Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MA vs AXP vs V vs COF vs BAC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Banks - Diversified
MA vs AXP vs V vs COF vs BAC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | $443.44B | $218.57B | $616.45B | $119.19B | $401.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $32.79B | $80.46B | $40.00B | $69.25B | $188.75B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $15.57B | $11.22B | $22.24B | $2.45B | $30.63B |
| Gross Margin | 83.4% | 83.2% | 80.4% | 47.3% | 55.4% |
| Operating Margin | 59.2% | 17.1% | 60.0% | 3.3% | 18.5% |
| Forward P/E | 25.5x | 18.1x | 24.6x | 9.8x | 11.9x |
| Total Debt | $19.00B | $57.76B | $25.17B | $51.00B | $365.90B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10.57B | $47.71B | $20.15B | $57.43B | $231.84B |
MA vs AXP vs V vs COF vs BAC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mastercard Incorpor… (MA) | 100 | 166.5 | +66.5% |
| American Express Co… (AXP) | 100 | 335.2 | +235.2% |
| Visa Inc. (V) | 100 | 164.6 | +64.6% |
| Capital One Financi… (COF) | 100 | 283.0 | +183.0% |
| Bank of America Cor… (BAC) | 100 | 218.7 | +118.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MA vs AXP vs V vs COF vs BAC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MA is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 16.4%, EPS growth 18.9%
- Beta 0.67 vs COF's 1.58
AXP is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 429.9% 10Y total return vs MA's 437.2%
- PEG 0.56 vs V's 1.55
V has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.68, Low D/E 66.4%, current ratio 1.08x
- Beta 0.68, yield 0.7%, current ratio 1.08x
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs AXP's 0.7% (lower = leaner)
- Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs AXP's 0.7%
COF is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if bank quality is your priority.
- NIM 6.4% vs BAC's 1.8%
- 28.4% NII/revenue growth vs BAC's -1.9%
- Lower P/E (9.8x vs 11.9x)
BAC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 1.00, yield 2.4%
- 2.4% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs AXP's 1.0%
- +31.6% vs MA's -11.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.4% NII/revenue growth vs BAC's -1.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.8x vs 11.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs AXP's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.67 vs COF's 1.58 | |
| Dividends | 2.4% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs AXP's 1.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +31.6% vs MA's -11.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs AXP's 0.7% |
MA vs AXP vs V vs COF vs BAC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MA vs AXP vs V vs COF vs BAC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
V leads in 1 of 6 categories
COF leads 1 • MA leads 1 • AXP leads 0 • BAC leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
V leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BAC is the larger business by revenue, generating $188.8B annually — 5.8x MA's $32.8B. V is the more profitable business, keeping 50.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to COF's 3.5%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $32.8B | $80.5B | $40.0B | $69.3B | $188.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $21.6B | $18.4B | $27.6B | $7.5B | $36.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $15.6B | $11.2B | $22.2B | $2.5B | $30.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $17.7B | $14.3B | $21.2B | $27.7B | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +83.4% | +83.2% | +80.4% | +47.3% | +55.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +59.2% | +17.1% | +60.0% | +3.3% | +18.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +45.6% | +13.5% | +50.1% | +3.5% | +16.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +51.6% | +19.9% | +53.9% | +37.7% | +6.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.2% | +17.6% | +35.3% | +22.1% | +18.3% |
Valuation Metrics
COF leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.8x trailing earnings, BAC trades at a 71% valuation discount to COF's 47.8x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AXP offers better value at 0.64x vs V's 1.99x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $443.4B | $218.6B | $616.4B | $119.2B | $401.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $451.9B | $228.6B | $621.5B | $112.8B | $535.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 30.32x | 20.72x | 31.50x | 47.77x | 13.81x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 25.55x | 18.10x | 24.59x | 9.76x | 11.86x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.44x | 0.64x | 1.99x | — | 0.90x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.00x | 14.68x | 24.65x | 14.95x | 14.63x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 13.52x | 2.72x | 15.41x | 1.72x | 2.13x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 58.07x | 6.63x | 16.66x | 0.92x | 1.31x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 26.22x | 13.66x | 28.57x | 4.56x | 31.83x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MA delivers a 2.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $2 for COF. COF carries lower financial leverage with a 0.45x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MA's 2.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MA scores 9/9 vs COF's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.1% | +33.9% | +58.9% | +2.4% | +10.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +29.5% | +3.7% | +22.7% | +0.4% | +0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +56.5% | +12.0% | +29.2% | +1.3% | +3.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +64.4% | +11.3% | +36.2% | +1.4% | +4.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 9 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.45x | 1.73x | 0.66x | 0.45x | 1.21x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8.4B | $10.1B | $5.0B | -$6.4B | $134.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10.6B | $47.7B | $20.2B | $57.4B | $231.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19.0B | $57.8B | $25.2B | $51.0B | $365.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 27.23x | 2.07x | 26.72x | 0.14x | 0.44x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — COF and BAC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AXP five years ago would be worth $20,853 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,019 for COF. Over the past 12 months, BAC leads with a +31.6% total return vs MA's -11.