Asset Management
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MAAS vs EDTK vs CLPS vs BIDU vs CODA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Education & Training Services
Information Technology Services
Internet Content & Information
Aerospace & Defense
MAAS vs EDTK vs CLPS vs BIDU vs CODA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Asset Management | Education & Training Services | Information Technology Services | Internet Content & Information | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $577M | $16M | $25M | $49.33B | $136M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.19B | $6M | $299M | $130.46B | $28M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-290M | $-26M | $-4M | $9.00B | $4M |
| Gross Margin | 39.6% | -42.0% | 22.8% | 44.7% | 66.3% |
| Operating Margin | -38.9% | -323.1% | -1.4% | -2.6% | 17.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 2.6x | 22.8x |
| Total Debt | $216M | $701K | $34M | $79.32B | $395K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $296M | $1M | $28M | $24.83B | $29M |
MAAS vs EDTK vs CLPS vs BIDU vs CODA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Highest Performance… (MAAS) | 100 | 83.5 | -16.5% |
| Skillful Craftsman … (EDTK) | 100 | 96.2 | -3.8% |
| CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) | 100 | 91.8 | -8.2% |
| Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) | 100 | 160.6 | +60.6% |
| Coda Octopus Group,… (CODA) | 100 | 180.7 | +80.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MAAS vs EDTK vs CLPS vs BIDU vs CODA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MAAS has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in defensive.
- Beta 0.99, current ratio 2.80x
- 9.4% NII/revenue growth vs EDTK's -55.3%
- +119.3% vs CLPS's -9.4%
Among these 5 stocks, EDTK doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CLPS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.19, yield 14.7%
- Beta 0.19 vs BIDU's 1.50
- 14.7% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
BIDU is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.04 vs CODA's 5.33
- Better valuation composite
CODA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 30.7%, EPS growth 15.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.1%
- 8.6% 10Y total return vs MAAS's 16.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.99, Low D/E 0.7%, current ratio 8.86x
- 14.8% margin vs EDTK's -416.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.4% NII/revenue growth vs EDTK's -55.3% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.8% margin vs EDTK's -416.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.19 vs BIDU's 1.50 | |
| Dividends | 14.7% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +119.3% vs CLPS's -9.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.6% ROA vs EDTK's -73.7%, ROIC 11.2% vs -5.2% |
MAAS vs EDTK vs CLPS vs BIDU vs CODA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MAAS vs EDTK vs CLPS vs BIDU vs CODA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CODA leads in 3 of 6 categories
BIDU leads 1 • MAAS leads 0 • EDTK leads 0 • CLPS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CODA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BIDU is the larger business by revenue, generating $130.5B annually — 21223.4x EDTK's $6M. CODA is the more profitable business, keeping 14.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EDTK's -4.2%. On growth, CODA holds the edge at +28.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $6M | $299M | $130.5B | $28M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$15M | -$1M | $4.9B | $6M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$26M | -$4M | $9.0B | $4M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$6M | $0 | -$15.7B | $7M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.6% | -42.0% | +22.8% | +44.7% | +66.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -38.9% | -3.2% | -1.4% | -2.6% | +17.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -24.4% | -4.2% | -1.3% | +6.9% | +14.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.5% | -104.4% | -2.3% | -12.0% | +24.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -92.0% | +15.3% | -7.1% | +28.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -7.0% | +75.8% | -2.6% | +3.0% |
Valuation Metrics
BIDU leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.6x trailing earnings, BIDU trades at a 56% valuation discount to CODA's 32.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BIDU offers better value at 0.24x vs CODA's 7.64x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $577M | $16M | $25M | $49.3B | $136M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $565M | $15M | $31M | $57.3B | $108M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -13.55x | -5.26x | -3.46x | 14.56x | 32.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 2.60x | 22.85x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 0.24x | 7.64x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 10.87x | 18.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.31x | 17.82x | 0.15x | 2.52x | 5.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.49x | 1.15x | 0.43x | 1.18x | 2.34x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 73.42x | — | — | 25.62x | 22.60x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CODA leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CODA delivers a 7.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-133 for EDTK. CODA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CLPS's 0.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CODA scores 7/9 vs CLPS's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -20.3% | -133.3% | -6.1% | +3.1% | +7.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -12.8% | -73.7% | -3.2% | +2.0% | +6.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -22.4% | -5.2% | -7.9% | +4.8% | +11.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -25.1% | -4.3% | -9.8% | +6.3% | +8.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.08x | 0.05x | 0.59x | 0.28x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$80M | -$517,347 | $6M | $54.5B | -$28M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $296M | $1M | $28M | $24.8B | $29M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $216M | $700,621 | $34M | $79.3B | $394,932 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -6.78x | — | 9.71x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CODA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CODA five years ago would be worth $15,586 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,081 for CLPS. Over the past 12 months, MAAS leads with a +119.3% total return vs CLPS's -9.