Entertainment
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MANU vs MSGE vs FWONK vs TKO vs NKE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Entertainment
Entertainment
Apparel - Footwear & Accessories
MANU vs MSGE vs FWONK vs TKO vs NKE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Entertainment | Entertainment | Entertainment | Apparel - Footwear & Accessories |
| Market Cap | $3.21B | $2.67B | $19.48B | $21.71B | $51.28B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $655M | $1.01B | $1.02B | $4.74B | $46.51B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $52M | $449M | $195M | $2.52B |
| Gross Margin | 64.8% | 46.1% | -18.4% | -43.0% | 41.1% |
| Operating Margin | 2.8% | 13.5% | -3.4% | 17.6% | 6.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 56.2x | 53.8x | 38.0x | 28.9x |
| Total Debt | $645M | $1.20B | $0.00 | $4.06B | $11.02B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $86M | $43M | $1.05B | $831M | $7.46B |
MANU vs MSGE vs FWONK vs TKO vs NKE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manchester United p… (MANU) | 100 | 113.3 | +13.3% |
| Madison Square Gard… (MSGE) | 100 | 84.5 | -15.5% |
| Formula One Group (FWONK) | 100 | 260.2 | +160.2% |
| TKO Group Holdings,… (TKO) | 100 | 411.6 | +311.6% |
| NIKE, Inc. (NKE) | 100 | 45.0 | -55.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MANU vs MSGE vs FWONK vs TKO vs NKE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, MANU doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
MSGE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +94.3% vs NKE's -22.1%
FWONK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and stability.
- 43.8% margin vs MANU's -1.4%
- Beta 0.35 vs NKE's 1.17
- 42.6% ROA vs MANU's -0.5%
TKO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 68.9%, EPS growth 40.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 60.7%
- 10.7% 10Y total return vs FWONK's 373.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.64, Low D/E 43.9%, current ratio 1.26x
- 68.9% revenue growth vs FWONK's -100.0%
NKE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Dividend streak 23 yrs, beta 1.17, yield 3.6%
- PEG 4.68 vs TKO's 31.88
- Beta 1.17, yield 3.6%, current ratio 2.21x
- Lower P/E (28.9x vs 38.0x), PEG 4.68 vs 31.88
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 68.9% revenue growth vs FWONK's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (28.9x vs 38.0x), PEG 4.68 vs 31.88 | |
| Quality / Margins | 43.8% margin vs MANU's -1.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.35 vs NKE's 1.17 | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 23-year raise streak, vs TKO's 0.5%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +94.3% vs NKE's -22.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 42.6% ROA vs MANU's -0.5% |
MANU vs MSGE vs FWONK vs TKO vs NKE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MANU vs MSGE vs FWONK vs TKO vs NKE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NKE leads in 2 of 6 categories
MSGE leads 1 • MANU leads 0 • FWONK leads 0 • TKO leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MANU and FWONK and TKO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NKE is the larger business by revenue, generating $46.5B annually — 71.0x MANU's $655M. FWONK is the more profitable business, keeping 43.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MANU's -1.4%. On growth, TKO holds the edge at +61.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $655M | $1.0B | $1.0B | $4.7B | $46.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $238M | $195M | $231M | $1.3B | $3.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | $52M | $449M | $195M | $2.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$135M | $207M | $279M | $1.2B | $2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +64.8% | +46.1% | -18.4% | -43.0% | +41.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +13.5% | -3.4% | +17.6% | +6.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.4% | +5.1% | +43.8% | +4.1% | +5.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -20.6% | +20.4% | +27.3% | +26.2% | +5.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.2% | +12.9% | -2.6% | +61.6% | +0.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +115.1% | +24.4% | +100.0% | -144.4% | -30.8% |
Valuation Metrics
NKE leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.9x trailing earnings, NKE trades at a 77% valuation discount to MSGE's 85.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NKE offers better value at 3.22x vs TKO's 69.40x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.2B | $2.7B | $19.5B | $21.7B | $51.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.0B | $3.8B | $18.4B | $24.9B | $54.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -72.35x | 85.70x | — | 82.72x | 19.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 56.22x | 53.75x | 38.00x | 28.93x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 69.40x | 3.22x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.12x | 21.26x | — | 18.90x | 12.16x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.56x | 2.83x | — | 4.59x | 1.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 12.25x | — | — | 3.93x | 4.85x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 84.80x | 28.65x | 21.45x | 16.89x | 15.69x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — FWONK and NKE each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MSGE delivers a 144.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $144 in annual profit, vs $-5 for MANU. TKO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.44x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MANU's 3.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MSGE scores 6/9 vs FWONK's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.8% | +144.2% | — | +2.1% | +17.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.5% | +2.8% | +42.6% | +1.3% | +6.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.0% | +8.5% | — | +5.3% | +16.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.1% | +11.0% | -0.5% | +6.5% | +13.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.33x | — | — | 0.44x | 0.83x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $559M | $1.2B | -$1.1B | $3.2B | $3.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $86M | $43M | $1.1B | $831M | $7.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $645M | $1.2B | $0 | $4.1B | $11.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.62x | 3.08x | 3.35x | 8.95x | 10.45x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MSGE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TKO five years ago would be worth $35,964 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,789 for NKE. Over the past 12 months, MSGE leads with a +94.3% total return vs NKE's -22.