Apparel - Footwear & Accessories
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MAMK vs XMTR vs ETSY vs UPWK vs SHOP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Specialty Retail
Staffing & Employment Services
Software - Application
MAMK vs XMTR vs ETSY vs UPWK vs SHOP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Footwear & Accessories | Industrial - Machinery | Specialty Retail | Staffing & Employment Services | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $120M | $4.23B | $5.46B | $1.09B | $129.56B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $21M | $741M | $2.86B | $595M | $12.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $-52M | $285M | $109M | $1.33B |
| Gross Margin | 18.5% | 39.3% | 72.0% | 103.0% | 48.0% |
| Operating Margin | 10.3% | -4.8% | 14.3% | 20.7% | 13.3% |
| Forward P/E | 118.2x | 122.3x | 16.6x | 5.8x | 54.3x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $349M | $742M | $381M | $188M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $176K | $15M | $1.40B | $298M | $1.53B |
MAMK vs XMTR vs ETSY vs UPWK vs SHOP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Xometry, Inc. (XMTR) | 100 | 96.0 | -4.0% |
| Etsy, Inc. (ETSY) | 100 | 27.9 | -72.1% |
| Upwork Inc. (UPWK) | 100 | 14.3 | -85.7% |
| Shopify Inc. (SHOP) | 100 | 68.3 | -31.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MAMK vs XMTR vs ETSY vs UPWK vs SHOP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MAMK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum and efficiency is your priority.
- +252.3% vs UPWK's -52.0%
- 11.9% ROA vs XMTR's -7.3%, ROIC 15.5% vs -5.7%
XMTR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, ETSY doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
UPWK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.12
- Lower volatility, beta 1.12, Low D/E 60.4%, current ratio 1.46x
- Beta 1.12, current ratio 1.46x
- Lower P/E (5.8x vs 54.3x)
SHOP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 30.1%, EPS growth -39.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.3%
- 36.0% 10Y total return vs MAMK's 252.3%
- 30.1% revenue growth vs MAMK's -18.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 30.1% revenue growth vs MAMK's -18.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.8x vs 54.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.3% margin vs XMTR's -7.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.12 vs SHOP's 2.49 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +252.3% vs UPWK's -52.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.9% ROA vs XMTR's -7.3%, ROIC 15.5% vs -5.7% |
MAMK vs XMTR vs ETSY vs UPWK vs SHOP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MAMK vs XMTR vs ETSY vs UPWK vs SHOP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
UPWK leads in 2 of 6 categories
MAMK leads 1 • XMTR leads 1 • ETSY leads 0 • SHOP leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UPWK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SHOP is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.4B annually — 576.9x MAMK's $21M. UPWK is the more profitable business, keeping 18.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to XMTR's -7.0%. On growth, XMTR holds the edge at +35.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $21M | $741M | $2.9B | $595M | $12.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$15M | $508M | $150M | $1.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$52M | $285M | $109M | $1.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$11M | $673M | $224M | $2.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +18.5% | +39.3% | +72.0% | +103.0% | +48.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.3% | -4.8% | +14.3% | +20.7% | +13.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +8.5% | -7.0% | +9.9% | +18.3% | +10.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -14.3% | -1.4% | +23.5% | +37.7% | +17.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +35.9% | +3.1% | -100.0% | +34.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +66.7% | +2.2% | -11.1% | +15.1% |
Valuation Metrics
UPWK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.1x trailing earnings, UPWK trades at a 91% valuation discount to MAMK's 118.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, UPWK's 7.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SHOP's 85.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $120M | $4.2B | $5.5B | $1.1B | $129.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $124M | $4.6B | $4.8B | $1.2B | $128.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 118.18x | -68.79x | 41.37x | 10.06x | 106.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 122.31x | 16.64x | 5.80x | 54.34x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 3.62x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 51.51x | — | 10.23x | 7.72x | 85.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 5.58x | 6.15x | 1.89x | 1.38x | 11.21x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 26.74x | 15.41x | — | 1.85x | 9.67x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 8.54x | 4.49x | 64.55x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MAMK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MAMK delivers a 26.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $26 in annual profit, vs $-19 for XMTR. SHOP carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to XMTR's 1.26x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UPWK scores 6/9 vs XMTR's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +26.2% | -18.8% | — | +17.9% | +10.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.9% | -7.3% | +10.6% | +8.5% | +9.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.5% | -5.7% | — | +14.3% | +9.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +25.8% | -7.5% | +22.9% | +16.2% | +11.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.59x | 1.26x | — | 0.60x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5M | $334M | -$653M | $83M | -$1.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $176,236 | $15M | $1.4B | $298M | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $349M | $742M | $381M | $188M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 14.56x | -9.87x | 27.47x | 146.13x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
