Insurance - Property & Casualty
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
MKL vs MMC vs AON vs ERIE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Brokers
Insurance - Brokers
Insurance - Brokers
MKL vs MMC vs AON vs ERIE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Brokers | Insurance - Brokers | Insurance - Brokers |
| Market Cap | $22.52B | $85.27B | $67.19B | $10.01B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $16.57B | $26.45B | $17.49B | $4.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.77B | $4.13B | $3.94B | $571M |
| Gross Margin | 61.4% | 42.3% | 55.9% | 18.1% |
| Operating Margin | 13.9% | 23.2% | 27.0% | 17.0% |
| Forward P/E | 16.0x | 16.9x | 16.5x | 17.1x |
| Total Debt | $4.30B | $21.86B | $16.53B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.96B | $2.40B | $1.20B | $346M |
MKL vs MMC vs AON vs ERIE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Markel Corporation (MKL) | 100 | 200.6 | +100.6% |
| Marsh & McLennan Co… (MMC) | 100 | 177.7 | +77.7% |
| Aon plc (AON) | 100 | 159.2 | +59.2% |
| Erie Indemnity Comp… (ERIE) | 100 | 120.3 | +20.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MKL vs MMC vs AON vs ERIE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MKL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.64 vs ERIE's 1.26
- Lower P/E (16.0x vs 17.1x), PEG 0.64 vs 1.26
- 2.7% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs MMC's 1.8%
- -4.1% vs ERIE's -38.7%
MMC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 19 yrs, beta 0.14, yield 1.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.14, current ratio 1.13x
AON is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 9.4%, EPS growth 36.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.2%
- 219.8% 10Y total return vs MMC's 209.8%
- 9.4% revenue growth vs MKL's -1.0%
- Combined ratio 0.7 vs MKL's 0.8 (lower = better underwriting)
ERIE is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.16, yield 2.2%, current ratio 1.27x
- 17.3% ROA vs MKL's 3.0%, ROIC 29.5% vs 10.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.4% revenue growth vs MKL's -1.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.0x vs 17.1x), PEG 0.64 vs 1.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 0.7 vs MKL's 0.8 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.10 vs MKL's 0.44 | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs MMC's 1.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -4.1% vs ERIE's -38.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.3% ROA vs MKL's 3.0%, ROIC 29.5% vs 10.7% |
MKL vs MMC vs AON vs ERIE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MKL vs MMC vs AON vs ERIE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AON leads in 2 of 6 categories
MKL leads 2 • ERIE leads 1 • MMC leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AON leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MMC is the larger business by revenue, generating $26.5B annually — 6.1x ERIE's $4.3B. AON is the more profitable business, keeping 22.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MKL's 10.7%. On growth, MMC holds the edge at +11.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $16.6B | $26.5B | $17.5B | $4.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.5B | $7.0B | $5.4B | $786M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.8B | $4.1B | $3.9B | $571M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.2B | $5.1B | $3.5B | $537M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.4% | +42.3% | +55.9% | +18.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.9% | +23.2% | +27.0% | +17.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.7% | +15.6% | +22.5% | +13.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | +19.3% | +20.0% | +12.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.7% | +11.5% | +6.4% | +2.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.6% | 0.0% | +27.1% | +7.9% |
Valuation Metrics
MKL leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.6x trailing earnings, MKL trades at a 50% valuation discount to MMC's 21.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MKL offers better value at 0.43x vs ERIE's 1.50x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $22.5B | $85.3B | $67.2B | $10.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $22.9B | $104.7B | $82.5B | $9.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.64x | 21.28x | 18.42x | 20.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.99x | 16.89x | 16.50x | 17.15x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.43x | 1.11x | 1.23x | 1.50x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.78x | 15.96x | 15.54x | 12.14x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.36x | 3.49x | 3.91x | 2.46x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.20x | 6.38x | 7.11x | 5.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.82x | 21.39x | 20.88x | 17.53x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ERIE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AON delivers a 44.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $44 in annual profit, vs $10 for MKL. MKL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AON's 1.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MKL scores 7/9 vs ERIE's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.6% | +26.9% | +44.2% | +25.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.0% | +7.0% | +7.6% | +17.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.7% | +15.2% | +13.5% | +29.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.9% | +17.8% | +16.2% | +32.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.23x | 1.62x | 1.73x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $339M | $19.5B | $15.3B | -$346M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4.0B | $2.4B | $1.2B | $346M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.3B | $21.9B | $16.5B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 12.00x | 6.66x | 9.58x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MKL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MKL five years ago would be worth $14,749 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,482 for ERIE. Over the past 12 months, MKL leads with a -4.1% total return vs ERIE's -38.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MKL at 9.4% vs AON's -1.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.5% | -3.6% | -8.5% | -20.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -4.1% | -22.0% | -12.0% | -38.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +31.0% | +2.0% | -3.2% | -0.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.5% | +36.5% | +26.2% | +14.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +89.3% | +209.8% | +219.8% | +171.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.4% | +0.7% | -1.1% | -0.1% |
