Software - Application
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
NICE vs FIVN vs SPOK vs TWLO vs TTEC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Internet Content & Information
Information Technology Services
NICE vs FIVN vs SPOK vs TWLO vs TTEC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Internet Content & Information | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $7.72B | $1.86B | $225M | $29.63B | $144M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.95B | $1.17B | $103M | $5.30B | $2.14B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $613M | $57M | $11M | $104M | $-192M |
| Gross Margin | 66.4% | 55.1% | 91.4% | 48.8% | -1.1% |
| Operating Margin | 21.9% | 4.7% | 13.2% | 4.7% | -5.5% |
| Forward P/E | 11.4x | 7.6x | 16.5x | 36.1x | 2.4x |
| Total Debt | $164M | $847M | $7M | $1.08B | $1.00B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $379M | $232M | $25M | $682M | $83M |
NICE vs FIVN vs SPOK vs TWLO vs TTEC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| NICE Ltd. (NICE) | 100 | 67.2 | -32.8% |
| Five9, Inc. (FIVN) | 100 | 23.3 | -76.7% |
| Spok Holdings, Inc. (SPOK) | 100 | 105.8 | +5.8% |
| Twilio Inc. (TWLO) | 100 | 99.0 | -1.0% |
| TTEC Holdings, Inc. (TTEC) | 100 | 7.0 | -93.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: NICE vs FIVN vs SPOK vs TWLO vs TTEC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
NICE has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.72, Low D/E 4.2%, current ratio 1.55x
- 20.8% margin vs TTEC's -9.0%
- 12.0% ROA vs TTEC's -23.3%, ROIC 13.5% vs -7.6%
FIVN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 10.3%, EPS growth 370.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.8%
SPOK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.42, yield 11.9%
- Beta 0.42 vs TTEC's 1.84, lower leverage
- 11.9% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
TWLO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and defensive.
- 5.8% 10Y total return vs FIVN's 153.0%
- Beta 1.51, current ratio 4.03x
- 13.7% revenue growth vs TTEC's -3.2%
- +89.8% vs SPOK's -26.3%
TTEC is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (2.4x vs 36.1x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.7% revenue growth vs TTEC's -3.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.4x vs 36.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.8% margin vs TTEC's -9.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.42 vs TTEC's 1.84, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 11.9% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +89.8% vs SPOK's -26.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.0% ROA vs TTEC's -23.3%, ROIC 13.5% vs -7.6% |
NICE vs FIVN vs SPOK vs TWLO vs TTEC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
NICE vs FIVN vs SPOK vs TWLO vs TTEC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TTEC leads in 1 of 6 categories
NICE leads 1 • TWLO leads 1 • SPOK leads 1 • FIVN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NICE and SPOK each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TWLO is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.3B annually — 51.3x SPOK's $103M. NICE is the more profitable business, keeping 20.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TTEC's -9.0%. On growth, TWLO holds the edge at +20.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.0B | $1.2B | $103M | $5.3B | $2.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $846M | $140M | $17M | $415M | -$27M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $613M | $57M | $11M | $104M | -$192M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $665M | $206M | $26M | $1.0B | $29M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +66.4% | +55.1% | +91.4% | +48.8% | -1.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.9% | +4.7% | +13.2% | +4.7% | -5.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.8% | +4.9% | +10.3% | +2.0% | -9.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +22.5% | +17.6% | +24.7% | +19.0% | +1.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.7% | +9.2% | -100.0% | +20.0% | +0.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +57.8% | +20.0% | -64.0% | +3.8% | -86.8% |
Valuation Metrics
TTEC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 12.8x trailing earnings, NICE trades at a 99% valuation discount to TWLO's 931.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NICE's 8.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TWLO's 76.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.7B | $1.9B | $225M | $29.6B | $144M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.5B | $2.5B | $207M | $30.0B | $1.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 12.82x | 52.74x | 14.49x | 931.33x | -0.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.42x | 7.60x | 16.47x | 36.05x | 2.45x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.48x | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.72x | 17.98x | 8.95x | 76.59x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.60x | 1.62x | 1.61x | 5.85x | 0.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.04x | 2.69x | 1.56x | 4.00x | 1.10x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.98x | 9.23x | 8.94x | 28.69x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NICE leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NICE delivers a 15.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-147 for TTEC. NICE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TTEC's 7.65x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FIVN scores 8/9 vs TTEC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.8% | +7.4% | +7.3% | +1.3% | -147.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.0% | +3.2% | +5.2% | +1.1% | -23.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.5% | +1.7% | +11.3% | +1.6% | -7.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +16.4% | +2.2% | +12.1% | +1.9% | -12.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 8 | 6 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 1.08x | 0.05x | 0.14x | 7.65x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$216M | $615M | -$18M | $399M | $917M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $379M | $232M | $25M | $682M | $83M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $164M | $847M | $7M | $1.1B | $1.