XMTR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MAMK five years ago would be worth $35,230 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,187 for UPWK. Over the past 12 months, MAMK leads with a +252.3% total return vs UPWK's -52.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors XMTR at 71.1% vs ETSY's -15.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | 0.0% | +33.7% | +0.4% | -57.9% | -36.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +252.3% | +159.7% | +20.8% | -52.0% | -4.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +252.3% | +401.0% | -39.3% | +4.4% | +62.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +252.3% | -4.0% | -63.9% | -78.1% | -7.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +252.3% | -4.0% | +594.6% | -60.6% | +3604.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +52.2% | +71.1% | -15.3% | +1.4% | +17.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MAMK and XMTR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MAMK is the less volatile stock with a -0.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHOP's 2.49 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. XMTR currently trades 99.8% from its 52-week high vs UPWK's 36.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.11x | 1.89x | 1.20x | 1.12x | 2.49x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.30 | $84.08 | $76.52 | $22.84 | $182.19 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.87 | $29.60 | $44.00 | $7.44 | $98.56 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.9% | +99.8% | +75.2% | +36.6% | +54.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 80.8 | 85.2 | 47.8 | 28.7 | 35.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 135K | 808K | 2.8M | 3.9M | 9.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: XMTR as "Buy", ETSY as "Buy", UPWK as "Buy", SHOP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 93.2% upside for UPWK (target: $16) vs -10.6% for XMTR (target: $75).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $75.00 | $70.07 | $16.13 | $156.79 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 14 | 45 | 23 | 63 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% | +14.2% | +12.5% | 0.0% |
UPWK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MAMK leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
MAMK vs XMTR vs ETSY vs UPWK vs SHOP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MAMK or XMTR or ETSY or UPWK or SHOP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Shopify Inc.
(SHOP) is the stronger pick with 30. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 4% for MaxsMaking Inc. Class A Ordinary Shares (MAMK). Upwork Inc. (UPWK) offers the better valuation at 10. 1x trailing P/E (5. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Xometry, Inc. (XMTR) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MAMK or XMTR or ETSY or UPWK or SHOP?
On trailing P/E, Upwork Inc.
(UPWK) is the cheapest at 10. 1x versus MaxsMaking Inc. Class A Ordinary Shares at 118. 2x. On forward P/E, Upwork Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MAMK or XMTR or ETSY or UPWK or SHOP?
Over the past 5 years, MaxsMaking Inc.
Class A Ordinary Shares (MAMK) delivered a total return of +252. 3%, compared to -78. 1% for Upwork Inc. (UPWK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SHOP returned +36. 0% versus UPWK's -60. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MAMK or XMTR or ETSY or UPWK or SHOP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MaxsMaking Inc.
Class A Ordinary Shares (MAMK) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 11β versus Shopify Inc. 's 2. 49β — meaning SHOP is approximately -2312% more volatile than MAMK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Shopify Inc. (SHOP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 126% for Xometry, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MAMK or XMTR or ETSY or UPWK or SHOP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shopify Inc.
(SHOP) is pulling ahead at 30. 1% versus -18. 4% for MaxsMaking Inc. Class A Ordinary Shares (MAMK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MaxsMaking Inc. Class A Ordinary Shares grew EPS 0. 0% year-over-year, compared to -45. 4% for Upwork Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SHOP leads at 27. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MAMK or XMTR or ETSY or UPWK or SHOP?
Upwork Inc.
(UPWK) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 7% net margin versus -9. 0% for Xometry, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: UPWK leads at 16. 4% versus -6. 6% for XMTR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — UPWK leads at 77. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MAMK or XMTR or ETSY or UPWK or SHOP more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Upwork Inc.
(UPWK) trades at 5. 8x forward P/E versus 122. 3x for Xometry, Inc. — 116. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UPWK: 93. 2% to $16. 13.
08Which pays a better dividend — MAMK or XMTR or ETSY or UPWK or SHOP?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is MAMK or XMTR or ETSY or UPWK or SHOP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MaxsMaking Inc.
Class A Ordinary Shares (MAMK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 11), +252. 3% 10Y return). Shopify Inc. (SHOP) carries a higher beta of 2. 49 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MAMK: +252. 3%, SHOP: +36. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MAMK and XMTR and ETSY and UPWK and SHOP?
These companies operate in different sectors (MAMK (Consumer Cyclical) and XMTR (Industrials) and ETSY (Consumer Cyclical) and UPWK (Industrials) and SHOP (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MAMK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; XMTR is a small-cap high-growth stock; ETSY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; UPWK is a small-cap deep-value stock; SHOP is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.