Insurance - Property & Casualty
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MKL vs MMC vs AON vs ERIE vs AJG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Insurance - Brokers
Insurance - Brokers
Insurance - Brokers
Insurance - Brokers
MKL vs MMC vs AON vs ERIE vs AJG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Insurance - Property & Casualty | Insurance - Brokers | Insurance - Brokers | Insurance - Brokers | Insurance - Brokers |
| Market Cap | $22.52B | $85.27B | $67.19B | $10.01B | $51.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $16.57B | $26.45B | $17.49B | $4.33B | $13.94B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.77B | $4.13B | $3.94B | $571M | $1.49B |
| Gross Margin | 61.4% | 42.3% | 55.9% | 18.1% | 54.8% |
| Operating Margin | 13.9% | 23.2% | 27.0% | 17.0% | 18.3% |
| Forward P/E | 16.0x | 16.9x | 16.5x | 17.1x | 15.3x |
| Total Debt | $4.30B | $21.86B | $16.53B | $0.00 | $14.00B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.96B | $2.40B | $1.20B | $346M | $1.40B |
MKL vs MMC vs AON vs ERIE vs AJG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Markel Corporation (MKL) | 100 | 200.6 | +100.6% |
| Marsh & McLennan Co… (MMC) | 100 | 177.7 | +77.7% |
| Aon plc (AON) | 100 | 159.2 | +59.2% |
| Erie Indemnity Comp… (ERIE) | 100 | 120.3 | +20.3% |
| Arthur J. Gallagher… (AJG) | 100 | 214.1 | +114.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MKL vs MMC vs AON vs ERIE vs AJG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MKL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.64 vs AJG's 2.35
- Lower P/E (16.0x vs 17.1x), PEG 0.64 vs 1.26
- 2.7% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs MMC's 1.8%
- -4.1% vs AJG's -39.8%
MMC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 19 yrs, beta 0.14, yield 1.8%
AON ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality.
- Combined ratio 0.7 vs MKL's 0.8 (lower = better underwriting)
ERIE is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 0.16, yield 2.2%, current ratio 1.27x
- 17.3% ROA vs AJG's 2.0%, ROIC 29.5% vs 7.0%
AJG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 20.7%, EPS growth -11.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.7%
- 372.4% 10Y total return vs AON's 219.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.09, Low D/E 60.0%, current ratio 1.06x
- 20.7% revenue growth vs MKL's -1.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.7% revenue growth vs MKL's -1.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.0x vs 17.1x), PEG 0.64 vs 1.26 | |
| Quality / Margins | Combined ratio 0.7 vs MKL's 0.8 (lower = better underwriting) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.09 vs MKL's 0.44 | |
| Dividends | 2.7% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs MMC's 1.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -4.1% vs AJG's -39.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.3% ROA vs AJG's 2.0%, ROIC 29.5% vs 7.0% |
MKL vs MMC vs AON vs ERIE vs AJG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MKL vs MMC vs AON vs ERIE vs AJG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MKL leads in 2 of 6 categories
AON leads 1 • ERIE leads 1 • MMC leads 0 • AJG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AON leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MMC is the larger business by revenue, generating $26.5B annually — 6.1x ERIE's $4.3B. AON is the more profitable business, keeping 22.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MKL's 10.7%. On growth, AJG holds the edge at +33.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $16.6B | $26.5B | $17.5B | $4.3B | $13.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.5B | $7.0B | $5.4B | $786M | $3.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.8B | $4.1B | $3.9B | $571M | $1.5B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.2B | $5.1B | $3.5B | $537M | $1.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.4% | +42.3% | +55.9% | +18.1% | +54.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.9% | +23.2% | +27.0% | +17.0% | +18.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.7% | +15.6% | +22.5% | +13.2% | +10.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | +19.3% | +20.0% | +12.4% | +12.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.7% | +11.5% | +6.4% | +2.3% | +33.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.6% | 0.0% | +27.1% | +7.9% | -48.2% |
Valuation Metrics
MKL leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.6x trailing earnings, MKL trades at a 70% valuation discount to AJG's 35.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), MKL offers better value at 0.43x vs AJG's 5.42x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $22.5B | $85.3B | $67.2B | $10.0B | $51.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $22.9B | $104.7B | $82.5B | $9.7B | $64.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 10.64x | 21.28x | 18.42x | 20.41x | 35.11x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.99x | 16.89x | 16.50x | 17.15x | 15.26x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.43x | 1.11x | 1.23x | 1.50x | 5.42x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.78x | 15.96x | 15.54x | 12.14x | 17.57x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.36x | 3.49x | 3.91x | 2.46x | 3.72x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.20x | 6.38x | 7.11x | 5.00x | 2.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.82x | 21.39x | 20.88x | 17.53x | 29.08x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ERIE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AON delivers a 44.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $44 in annual profit, vs $6 for AJG. MKL carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AON's 1.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MKL scores 7/9 vs ERIE's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.6% | +26.9% | +44.2% | +25.0% | +6.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.0% | +7.0% | +7.6% | +17.3% | +2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +10.7% | +15.2% | +13.5% | +29.5% | +7.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.9% | +17.8% | +16.2% | +32.0% | +7.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.23x | 1.62x | 1.73x | — | 0.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $339M | $19.5B | $15.3B | -$346M | $12.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4.0B | $2.4B | $1.2B | $346M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.3B | $21.9B | $16.5B | $0 | $14.