Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LZ vs CLST vs LKFN vs UPWK

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LZ
LegalZoom.com, Inc.

Specialty Business Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.05B
5Y Perf.-78.1%
CLST
Catalyst Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$66M
5Y Perf.+16.7%
LKFN
Lakeland Financial Corporation

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.63B
5Y Perf.-14.4%
UPWK
Upwork Inc.

Staffing & Employment Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.38B
5Y Perf.-81.3%

LZ vs CLST vs LKFN vs UPWK — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LZ logoLZ
CLST logoCLST
LKFN logoLKFN
UPWK logoUPWK
IndustrySpecialty Business ServicesBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalStaffing & Employment Services
Market Cap$1.05B$66M$1.63B$1.38B
Revenue (TTM)$780M$15M$422M$595M
Net Income (TTM)$11M$2M$103M$109M
Gross Margin65.9%72.8%61.0%103.0%
Operating Margin2.6%16.3%29.8%20.7%
Forward P/E8.4x28.9x14.2x7.4x
Total Debt$24M$15M$184M$381M
Cash & Equiv.$203M$25M$57M$298M

LZ vs CLST vs LKFN vs UPWKLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LZ
CLST
LKFN
UPWK
StockOct 21May 26Return
LegalZoom.com, Inc. (LZ)10021.9-78.1%
Catalyst Bancorp, I… (CLST)100116.7+16.7%
Lakeland Financial … (LKFN)10085.6-14.4%
Upwork Inc. (UPWK)10018.7-81.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LZ vs CLST vs LKFN vs UPWK

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CLST leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. Lakeland Financial Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. UPWK also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
LZ
LegalZoom.com, Inc.
The Value Pick

LZ is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.50 vs LKFN's 3.57
Best for: valuation efficiency
CLST
Catalyst Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CLST carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 55.3%, EPS growth 171.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.02, Low D/E 18.0%, current ratio 0.40x
  • Beta 0.02, current ratio 0.40x
  • NIM 3.5% vs LKFN's 3.2%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
LKFN
Lakeland Financial Corporation
The Banking Pick

LKFN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.79, yield 3.2%
  • 142.7% 10Y total return vs CLST's 19.2%
  • 24.5% margin vs LZ's 1.5%
  • 3.2% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
UPWK
Upwork Inc.
The Value Play

UPWK is the clearest fit if your priority is value and efficiency.

  • Lower P/E (7.4x vs 14.2x)
  • 8.5% ROA vs CLST's 0.7%, ROIC 14.3% vs 2.0%
Best for: value and efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCLST logoCLST55.3% NII/revenue growth vs LKFN's -1.9%
ValueUPWK logoUPWKLower P/E (7.4x vs 14.2x)
Quality / MarginsLKFN logoLKFN24.5% margin vs LZ's 1.5%
Stability / SafetyCLST logoCLSTBeta 0.02 vs LZ's 1.31
DividendsLKFN logoLKFN3.2% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CLST logoCLST+40.4% vs UPWK's -34.8%
Efficiency (ROA)UPWK logoUPWK8.5% ROA vs CLST's 0.7%, ROIC 14.3% vs 2.0%

LZ vs CLST vs LKFN vs UPWK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

LZLegalZoom.com, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$756M
CLSTCatalyst Bancorp, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

LKFNLakeland Financial Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

UPWKUpwork Inc.
FY 2025
Enterprise
86.7%$683M
Marketplace
13.3%$105M

LZ vs CLST vs LKFN vs UPWK — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLUPWKLAGGINGLZ

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

UPWK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

LZ is the larger business by revenue, generating $780M annually — 50.8x CLST's $15M. LKFN is the more profitable business, keeping 24.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LZ's 1.5%. On growth, LZ holds the edge at +12.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricLZ logoLZLegalZoom.com, In…CLST logoCLSTCatalyst Bancorp,…LKFN logoLKFNLakeland Financia…UPWK logoUPWKUpwork Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$780M$15M$422M$595M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$56M$3M$130M$150M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$11M$2M$103M$109M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$148M$3M$104M$224M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+65.9%+72.8%+61.0%+103.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+2.6%+16.3%+29.8%+20.7%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+1.5%+13.4%+24.5%+18.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+18.9%+20.2%+24.6%+37.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.9%-100.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-64.8%-18.8%+23.4%+29.6%
UPWK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

UPWK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 12.8x trailing earnings, UPWK trades at a 83% valuation discount to LZ's 75.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), LKFN offers better value at 3.93x vs LZ's 4.53x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricLZ logoLZLegalZoom.com, In…CLST logoCLSTCatalyst Bancorp,…LKFN logoLKFNLakeland Financia…UPWK logoUPWKUpwork Inc.
Market CapShares × price$1.0B$66M$1.6B$1.4B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$871M$55M$1.8B$1.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS75.88x28.88x15.61x12.78x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.8.35x14.17x7.37x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate4.53x3.93x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple14.10x22.02x13.49x9.66x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.39x4.28x3.87x1.76x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share6.52x0.74x2.12x2.35x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF7.10x21.18x15.72x5.71x
UPWK leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