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors COF at 31.0% vs MA's 9.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -10.7% | -14.0% | -7.1% | -22.0% | -5.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -11.0% | +16.6% | -7.4% | +4.7% | +31.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +32.2% | +114.0% | +41.2% | +124.7% | +101.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +36.8% | +108.5% | +42.6% | +30.2% | +36.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +437.2% | +429.9% | +329.1% | +205.6% | +330.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.7% | +28.9% | +12.2% | +31.0% | +26.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MA and BAC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MA is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COF's 1.58 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BAC currently trades 91.7% from its 52-week high vs COF's 74.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.67x | 1.24x | 0.68x | 1.58x | 1.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $601.77 | $387.49 | $375.51 | $259.64 | $57.55 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $480.50 | $273.89 | $293.89 | $174.98 | $40.86 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.2% | +82.3% | +85.6% | +74.2% | +91.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.3 | 53.4 | 53.3 | 50.3 | 59.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.2M | 3.1M | 6.9M | 4.6M | 36.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — AXP and V and BAC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MA as "Buy", AXP as "Hold", V as "Buy", COF as "Buy", BAC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 38.8% upside for COF (target: $267) vs 12.8% for V (target: $362). For income investors, BAC offers the higher dividend yield at 2.40% vs MA's 0.61%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $656.87 | $373.30 | $362.45 | $267.18 | $61.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 64 | 57 | 61 | 56 | 54 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.6% | +1.0% | +0.7% | +1.7% | +2.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 14 | 15 | 15 | 3 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.07 | $3.26 | $2.36 | $3.27 | $1.27 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +2.6% | +2.7% | +2.2% | +3.4% | +5.3% |
V leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). COF leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
MA vs AXP vs V vs COF vs BAC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MA or AXP or V or COF or BAC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Capital One Financial Corporation (COF) is the stronger pick with 28.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 9% for Bank of America Corporation (BAC). Bank of America Corporation (BAC) offers the better valuation at 13. 8x trailing P/E (11. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mastercard Incorporated (MA) a "Buy" — based on 64 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MA or AXP or V or COF or BAC?
On trailing P/E, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is the cheapest at 13.
8x versus Capital One Financial Corporation at 47. 8x. On forward P/E, Capital One Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: American Express Company wins at 0. 56x versus Visa Inc. 's 1. 55x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MA or AXP or V or COF or BAC?
Over the past 5 years, American Express Company (AXP) delivered a total return of +108.
5%, compared to +30. 2% for Capital One Financial Corporation (COF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MA returned +437. 2% versus COF's +205. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MA or AXP or V or COF or BAC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
67β versus Capital One Financial Corporation's 1. 58β — meaning COF is approximately 137% more volatile than MA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Capital One Financial Corporation (COF) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 45% versus 2% for Mastercard Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MA or AXP or V or COF or BAC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Capital One Financial Corporation (COF) is pulling ahead at 28.
4% versus -1. 9% for Bank of America Corporation (BAC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mastercard Incorporated grew EPS 18. 9% year-over-year, compared to -65. 2% for Capital One Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MA or AXP or V or COF or BAC?
Visa Inc.
(V) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 1% net margin versus 3. 5% for Capital One Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 50. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: V leads at 60. 0% versus 3. 3% for COF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MA leads at 83. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MA or AXP or V or COF or BAC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, American Express Company (AXP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 56x versus Visa Inc. 's 1. 55x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Capital One Financial Corporation (COF) trades at 9. 8x forward P/E versus 25. 5x for Mastercard Incorporated — 15. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COF: 38. 8% to $267. 18.
08Which pays a better dividend — MA or AXP or V or COF or BAC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Bank of America Corporation (BAC) offers the highest yield at 2. 4%, versus 0. 6% for Mastercard Incorporated (MA).
09Is MA or AXP or V or COF or BAC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Mastercard Incorporated (MA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
67), 0. 6% yield, +437. 2% 10Y return). Capital One Financial Corporation (COF) carries a higher beta of 1. 58 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MA: +437. 2%, COF: +205. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MA and AXP and V and COF and BAC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MA is a large-cap high-growth stock; AXP is a large-cap quality compounder stock; V is a large-cap quality compounder stock; COF is a mid-cap high-growth stock; BAC is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.