Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MFIN vs WRLD vs ENVA vs PRAA vs CACC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
Financial - Credit Services
MFIN vs WRLD vs ENVA vs PRAA vs CACC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Credit Services |
| Market Cap | $225M | $753M | $4.30B | $803M | $5.45B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $353M | $565M | $3.15B | $1.24B | $2.32B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $47M | $43M | $327M | $-305M | $453M |
| Gross Margin | 96.7% | 70.0% | 50.1% | 99.2% | 98.7% |
| Operating Margin | 50.5% | 28.1% | 23.5% | 33.9% | 47.6% |
| Forward P/E | 8.0x | 21.1x | 10.5x | 25.9x | 11.3x |
| Total Debt | $316M | $526M | $4.56B | $32M | $6.35B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $202M | $10M | $72M | $104M | $501M |
MFIN vs WRLD vs ENVA vs PRAA vs CACC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Medallion Financial… (MFIN) | 100 | 410.3 | +310.3% |
| World Acceptance Co… (WRLD) | 100 | 224.9 | +124.9% |
| Enova International… (ENVA) | 100 | 1219.1 | +1119.1% |
| PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA) | 100 | 61.2 | -38.8% |
| Credit Acceptance C… (CACC) | 100 | 141.4 | +41.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MFIN vs WRLD vs ENVA vs PRAA vs CACC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MFIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.15, yield 4.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.15, Low D/E 62.3%, current ratio 27.10x
- Beta 1.15, yield 4.7%, current ratio 27.10x
- 21.1% NII/revenue growth vs WRLD's -1.5%
WRLD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency and bank quality.
- PEG 0.59 vs CACC's 1.15
- NIM 41.9% vs MFIN's 7.3%
ENVA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 18.6%, EPS growth 55.9%
- 20.3% 10Y total return vs CACC's 184.8%
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PRAA's 0.7% (lower = leaner)
- +87.8% vs CACC's +7.9%
PRAA lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, CACC doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.1% NII/revenue growth vs WRLD's -1.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.0x vs 11.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PRAA's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.15 vs PRAA's 1.82 | |
| Dividends | 4.7% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +87.8% vs CACC's +7.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs PRAA's 0.7% |
MFIN vs WRLD vs ENVA vs PRAA vs CACC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
MFIN vs WRLD vs ENVA vs PRAA vs CACC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PRAA leads in 2 of 6 categories
MFIN leads 2 • ENVA leads 1 • WRLD leads 0 • CACC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRAA leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ENVA is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 8.9x MFIN's $353M. CACC is the more profitable business, keeping 18.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRAA's -24.6%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $353M | $565M | $3.2B | $1.2B | $2.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $111M | $61M | $815M | $431M | $579M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $47M | $43M | $327M | -$305M | $453M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $126M | $252M | $1.9B | -$90M | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +96.7% | +70.0% | +50.1% | +99.2% | +98.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +50.5% | +28.1% | +23.5% | +33.9% | +47.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.2% | +15.9% | +9.8% | -24.6% | +18.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +35.7% | +44.3% | +56.2% | -7.3% | +45.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.3% | -107.8% | +28.6% | +2.1% | +43.2% |
Valuation Metrics
MFIN leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.4x trailing earnings, MFIN trades at a 64% valuation discount to ENVA's 14.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WRLD offers better value at 0.26x vs CACC's 1.41x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $225M | $753M | $4.3B | $803M | $5.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $340M | $1.3B | $8.8B | $731M | $11.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 5.37x | 9.17x | 14.90x | -2.68x | 13.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.97x | 21.15x | 10.49x | 25.94x | 11.33x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.26x | — | — | 1.41x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1.90x | 7.53x | 11.26x | 1.69x | 9.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.64x | 1.33x | 1.37x | 0.65x | 2.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.46x | 1.87x | 3.40x | 0.79x | 3.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.78x | 3.01x | 2.43x | — | 5.18x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PRAA leads this category, winning 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CACC delivers a 29.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $29 in annual profit, vs $-26 for PRAA. PRAA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CACC's 4.17x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WRLD scores 9/9 vs PRAA's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.4% | +10.8% | +24.9% | -26.0% | +29.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.6% | +4.0% | +5.2% | -5.9% | +5.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +17.2% | +12.1% | +10.4% | +11.2% | +10.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.0% | +16.3% | +13.5% | +8.7% | +14.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 9 | 6 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.62x | 1.20x | 3.41x | 0.03x | 4.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $115M | $516M | $4.5B | -$72M | $5.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $202M | $10M | $72M | $104M | $501M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $316M | $526M | $4.6B | $32M | $6.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.07x | 1.13x | 79.01x | 0.06x | 4.