Leisure
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MAT vs HAS vs JAKK vs SPWH vs PLBY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Leisure
Leisure
Specialty Retail
Leisure
MAT vs HAS vs JAKK vs SPWH vs PLBY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Leisure | Leisure | Leisure | Specialty Retail | Leisure |
| Market Cap | $4.53B | $13.70B | $266M | $55M | $188M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.38B | $4.70B | $571M | $1.21B | $121M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $499M | $-322M | $10M | $-37M | $-13M |
| Gross Margin | 47.9% | 70.3% | 32.4% | 31.2% | 71.0% |
| Operating Margin | 10.0% | 22.5% | 2.5% | -1.3% | -6.3% |
| Forward P/E | 11.5x | 16.8x | 7.4x | — | 22.8x |
| Total Debt | $2.87B | $3.40B | $93M | $455M | $24M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.24B | $777M | $54M | $3M | $38M |
MAT vs HAS vs JAKK vs SPWH vs PLBY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mattel, Inc. (MAT) | 100 | 139.6 | +39.6% |
| Hasbro, Inc. (HAS) | 100 | 123.4 | +23.4% |
| JAKKS Pacific, Inc. (JAKK) | 100 | 587.9 | +487.9% |
| Sportsman's Warehou… (SPWH) | 100 | 9.0 | -91.0% |
| Playboy, Inc. (PLBY) | 100 | 16.9 | -83.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MAT vs HAS vs JAKK vs SPWH vs PLBY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MAT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.24, current ratio 2.15x
- 9.3% margin vs PLBY's -10.5%
- 7.7% ROA vs HAS's -5.8%, ROIC 12.5% vs 22.4%
HAS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 42.9% 10Y total return vs JAKK's -66.6%
- 13.7% revenue growth vs JAKK's -17.4%
- Beta 1.16 vs PLBY's 1.96
- +63.1% vs SPWH's -17.4%
JAKK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.79, yield 4.2%
- Beta 1.79, yield 4.2%, current ratio 1.82x
- Lower P/E (7.4x vs 22.8x)
- 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs HAS's 2.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
SPWH lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
PLBY is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 4.1%, EPS growth 87.5%, 3Y rev CAGR -13.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.7% revenue growth vs JAKK's -17.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.4x vs 22.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.3% margin vs PLBY's -10.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.16 vs PLBY's 1.96 | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs HAS's 2.9%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +63.1% vs SPWH's -17.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.7% ROA vs HAS's -5.8%, ROIC 12.5% vs 22.4% |
MAT vs HAS vs JAKK vs SPWH vs PLBY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MAT vs HAS vs JAKK vs SPWH vs PLBY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HAS leads in 2 of 6 categories
SPWH leads 1 • PLBY leads 1 • JAKK leads 1 • MAT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HAS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MAT is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.4B annually — 44.5x PLBY's $121M. MAT is the more profitable business, keeping 9.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PLBY's -10.5%. On growth, HAS holds the edge at +31.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.4B | $4.7B | $571M | $1.2B | $121M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $726M | $1.2B | $24M | $24M | $684,000 |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $499M | -$322M | $10M | -$37M | -$13M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $400M | $830M | -$1M | -$55M | -$1M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.9% | +70.3% | +32.4% | +31.2% | +71.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.0% | +22.5% | +2.5% | -1.3% | -6.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +9.3% | -6.9% | +1.7% | -3.1% | -10.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | +17.7% | -0.2% | -4.5% | -0.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.3% | +31.3% | -2.8% | +1.8% | -58.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.7% | +6.6% | +43.4% | -12.5% | +120.8% |
Valuation Metrics
SPWH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.1x trailing earnings, MAT trades at a 55% valuation discount to JAKK's 27.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MAT's 7.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PLBY's 34.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.5B | $13.7B | $266M | $55M | $188M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.2B | $16.3B | $305M | $507M | $174M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.10x | -42.34x | 27.07x | -1.63x | -12.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.45x | 16.79x | 7.41x | — | 22.78x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.42x | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.82x | 13.28x | 12.49x | 22.78x | 34.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.85x | 2.91x | 0.47x | 0.05x | 1.56x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.14x | 24.15x | 1.07x | 0.23x | 9.22x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.02x | 16.51x | — | 2.78x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
PLBY leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MAT delivers a 22.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-2 for PLBY. JAKK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to HAS's 6.01x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PLBY scores 6/9 vs JAKK's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +22.7% | -52.3% | +4.0% | -17.9% | -2.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.7% | -5.8% | +2.2% | -3.9% | -4.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +12.5% | +22.4% | +4.1% | -1.9% | -2.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +11.9% | +24.5% | +4.8% | -3.2% | -1.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.28x | 6.01x | 0.37x | 1.93x | 1.