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CODA at 11.0% vs EDTK's -16.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +64.1% | +11.1% | -10.9% | -6.2% | +27.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +119.3% | +13.6% | -9.4% | +60.9% | +78.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.9% | -41.0% | +0.0% | +15.2% | +36.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.9% | -52.4% | -69.2% | -23.1% | +55.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.9% | -78.9% | -78.6% | -16.8% | +861.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +5.3% | -16.1% | +0.0% | +4.8% | +11.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EDTK and BIDU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EDTK is the less volatile stock with a -0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BIDU's 1.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BIDU currently trades 85.3% from its 52-week high vs MAAS's 45.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.99x | -0.23x | 0.19x | 1.50x | 0.99x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $20.89 | $1.18 | $1.88 | $165.30 | $17.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.41 | $0.80 | $0.80 | $81.17 | $5.98 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +45.8% | +84.7% | +47.9% | +85.3% | +70.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.4 | 50.7 | 46.8 | 67.9 | 48.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 229K | 3K | 15K | 2.0M | 255K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CLPS and BIDU each lead in 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: BIDU as "Buy", CODA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 15.6% upside for CODA (target: $14) vs 9.3% for BIDU (target: $154). CLPS is the only dividend payer here at 14.69% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | $154.11 | $14.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | 53 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +14.7% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 3 | 3 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.13 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.9% | 0.0% |
CODA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). BIDU leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
MAAS vs EDTK vs CLPS vs BIDU vs CODA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MAAS or EDTK or CLPS or BIDU or CODA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Highest Performances Holdings Inc.
American Depository Shares (MAAS) is the stronger pick with 935. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -55. 3% for Skillful Craftsman Education Technology Limited (EDTK). Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) offers the better valuation at 14. 6x trailing P/E (2. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) a "Buy" — based on 53 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MAAS or EDTK or CLPS or BIDU or CODA?
On trailing P/E, Baidu, Inc.
(BIDU) is the cheapest at 14. 6x versus Coda Octopus Group, Inc. at 32. 7x. On forward P/E, Baidu, Inc. is actually cheaper at 2. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Baidu, Inc. wins at 0. 04x versus Coda Octopus Group, Inc. 's 5. 33x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MAAS or EDTK or CLPS or BIDU or CODA?
Over the past 5 years, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
(CODA) delivered a total return of +55. 9%, compared to -69. 2% for CLPS Incorporation (CLPS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CODA returned +861. 1% versus EDTK's -78. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MAAS or EDTK or CLPS or BIDU or CODA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Skillful Craftsman Education Technology Limited (EDTK) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
23β versus Baidu, Inc. 's 1. 50β — meaning BIDU is approximately -752% more volatile than EDTK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 59% for CLPS Incorporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MAAS or EDTK or CLPS or BIDU or CODA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Highest Performances Holdings Inc.
American Depository Shares (MAAS) is pulling ahead at 935. 8% versus -55. 3% for Skillful Craftsman Education Technology Limited (EDTK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Skillful Craftsman Education Technology Limited grew EPS 38. 7% year-over-year, compared to -566. 7% for Highest Performances Holdings Inc. American Depository Shares. Over a 3-year CAGR, CODA leads at 6. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MAAS or EDTK or CLPS or BIDU or CODA?
Baidu, Inc.
(BIDU) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 8% net margin versus -333. 3% for Skillful Craftsman Education Technology Limited — meaning it keeps 17. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CODA leads at 17. 1% versus -116. 4% for EDTK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EDTK leads at 78. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MAAS or EDTK or CLPS or BIDU or CODA more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 04x versus Coda Octopus Group, Inc. 's 5. 33x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) trades at 2. 6x forward P/E versus 22. 8x for Coda Octopus Group, Inc. — 20. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CODA: 15. 6% to $14. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MAAS or EDTK or CLPS or BIDU or CODA?
In this comparison, CLPS (14.
7% yield) pays a dividend. MAAS, EDTK, BIDU, CODA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MAAS or EDTK or CLPS or BIDU or CODA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
19), 14. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLPS: -78. 6%, BIDU: -16. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MAAS and EDTK and CLPS and BIDU and CODA?
These companies operate in different sectors (MAAS (Financial Services) and EDTK (Consumer Defensive) and CLPS (Technology) and BIDU (Communication Services) and CODA (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MAAS is a small-cap high-growth stock; EDTK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; BIDU is a mid-cap deep-value stock; CODA is a small-cap high-growth stock. CLPS pays a dividend while MAAS, EDTK, BIDU, CODA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.