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ENVA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ENVA five years ago would be worth $46,811 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,317 for PRAA. Over the past 12 months, ENVA leads with a +87.8% total return vs CACC's +7.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ENVA at 59.0% vs PRAA's -15.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.9% | +5.5% | +6.5% | +19.5% | +15.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +8.2% | +12.8% | +87.8% | +57.2% | +7.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +58.9% | +32.8% | +302.0% | -39.3% | +17.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.2% | +11.3% | +368.1% | -46.8% | +23.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +60.3% | +266.2% | +2034.9% | -32.2% | +184.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.7% | +9.9% | +59.0% | -15.3% | +5.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MFIN and ENVA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MFIN is the less volatile stock with a 1.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PRAA's 1.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ENVA currently trades 97.6% from its 52-week high vs WRLD's 80.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.15x | 1.27x | 1.48x | 1.82x | 1.61x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.00 | $185.48 | $176.68 | $22.55 | $565.14 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.88 | $110.00 | $89.00 | $10.25 | $401.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.9% | +80.6% | +97.6% | +92.6% | +92.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.0 | 53.8 | 65.4 | 61.2 | 67.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 59K | 160K | 227K | 449K | 179K |
Analyst Outlook
MFIN leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MFIN as "Hold", WRLD as "Hold", ENVA as "Buy", PRAA as "Hold", CACC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 24.5% upside for PRAA (target: $26) vs 3.3% for CACC (target: $540). MFIN is the only dividend payer here at 4.73% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $199.50 | $26.00 | $540.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 10 | 10 | 13 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.7% | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | — | 1 | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.45 | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | +7.2% | +5.0% | +2.5% | 0.0% |
PRAA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MFIN leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
MFIN vs WRLD vs ENVA vs PRAA vs CACC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MFIN or WRLD or ENVA or PRAA or CACC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) is the stronger pick with 21. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 5% for World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD). Medallion Financial Corp. (MFIN) offers the better valuation at 5. 4x trailing P/E (8. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Enova International, Inc. (ENVA) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MFIN or WRLD or ENVA or PRAA or CACC?
On trailing P/E, Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) is the cheapest at 5. 4x versus Enova International, Inc. at 14. 9x. On forward P/E, Medallion Financial Corp. is actually cheaper at 8. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: World Acceptance Corporation wins at 0. 59x versus Credit Acceptance Corporation's 1. 15x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MFIN or WRLD or ENVA or PRAA or CACC?
Over the past 5 years, Enova International, Inc.
(ENVA) delivered a total return of +368. 1%, compared to -46. 8% for PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ENVA returned +20. 3% versus PRAA's -32. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MFIN or WRLD or ENVA or PRAA or CACC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 15β versus PRA Group, Inc. 's 1. 82β — meaning PRAA is approximately 58% more volatile than MFIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 4% for Credit Acceptance Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MFIN or WRLD or ENVA or PRAA or CACC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) is pulling ahead at 21. 1% versus -1. 5% for World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Credit Acceptance Corporation grew EPS 88. 9% year-over-year, compared to -535. 2% for PRA Group, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MFIN or WRLD or ENVA or PRAA or CACC?
Credit Acceptance Corporation (CACC) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
3% net margin versus -24. 6% for PRA Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MFIN leads at 50. 5% versus 23. 5% for ENVA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRAA leads at 99. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MFIN or WRLD or ENVA or PRAA or CACC more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, World Acceptance Corporation (WRLD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 59x versus Credit Acceptance Corporation's 1. 15x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Medallion Financial Corp. (MFIN) trades at 8. 0x forward P/E versus 25. 9x for PRA Group, Inc. — 18. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRAA: 24. 5% to $26. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MFIN or WRLD or ENVA or PRAA or CACC?
In this comparison, MFIN (4.
7% yield) pays a dividend. WRLD, ENVA, PRAA, CACC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MFIN or WRLD or ENVA or PRAA or CACC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Medallion Financial Corp.
(MFIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 15), 4. 7% yield). PRA Group, Inc. (PRAA) carries a higher beta of 1. 82 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MFIN: +60. 3%, PRAA: -32. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MFIN and WRLD and ENVA and PRAA and CACC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MFIN is a small-cap high-growth stock; WRLD is a small-cap deep-value stock; ENVA is a small-cap high-growth stock; PRAA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CACC is a small-cap deep-value stock. MFIN pays a dividend while WRLD, ENVA, PRAA, CACC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.