Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LYG vs BCS vs NWG vs HSBC vs UBS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LYG
Lloyds Banking Group plc

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNYSE • GB
Market Cap$77.17B
5Y Perf.+285.1%
BCS
Barclays PLC

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • GB
Market Cap$79.93B
5Y Perf.+318.9%
NWG
NatWest Group plc

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • GB
Market Cap$30.60B
5Y Perf.+429.4%
HSBC
HSBC Holdings plc

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • GB
Market Cap$305.76B
5Y Perf.+291.1%
UBS
UBS Group AG

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • CH
Market Cap$137.82B
5Y Perf.+322.7%

LYG vs BCS vs NWG vs HSBC vs UBS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LYG logoLYG
BCS logoBCS
NWG logoNWG
HSBC logoHSBC
UBS logoUBS
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - DiversifiedBanks - DiversifiedBanks - DiversifiedBanks - Diversified
Market Cap$77.17B$79.93B$30.60B$305.76B$137.82B
Revenue (TTM)$65.00B$26.82B$29.48B$147.86B$59.05B
Net Income (TTM)$4.66B$7.05B$5.83B$22.29B$6.27B
Gross Margin29.9%108.6%56.3%54.6%63.6%
Operating Margin10.2%37.3%26.1%20.3%11.9%
Forward P/E13.0x11.1x10.7x10.8x13.8x
Total Debt$95.14B$219.94B$71.83B$495.79B$356.12B
Cash & Equiv.$56.66B$229.75B$85.35B$286.92B$209.86B

LYG vs BCS vs NWG vs HSBC vs UBSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LYG
BCS
NWG
HSBC
UBS
StockMay 20May 26Return
Lloyds Banking Grou… (LYG)100385.1+285.1%
Barclays PLC (BCS)100418.9+318.9%
NatWest Group plc (NWG)100529.4+429.4%
HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC)100391.1+291.1%
UBS Group AG (UBS)100422.7+322.7%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LYG vs BCS vs NWG vs HSBC vs UBS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LYG leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. NatWest Group plc is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. HSBC also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
LYG
Lloyds Banking Group plc
The Banking Pick

LYG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth and quality.

  • 72.8% NII/revenue growth vs BCS's -53.0%
  • Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs BCS's 0.7% (lower = leaner)
  • Beta 1.05 vs BCS's 1.39, lower leverage
  • Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs BCS's 0.7%
Best for: growth and quality
BCS
Barclays PLC
The Financial Play

BCS lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: financial services exposure
NWG
NatWest Group plc
The Banking Pick

NWG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.15, yield 10.3%
  • Rev growth 3.2%, EPS growth 27.4%
  • NIM 1.8% vs UBS's 0.4%
  • Lower P/E (10.7x vs 13.8x)
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
HSBC
HSBC Holdings plc
The Banking Pick

HSBC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 264.7% 10Y total return vs UBS's 232.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.12, current ratio 2.62x
  • PEG 0.24 vs UBS's 12.52
  • Beta 1.12, yield 3.7%, current ratio 2.62x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
UBS
UBS Group AG
The Financial Play

Among these 5 stocks, UBS doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: financial services exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthLYG logoLYG72.8% NII/revenue growth vs BCS's -53.0%
ValueNWG logoNWGLower P/E (10.7x vs 13.8x)
Quality / MarginsLYG logoLYGEfficiency ratio 0.2% vs BCS's 0.7% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyLYG logoLYGBeta 1.05 vs BCS's 1.39, lower leverage
DividendsNWG logoNWG10.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs BCS's 3.5%
Momentum (1Y)HSBC logoHSBC+64.7% vs NWG's +27.0%
Efficiency (ROA)LYG logoLYGEfficiency ratio 0.2% vs BCS's 0.7%

LYG vs BCS vs NWG vs HSBC vs UBS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNWGLAGGINGUBS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BCS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

HSBC is the larger business by revenue, generating $147.9B annually — 5.5x BCS's $26.8B. BCS is the more profitable business, keeping 26.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LYG's 7.2%.

