Entertainment
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
MSGS vs MANU vs FWONK vs BRLS vs TKO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
Entertainment
Packaged Foods
Entertainment
MSGS vs MANU vs FWONK vs BRLS vs TKO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Entertainment | Entertainment | Packaged Foods | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $8.00B | $3.30B | $20.83B | $33M | $36.50B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.07B | $655M | $1.02B | $28M | $5.06B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-17M | $-9M | $449M | $-18M | $385M |
| Gross Margin | 25.9% | 64.8% | -18.4% | 9.7% | 34.5% |
| Operating Margin | 0.4% | 2.8% | -3.4% | -46.0% | 20.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 57.5x | — | 38.1x |
| Total Debt | $1.18B | $645M | $0.00 | $32M | $4.06B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $153M | $86M | $1.05B | $653K | $831M |
MSGS vs MANU vs FWONK vs BRLS vs TKO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Madison Square Gard… (MSGS) | 100 | 175.5 | +75.5% |
| Manchester United p… (MANU) | 100 | 117.4 | +17.4% |
| Formula One Group (FWONK) | 100 | 170.4 | +70.4% |
| Borealis Foods Inc. (BRLS) | 100 | 15.5 | -84.5% |
| TKO Group Holdings,… (TKO) | 100 | 307.0 | +207.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MSGS vs MANU vs FWONK vs BRLS vs TKO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MSGS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +74.7% vs BRLS's -73.6%
Among these 5 stocks, MANU doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
FWONK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.
- 43.8% margin vs BRLS's -65.7%
- 42.6% ROA vs BRLS's -31.6%
BRLS is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 0.21 vs MANU's 0.92
TKO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.64, yield 1.8%
- Rev growth 68.9%, EPS growth 40.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 60.7%
- 10.6% 10Y total return vs FWONK's 418.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.64, Low D/E 43.9%, current ratio 1.26x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 68.9% revenue growth vs FWONK's -100.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 43.8% margin vs BRLS's -65.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs MANU's 0.92 | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +74.7% vs BRLS's -73.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 42.6% ROA vs BRLS's -31.6% |
MSGS vs MANU vs FWONK vs BRLS vs TKO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
MSGS vs MANU vs FWONK vs BRLS vs TKO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TKO leads in 5 of 6 categories
MSGS leads 0 • MANU leads 0 • FWONK leads 0 • BRLS leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TKO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TKO is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.1B annually — 181.5x BRLS's $28M. FWONK is the more profitable business, keeping 43.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BRLS's -65.7%. On growth, TKO holds the edge at +25.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $655M | $1.0B | $28M | $5.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $8M | $238M | $231M | -$11M | $1.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$17M | -$9M | $449M | -$18M | $385M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $3M | -$135M | $279M | -$5M | $1.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.9% | +64.8% | -18.4% | +9.7% | +34.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.4% | +2.8% | -3.4% | -46.0% | +20.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -1.5% | -1.4% | +43.8% | -65.7% | +7.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.3% | -20.6% | +27.3% | -17.4% | +35.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.8% | -4.2% | -2.6% | -7.6% | +25.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.5% | +115.1% | +100.0% | +21.7% | +62.3% |
Valuation Metrics
TKO leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, MANU's 15.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MSGS's 501.2x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8.0B | $3.3B | $20.8B | $33M | $36.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.0B | $4.1B | $19.8B | $65M | $39.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -357.55x | -74.04x | — | -1.23x | 82.98x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 57.49x | — | 38.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 69.62x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 501.20x | 15.41x | — | — | 27.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.70x | 3.64x | — | 1.19x | 7.71x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 12.53x | — | — | 3.93x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 90.96x | 86.79x | 22.94x | — | 31.50x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TKO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TKO delivers a 4.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-4 for BRLS. TKO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.44x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MANU's 3.33x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MSGS scores 5/9 vs FWONK's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -4.8% | — | -3.7% | +4.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.1% | -0.5% | +42.6% | -31.6% | +2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.5% | -2.0% | — | -62.0% | +6.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.5% | -2.1% | -0.5% | -83.0% | +7.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 3.33x | — | — | 0.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.0B | $559M | -$1.1B | $32M | $3.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $153M | $86M | $1.1B | $652,965 | $831M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.2B | $645M | $0 | $32M | $4.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.68x | 0.62x | 3.35x | -2.28x | 6.00x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TKO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TKO five years ago would be worth $35,640 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,568 for BRLS. Over the past 12 months, MSGS leads with a +74.7% total return vs BRLS's -73.