,570 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $23,158 for LYG. Over the past 12 months, HSBC leads with a +64.7% total return vs NWG's +27.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BCS at 46.5% vs UBS's 33.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +0.4% | -9.4% | -10.3% | +13.4% | -3.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +41.1% | +49.0% | +27.0% | +64.7% | +47.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +150.1% | +214.4% | +161.1% | +162.1% | +139.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +131.6% | +146.3% | +204.0% | +225.7% | +204.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +77.6% | +187.7% | +192.4% | +264.7% | +232.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +35.7% | +46.5% | +37.7% | +37.9% | +33.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LYG and HSBC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LYG is the less volatile stock with a 1.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BCS's 1.39 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HSBC currently trades 93.9% from its 52-week high vs NWG's 79.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.13x | 1.42x | 1.19x | 1.15x | 1.20x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.34 | $27.70 | $19.36 | $94.80 | $49.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.81 | $15.88 | $12.76 | $56.21 | $30.36 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.2% | +84.1% | +79.4% | +93.9% | +90.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.4 | 60.1 | 48.7 | 57.3 | 68.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 20.8M | 8.2M | 4.0M | 2.0M | 2.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — BCS and NWG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LYG as "Buy", BCS as "Buy", NWG as "Buy", HSBC as "Hold", UBS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 88.9% upside for BCS (target: $44) vs -47.9% for LYG (target: $3). For income investors, NWG offers the higher dividend yield at 10.35% vs UBS's 1.62%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $2.75 | $44.00 | — | $52.00 | $23.57 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 24 | 6 | 19 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.4% | +3.5% | +10.3% | +3.7% | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.13 | $0.61 | $1.17 | $3.30 | $0.72 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.9% | +10.4% | +11.4% | +4.1% | +3.1% |
NWG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). BCS leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
LYG vs BCS vs NWG vs HSBC vs UBS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LYG or BCS or NWG or HSBC or UBS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG) is the stronger pick with 72.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -53. 0% for Barclays PLC (BCS). NatWest Group plc (NWG) offers the better valuation at 4. 2x trailing P/E (10. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LYG or BCS or NWG or HSBC or UBS?
On trailing P/E, NatWest Group plc (NWG) is the cheapest at 4.
2x versus UBS Group AG at 23. 7x. On forward P/E, NatWest Group plc is actually cheaper at 10. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: HSBC Holdings plc wins at 0. 24x versus UBS Group AG's 12. 52x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LYG or BCS or NWG or HSBC or UBS?
Over the past 5 years, HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) delivered a total return of +225.
7%, compared to +131. 6% for Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HSBC returned +268. 5% versus LYG's +81. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LYG or BCS or NWG or HSBC or UBS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
13β versus Barclays PLC's 1. 42β — meaning BCS is approximately 26% more volatile than LYG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NatWest Group plc (NWG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 169% versus 4% for UBS Group AG — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LYG or BCS or NWG or HSBC or UBS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG) is pulling ahead at 72.
8% versus -53. 0% for Barclays PLC (BCS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NatWest Group plc grew EPS 27. 4% year-over-year, compared to -2. 4% for HSBC Holdings plc. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LYG or BCS or NWG or HSBC or UBS?
Barclays PLC (BCS) is the more profitable company, earning 26.
7% net margin versus 7. 2% for Lloyds Banking Group plc — meaning it keeps 26. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BCS leads at 37. 3% versus 10. 2% for LYG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BCS leads at 108. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LYG or BCS or NWG or HSBC or UBS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 24x versus UBS Group AG's 12. 52x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, NatWest Group plc (NWG) trades at 10. 7x forward P/E versus 13. 8x for UBS Group AG — 3. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BCS: 88. 9% to $44. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LYG or BCS or NWG or HSBC or UBS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
NatWest Group plc (NWG) offers the highest yield at 10. 3%, versus 1. 6% for UBS Group AG (UBS).
09Is LYG or BCS or NWG or HSBC or UBS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
15), 3. 7% yield, +268. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HSBC: +268. 5%, BCS: +192. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LYG and BCS and NWG and HSBC and UBS?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LYG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BCS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; NWG is a mid-cap deep-value stock; HSBC is a large-cap deep-value stock; UBS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.