MetricLYG logoLYGLloyds Banking Gr…BCS logoBCSBarclays PLCNWG logoNWGNatWest Group plcHSBC logoHSBCHSBC Holdings plcUBS logoUBSUBS Group AG
RevenueTrailing 12 months$65.0B$26.8B$29.5B$147.9B$59.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$6.7B$9.0B$8.9B$35.8B$9.9B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$4.7B$7.1B$5.8B$22.3B$6.3B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$0$0$0$0$3.9B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+29.9%+108.6%+56.3%+54.6%+63.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+10.2%+37.3%+26.1%+20.3%+11.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+7.2%+26.7%+19.8%+15.1%+10.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-1.0%-30.1%+19.6%+17.0%-26.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+141.8%+36.0%+13.3%+23.5%+26.1%
BCS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

NWG leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 4.2x trailing earnings, NWG trades at a 82% valuation discount to UBS's 23.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BCS offers better value at 0.28x vs UBS's 21.49x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricLYG logoLYGLloyds Banking Gr…BCS logoBCSBarclays PLCNWG logoNWGNatWest Group plcHSBC logoHSBCHSBC Holdings plcUBS logoUBSUBS Group AG
Market CapShares × price$77.2B$79.9B$30.6B$305.8B$137.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$129.5B$66.6B$12.2B$514.6B$284.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS14.37x10.44x4.19x14.71x23.75x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.13.02x11.09x10.67x10.76x13.84x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.35x0.28x0.33x21.49x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple14.30x4.66x1.01x16.11x29.75x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.87x2.19x0.76x2.07x2.33x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.21x0.80x0.54x1.69x1.62x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF3.89x12.18x
NWG leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NWG leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

NWG delivers a 13.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $7 for UBS. NWG carries lower financial leverage with a 1.69x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UBS's 3.94x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NWG scores 7/9 vs BCS's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricLYG logoLYGLloyds Banking Gr…BCS logoBCSBarclays PLCNWG logoNWGNatWest Group plcHSBC logoHSBCHSBC Holdings plcUBS logoUBSUBS Group AG
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+9.9%+9.2%+13.8%+11.4%+7.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.5%+0.4%+0.8%+0.7%+0.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+3.6%+2.7%+5.3%+4.0%+1.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+1.6%+1.2%+3.3%+1.4%+1.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–954766
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.99x2.81x1.69x2.68x3.94x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$38.5B-$9.8B-$13.5B$208.9B$146.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$56.7B$229.8B$85.3B$286.9B$209.9B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$95.1B$219.9B$71.8B$495.8B$356.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.39x0.42x0.60x0.47x0.33x
NWG leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

HSBC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in HSBC five years ago would be worth $32,570 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $23,158 for LYG. Over the past 12 months, HSBC leads with a +64.7% total return vs NWG's +27.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BCS at 46.5% vs UBS's 33.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLYG logoLYGLloyds Banking Gr…BCS logoBCSBarclays PLCNWG logoNWGNatWest Group plcHSBC logoHSBCHSBC Holdings plcUBS logoUBSUBS Group AG
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+0.4%-9.4%-10.3%+13.4%-3.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+41.1%+49.0%+27.0%+64.7%+47.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+150.1%+214.4%+161.1%+162.1%+139.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+131.6%+146.3%+204.0%+225.7%+204.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+77.6%+187.7%+192.4%+264.7%+232.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+35.7%+46.5%+37.7%+37.9%+33.8%
HSBC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — LYG and HSBC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

LYG is the less volatile stock with a 1.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BCS's 1.39 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HSBC currently trades 93.9% from its 52-week high vs NWG's 79.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLYG logoLYGLloyds Banking Gr…BCS logoBCSBarclays PLCNWG logoNWGNatWest Group plcHSBC logoHSBCHSBC Holdings plcUBS logoUBSUBS Group AG
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.13x1.42x1.19x1.15x1.20x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$6.34$27.70$19.36$94.80$49.36
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$3.81$15.88$12.76$56.21$30.36
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+83.2%+84.1%+79.4%+93.9%+90.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10053.460.148.757.368.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded20.8M8.2M4.0M2.0M2.7M
Evenly matched — LYG and HSBC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — BCS and NWG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: LYG as "Buy", BCS as "Buy", NWG as "Buy", HSBC as "Hold", UBS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 88.9% upside for BCS (target: $44) vs -47.9% for LYG (target: $3). For income investors, NWG offers the higher dividend yield at 10.35% vs UBS's 1.62%.

