Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NGNE vs KRYS vs RCKT vs PRAX vs ARQT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
NGNE vs KRYS vs RCKT vs PRAX vs ARQT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $488M | $8.75B | $398M | $9.63B | $2.58B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $417M | $0.00 | $-92K | $416M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-90M | $225M | $-223M | $-327M | $-2M |
| Gross Margin | — | 92.8% | — | — | 90.9% |
| Operating Margin | — | 42.8% | — | — | 0.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 39.3x | — | — | 77.6x |
| Total Debt | $10M | $9M | $25M | $110K | $6M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $104M | $496M | $78M | $357M | $43M |
NGNE vs KRYS vs RCKT vs PRAX vs ARQT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neurogene Inc. (NGNE) | 100 | 14.9 | -85.1% |
| Krystal Biotech, In… (KRYS) | 100 | 690.2 | +590.2% |
| Rocket Pharmaceutic… (RCKT) | 100 | 13.1 | -86.9% |
| Praxis Precision Me… (PRAX) | 100 | 63.5 | -36.5% |
| Arcutis Biotherapeu… (ARQT) | 100 | 115.9 | +15.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NGNE vs KRYS vs RCKT vs PRAX vs ARQT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NGNE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
KRYS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.12
- 26.9% 10Y total return vs ARQT's -5.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.12, Low D/E 0.8%, current ratio 9.95x
- Beta 1.12, current ratio 9.95x
Among these 5 stocks, RCKT doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
PRAX is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +7.7% vs RCKT's -45.2%
ARQT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 91.3%, EPS growth 88.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 367.3%
- 91.3% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 91.3% revenue growth vs PRAX's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (39.3x vs 77.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 53.9% margin vs ARQT's -0.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.12 vs NGNE's 2.16, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +7.7% vs RCKT's -45.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 17.6% ROA vs RCKT's -67.5%, ROIC 18.0% vs -63.2% |
NGNE vs KRYS vs RCKT vs PRAX vs ARQT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
NGNE vs KRYS vs RCKT vs PRAX vs ARQT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KRYS leads in 3 of 6 categories
ARQT leads 1 • PRAX leads 1 • NGNE leads 0 • RCKT leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KRYS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KRYS and PRAX operate at a comparable scale, with $417M and -$92,000 in trailing revenue. KRYS is the more profitable business, keeping 53.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ARQT's -0.6%. On growth, ARQT holds the edge at +60.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $417M | $0 | -$92,000 | $416M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$100M | $185M | -$232M | -$357M | $6M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$90M | $225M | -$223M | -$327M | -$2M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$78M | $237M | -$190M | -$283M | $27M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +92.8% | — | — | +90.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +42.8% | — | — | +0.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +53.9% | — | — | -0.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +56.9% | — | — | +6.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +31.9% | — | — | +60.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -22.1% | +52.5% | +38.7% | +2.7% | +55.0% |
Valuation Metrics
ARQT leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $488M | $8.7B | $398M | $9.6B | $2.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $394M | $8.3B | $345M | $9.3B | $2.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.37x | 43.38x | -1.83x | -24.72x | -158.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 39.33x | — | — | 77.64x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 49.21x | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 22.48x | — | — | 6.87x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.50x | 7.29x | 1.47x | 8.54x | 13.87x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 46.30x | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
KRYS leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KRYS delivers a 19.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $-80 for RCKT. PRAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RCKT's 0.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), KRYS scores 5/9 vs RCKT's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -33.0% | +19.3% | -80.5% | -43.0% | -1.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -30.4% | +17.6% | -67.5% | -40.2% | -0.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -43.3% | +18.0% | -63.2% | -65.0% | -5.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -34.8% | +14.8% | -58.9% | -49.3% | -4.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 0.01x | 0.09x | 0.00x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$94M | -$487M | -$53M | -$357M | -$37M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $104M | $496M | $78M | $357M | $43M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $9M | $25M | $110,000 | $6M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -18628.20x | — | — | — | 2.08x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRAX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KRYS five years ago would be worth $41,919 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $838 for RCKT. Over the past 12 months, PRAX leads with a +775.0% total return vs RCKT's -45.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRAX at 174.9% vs RCKT's -44.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +55.1% | +20.2% | +6.1% | +16.4% | -28.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +125.5% | +116.9% | -45.2% | +775.0% | +50.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +77.6% | +238.5% | -82.8% | +1976.5% | +44.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -86.5% | +319.2% | -91.6% | -20.8% | -39.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -79.8% | +2688.5% | -91.3% | -20.1% | -5.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +21.1% | +50.1% | -44.4% | +174.9% | +13.2% |