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 12.00x | 6.66x | 9.58x | — | 3.97x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MKL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MKL five years ago would be worth $14,749 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,482 for ERIE. Over the past 12 months, MKL leads with a -4.1% total return vs AJG's -39.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MKL at 9.4% vs AON's -1.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -15.5% | -3.6% | -8.5% | -20.9% | -20.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -4.1% | -22.0% | -12.0% | -38.7% | -39.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +31.0% | +2.0% | -3.2% | -0.2% | -2.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +47.5% | +36.5% | +26.2% | +14.8% | +41.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +89.3% | +209.8% | +219.8% | +171.6% | +372.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +9.4% | +0.7% | -1.1% | -0.1% | -1.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AON and AJG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AJG is the less volatile stock with a 0.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MKL's 0.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AON currently trades 82.3% from its 52-week high vs ERIE's 56.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.44x | 0.14x | 0.10x | 0.16x | 0.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2207.59 | $235.78 | $381.00 | $380.67 | $351.23 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1719.41 | $170.37 | $304.59 | $210.06 | $194.15 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.5% | +73.8% | +82.3% | +56.9% | +57.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 34.5 | 37.2 | 37.9 | 33.6 | 27.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 59K | 2.7M | 1.2M | 231K | 1.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MKL and MMC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MKL as "Hold", MMC as "Hold", AON as "Buy", AJG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 35.9% upside for AJG (target: $274) vs 8.3% for MKL (target: $1950). For income investors, MKL offers the higher dividend yield at 2.70% vs AON's 0.93%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $1950.00 | $206.75 | $404.40 | — | $274.38 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 26 | 38 | — | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.7% | +1.8% | +0.9% | +2.2% | +1.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 6 | 19 | 14 | 2 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $48.55 | $3.05 | $2.91 | $4.83 | $2.56 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.9% | +1.1% | +1.5% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
MKL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). AON leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
MKL vs MMC vs AON vs ERIE vs AJG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MKL or MMC or AON or ERIE or AJG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Arthur J.
Gallagher & Co. (AJG) is the stronger pick with 20. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 0% for Markel Corporation (MKL). Markel Corporation (MKL) offers the better valuation at 10. 6x trailing P/E (16. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Aon plc (AON) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MKL or MMC or AON or ERIE or AJG?
On trailing P/E, Markel Corporation (MKL) is the cheapest at 10.
6x versus Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. at 35. 1x. On forward P/E, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. is actually cheaper at 15. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Markel Corporation wins at 0. 64x versus Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. 's 2. 35x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MKL or MMC or AON or ERIE or AJG?
Over the past 5 years, Markel Corporation (MKL) delivered a total return of +47.
5%, compared to +14. 8% for Erie Indemnity Company (ERIE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AJG returned +372. 4% versus MKL's +89. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MKL or MMC or AON or ERIE or AJG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Arthur J.
Gallagher & Co. (AJG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 09β versus Markel Corporation's 0. 44β — meaning MKL is approximately 403% more volatile than AJG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Markel Corporation (MKL) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 173% for Aon plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MKL or MMC or AON or ERIE or AJG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arthur J.
Gallagher & Co. (AJG) is pulling ahead at 20. 7% versus -1. 0% for Markel Corporation (MKL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Aon plc grew EPS 36. 3% year-over-year, compared to -15. 1% for Markel Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, AJG leads at 17. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MKL or MMC or AON or ERIE or AJG?
Aon plc (AON) is the more profitable company, earning 21.
5% net margin versus 10. 7% for Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. — meaning it keeps 21. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AON leads at 25. 3% versus 16. 5% for MKL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MKL leads at 69. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MKL or MMC or AON or ERIE or AJG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Markel Corporation (MKL) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 64x versus Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. 's 2. 35x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG) trades at 15. 3x forward P/E versus 17. 1x for Erie Indemnity Company — 1. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AJG: 35. 9% to $274. 38.
08Which pays a better dividend — MKL or MMC or AON or ERIE or AJG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Markel Corporation (MKL) offers the highest yield at 2. 7%, versus 0. 9% for Aon plc (AON).
09Is MKL or MMC or AON or ERIE or AJG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Arthur J.
Gallagher & Co. (AJG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 09), 1. 3% yield, +372. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AJG: +372. 4%, MKL: +89. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MKL and MMC and AON and ERIE and AJG?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MKL is a mid-cap deep-value stock; MMC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AON is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ERIE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AJG is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.