MetricLYG logoLYGLloyds Banking Gr…BCS logoBCSBarclays PLCNWG logoNWGNatWest Group plcHSBC logoHSBCHSBC Holdings plcUBS logoUBSUBS Group AG
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$2.75$44.00$52.00$23.57
# AnalystsCovering analysts242461929
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.4%+3.5%+10.3%+3.7%+1.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises05204
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.13$0.61$1.17$3.30$0.72
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+2.9%+10.4%+11.4%+4.1%+3.1%
Evenly matched — BCS and NWG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

NWG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). BCS leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.

Best OverallNatWest Group plc (NWG)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LYG vs BCS vs NWG vs HSBC vs UBS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LYG or BCS or NWG or HSBC or UBS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG) is the stronger pick with 72.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -53. 0% for Barclays PLC (BCS). NatWest Group plc (NWG) offers the better valuation at 4. 2x trailing P/E (10. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LYG or BCS or NWG or HSBC or UBS?

On trailing P/E, NatWest Group plc (NWG) is the cheapest at 4.

2x versus UBS Group AG at 23. 7x. On forward P/E, NatWest Group plc is actually cheaper at 10. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: HSBC Holdings plc wins at 0. 24x versus UBS Group AG's 12. 52x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LYG or BCS or NWG or HSBC or UBS?

Over the past 5 years, HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) delivered a total return of +225.

7%, compared to +131. 6% for Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HSBC returned +268. 5% versus LYG's +81. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LYG or BCS or NWG or HSBC or UBS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

13β versus Barclays PLC's 1. 42β — meaning BCS is approximately 26% more volatile than LYG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NatWest Group plc (NWG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 169% versus 4% for UBS Group AG — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LYG or BCS or NWG or HSBC or UBS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lloyds Banking Group plc (LYG) is pulling ahead at 72.

8% versus -53. 0% for Barclays PLC (BCS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NatWest Group plc grew EPS 27. 4% year-over-year, compared to -2. 4% for HSBC Holdings plc. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LYG or BCS or NWG or HSBC or UBS?

Barclays PLC (BCS) is the more profitable company, earning 26.

7% net margin versus 7. 2% for Lloyds Banking Group plc — meaning it keeps 26. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BCS leads at 37. 3% versus 10. 2% for LYG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BCS leads at 108. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is LYG or BCS or NWG or HSBC or UBS more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 24x versus UBS Group AG's 12. 52x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, NatWest Group plc (NWG) trades at 10. 7x forward P/E versus 13. 8x for UBS Group AG — 3. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BCS: 88. 9% to $44. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — LYG or BCS or NWG or HSBC or UBS?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

NatWest Group plc (NWG) offers the highest yield at 10. 3%, versus 1. 6% for UBS Group AG (UBS).

09

Is LYG or BCS or NWG or HSBC or UBS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, HSBC Holdings plc (HSBC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

15), 3. 7% yield, +268. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HSBC: +268. 5%, BCS: +192. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between LYG and BCS and NWG and HSBC and UBS?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: LYG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BCS is a mid-cap deep-value stock; NWG is a mid-cap deep-value stock; HSBC is a large-cap deep-value stock; UBS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

LYG

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 36%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BCS

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 16%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.4%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NWG

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 11%
  • Dividend Yield > 4.1%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HSBC

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 9%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.4%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

UBS

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform LYG and BCS and NWG and HSBC and UBS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(LYG: 72.8% · BCS: -53.0%)
Net Margin>
%
(LYG: 7.2% · BCS: 26.7%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(LYG: 14.4x · BCS: 10.4x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.