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.6B | $2.6B | $39M | $452M | -$14M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.2B | $777M | $54M | $3M | $38M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.9B | $3.4B | $93M | $455M | $24M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.65x | 0.38x | 32.35x | -1.26x | -0.39x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HAS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JAKK five years ago would be worth $26,151 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $339 for PLBY. Over the past 12 months, HAS leads with a +63.1% total return vs SPWH's -17.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HAS at 20.9% vs SPWH's -38.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -25.1% | +18.2% | +36.6% | -2.7% | -9.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -13.9% | +63.1% | +30.0% | -17.4% | +54.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.4% | +76.7% | +4.1% | -77.2% | -8.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.4% | +11.6% | +161.5% | -92.0% | -96.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -45.0% | +42.9% | -66.6% | -87.6% | -83.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -5.8% | +20.9% | +1.3% | -38.9% | -3.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HAS and JAKK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HAS is the less volatile stock with a 1.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PLBY's 1.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JAKK currently trades 94.7% from its 52-week high vs SPWH's 32.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.24x | 1.16x | 1.79x | 1.80x | 1.96x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $22.48 | $106.98 | $24.57 | $4.33 | $2.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $14.10 | $60.64 | $14.87 | $1.08 | $1.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +66.7% | +91.0% | +94.7% | +32.8% | +60.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.0 | 57.8 | 59.2 | 49.9 | 45.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.4M | 1.6M | 76K | 833K | 775K |
Analyst Outlook
JAKK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MAT as "Buy", HAS as "Buy", JAKK as "Hold", PLBY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 656.3% upside for PLBY (target: $13) vs 14.7% for HAS (target: $112). For income investors, JAKK offers the higher dividend yield at 4.21% vs HAS's 2.87%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.29 | $111.67 | $41.67 | — | $12.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 34 | 33 | 16 | — | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.9% | +4.2% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.80 | $0.98 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.1% | +0.6% | 0.0% |
HAS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). SPWH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
MAT vs HAS vs JAKK vs SPWH vs PLBY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MAT or HAS or JAKK or SPWH or PLBY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Hasbro, Inc.
(HAS) is the stronger pick with 13. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 4% for JAKKS Pacific, Inc. (JAKK). Mattel, Inc. (MAT) offers the better valuation at 12. 1x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mattel, Inc. (MAT) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MAT or HAS or JAKK or SPWH or PLBY?
On trailing P/E, Mattel, Inc.
(MAT) is the cheapest at 12. 1x versus JAKKS Pacific, Inc. at 27. 1x. On forward P/E, JAKKS Pacific, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MAT or HAS or JAKK or SPWH or PLBY?
Over the past 5 years, JAKKS Pacific, Inc.
(JAKK) delivered a total return of +161. 5%, compared to -96. 6% for Playboy, Inc. (PLBY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HAS returned +42. 9% versus SPWH's -87. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MAT or HAS or JAKK or SPWH or PLBY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hasbro, Inc.
(HAS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 16β versus Playboy, Inc. 's 1. 96β — meaning PLBY is approximately 69% more volatile than HAS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, JAKKS Pacific, Inc. (JAKK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 6% for Hasbro, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MAT or HAS or JAKK or SPWH or PLBY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Hasbro, Inc.
(HAS) is pulling ahead at 13. 7% versus -17. 4% for JAKKS Pacific, Inc. (JAKK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Playboy, Inc. grew EPS 87. 5% year-over-year, compared to -183. 6% for Hasbro, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MAT leads at -0. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MAT or HAS or JAKK or SPWH or PLBY?
Mattel, Inc.
(MAT) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 4% net margin versus -10. 5% for Playboy, Inc. — meaning it keeps 7. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HAS leads at 22. 5% versus -2. 7% for PLBY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLBY leads at 71. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MAT or HAS or JAKK or SPWH or PLBY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, JAKKS Pacific, Inc.
(JAKK) trades at 7. 4x forward P/E versus 22. 8x for Playboy, Inc. — 15. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PLBY: 656. 3% to $12. 63.
08Which pays a better dividend — MAT or HAS or JAKK or SPWH or PLBY?
In this comparison, JAKK (4.
2% yield), HAS (2. 9% yield) pay a dividend. MAT, SPWH, PLBY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MAT or HAS or JAKK or SPWH or PLBY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hasbro, Inc.
(HAS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 16), 2. 9% yield). Playboy, Inc. (PLBY) carries a higher beta of 1. 96 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HAS: +42. 9%, PLBY: -83. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MAT and HAS and JAKK and SPWH and PLBY?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MAT is a small-cap deep-value stock; HAS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; JAKK is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SPWH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PLBY is a small-cap quality compounder stock. HAS, JAKK pay a dividend while MAT, SPWH, PLBY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.