MITT
TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc
REIT - Mortgage
Market Cap$254M
5Y Perf.+8.3%
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
MITT vs SACH vs MFA vs GPMT vs BXMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
SACH
Sachem Capital Corp.
REIT - Mortgage
Market Cap$53M
5Y Perf.-61.9%
MFA
MFA Financial, Inc.
REIT - Mortgage
Market Cap$1.01B
5Y Perf.+46.4%
GPMT
Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.
REIT - Mortgage
Market Cap$70M
5Y Perf.-70.1%
BXMT
Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc.
REIT - Mortgage
Market Cap$3.23B
5Y Perf.-18.9%
MITT vs SACH vs MFA vs GPMT vs BXMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | MITT | SACH | MFA | GPMT | BXMT |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage | REIT - Mortgage |
| Market Cap | $254M | $53M | $1.01B | $70M | $3.23B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $493M | $38M | $650M | $132M | $1.54B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $34M | $6M | $135M | $-40M | $104M |
| Gross Margin | 94.2% | 98.1% | 59.3% | 47.3% | 62.6% |
| Operating Margin | 93.3% | 42.0% | 41.0% | -4.3% | 58.3% |
| Forward P/E | 7.3x | 28.1x | 7.5x | — | 12.3x |
| Total Debt | $8.10B | $278M | $10.99B | $1.17B | $16.16B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $76M | $11M | $213M | $66M | $453M |
MITT vs SACH vs MFA vs GPMT vs BXMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
MITT
SACH
MFA
GPMT
BXMT
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| TPG Mortgage Invest… (MITT) | 100 | 108.3 | +8.3% |
| Sachem Capital Corp. (SACH) | 100 | 38.1 | -61.9% |
| MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) | 100 | 146.4 | +46.4% |
| Granite Point Mortg… (GPMT) | 100 | 29.9 | -70.1% |
| Blackstone Mortgage… (BXMT) | 100 | 81.1 | -18.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MITT vs SACH vs MFA vs GPMT vs BXMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: SACH leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. MFA Financial, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. MITT also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
MITT
TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc
The Real Estate Income Play
MITT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (7.3x vs 12.3x)
Best for: value
SACH
Sachem Capital Corp.
The Real Estate Income Play
SACH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.40, yield 18.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.40, current ratio 0.84x
- Beta 0.40, yield 18.4%, current ratio 0.84x
- Beta 0.40 vs GPMT's 1.42, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
MFA
MFA Financial, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play
MFA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 213.0%, EPS growth 104.9%
- 213.0% FFO/revenue growth vs SACH's -18.2%
- 20.7% margin vs GPMT's -30.5%
Best for: growth exposure
GPMT
Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc.
The REIT Holding
GPMT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Best for: real estate exposure
BXMT
Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play
BXMT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 50.4% 10Y total return vs MFA's 8.3%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | MFA | 213.0% FFO/revenue growth vs SACH's -18.2% |
| Value | MITT | Lower P/E (7.3x vs 12.3x) |
| Quality / Margins | MFA | 20.7% margin vs GPMT's -30.5% |
| Stability / Safety | SACH | Beta 0.40 vs GPMT's 1.42, lower leverage |
| Dividends | SACH | 18.4% yield, vs MFA's 18.1% |
| Momentum (1Y) | SACH | +35.6% vs GPMT's -23.4% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | SACH | 1.3% ROA vs GPMT's -2.3%, ROIC 4.8% vs 2.6% |
MITT vs SACH vs MFA vs GPMT vs BXMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2018
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
MITT vs SACH vs MFA vs GPMT vs BXMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLGPMTLAGGINGBXMT
Who Leads Where
GPMT leads in 2 of 6 categories
SACH leads 1 • MITT leads 1 • MFA leads 0 • BXMT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓BXMTBlackstone Mortgage T…
0leads
MFAMFA Financial, Inc.
0leads
SACHSachem Capital Corp.
