Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LZMH vs EDTK vs CLPS vs GOTU vs BIDU
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Education & Training Services
Information Technology Services
Education & Training Services
Internet Content & Information
LZMH vs EDTK vs CLPS vs GOTU vs BIDU — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Education & Training Services | Information Technology Services | Education & Training Services | Internet Content & Information |
| Market Cap | $948K | $16M | $25M | $760M | $48.92B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $823M | $6M | $299M | $5.85B | $130.46B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6M | $-26M | $-4M | $-374M | $9.00B |
| Gross Margin | 4.2% | -42.0% | 22.8% | 67.5% | 44.7% |
| Operating Margin | 0.4% | -323.1% | -1.4% | -9.1% | -2.6% |
| Forward P/E | 1.2x | — | — | — | 2.6x |
| Total Debt | $35M | $701K | $34M | $492M | $79.32B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $1M | $28M | $1.32B | $24.83B |
LZMH vs EDTK vs CLPS vs GOTU vs BIDU — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| LZ Technology Holdi… (LZMH) | 100 | 1.7 | -98.3% |
| Skillful Craftsman … (EDTK) | 100 | 101.5 | +1.5% |
| CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) | 100 | 77.6 | -22.4% |
| Gaotu Techedu Inc. (GOTU) | 100 | 56.1 | -43.9% |
| Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) | 100 | 163.2 | +63.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LZMH vs EDTK vs CLPS vs GOTU vs BIDU
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LZMH ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 44.6%, EPS growth 188.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 116.5%
- Lower P/E (1.2x vs 2.6x)
Among these 5 stocks, EDTK doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CLPS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 14.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.27, Low D/E 58.8%, current ratio 1.58x
- Beta 0.27, yield 14.6%, current ratio 1.58x
- Beta 0.27 vs BIDU's 1.41
GOTU is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 56.0% revenue growth vs EDTK's -55.3%
BIDU carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- -17.5% 10Y total return vs CLPS's -78.5%
- 6.9% margin vs EDTK's -416.2%
- +61.3% vs LZMH's -99.1%
- 2.0% ROA vs EDTK's -73.7%, ROIC 4.8% vs -5.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 56.0% revenue growth vs EDTK's -55.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (1.2x vs 2.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.9% margin vs EDTK's -416.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.27 vs BIDU's 1.41 | |
| Dividends | 14.6% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +61.3% vs LZMH's -99.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.0% ROA vs EDTK's -73.7%, ROIC 4.8% vs -5.2% |
LZMH vs EDTK vs CLPS vs GOTU vs BIDU — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LZMH vs EDTK vs CLPS vs GOTU vs BIDU — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BIDU leads in 2 of 6 categories
GOTU leads 1 • LZMH leads 1 • EDTK leads 0 • CLPS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GOTU leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BIDU is the larger business by revenue, generating $130.5B annually — 21223.4x EDTK's $6M. BIDU is the more profitable business, keeping 6.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EDTK's -4.2%. On growth, GOTU holds the edge at +32.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $823M | $6M | $299M | $5.8B | $130.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$15M | -$1M | -$378M | $4.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$26M | -$4M | -$374M | $9.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$6M | $0 | $0 | -$15.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | -42.0% | +22.8% | +67.5% | +44.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.4% | -3.2% | -1.4% | -9.1% | -2.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | -4.2% | -1.3% | -6.4% | +6.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.5% | -104.4% | -2.3% | +1.7% | -12.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -92.0% | +15.3% | +32.9% | -7.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -7.0% | +75.8% | +66.7% | -2.6% |
Valuation Metrics
LZMH leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 1.2x trailing earnings, LZMH trades at a 92% valuation discount to BIDU's 14.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LZMH's 3.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BIDU's 10.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $947,541 | $16M | $25M | $760M | $48.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6M | $15M | $31M | $638M | $56.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1.16x | -5.26x | -3.48x | -4.86x | 14.44x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | 2.60x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.24x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.04x | — | — | — | 10.79x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.01x | 17.82x | 0.15x | 1.12x | 2.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.10x | 1.15x | 0.43x | 2.67x | 1.17x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.49x | — | — | 64.81x | 25.41x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BIDU leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LZMH delivers a 8.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-133 for EDTK. EDTK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CLPS's 0.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LZMH scores 6/9 vs CLPS's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.6% | -133.3% | -6.1% | -21.8% | +3.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.9% | -73.7% | -3.2% | -6.8% | +2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.0% | -5.2% | -7.9% | -47.8% | +4.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.4% | -4.3% | -9.8% | -39.9% | +6.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.52x | 0.05x | 0.59x | 0.25x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $31M | -$517,347 | $6M | -$829M | $54.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $1M | $28M | $1.3B | $24.