Insurance - Property & Casualty
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MKL vs HCI vs RNR vs ACGL vs GLRE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Property & Casualty
Insurance - Reinsurance
Insurance - Diversified
Insurance - Reinsurance
MKL vs HCI vs RNR vs ACGL vs GLRE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Reinsurance | Insurance - Diversified | Insurance - Reinsurance |
| Market Cap | $22.52B | $1.99B | $12.98B | $33.67B | $590M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $16.57B | $927M | $11.49B | $19.93B | $706M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.77B | $314M | $3.09B | $4.40B | $81M |
| Gross Margin | 61.4% | 66.5% | 44.6% | 37.2% | 38.9% |
| Operating Margin | 13.9% | 47.9% | 35.5% | 25.0% | 6.7% |
| Forward P/E | 16.0x | 9.2x | 7.7x | 10.1x | 8.9x |
| Total Debt | $4.30B | $68M | $2.33B | $2.73B | $5M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.96B | $1.21B | $1.73B | $993M | $112M |
MKL vs HCI vs RNR vs ACGL vs GLRE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Markel Corporation (MKL) | 100 | 200.6 | +100.6% |
| HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) | 100 | 340.8 | +240.8% |
| RenaissanceRe Holdi… (RNR) | 100 | 179.2 | +79.2% |
| Arch Capital Group … (ACGL) | 100 | 334.9 | +234.9% |
| Greenlight Capital … (GLRE) | 100 | 245.9 | +145.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MKL vs HCI vs RNR vs ACGL vs GLRE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MKL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.44, yield 2.7%
- 2.7% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs HCI's 1.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
HCI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 20.2%, EPS growth 179.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.3%
- 436.8% 10Y total return vs ACGL's 324.0%
- Beta 0.39, yield 1.0%, current ratio 1.24x
- 20.2% revenue growth vs MKL's -1.0%
RNR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Lower P/E (7.7x vs 10.1x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.35
ACGL is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.02, Low D/E 11.3%, current ratio 1.21x
- Beta 0.02 vs MKL's 0.44, lower leverage
GLRE is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.11 vs MKL's 0.64
- +32.4% vs MKL's -4.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.2% revenue growth vs MKL's -1.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.7x vs 10.1x), PEG 0.26 vs 0.35 | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 0.5 vs GLRE's 0.9 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.02 vs MKL's 0.44, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs HCI's 1.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +32.4% vs MKL's -4.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.2% ROA vs MKL's 3.0%, ROIC 6.8% vs 10.7% |
MKL vs HCI vs RNR vs ACGL vs GLRE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
MKL vs HCI vs RNR vs ACGL vs GLRE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HCI leads in 3 of 6 categories
RNR leads 1 • MKL leads 1 • ACGL leads 0 • GLRE leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HCI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ACGL is the larger business by revenue, generating $19.9B annually — 28.2x GLRE's $706M. HCI is the more profitable business, keeping 33.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MKL's 10.7%. On growth, HCI holds the edge at +11.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $16.6B | $927M | $11.5B | $19.9B | $706M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.5B | $454M | $4.1B | $5.2B | $51M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.8B | $314M | $3.1B | $4.4B | $81M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.2B | $431M | $4.2B | $6.1B | $237M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.4% | +66.5% | +44.6% | +37.2% | +38.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.9% | +47.9% | +35.5% | +25.0% | +6.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.7% | +33.9% | +26.9% | +22.1% | +11.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | +46.4% | +36.7% | +30.7% | +33.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.7% | +11.9% | -36.4% | +7.3% | +5.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.6% | +23.4% | +100.9% | +39.0% | +22.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — RNR and GLRE each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.3x trailing earnings, RNR trades at a 50% valuation discount to MKL's 10.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GLRE offers better value at 0.10x vs MKL's 0.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $22.5B | $2.0B | $13.0B | $33.7B | $590M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $22.9B | $844M | $13.6B | $35.4B | $483M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.64x | 6.15x | 5.31x | 8.13x | 8.20x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.99x | 9.19x | 7.66x | 10.05x | 8.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.43x | 0.13x | 0.18x | 0.29x | 0.10x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.78x | 1.92x | 3.38x | 6.85x | 5.82x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.36x | 2.20x | 1.02x | 1.69x | 0.85x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.20x | 1.77x | 0.70x | 1.47x | 0.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.82x | 4.47x | 3.51x | 5.50x | 2.81x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HCI leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HCI delivers a 32.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $10 for MKL. GLRE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MKL's 0.23x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HCI scores 8/9 vs GLRE's 7/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.6% | +32.0% | +16.6% | +19.0% | +11.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.0% | +13.2% | +5.7% | +5.9% | +3.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.7% | +6.8% | +16.0% | +15.4% | +9.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.9% | +40.6% | +10.7% | +11.6% | +6.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.23x | 0.06x | 0.12x | 0.11x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $339M | -$1.1B | $598M | $1.7B | -$107M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4.0B | $1.2B | $1.7B | $993M | $112M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.3B | $68M | $2.3B | $2.7B | $5M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 12.00x | 67.24x | 33.28x | 34.86x | 15.78x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HCI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ACGL five years ago would be worth $24,398 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,749 for MKL. Over the past 12 months, GLRE leads with a +32.4% total return vs MKL's -4.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HCI at 45.7% vs ACGL's 9.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.5% | -16.7% | +10.6% | +0.7% | +25.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -4.1% | +2.4% | +21.9% | +2.0% | +32.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +31.0% | +209.6% | +45.7% | +30.7% | +74.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.5% | +105.3% | +87.1% | +144.0% | +99.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +89.3% | +436.8% | +176.9% | +324.0% | -16.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.4% | +45.7% | +13.4% | +9.3% | +20.5% |
