Financial - Credit Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
NAVI vs ECPG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Mortgages
NAVI vs ECPG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Credit Services | Financial - Mortgages |
| Market Cap | $803M | $1.80B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.23B | $1.76B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-60M | $296M |
| Gross Margin | 87.0% | 69.0% |
| Operating Margin | 77.1% | 35.4% |
| Forward P/E | 11.9x | 6.5x |
| Total Debt | $45.71B | $4.13B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.10B | $157M |
NAVI vs ECPG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Navient Corporation (NAVI) | 100 | 114.8 | +14.8% |
| Encore Capital Grou… (ECPG) | 100 | 264.0 | +164.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NAVI vs ECPG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NAVI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.87, yield 7.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.87, current ratio 0.41x
- Beta 0.87, yield 7.5%, current ratio 0.41x
ECPG is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 33.9%, EPS growth 287.1%
- 220.6% 10Y total return vs NAVI's 13.4%
- 33.9% NII/revenue growth vs NAVI's -23.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 33.9% NII/revenue growth vs NAVI's -23.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs ECPG's 0.3% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs ECPG's 0.93 | |
| Dividends | 7.5% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +105.7% vs NAVI's -29.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.1% vs ECPG's 0.3% |
NAVI vs ECPG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NAVI vs ECPG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NAVI leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NAVI is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 1.8x ECPG's $1.8B. ECPG is the more profitable business, keeping 14.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NAVI's -2.5%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.2B | $1.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $544M | $709M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$60M | $296M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $323M | $166M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +87.0% | +69.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +77.1% | +35.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | +14.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.7% | +7.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.7% | +100.0% |
Valuation Metrics
NAVI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, ECPG's 8.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NAVI's 17.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $803M | $1.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $44.4B | $5.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -10.54x | 7.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.89x | 6.48x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.75x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.80x | 8.85x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.25x | 1.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.35x | 2.02x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.82x | 14.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ECPG leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ECPG delivers a 30.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $31 in annual profit, vs $-2 for NAVI. ECPG carries lower financial leverage with a 4.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NAVI's 19.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ECPG scores 7/9 vs NAVI's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.5% | +30.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.1% | +5.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.8% | +9.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.5% | +12.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 19.05x | 4.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $43.6B | $4.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.1B | $157M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $45.7B | $4.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.21x | 2.36x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ECPG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ECPG five years ago would be worth $20,000 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,806 for NAVI. Over the past 12 months, ECPG leads with a +105.7% total return vs NAVI's -29.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ECPG at 20.9% vs NAVI's -11.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -31.9% | +50.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -29.2% | +105.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -29.5% | +76.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -31.9% | +100.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +13.4% | +220.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -11.0% | +20.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — NAVI and ECPG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NAVI is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ECPG's 0.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ECPG currently trades 90.5% from its 52-week high vs NAVI's 53.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 0.93x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.07 | $92.64 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.80 | $35.67 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +53.1% | +90.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.0 | 60.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 914K | 321K |
Analyst Outlook
ECPG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates NAVI as "Hold" and ECPG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1.5% upside for NAVI (target: $9) vs 1.3% for ECPG (target: $85). NAVI is the only dividend payer here at 7.45% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.67 | $85.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 15 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.5% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.64 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +13.8% | +5.0% |
ECPG leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). NAVI leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
NAVI vs ECPG: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NAVI or ECPG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Encore Capital Group, Inc.
(ECPG) is the stronger pick with 33. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -23. 7% for Navient Corporation (NAVI). Encore Capital Group, Inc. (ECPG) offers the better valuation at 7. 7x trailing P/E (6. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Encore Capital Group, Inc. (ECPG) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NAVI or ECPG?
On forward P/E, Encore Capital Group, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 6. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NAVI or ECPG?
Over the past 5 years, Encore Capital Group, Inc.
(ECPG) delivered a total return of +100. 0%, compared to -31. 9% for Navient Corporation (NAVI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ECPG returned +220. 6% versus NAVI's +13. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NAVI or ECPG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Navient Corporation (NAVI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
87β versus Encore Capital Group, Inc. 's 0. 93β — meaning ECPG is approximately 7% more volatile than NAVI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Encore Capital Group, Inc. (ECPG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 19% for Navient Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NAVI or ECPG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Encore Capital Group, Inc.
(ECPG) is pulling ahead at 33. 9% versus -23. 7% for Navient Corporation (NAVI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Encore Capital Group, Inc. grew EPS 287. 1% year-over-year, compared to -168. 6% for Navient Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NAVI or ECPG?
Encore Capital Group, Inc.
(ECPG) is the more profitable company, earning 14. 6% net margin versus -2. 5% for Navient Corporation — meaning it keeps 14. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NAVI leads at 77. 1% versus 35. 4% for ECPG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NAVI leads at 87. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NAVI or ECPG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Encore Capital Group, Inc.
(ECPG) trades at 6. 5x forward P/E versus 11. 9x for Navient Corporation — 5. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NAVI: 1. 5% to $8. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — NAVI or ECPG?
In this comparison, NAVI (7.
5% yield) pays a dividend. ECPG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NAVI or ECPG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Navient Corporation (NAVI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
87), 7. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NAVI: +13. 4%, ECPG: +220. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NAVI and ECPG?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NAVI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; ECPG is a small-cap high-growth stock. NAVI pays a dividend while ECPG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.