UPWK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

UPWK delivers a 17.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $3 for CLST. LZ carries lower financial leverage with a 0.14x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UPWK's 0.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CLST scores 8/9 vs LZ's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricLZ logoLZLegalZoom.com, In…CLST logoCLSTCatalyst Bancorp,…LKFN logoLKFNLakeland Financia…UPWK logoUPWKUpwork Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+6.4%+2.5%+14.2%+17.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.2%+0.7%+1.5%+8.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+2.0%+11.6%+14.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+9.0%+2.7%+15.8%+16.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–95866
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.14x0.18x0.24x0.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$179M-$10M$127M$83M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$203M$25M$57M$298M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$24M$15M$184M$381M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense58.95x0.61x0.82x146.13x
UPWK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CLST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CLST five years ago would be worth $11,925 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,604 for LZ. Over the past 12 months, CLST leads with a +40.4% total return vs UPWK's -34.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLST at 19.1% vs LZ's -8.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLZ logoLZLegalZoom.com, In…CLST logoCLSTCatalyst Bancorp,…LKFN logoLKFNLakeland Financia…UPWK logoUPWKUpwork Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-36.7%+2.7%+12.7%-46.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-16.3%+40.4%+9.0%-34.8%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-24.1%+69.1%+48.1%+32.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-84.0%+19.2%+10.5%-74.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-84.0%+19.2%+142.7%-49.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-8.8%+19.1%+14.0%+9.7%
CLST leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — CLST and LKFN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

CLST is the less volatile stock with a 0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LZ's 1.31 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LKFN currently trades 90.2% from its 52-week high vs UPWK's 46.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLZ logoLZLegalZoom.com, In…CLST logoCLSTCatalyst Bancorp,…LKFN logoLKFNLakeland Financia…UPWK logoUPWKUpwork Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.16x0.00x0.77x1.12x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$12.40$18.16$69.40$22.84
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$5.28$11.52$54.36$10.02
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+49.0%+89.0%+90.2%+46.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10047.137.460.935.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2.5M7K153K3.4M
Evenly matched — CLST and LKFN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

LKFN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: LZ as "Buy", LKFN as "Hold", UPWK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 118.1% upside for UPWK (target: $23) vs 5.4% for LKFN (target: $66). LKFN is the only dividend payer here at 3.19% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricLZ logoLZLegalZoom.com, In…CLST logoCLSTCatalyst Bancorp,…LKFN logoLKFNLakeland Financia…UPWK logoUPWKUpwork Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$8.17$66.00$23.14
# AnalystsCovering analysts121023
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises012
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2.00
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+7.7%+3.9%+1.2%+9.8%
LKFN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

UPWK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CLST leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallUpwork Inc. (UPWK)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LZ vs CLST vs LKFN vs UPWK: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LZ or CLST or LKFN or UPWK a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Catalyst Bancorp, Inc.

(CLST) is the stronger pick with 55. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 9% for Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN). Upwork Inc. (UPWK) offers the better valuation at 12. 8x trailing P/E (7. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate LegalZoom. com, Inc. (LZ) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LZ or CLST or LKFN or UPWK?

On trailing P/E, Upwork Inc.

(UPWK) is the cheapest at 12. 8x versus LegalZoom. com, Inc. at 75. 9x. On forward P/E, Upwork Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 4x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: LegalZoom. com, Inc. wins at 0. 50x versus Lakeland Financial Corporation's 3. 57x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LZ or CLST or LKFN or UPWK?

Over the past 5 years, Catalyst Bancorp, Inc.

(CLST) delivered a total return of +19. 2%, compared to -84. 0% for LegalZoom. com, Inc. (LZ). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LKFN returned +139. 3% versus LZ's -83. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LZ or CLST or LKFN or UPWK?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Catalyst Bancorp, Inc.

(CLST) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 00β versus LegalZoom. com, Inc. 's 1. 16β — meaning LZ is approximately Infinity% more volatile than CLST relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, LegalZoom. com, Inc. (LZ) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 14% versus 60% for Upwork Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LZ or CLST or LKFN or UPWK?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Catalyst Bancorp, Inc.

(CLST) is pulling ahead at 55. 3% versus -1. 9% for Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Catalyst Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 171. 8% year-over-year, compared to -50. 0% for LegalZoom. com, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, UPWK leads at 8. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LZ or CLST or LKFN or UPWK?

Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN) is the more profitable company, earning 24.

5% net margin versus 2. 0% for LegalZoom. com, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LKFN leads at 29. 8% versus 1. 9% for LZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UPWK leads at 77. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is LZ or CLST or LKFN or UPWK more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, LegalZoom. com, Inc. (LZ) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 50x versus Lakeland Financial Corporation's 3. 57x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Upwork Inc. (UPWK) trades at 7. 4x forward P/E versus 14. 2x for Lakeland Financial Corporation — 6. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UPWK: 118. 1% to $23. 14.

08

Which pays a better dividend — LZ or CLST or LKFN or UPWK?

In this comparison, LKFN (3.

2% yield) pays a dividend. LZ, CLST, UPWK do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is LZ or CLST or LKFN or UPWK better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Catalyst Bancorp, Inc.

(CLST) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 00)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLST: +18. 3%, LZ: -83. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between LZ and CLST and LKFN and UPWK?

These companies operate in different sectors (LZ (Industrials) and CLST (Financial Services) and LKFN (Financial Services) and UPWK (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: LZ is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLST is a small-cap high-growth stock; LKFN is a small-cap deep-value stock; UPWK is a small-cap deep-value stock. LKFN pays a dividend while LZ, CLST, UPWK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

LZ

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Gross Margin > 39%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CLST

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 27%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LKFN

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 14%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.2%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

UPWK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform LZ and CLST and LKFN and UPWK on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(LZ: 12.9% · CLST: 55.3%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(LZ: 75.9x · CLST: 28.9x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.