Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MESA vs ALK vs DAL vs SKYW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
MESA vs ALK vs DAL vs SKYW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Airlines, Airports & Air Services |
| Market Cap | $879M | $4.65B | $47.75B | $3.52B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $381M | $14.24B | $63.36B | $4.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-166M | $100M | $5.01B | $429M |
| Gross Margin | 10.8% | 59.7% | 24.5% | 41.9% |
| Operating Margin | -44.6% | 2.1% | 9.2% | 14.6% |
| Forward P/E | 30.9x | 46.7x | 13.6x | 8.0x |
| Total Debt | $103M | $6.89B | $21.08B | $2.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $42M | $627M | $4.31B | — |
MESA vs ALK vs DAL vs SKYW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Jan 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mesa Air Group, Inc. (MESA) | 100 | 646.2 | +546.2% |
| Alaska Air Group, I… (ALK) | 100 | 147.1 | +47.1% |
| Delta Air Lines, In… (DAL) | 100 | 275.3 | +175.3% |
| SkyWest, Inc. (SKYW) | 100 | 313.1 | +213.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MESA vs ALK vs DAL vs SKYW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MESA has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in defensive.
- Beta 0.82, current ratio 0.67x
- Beta 0.82 vs ALK's 2.16
- +20.3% vs ALK's -19.1%
ALK is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 21.3%, EPS growth -71.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.9%
- 21.3% revenue growth vs MESA's -19.9%
DAL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 1.93, yield 0.9%
- 0.9% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
- 6.2% ROA vs MESA's -71.1%, ROIC 12.0% vs -62.9%
SKYW is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 282.0% 10Y total return vs MESA's 78.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.49, Low D/E 87.1%, current ratio 0.65x
- Lower P/E (8.0x vs 13.6x)
- 10.4% margin vs MESA's -43.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.3% revenue growth vs MESA's -19.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.0x vs 13.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.4% margin vs MESA's -43.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.82 vs ALK's 2.16 | |
| Dividends | 0.9% yield; 2-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.3% vs ALK's -19.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.2% ROA vs MESA's -71.1%, ROIC 12.0% vs -62.9% |
MESA vs ALK vs DAL vs SKYW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MESA vs ALK vs DAL vs SKYW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SKYW leads in 2 of 6 categories
DAL leads 2 • MESA leads 2 • ALK leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SKYW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DAL is the larger business by revenue, generating $63.4B annually — 166.1x MESA's $381M. SKYW is the more profitable business, keeping 10.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MESA's -43.6%. On growth, SKYW holds the edge at +6.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $381M | $14.2B | $63.4B | $4.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$150M | $1.1B | $8.9B | $967M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$166M | $100M | $5.0B | $429M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$53M | -$339M | $3.8B | $339M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +10.8% | +59.7% | +24.5% | +41.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -44.6% | +2.1% | +9.2% | +14.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -43.6% | +0.7% | +7.9% | +10.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -14.0% | -2.4% | +6.1% | +8.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -21.3% | +2.8% | +2.9% | +6.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +43.3% | -67.3% | +44.2% | +3.3% |
Valuation Metrics
SKYW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.5x trailing earnings, SKYW trades at a 82% valuation discount to ALK's 46.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SKYW's 6.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ALK's 9.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $879M | $4.7B | $47.8B | $3.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.2B | $10.9B | $64.5B | $5.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.04x | 46.67x | 9.54x | 8.47x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 30.88x | — | 13.58x | 8.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.95x | 7.81x | 6.02x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.85x | 0.33x | 0.75x | 0.87x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.03x | 1.16x | 2.30x | 1.32x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 63.13x | — | 12.43x | 12.27x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DAL leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DAL delivers a 24.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-5 for MESA. SKYW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.87x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALK's 1.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SKYW scores 8/9 vs MESA's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -5.3% | +2.4% | +24.1% | +16.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -71.1% | +0.5% | +6.2% | +5.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -62.9% | +2.3% | +12.0% | +9.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -86.2% | +2.2% | +11.4% | +10.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.67x | 1.02x | 0.87x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $61M | $6.3B | $16.8B | $2.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $42M | $627M | $4.3B | — |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $103M | $6.9B | $21.1B | $2.