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MSGE at 24.0% vs NKE's -27.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +17.8% | +21.4% | -10.9% | -9.3% | -31.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +31.8% | +94.3% | -4.9% | +13.7% | -22.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -2.5% | +90.7% | +22.7% | +81.5% | -62.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.8% | -23.5% | +97.0% | +259.6% | -62.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.7% | -25.4% | +373.2% | +1074.8% | -6.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.8% | +24.0% | +7.1% | +22.0% | -27.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MSGE and FWONK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FWONK is the less volatile stock with a 0.35 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NKE's 1.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MSGE currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs NKE's 53.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.92x | 0.94x | 0.35x | 0.64x | 1.17x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.65 | $68.51 | $109.36 | $226.94 | $80.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.22 | $33.01 | $80.15 | $152.29 | $42.09 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.6% | +96.3% | +79.9% | +82.4% | +53.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 58.6 | 64.9 | 53.1 | 41.5 | 30.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 324K | 300K | 2.1M | 1.2M | 20.5M |
Analyst Outlook
NKE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MANU as "Hold", MSGE as "Buy", FWONK as "Buy", TKO as "Buy", NKE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 62.3% upside for NKE (target: $70) vs -3.4% for MANU (target: $18). For income investors, NKE offers the higher dividend yield at 3.59% vs TKO's 0.51%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.95 | $66.29 | $116.33 | $236.67 | $69.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 12 | 24 | 19 | 71 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +0.5% | +3.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | 23 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $0.95 | $1.55 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.5% | 0.0% | +4.0% | +5.8% |
NKE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). MSGE leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
MANU vs MSGE vs FWONK vs TKO vs NKE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MANU or MSGE or FWONK or TKO or NKE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TKO Group Holdings, Inc.
(TKO) is the stronger pick with 68. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Formula One Group (FWONK). NIKE, Inc. (NKE) offers the better valuation at 19. 9x trailing P/E (28. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. (MSGE) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MANU or MSGE or FWONK or TKO or NKE?
On trailing P/E, NIKE, Inc.
(NKE) is the cheapest at 19. 9x versus Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. at 85. 7x. On forward P/E, NIKE, Inc. is actually cheaper at 28. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NIKE, Inc. wins at 4. 68x versus TKO Group Holdings, Inc. 's 31. 88x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MANU or MSGE or FWONK or TKO or NKE?
Over the past 5 years, TKO Group Holdings, Inc.
(TKO) delivered a total return of +259. 6%, compared to -62. 1% for NIKE, Inc. (NKE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TKO returned +1075% versus MSGE's -25. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MANU or MSGE or FWONK or TKO or NKE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Formula One Group (FWONK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
35β versus NIKE, Inc. 's 1. 17β — meaning NKE is approximately 231% more volatile than FWONK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TKO Group Holdings, Inc. (TKO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 44% versus 3% for Manchester United plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MANU or MSGE or FWONK or TKO or NKE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TKO Group Holdings, Inc.
(TKO) is pulling ahead at 68. 9% versus -100. 0% for Formula One Group (FWONK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TKO Group Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 40. 3% year-over-year, compared to -74. 1% for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TKO leads at 60. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MANU or MSGE or FWONK or TKO or NKE?
Formula One Group (FWONK) is the more profitable company, earning 43.
8% net margin versus -5. 0% for Manchester United plc — meaning it keeps 43. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TKO leads at 17. 6% versus -3. 4% for FWONK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MANU leads at 82. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MANU or MSGE or FWONK or TKO or NKE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NIKE, Inc. (NKE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 4. 68x versus TKO Group Holdings, Inc. 's 31. 88x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, NIKE, Inc. (NKE) trades at 28. 9x forward P/E versus 56. 2x for Madison Square Garden Entertainment Corp. — 27. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NKE: 62. 3% to $69. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — MANU or MSGE or FWONK or TKO or NKE?
In this comparison, NKE (3.
6% yield), TKO (0. 5% yield) pay a dividend. MANU, MSGE, FWONK do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MANU or MSGE or FWONK or TKO or NKE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TKO Group Holdings, Inc.
(TKO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 64), 0. 5% yield, +1075% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TKO: +1075%, MSGE: -25. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MANU and MSGE and FWONK and TKO and NKE?
These companies operate in different sectors (MANU (Communication Services) and MSGE (Communication Services) and FWONK (Communication Services) and TKO (Communication Services) and NKE (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MANU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MSGE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FWONK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TKO is a mid-cap high-growth stock; NKE is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. TKO, NKE pay a dividend while MANU, MSGE, FWONK do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 30%
- Dividend Yield > 0.5%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.