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TKO at 22.3% vs BRLS's -47.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +28.5% | +21.2% | -4.7% | -13.0% | -9.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +74.7% | +32.7% | -0.1% | -73.6% | +12.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +62.8% | +2.2% | +30.5% | -85.3% | +83.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +84.5% | +16.6% | +117.7% | -84.3% | +256.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +321.1% | +19.9% | +418.1% | -84.3% | +1060.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +17.6% | +0.7% | +9.3% | -47.3% | +22.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MANU and BRLS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BRLS is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MANU's 0.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MANU currently trades 97.4% from its 52-week high vs BRLS's 21.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.61x | 0.92x | 0.35x | 0.21x | 0.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $345.50 | $19.65 | $109.36 | $7.05 | $226.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $186.00 | $13.22 | $80.15 | $0.60 | $152.29 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.2% | +97.4% | +85.5% | +21.8% | +82.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.4 | 64.2 | 54.6 | 56.6 | 50.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 223K | 307K | 2.1M | 290K | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
TKO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MSGS as "Buy", MANU as "Hold", FWONK as "Buy", TKO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 26.2% upside for TKO (target: $237) vs -6.2% for MANU (target: $18). TKO is the only dividend payer here at 1.76% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $363.67 | $17.95 | $116.33 | — | $236.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 29 | 10 | 24 | — | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.0% | — | — | — | +1.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.03 | — | — | — | $3.30 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +2.4% |
TKO leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
MSGS vs MANU vs FWONK vs BRLS vs TKO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MSGS or MANU or FWONK or BRLS or TKO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TKO Group Holdings, Inc.
(TKO) is the stronger pick with 68. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Formula One Group (FWONK). TKO Group Holdings, Inc. (TKO) offers the better valuation at 83. 0x trailing P/E (38. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Madison Square Garden Sports Corp. (MSGS) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MSGS or MANU or FWONK or BRLS or TKO?
On forward P/E, TKO Group Holdings, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 38. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MSGS or MANU or FWONK or BRLS or TKO?
Over the past 5 years, TKO Group Holdings, Inc.
(TKO) delivered a total return of +256. 4%, compared to -84. 3% for Borealis Foods Inc. (BRLS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TKO returned +1060% versus BRLS's -84. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MSGS or MANU or FWONK or BRLS or TKO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Borealis Foods Inc.
(BRLS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 21β versus Manchester United plc's 0. 92β — meaning MANU is approximately 346% more volatile than BRLS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TKO Group Holdings, Inc. (TKO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 44% versus 3% for Manchester United plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MSGS or MANU or FWONK or BRLS or TKO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TKO Group Holdings, Inc.
(TKO) is pulling ahead at 68. 9% versus -100. 0% for Formula One Group (FWONK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TKO Group Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 40. 3% year-over-year, compared to -733. 3% for Borealis Foods Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TKO leads at 60. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MSGS or MANU or FWONK or BRLS or TKO?
Formula One Group (FWONK) is the more profitable company, earning 43.
8% net margin versus -91. 5% for Borealis Foods Inc. — meaning it keeps 43. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TKO leads at 20. 3% versus -73. 7% for BRLS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MANU leads at 82. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MSGS or MANU or FWONK or BRLS or TKO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, TKO Group Holdings, Inc.
(TKO) trades at 38. 1x forward P/E versus 57. 5x for Formula One Group — 19. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TKO: 26. 2% to $236. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — MSGS or MANU or FWONK or BRLS or TKO?
In this comparison, TKO (1.
8% yield) pays a dividend. MSGS, MANU, FWONK, BRLS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MSGS or MANU or FWONK or BRLS or TKO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TKO Group Holdings, Inc.
(TKO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 64), 1. 8% yield, +1060% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TKO: +1060%, MANU: +19. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MSGS and MANU and FWONK and BRLS and TKO?
These companies operate in different sectors (MSGS (Communication Services) and MANU (Communication Services) and FWONK (Communication Services) and BRLS (Consumer Defensive) and TKO (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MSGS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MANU is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FWONK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BRLS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TKO is a mid-cap high-growth stock. TKO pays a dividend while MSGS, MANU, FWONK, BRLS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 6%
- Gross Margin > 15%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.