Specialty Business Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
LZ vs CLST vs LKFN vs UPWK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Staffing & Employment Services
LZ vs CLST vs LKFN vs UPWK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Business Services | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Staffing & Employment Services |
| Market Cap | $1.05B | $66M | $1.63B | $1.38B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $780M | $15M | $422M | $595M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $11M | $2M | $103M | $109M |
| Gross Margin | 65.9% | 72.8% | 61.0% | 103.0% |
| Operating Margin | 2.6% | 16.3% | 29.8% | 20.7% |
| Forward P/E | 8.4x | 28.9x | 14.2x | 7.4x |
| Total Debt | $24M | $15M | $184M | $381M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $203M | $25M | $57M | $298M |
LZ vs CLST vs LKFN vs UPWK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| LegalZoom.com, Inc. (LZ) | 100 | 21.9 | -78.1% |
| Catalyst Bancorp, I… (CLST) | 100 | 116.7 | +16.7% |
| Lakeland Financial … (LKFN) | 100 | 85.6 | -14.4% |
| Upwork Inc. (UPWK) | 100 | 18.7 | -81.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LZ vs CLST vs LKFN vs UPWK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LZ is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.50 vs LKFN's 3.57
CLST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 55.3%, EPS growth 171.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.02, Low D/E 18.0%, current ratio 0.40x
- Beta 0.02, current ratio 0.40x
- NIM 3.5% vs LKFN's 3.2%
LKFN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.79, yield 3.2%
- 142.7% 10Y total return vs CLST's 19.2%
- 24.5% margin vs LZ's 1.5%
- 3.2% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
UPWK is the clearest fit if your priority is value and efficiency.
- Lower P/E (7.4x vs 14.2x)
- 8.5% ROA vs CLST's 0.7%, ROIC 14.3% vs 2.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 55.3% NII/revenue growth vs LKFN's -1.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.4x vs 14.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.5% margin vs LZ's 1.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.02 vs LZ's 1.31 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +40.4% vs UPWK's -34.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.5% ROA vs CLST's 0.7%, ROIC 14.3% vs 2.0% |
LZ vs CLST vs LKFN vs UPWK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
LZ vs CLST vs LKFN vs UPWK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
UPWK leads in 3 of 6 categories
CLST leads 1 • LKFN leads 1 • LZ leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UPWK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LZ is the larger business by revenue, generating $780M annually — 50.8x CLST's $15M. LKFN is the more profitable business, keeping 24.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LZ's 1.5%. On growth, LZ holds the edge at +12.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $780M | $15M | $422M | $595M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $56M | $3M | $130M | $150M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $11M | $2M | $103M | $109M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $148M | $3M | $104M | $224M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +65.9% | +72.8% | +61.0% | +103.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.6% | +16.3% | +29.8% | +20.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | +13.4% | +24.5% | +18.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.9% | +20.2% | +24.6% | +37.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.9% | — | — | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -64.8% | -18.8% | +23.4% | +29.6% |
Valuation Metrics
UPWK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.8x trailing earnings, UPWK trades at a 83% valuation discount to LZ's 75.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), LKFN offers better value at 3.93x vs LZ's 4.53x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.0B | $66M | $1.6B | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $871M | $55M | $1.8B | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 75.88x | 28.88x | 15.61x | 12.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.35x | — | 14.17x | 7.37x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 4.53x | — | 3.93x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 14.10x | 22.02x | 13.49x | 9.66x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.39x | 4.28x | 3.87x | 1.76x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.52x | 0.74x | 2.12x | 2.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.10x | 21.18x | 15.72x | 5.71x |
Profitability & Efficiency
UPWK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
UPWK delivers a 17.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $3 for CLST. LZ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UPWK's 0.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLST scores 8/9 vs LZ's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.4% | +2.5% | +14.2% | +17.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.2% | +0.7% | +1.5% | +8.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +2.0% | +11.6% | +14.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.0% | +2.7% | +15.8% | +16.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.14x | 0.18x | 0.24x | 0.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$179M | -$10M | $127M | $83M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $203M | $25M | $57M | $298M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $24M | $15M | $184M | $381M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 58.95x | 0.61x | 0.82x | 146.13x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CLST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CLST five years ago would be worth $11,925 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,604 for LZ. Over the past 12 months, CLST leads with a +40.4% total return vs UPWK's -34.