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -8.18x | 2.05x | 9.69x | 9.88x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MESA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MESA five years ago would be worth $18,834 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,979 for ALK. Over the past 12 months, MESA leads with a +2034.1% total return vs ALK's -19.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MESA at 118.6% vs ALK's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | 0.0% | -21.2% | +6.1% | -13.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +2034.1% | -19.1% | +63.0% | -9.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +944.8% | -6.6% | +118.3% | +220.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +88.3% | -40.2% | +61.9% | +76.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +78.7% | -33.6% | +87.4% | +282.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +118.6% | -2.2% | +29.7% | +47.4% |
Risk & Volatility
MESA leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MESA is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ALK's 2.16 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MESA currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs ALK's 61.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.82x | 2.16x | 1.93x | 1.49x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $21.00 | $65.88 | $76.39 | $123.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.90 | $33.03 | $44.78 | $80.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +100.0% | +61.6% | +95.7% | +70.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 98.1 | 50.8 | 64.2 | 47.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 4.7M | 12.2M | 379K |
Analyst Outlook
DAL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MESA as "Hold", ALK as "Buy", DAL as "Buy", SKYW as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 65.0% upside for ALK (target: $67) vs 12.8% for DAL (target: $82). DAL is the only dividend payer here at 0.92% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $67.00 | $82.45 | $122.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 28 | 44 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +0.9% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.67 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.4% |
SKYW leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). DAL leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook).
MESA vs ALK vs DAL vs SKYW: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MESA or ALK or DAL or SKYW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Alaska Air Group, Inc.
(ALK) is the stronger pick with 21. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 9% for Mesa Air Group, Inc. (MESA). SkyWest, Inc. (SKYW) offers the better valuation at 8. 5x trailing P/E (8. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alaska Air Group, Inc. (ALK) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MESA or ALK or DAL or SKYW?
On trailing P/E, SkyWest, Inc.
(SKYW) is the cheapest at 8. 5x versus Alaska Air Group, Inc. at 46. 7x. On forward P/E, SkyWest, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MESA or ALK or DAL or SKYW?
Over the past 5 years, Mesa Air Group, Inc.
(MESA) delivered a total return of +88. 3%, compared to -40. 2% for Alaska Air Group, Inc. (ALK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SKYW returned +282. 0% versus ALK's -33. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MESA or ALK or DAL or SKYW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Mesa Air Group, Inc.
(MESA) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus Alaska Air Group, Inc. 's 2. 16β — meaning ALK is approximately 164% more volatile than MESA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SkyWest, Inc. (SKYW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 87% versus 167% for Alaska Air Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MESA or ALK or DAL or SKYW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Alaska Air Group, Inc.
(ALK) is pulling ahead at 21. 3% versus -19. 9% for Mesa Air Group, Inc. (MESA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Delta Air Lines, Inc. grew EPS 43. 7% year-over-year, compared to -82. 4% for Mesa Air Group, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ALK leads at 13. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MESA or ALK or DAL or SKYW?
SkyWest, Inc.
(SKYW) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 6% net margin versus -39. 9% for Mesa Air Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SKYW leads at 15. 2% versus -46. 5% for MESA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MESA leads at 99. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MESA or ALK or DAL or SKYW more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, SkyWest, Inc.
(SKYW) trades at 8. 0x forward P/E versus 30. 9x for Mesa Air Group, Inc. — 22. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ALK: 65. 0% to $67. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MESA or ALK or DAL or SKYW?
In this comparison, DAL (0.
9% yield) pays a dividend. MESA, ALK, SKYW do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MESA or ALK or DAL or SKYW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Mesa Air Group, Inc.
(MESA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82)). Alaska Air Group, Inc. (ALK) carries a higher beta of 2. 16 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MESA: +78. 7%, ALK: -33. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MESA and ALK and DAL and SKYW?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MESA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ALK is a small-cap high-growth stock; DAL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; SKYW is a small-cap high-growth stock. DAL pays a dividend while MESA, ALK, SKYW do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.