1leads
MITTTPG Mortgage Investme…
1leads
GPMTGranite Point Mortgag…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs MITTvs SACHMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
GPMT2/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
GPMT3/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
SACH6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
MITT3/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GPMT leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BXMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 40.6x SACH's $38M. MFA is the more profitable business, keeping 20.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to GPMT's -30.5%. On growth, GPMT holds the edge at +157.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | MITTTPG Mortgage Inve… | SACHSachem Capital Co… | MFAMFA Financial, In… | GPMTGranite Point Mor… | BXMTBlackstone Mortga… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $493M | $38M | $650M | $132M | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $457M | $17M | $268M | -$8M | $948M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $34M | $6M | $135M | -$40M | $104M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $68M | $3M | $91M | $463,000 | $335M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +94.2% | +98.1% | +59.3% | +47.3% | +62.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +93.3% | +42.0% | +41.0% | -4.3% | +58.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.8% | +16.7% | +20.7% | -30.5% | +6.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.8% | +6.6% | +14.0% | +0.4% | +21.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.9% | +145.2% | +118.9% | +157.8% | +4.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.3% | -79.9% | -103.0% | +40.9% | — |
GPMT leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
GPMT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.9x trailing earnings, MFA trades at a 80% valuation discount to BXMT's 29.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SACH's 11.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GPMT's 20.7x.
| Metric | MITTTPG Mortgage Inve… | SACHSachem Capital Co… | MFAMFA Financial, In… | GPMTGranite Point Mor… | BXMTBlackstone Mortga… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $254M | $53M | $1.0B | $70M | $3.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.3B | $320M | $11.8B | $1.2B | $18.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 8.88x | 28.06x | 5.89x | -1.27x | 29.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.34x | — | 7.52x | — | 12.28x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 18.26x | 11.33x | 17.09x | 20.68x | 16.35x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.54x | 1.12x | 1.15x | 0.48x | 2.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.44x | 0.29x | 0.57x | 0.13x | 0.93x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.26x | 21.11x | 13.26x | 26.41x | 11.70x |
GPMT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SACH leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MFA delivers a 7.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-7 for GPMT. SACH carries lower financial leverage with a 1.59x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MITT's 14.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SACH scores 6/9 vs MITT's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | MITTTPG Mortgage Inve… | SACHSachem Capital Co… | MFAMFA Financial, In… | GPMTGranite Point Mor… | BXMTBlackstone Mortga… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.1% | +3.6% | +7.4% | -7.1% | +2.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +1.3% | +1.1% | -2.3% | +0.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.5% | +4.8% | +4.4% | +2.6% | +4.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.5% | +6.2% | +5.8% | +4.6% | +11.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 14.45x | 1.59x | 6.01x | 2.12x | 4.61x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $8.0B | $267M | $10.8B | $1.1B | $15.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $76M | $11M | $213M | $66M | $453M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8.1B | $278M | $11.0B | $1.2B | $16.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.12x | 1.25x | 1.34x | 0.58x | 1.11x |
SACH leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MITT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MITT five years ago would be worth $10,301 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,518 for GPMT. Over the past 12 months, SACH leads with a +35.6% total return vs GPMT's -23.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MITT at 24.0% vs SACH's -16.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | MITTTPG Mortgage Inve… | SACHSachem Capital Co… | MFAMFA Financial, In… | GPMTGranite Point Mor… | BXMTBlackstone Mortga… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.9% | +10.6% | +7.7% | -35.9% | +0.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +28.7% | +35.6% | +19.7% | -23.4% | +10.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +90.6% | -42.4% | +35.5% | -36.3% | +48.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.0% | -43.6% | +1.7% | -64.8% | -2.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -16.6% | -5.2% | +8.3% | -50.4% | +50.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +24.0% | -16.8% | +10.7% | -13.9% | +14.0% |
MITT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SACH and MFA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SACH is the less volatile stock with a 0.40 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GPMT's 1.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MFA currently trades 93.7% from its 52-week high vs GPMT's 47.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | MITTTPG Mortgage Inve… | SACHSachem Capital Co… | MFAMFA Financial, In… | GPMTGranite Point Mor… | BXMTBlackstone Mortga… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 0.40x | 0.72x | 1.42x | 0.74x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.27 | $1.35 | $10.57 | $3.12 | $20.67 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.77 | $0.80 | $8.78 | $1.24 | $17.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.2% | +81.5% | +93.7% | +47.1% | +92.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.9 | 64.9 | 43.4 | 54.4 | 45.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 270K | 158K | 1.4M | 152K | 1.4M |
Evenly matched — SACH and MFA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MITT and SACH and MFA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MITT as "Buy", MFA as "Hold", GPMT as "Hold", BXMT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 70.1% upside for GPMT (target: $3) vs 3.5% for MFA (target: $10). For income investors, SACH offers the higher dividend yield at 18.42% vs MITT's 9.86%.