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLST at 19.1% vs LZ's -8.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -36.7% | +2.7% | +12.7% | -46.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -16.3% | +40.4% | +9.0% | -34.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -24.1% | +69.1% | +48.1% | +32.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.0% | +19.2% | +10.5% | -74.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.0% | +19.2% | +142.7% | -49.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -8.8% | +19.1% | +14.0% | +9.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CLST and LKFN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CLST is the less volatile stock with a 0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LZ's 1.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LKFN currently trades 90.2% from its 52-week high vs UPWK's 46.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.16x | 0.00x | 0.77x | 1.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.40 | $18.16 | $69.40 | $22.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.28 | $11.52 | $54.36 | $10.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +49.0% | +89.0% | +90.2% | +46.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.1 | 37.4 | 60.9 | 35.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.5M | 7K | 153K | 3.4M |
Analyst Outlook
LKFN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LZ as "Buy", LKFN as "Hold", UPWK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 118.1% upside for UPWK (target: $23) vs 5.4% for LKFN (target: $66). LKFN is the only dividend payer here at 3.19% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.17 | — | $66.00 | $23.14 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | — | 10 | 23 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +3.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 12 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $2.00 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.7% | +3.9% | +1.2% | +9.8% |
UPWK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CLST leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
LZ vs CLST vs LKFN vs UPWK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LZ or CLST or LKFN or UPWK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Catalyst Bancorp, Inc.
(CLST) is the stronger pick with 55. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 9% for Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN). Upwork Inc. (UPWK) offers the better valuation at 12. 8x trailing P/E (7. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate LegalZoom. com, Inc. (LZ) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LZ or CLST or LKFN or UPWK?
On trailing P/E, Upwork Inc.
(UPWK) is the cheapest at 12. 8x versus LegalZoom. com, Inc. at 75. 9x. On forward P/E, Upwork Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: LegalZoom. com, Inc. wins at 0. 50x versus Lakeland Financial Corporation's 3. 57x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LZ or CLST or LKFN or UPWK?
Over the past 5 years, Catalyst Bancorp, Inc.
(CLST) delivered a total return of +19. 2%, compared to -84. 0% for LegalZoom. com, Inc. (LZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LKFN returned +139. 3% versus LZ's -83. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LZ or CLST or LKFN or UPWK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Catalyst Bancorp, Inc.
(CLST) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 00β versus LegalZoom. com, Inc. 's 1. 16β — meaning LZ is approximately Infinity% more volatile than CLST relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, LegalZoom. com, Inc. (LZ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 60% for Upwork Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LZ or CLST or LKFN or UPWK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Catalyst Bancorp, Inc.
(CLST) is pulling ahead at 55. 3% versus -1. 9% for Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Catalyst Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 171. 8% year-over-year, compared to -50. 0% for LegalZoom. com, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, UPWK leads at 8. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LZ or CLST or LKFN or UPWK?
Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN) is the more profitable company, earning 24.
5% net margin versus 2. 0% for LegalZoom. com, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LKFN leads at 29. 8% versus 1. 9% for LZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UPWK leads at 77. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LZ or CLST or LKFN or UPWK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, LegalZoom. com, Inc. (LZ) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 50x versus Lakeland Financial Corporation's 3. 57x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Upwork Inc. (UPWK) trades at 7. 4x forward P/E versus 14. 2x for Lakeland Financial Corporation — 6. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UPWK: 118. 1% to $23. 14.
08Which pays a better dividend — LZ or CLST or LKFN or UPWK?
In this comparison, LKFN (3.
2% yield) pays a dividend. LZ, CLST, UPWK do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LZ or CLST or LKFN or UPWK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Catalyst Bancorp, Inc.
(CLST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 00)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLST: +18. 3%, LZ: -83. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LZ and CLST and LKFN and UPWK?
These companies operate in different sectors (LZ (Industrials) and CLST (Financial Services) and LKFN (Financial Services) and UPWK (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LZ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLST is a small-cap high-growth stock; LKFN is a small-cap deep-value stock; UPWK is a small-cap deep-value stock. LKFN pays a dividend while LZ, CLST, UPWK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.