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 7.94x | — | — | 1.74x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TWLO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SPOK five years ago would be worth $16,329 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $549 for TTEC. Over the past 12 months, TWLO leads with a +89.8% total return vs SPOK's -26.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TWLO at 55.1% vs TTEC's -52.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.7% | +29.0% | -14.0% | +41.4% | -16.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -20.9% | -3.9% | -26.3% | +89.8% | -22.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -33.2% | -56.4% | +13.4% | +273.5% | -89.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.0% | -85.8% | +63.3% | -41.7% | -94.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +96.6% | +153.0% | +13.1% | +579.3% | -61.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -12.6% | -24.1% | +4.3% | +55.1% | -52.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SPOK and TWLO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SPOK is the less volatile stock with a 0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TTEC's 1.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TWLO currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs TTEC's 53.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.72x | 1.79x | 0.42x | 1.51x | 1.84x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $180.61 | $30.38 | $19.31 | $196.37 | $5.60 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $94.89 | $13.29 | $9.96 | $91.84 | $1.98 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.2% | +79.9% | +56.3% | +99.6% | +53.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.6 | 82.7 | 38.8 | 81.4 | 47.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 588K | 2.7M | 185K | 2.2M | 672K |
Analyst Outlook
SPOK leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: NICE as "Buy", FIVN as "Buy", SPOK as "Hold", TWLO as "Buy", TTEC as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 1050.5% upside for TTEC (target: $34) vs -5.3% for TWLO (target: $185). SPOK is the only dividend payer here at 11.90% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $150.88 | $28.40 | $15.00 | $185.17 | $34.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 41 | 1 | 52 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +11.9% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | 5 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.29 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.4% | +2.7% | +1.3% | +2.9% | 0.0% |
TTEC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). NICE leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
NICE vs FIVN vs SPOK vs TWLO vs TTEC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is NICE or FIVN or SPOK or TWLO or TTEC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Twilio Inc.
(TWLO) is the stronger pick with 13. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 2% for TTEC Holdings, Inc. (TTEC). NICE Ltd. (NICE) offers the better valuation at 12. 8x trailing P/E (11. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate NICE Ltd. (NICE) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — NICE or FIVN or SPOK or TWLO or TTEC?
On trailing P/E, NICE Ltd.
(NICE) is the cheapest at 12. 8x versus Twilio Inc. at 931. 3x. On forward P/E, TTEC Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 2. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — NICE or FIVN or SPOK or TWLO or TTEC?
Over the past 5 years, Spok Holdings, Inc.
(SPOK) delivered a total return of +63. 3%, compared to -94. 5% for TTEC Holdings, Inc. (TTEC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TWLO returned +579. 3% versus TTEC's -61. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — NICE or FIVN or SPOK or TWLO or TTEC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Spok Holdings, Inc.
(SPOK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 42β versus TTEC Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 84β — meaning TTEC is approximately 339% more volatile than SPOK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NICE Ltd. (NICE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 8% for TTEC Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — NICE or FIVN or SPOK or TWLO or TTEC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Twilio Inc.
(TWLO) is pulling ahead at 13. 7% versus -3. 2% for TTEC Holdings, Inc. (TTEC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Five9, Inc. grew EPS 370. 6% year-over-year, compared to 2. 7% for Spok Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FIVN leads at 13. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — NICE or FIVN or SPOK or TWLO or TTEC?
NICE Ltd.
(NICE) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 8% net margin versus -9. 0% for TTEC Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NICE leads at 22. 2% versus -5. 5% for TTEC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPOK leads at 78. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is NICE or FIVN or SPOK or TWLO or TTEC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, TTEC Holdings, Inc.
(TTEC) trades at 2. 4x forward P/E versus 36. 1x for Twilio Inc. — 33. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TTEC: 1050. 5% to $34. 17.
08Which pays a better dividend — NICE or FIVN or SPOK or TWLO or TTEC?
In this comparison, SPOK (11.
9% yield) pays a dividend. NICE, FIVN, TWLO, TTEC do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is NICE or FIVN or SPOK or TWLO or TTEC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Spok Holdings, Inc.
(SPOK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 42), 11. 9% yield). TTEC Holdings, Inc. (TTEC) carries a higher beta of 1. 84 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SPOK: +13. 1%, TTEC: -61. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between NICE and FIVN and SPOK and TWLO and TTEC?
These companies operate in different sectors (NICE (Technology) and FIVN (Technology) and SPOK (Healthcare) and TWLO (Communication Services) and TTEC (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: NICE is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIVN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPOK is a small-cap deep-value stock; TWLO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TTEC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SPOK pays a dividend while NICE, FIVN, TWLO, TTEC do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 9%
- Gross Margin > 29%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.