| Metric | MITTTPG Mortgage Inve… | SACHSachem Capital Co… | MFAMFA Financial, In… | GPMTGranite Point Mor… | BXMTBlackstone Mortga… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $9.63 | — | $10.25 | $2.50 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 18 | — | 23 | 12 | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +9.9% | +18.4% | +18.1% | +14.7% | +9.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.79 | $0.20 | $1.79 | $0.22 | $1.89 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +1.5% | +8.0% | +3.4% |
Evenly matched — MITT and SACH and MFA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
GPMT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SACH leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
Best OverallGranite Point Mortgage Trus… (GPMT)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
MITT vs SACH vs MFA vs GPMT vs BXMT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MITT or SACH or MFA or GPMT or BXMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MFA Financial, Inc.
(MFA) is the stronger pick with 213. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -18. 2% for Sachem Capital Corp. (SACH). MFA Financial, Inc. (MFA) offers the better valuation at 5. 9x trailing P/E (7. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc (MITT) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MITT or SACH or MFA or GPMT or BXMT?
On trailing P/E, MFA Financial, Inc.
(MFA) is the cheapest at 5. 9x versus Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. at 29. 9x. On forward P/E, TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc is actually cheaper at 7. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MITT or SACH or MFA or GPMT or BXMT?
Over the past 5 years, TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc (MITT) delivered a total return of +3.
0%, compared to -64. 8% for Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. (GPMT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BXMT returned +50. 4% versus GPMT's -50. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MITT or SACH or MFA or GPMT or BXMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sachem Capital Corp.
(SACH) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 40β versus Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. 's 1. 42β — meaning GPMT is approximately 252% more volatile than SACH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sachem Capital Corp. (SACH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 159% versus 14% for TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MITT or SACH or MFA or GPMT or BXMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MFA Financial, Inc.
(MFA) is pulling ahead at 213. 0% versus -18. 2% for Sachem Capital Corp. (SACH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. grew EPS 154. 7% year-over-year, compared to -26. 8% for TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc. Over a 3-year CAGR, GPMT leads at 22. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MITT or SACH or MFA or GPMT or BXMT?
MFA Financial, Inc.
(MFA) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 2% net margin versus -28. 3% for Granite Point Mortgage Trust Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MITT leads at 96. 9% versus 43. 6% for GPMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SACH leads at 97. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MITT or SACH or MFA or GPMT or BXMT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc (MITT) trades at 7.
3x forward P/E versus 12. 3x for Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc. — 4. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GPMT: 70. 1% to $2. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — MITT or SACH or MFA or GPMT or BXMT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Sachem Capital Corp. (SACH) offers the highest yield at 18. 4%, versus 9. 9% for TPG Mortgage Investment Trust Inc (MITT).
09Is MITT or SACH or MFA or GPMT or BXMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sachem Capital Corp.
(SACH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 40), 18. 4% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SACH: -5. 2%, GPMT: -50. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MITT and SACH and MFA and GPMT and BXMT?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MITT is a small-cap deep-value stock; SACH is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MFA is a small-cap high-growth stock; GPMT is a small-cap high-growth stock; BXMT is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(MITT: 20.9% · SACH: 145.2%)Net Margin>
%
(MITT: 6.8% · SACH: 16.7%)P/E Ratio<
x
(MITT: 8.9x · SACH: 28.1x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.