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $35M | $700,621 | $34M | $492M | $79.3B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.75x | -6.78x | — | — | 9.71x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BIDU leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BIDU five years ago would be worth $7,302 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $191 for LZMH. Over the past 12 months, BIDU leads with a +61.3% total return vs LZMH's -99.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BIDU at 4.5% vs LZMH's -73.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -93.2% | +11.1% | -10.3% | -19.3% | -6.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.1% | +18.0% | -5.4% | -39.4% | +61.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.1% | -41.0% | +0.5% | -32.3% | +14.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.1% | -53.7% | -69.3% | -92.4% | -27.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.1% | -78.9% | -78.5% | -81.2% | -17.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -73.3% | -16.1% | +0.2% | -12.2% | +4.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LZMH and EDTK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LZMH is the less volatile stock with a -0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BIDU's 1.41 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. EDTK currently trades 84.7% from its 52-week high vs LZMH's 0.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.93x | -0.23x | 0.19x | 1.01x | 1.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.10 | $1.18 | $1.88 | $4.56 | $165.30 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.09 | $0.80 | $0.80 | $1.84 | $81.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.3% | +84.7% | +48.2% | +43.2% | +84.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 19.3 | 50.7 | 49.8 | 52.7 | 69.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.8M | 3K | 15K | 395K | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GOTU as "Hold", BIDU as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 49.2% upside for GOTU (target: $3) vs 10.2% for BIDU (target: $154). CLPS is the only dividend payer here at 14.60% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | $2.94 | $154.11 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | 10 | 53 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +14.6% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 3 | — | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.13 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.0% | +1.9% |
BIDU leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). GOTU leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
LZMH vs EDTK vs CLPS vs GOTU vs BIDU: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LZMH or EDTK or CLPS or GOTU or BIDU a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Gaotu Techedu Inc.
(GOTU) is the stronger pick with 56. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -55. 3% for Skillful Craftsman Education Technology Limited (EDTK). LZ Technology Holdings Limited Class B Ordinary Shares (LZMH) offers the better valuation at 1. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) a "Buy" — based on 53 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LZMH or EDTK or CLPS or GOTU or BIDU?
On trailing P/E, LZ Technology Holdings Limited Class B Ordinary Shares (LZMH) is the cheapest at 1.
2x versus Baidu, Inc. at 14. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LZMH or EDTK or CLPS or GOTU or BIDU?
Over the past 5 years, Baidu, Inc.
(BIDU) delivered a total return of -27. 0%, compared to -98. 1% for LZ Technology Holdings Limited Class B Ordinary Shares (LZMH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BIDU returned -16. 8% versus LZMH's -98. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LZMH or EDTK or CLPS or GOTU or BIDU?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LZ Technology Holdings Limited Class B Ordinary Shares (LZMH) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
93β versus Baidu, Inc. 's 1. 50β — meaning BIDU is approximately -261% more volatile than LZMH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Skillful Craftsman Education Technology Limited (EDTK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 59% for CLPS Incorporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LZMH or EDTK or CLPS or GOTU or BIDU?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Gaotu Techedu Inc.
(GOTU) is pulling ahead at 56. 0% versus -55. 3% for Skillful Craftsman Education Technology Limited (EDTK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LZ Technology Holdings Limited Class B Ordinary Shares grew EPS 188. 9% year-over-year, compared to -145. 0% for Gaotu Techedu Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LZMH leads at 116. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LZMH or EDTK or CLPS or GOTU or BIDU?
Baidu, Inc.
(BIDU) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 8% net margin versus -333. 3% for Skillful Craftsman Education Technology Limited — meaning it keeps 17. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BIDU leads at 16. 0% versus -116. 4% for EDTK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EDTK leads at 78. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LZMH or EDTK or CLPS or GOTU or BIDU more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GOTU: 49.
2% to $2. 94.
08Which pays a better dividend — LZMH or EDTK or CLPS or GOTU or BIDU?
In this comparison, CLPS (14.
6% yield) pays a dividend. LZMH, EDTK, GOTU, BIDU do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LZMH or EDTK or CLPS or GOTU or BIDU better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, LZ Technology Holdings Limited Class B Ordinary Shares (LZMH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
93)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LZMH: -98. 1%, BIDU: -16. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LZMH and EDTK and CLPS and GOTU and BIDU?
These companies operate in different sectors (LZMH (Technology) and EDTK (Consumer Defensive) and CLPS (Technology) and GOTU (Consumer Defensive) and BIDU (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LZMH is a small-cap high-growth stock; EDTK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; GOTU is a small-cap high-growth stock; BIDU is a mid-cap deep-value stock. CLPS pays a dividend while LZMH, EDTK, GOTU, BIDU do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.