Risk & Volatility
KRYS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KRYS is the less volatile stock with a 1.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NGNE's 2.16 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KRYS currently trades 97.9% from its 52-week high vs RCKT's 49.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.16x | 1.12x | 1.31x | 1.55x | 1.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $37.27 | $303.00 | $7.39 | $356.00 | $31.77 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $12.97 | $122.80 | $2.19 | $35.18 | $12.42 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.9% | +97.9% | +49.7% | +93.6% | +65.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 75.4 | 64.3 | 54.4 | 55.6 | 54.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 195K | 264K | 3.5M | 378K | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NGNE as "Buy", KRYS as "Buy", RCKT as "Buy", PRAX as "Buy", ARQT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 120.7% upside for NGNE (target: $69) vs 12.2% for KRYS (target: $333).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $69.00 | $332.75 | $5.00 | $544.40 | $35.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 17 | 19 | 16 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
KRYS leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ARQT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
NGNE vs KRYS vs RCKT vs PRAX vs ARQT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NGNE or KRYS or RCKT or PRAX or ARQT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(ARQT) is the stronger pick with 91. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). Krystal Biotech, Inc. (KRYS) offers the better valuation at 43. 4x trailing P/E (39. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Neurogene Inc. (NGNE) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NGNE or KRYS or RCKT or PRAX or ARQT?
On forward P/E, Krystal Biotech, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 39. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NGNE or KRYS or RCKT or PRAX or ARQT?
Over the past 5 years, Krystal Biotech, Inc.
(KRYS) delivered a total return of +319. 2%, compared to -91. 6% for Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RCKT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KRYS returned +26. 9% versus RCKT's -91. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NGNE or KRYS or RCKT or PRAX or ARQT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Krystal Biotech, Inc.
(KRYS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 12β versus Neurogene Inc. 's 2. 16β — meaning NGNE is approximately 93% more volatile than KRYS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 9% for Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NGNE or KRYS or RCKT or PRAX or ARQT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc.
(ARQT) is pulling ahead at 91. 3% versus -100. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc. (PRAX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Krystal Biotech, Inc. grew EPS 128. 0% year-over-year, compared to -32. 0% for Praxis Precision Medicines, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NGNE or KRYS or RCKT or PRAX or ARQT?
Krystal Biotech, Inc.
(KRYS) is the more profitable company, earning 52. 6% net margin versus -4. 3% for Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 52. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KRYS leads at 41. 5% versus -3. 3% for ARQT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KRYS leads at 92. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NGNE or KRYS or RCKT or PRAX or ARQT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Krystal Biotech, Inc.
(KRYS) trades at 39. 3x forward P/E versus 77. 6x for Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. — 38. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NGNE: 120. 7% to $69. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — NGNE or KRYS or RCKT or PRAX or ARQT?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is NGNE or KRYS or RCKT or PRAX or ARQT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Krystal Biotech, Inc.
(KRYS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 12)). Neurogene Inc. (NGNE) carries a higher beta of 2. 16 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KRYS: +26. 9%, NGNE: -79. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NGNE and KRYS and RCKT and PRAX and ARQT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: NGNE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KRYS is a small-cap high-growth stock; RCKT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRAX is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARQT is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.