Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
LYRA vs MCRB vs NKTR vs PRAX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
LYRA vs MCRB vs NKTR vs PRAX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $781K | $74M | $1.66B | $9.53B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $600K | $1M | $56M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-33M | $-47M | $-158M | $-327M |
| Gross Margin | 50.0% | 16.0% | 80.1% | — |
| Operating Margin | -58.2% | -76.4% | -226.3% | — |
| Forward P/E | — | 12.0x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $34M | $83M | $149M | $110K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $41M | $46M | $15M | $357M |
LYRA vs MCRB vs NKTR vs PRAX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lyra Therapeutics, … (LYRA) | 100 | 0.1 | -99.9% |
| Seres Therapeutics,… (MCRB) | 100 | 1.6 | -98.4% |
| Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) | 100 | 29.0 | -71.0% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 64.1 | -35.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LYRA vs MCRB vs NKTR vs PRAX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LYRA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.70
- Rev growth -1.5%, EPS growth -13.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 75.3%
- -1.5% revenue growth vs MCRB's -153.7%
- Beta 0.70 vs NKTR's 1.80
MCRB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if efficiency is your priority.
- -34.5% ROA vs LYRA's -60.2%, ROIC -90.3% vs -145.5%
NKTR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +7.8% vs LYRA's -90.7%
PRAX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- -20.9% 10Y total return vs NKTR's -59.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.40, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 10.22x
- Beta 1.40, current ratio 10.22x
- 2.4% margin vs LYRA's -54.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -1.5% revenue growth vs MCRB's -153.7% | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.4% margin vs LYRA's -54.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.70 vs NKTR's 1.80 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.8% vs LYRA's -90.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -34.5% ROA vs LYRA's -60.2%, ROIC -90.3% vs -145.5% |
LYRA vs MCRB vs NKTR vs PRAX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LYRA vs MCRB vs NKTR vs PRAX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PRAX leads in 2 of 6 categories
NKTR leads 1 • LYRA leads 0 • MCRB leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NKTR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NKTR and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $56M and $0 in trailing revenue. NKTR is the more profitable business, keeping -2.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LYRA's -54.9%. On growth, NKTR holds the edge at +3.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $600,000 | $1M | $56M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$34M | -$83M | -$125M | -$357M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$33M | -$47M | -$158M | -$327M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$34M | -$42M | -$160M | -$283M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.0% | +16.0% | +80.1% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -58.2% | -76.4% | -2.3% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -54.9% | -40.9% | -2.8% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -56.8% | -36.9% | -2.9% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -87.2% | — | +3.8% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -17.8% | -155.5% | +49.7% | +2.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — LYRA and MCRB and PRAX each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $781,126 | $74M | $1.7B | $9.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$5M | $111M | $1.8B | $9.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.31x | 12.03x | -8.42x | -24.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.51x | 94.00x | 30.09x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.47x | 1.54x | 15.38x | 8.46x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 85.74x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
PRAX leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PRAX delivers a -43.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-43 in annual profit, vs $-10 for LYRA. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LYRA's 2.97x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MCRB scores 7/9 vs NKTR's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -10.3% | -127.3% | -87.0% | -43.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -60.2% | -34.5% | -40.7% | -40.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -145.5% | -90.3% | -57.2% | -65.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -109.0% | -86.4% | -55.7% | -49.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.97x | 1.88x | 1.66x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$6M | $37M | $134M | -$357M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $41M | $46M | $15M | $357M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $34M | $83M | $149M | $110,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | -6.23x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PRAX five years ago would be worth $8,508 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11 for LYRA. Over the past 12 months, NKTR leads with a +782.4% total return vs LYRA's -90.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.0% vs LYRA's -85.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -86.1% | -49.2% | +88.6% | +15.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -90.7% | +10.6% | +782.4% | +767.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | -93.1% | +609.0% | +1956.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.9% | -98.1% | -72.3% | -14.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -98.5% | -59.8% | -20.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -85.0% | -58.9% | +92.1% | +174.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LYRA and PRAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LYRA is the less volatile stock with a 0.70 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NKTR's 1.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRAX currently trades 92.7% from its 52-week high vs LYRA's 1.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.70x | 1.73x | 1.80x | 1.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $37.50 | $29.98 | $109.00 | $356.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.44 | $6.53 | $7.99 | $35.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +1.2% | +25.7% | +75.1% | +92.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 22.3 | 42.9 | 50.5 | 53.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 162K | 50K | 977K | 376K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MCRB as "Buy", NKTR as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 79.9% upside for NKTR (target: $147) vs -83.8% for MCRB (target: $1).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $1.25 | $147.33 | $548.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 18 | 33 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
PRAX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). NKTR leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
LYRA vs MCRB vs NKTR vs PRAX: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LYRA or MCRB or NKTR or PRAX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Lyra Therapeutics, Inc.
(LYRA) is the stronger pick with -1. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Seres Therapeutics, Inc. (MCRB) offers the better valuation at 12. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Seres Therapeutics, Inc. (MCRB) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LYRA or MCRB or NKTR or PRAX?
Over the past 5 years, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.
(PRAX) delivered a total return of -14. 9%, compared to -99. 9% for Lyra Therapeutics, Inc. (LYRA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PRAX returned -20. 9% versus LYRA's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LYRA or MCRB or NKTR or PRAX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lyra Therapeutics, Inc.
(LYRA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 70β versus Nektar Therapeutics's 1. 80β — meaning NKTR is approximately 157% more volatile than LYRA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 3% for Lyra Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — LYRA or MCRB or NKTR or PRAX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lyra Therapeutics, Inc.
(LYRA) is pulling ahead at -1. 5% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Seres Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 103. 4% year-over-year, compared to -32. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LYRA leads at 75. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LYRA or MCRB or NKTR or PRAX?
Seres Therapeutics, Inc.
(MCRB) is the more profitable company, earning 721. 9% net margin versus -60. 9% for Lyra Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 721. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRAX leads at 0. 0% versus -119. 1% for MCRB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LYRA leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — LYRA or MCRB or NKTR or PRAX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is LYRA or MCRB or NKTR or PRAX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lyra Therapeutics, Inc.
(LYRA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 70)). Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) carries a higher beta of 1. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LYRA: -100. 0%, NKTR: -59. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between LYRA and MCRB and NKTR and PRAX?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LYRA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MCRB is a small-cap deep-value stock; NKTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.