Risk & Volatility
RNR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RNR is the less volatile stock with a -0.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MKL's 0.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RNR currently trades 94.5% from its 52-week high vs HCI's 72.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.44x | 0.39x | -0.03x | 0.02x | 0.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2207.59 | $210.50 | $318.20 | $103.39 | $19.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1719.41 | $136.37 | $231.17 | $82.45 | $11.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.5% | +72.6% | +94.5% | +91.4% | +91.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.5 | 48.7 | 46.9 | 46.3 | 49.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 59K | 167K | 303K | 1.9M | 204K |
Analyst Outlook
MKL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MKL as "Hold", HCI as "Buy", RNR as "Hold", ACGL as "Buy", GLRE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.0% upside for ACGL (target: $104) vs -17.2% for HCI (target: $127). For income investors, MKL offers the higher dividend yield at 2.70% vs RNR's 0.55%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $1950.00 | $126.50 | $308.33 | $104.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 14 | 28 | 34 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.7% | +1.0% | +0.6% | +0.0% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $48.55 | $1.50 | $1.67 | $0.02 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.9% | +0.1% | +12.3% | +5.6% | +1.7% |
HCI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). RNR leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
MKL vs HCI vs RNR vs ACGL vs GLRE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MKL or HCI or RNR or ACGL or GLRE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, HCI Group, Inc.
(HCI) is the stronger pick with 20. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 0% for Markel Corporation (MKL). RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR) offers the better valuation at 5. 3x trailing P/E (7. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MKL or HCI or RNR or ACGL or GLRE?
On trailing P/E, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
(RNR) is the cheapest at 5. 3x versus Markel Corporation at 10. 6x. On forward P/E, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. is actually cheaper at 7. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Greenlight Capital Re, Ltd. wins at 0. 11x versus Markel Corporation's 0. 64x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MKL or HCI or RNR or ACGL or GLRE?
Over the past 5 years, Arch Capital Group Ltd.
(ACGL) delivered a total return of +144. 0%, compared to +47. 5% for Markel Corporation (MKL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HCI returned +436. 8% versus GLRE's -16. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MKL or HCI or RNR or ACGL or GLRE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
(RNR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 03β versus Markel Corporation's 0. 44β — meaning MKL is approximately -1479% more volatile than RNR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Greenlight Capital Re, Ltd. (GLRE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 23% for Markel Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MKL or HCI or RNR or ACGL or GLRE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), HCI Group, Inc.
(HCI) is pulling ahead at 20. 2% versus -1. 0% for Markel Corporation (MKL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HCI Group, Inc. grew EPS 179. 8% year-over-year, compared to -15. 1% for Markel Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, RNR leads at 36. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MKL or HCI or RNR or ACGL or GLRE?
HCI Group, Inc.
(HCI) is the more profitable company, earning 33. 2% net margin versus 10. 7% for Greenlight Capital Re, Ltd. — meaning it keeps 33. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HCI leads at 47. 7% versus 11. 2% for GLRE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HCI leads at 73. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MKL or HCI or RNR or ACGL or GLRE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Greenlight Capital Re, Ltd. (GLRE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 11x versus Markel Corporation's 0. 64x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd. (RNR) trades at 7. 7x forward P/E versus 16. 0x for Markel Corporation — 8. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACGL: 10. 0% to $104. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MKL or HCI or RNR or ACGL or GLRE?
In this comparison, MKL (2.
7% yield), HCI (1. 0% yield), RNR (0. 6% yield) pay a dividend. ACGL, GLRE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MKL or HCI or RNR or ACGL or GLRE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, RenaissanceRe Holdings Ltd.
(RNR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 03), 0. 6% yield, +176. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RNR: +176. 9%, GLRE: -16. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MKL and HCI and RNR and ACGL and GLRE?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MKL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; HCI is a small-cap high-growth stock; RNR is a mid-cap deep-value stock; ACGL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; GLRE is a small-cap deep-value stock. MKL, HCI, RNR pay a dividend while ACGL, GLRE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.