Risk & Volatility
AON leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AON is the less volatile stock with a 0.10 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MKL's 0.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AON currently trades 82.3% from its 52-week high vs ERIE's 56.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.44x | 0.14x | 0.10x | 0.16x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2207.59 | $235.78 | $381.00 | $380.67 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1719.41 | $170.37 | $304.59 | $210.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.5% | +73.8% | +82.3% | +56.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.5 | 37.2 | 37.9 | 33.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 59K | 2.7M | 1.2M | 231K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MKL and MMC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MKL as "Hold", MMC as "Hold", AON as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 29.0% upside for AON (target: $404) vs 8.3% for MKL (target: $1950). For income investors, MKL offers the higher dividend yield at 2.70% vs AON's 0.93%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $1950.00 | $206.75 | $404.40 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 26 | 38 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.7% | +1.8% | +0.9% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 6 | 19 | 14 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $48.55 | $3.05 | $2.91 | $4.83 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.9% | +1.1% | +1.5% | 0.0% |
AON leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). MKL leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
MKL vs MMC vs AON vs ERIE: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MKL or MMC or AON or ERIE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Aon plc (AON) is the stronger pick with 9.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 0% for Markel Corporation (MKL). Markel Corporation (MKL) offers the better valuation at 10. 6x trailing P/E (16. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Aon plc (AON) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MKL or MMC or AON or ERIE?
On trailing P/E, Markel Corporation (MKL) is the cheapest at 10.
6x versus Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. at 21. 3x. On forward P/E, Markel Corporation is actually cheaper at 16. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Markel Corporation wins at 0. 64x versus Erie Indemnity Company's 1. 26x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MKL or MMC or AON or ERIE?
Over the past 5 years, Markel Corporation (MKL) delivered a total return of +47.
5%, compared to +14. 8% for Erie Indemnity Company (ERIE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AON returned +219. 8% versus MKL's +89. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MKL or MMC or AON or ERIE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Aon plc (AON) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
10β versus Markel Corporation's 0. 44β — meaning MKL is approximately 355% more volatile than AON relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Markel Corporation (MKL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 173% for Aon plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MKL or MMC or AON or ERIE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Aon plc (AON) is pulling ahead at 9.
4% versus -1. 0% for Markel Corporation (MKL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Aon plc grew EPS 36. 3% year-over-year, compared to -15. 1% for Markel Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, ERIE leads at 12. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MKL or MMC or AON or ERIE?
Aon plc (AON) is the more profitable company, earning 21.
5% net margin versus 12. 7% for Markel Corporation — meaning it keeps 21. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AON leads at 25. 3% versus 16. 5% for MKL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MKL leads at 69. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MKL or MMC or AON or ERIE more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Markel Corporation (MKL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 64x versus Erie Indemnity Company's 1. 26x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Markel Corporation (MKL) trades at 16. 0x forward P/E versus 17. 1x for Erie Indemnity Company — 1. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AON: 29. 0% to $404. 40.
08Which pays a better dividend — MKL or MMC or AON or ERIE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Markel Corporation (MKL) offers the highest yield at 2. 7%, versus 0. 9% for Aon plc (AON).
09Is MKL or MMC or AON or ERIE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Aon plc (AON) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
10), 0. 9% yield, +219. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AON: +219. 8%, MKL: +89. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MKL and MMC and AON and ERIE?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MKL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; MMC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AON is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ERIE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.